User talk:IndianBio/Archive 11

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5 ← Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 Archive 13 → Archive 15

Critical reception watch

You may want to watch the section because some editor thinks that it is premature to have this section included as part of Me. I Am Mariah... The Elusive Chanteuse.HotHat (talk) 23:29, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

100% premature. 100% poorly written and copy and paste prose.--PeterGriffin • Talk2Me 01:39, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
100% done before on Wikipedia. I said fix the prose if you do not like the wording that I utilized. I summed up the sources and just used the most pertinent parts for the quotes. It is not a QUOTEFARM. She has already released the album on iTunes Radio for a pre-sale marketing gimmick to sell more albums, so I don't see why not tell people what the most noteworthy review sites are saying on the music's merit.HotHat (talk) 03:10, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
I still don't get what is the issue. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 06:16, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
Honestly mate. Just ignore it. I still don't get what this one's on about..--PeterGriffin • Talk2Me 06:56, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
Critical reception should be added right? So that's how it is. And the article is shaping up pretty good pre-charting info I think. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 07:00, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

SPI note

Hello, IndianBio. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Reece Leonard.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

He's persistent, I'll give him that. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 13:57, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

"Bad Romance"

On the history page for "Bad Romance" you queried why there were so many wikichanges at one point a few days ago. Just to let you know, I tried to repair a broken link in a footnote and got into a tangle, which the Help Desk helped to sort out. I have steered clear of the footnotes since then! -- P123ct1 (talk) 13:22, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for explaining, I was worried what exactly was going on with your edits. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 13:32, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

My other edits are copy-edits as you will have seen. I am not very experienced at handling the technical side of Wiki editing yet (the wikicode, tools, etc), so will not attempt to rectify any more footnotes. I have noticed some more broken links; should I make a note of these on the "Bad Romance" Talk page? -- P123ct1 (talk) 18:09, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Please do so P123ct1. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 03:11, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

WP:BRD

The bold edit was hard-coding an image size, directly contravening WP:IMGSIZE. If the template has changed, and you don't like it, then discuss on the template talk page. We're not hard coding image sizes in hundreds of thousands of articles. --NeilN talk to me 12:00, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

@NeilN:, it is not a question of me not liking the hardcoding. As you can see it was not me who added that hardcoding in the article. There are other articles also especially in the music area that have the hard coding now that the image size has suddenly been altered. I would very much like to know the reason though. I'm on my way there posting. You also come and join. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 12:03, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
So why did you quote WP:BRD at the article? Articles should stay the same until it is determined why the template changed. Do you have a link to the template change diff? --NeilN talk to me 12:07, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
@NeilN: I'm not sure where the template codes are kept, I'm not very good at recognizing the jargon. I have left a post at the template talk page hoping one of the editors will reply and show us if it was an universally accepted change. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 12:10, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
The last change to that template was done on March 6th so the change is somewhere else. --NeilN talk to me 12:16, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
I'm pretty sure the code is not kept at {{Infobox person}} page, and the change is in the page where the code has been developed. This is just a transclusion of it. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 12:18, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
It's WMF-inflicted Wikipedia:VPT#Infobox_Image --NeilN talk to me 12:29, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Hmmmmm here's hoping they sort it out or rollback the new patches installed. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 12:46, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Frietjes tweaked the infobox. I manually purged the cache of the article you self-reverted on and the image is properly sized now. --NeilN talk to me 13:44, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Well, thanks for the reverts Neil! I'm glad the issue has been fixed. -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 01:21, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Matey

I appreciate it mate. It seems few really notice the gravity of his foolishness. Thanks for having my back :)--PeterGriffin • Talk2Me 07:25, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

@Petergriffin9901:, yeah talking and asking about whether 220 million is acceptable for an artist in a polite manner is one thing, but trying to troll with it and calling names and fan-wars is not something acceptable here. If he continues, bannville is where he would belong. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 07:35, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

To indianBio, i hope you would understand I'm not doing any personal attack between editor,

and what rules that i have break out regarding with word skinny and fat! because i'm telling that to the artist! Not personal attack between editor.

remember that and keep in your mind, i believe my contribution to the list of best-selling artits is VERY HIGH!.

and if you want to report me! go a head. It's your right but it's my right also to asking why?. thanks Politsi (talk) 15:55, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Because you are disrupting the professional environment that we accept here with your fanboy commentary. No one is interested in that. Either collaborate with respect and professionalism, else don't. Understood? —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 16:01, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Nope but thanks for remind me, and please look at this statement from Nathan in his talk-page when he/she said something about me 'I have you watch-listed so I can monitor your stupidity'.

IndianBio... Did you understand and realize? who the real person who make a personal attack and violation?. please behave yourself before you warned someone. thanks Politsi (talk) 16:12, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

I supported Nathan's statement, because guess what? You have been that. Now please be off from my talk page I have much more important stuff to do. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 16:17, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

So you support someone to calling stupid between registered editor?. Very nice to know, and please do not give me a warning again, because you don't deserve doing that. Politsi (talk) 16:25, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Yes because next time it will be ANI. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 16:27, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Whatever. But please keep in your mind IndianBio..... I NEVER saying someone Stupid! especially between registered editor of wikipedia. Because that's the real violation (personal attack).Politsi (talk) 16:35, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Priyanka Chopra's discography

Thanx so much for reviewing my edit on Priyanka Chopra's discography. But I wonder why just deleted all the info. I added so much new relevant and updated info. It seems kinda weird dat you just deleted the whole page with a notification that it is unnecessary... After she will release her album (in the nearby future) I would say that it IS interesting to create an own page for her discography!. Please feedback why you did it. And what your vision is on all of this. I'm a great PRiyanka fan myself. And to be honest I was really proud the 5 hour work I spend on making that page... Thanx in advance. :-) Robinhio84 (talk • contribs) 10:56, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

She is not yet an established singer. So far, all the songs she sang have received mixed reviews, that may stop her from continuing her singing career. Until she releases at least 3 studio albums, let her not have a discography article. And you Robinhio84 seem to have been here on Wikipedia since 2009, but have you learnt anything yet? Kailash29792 (talk) 11:35, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
@Robinhio84:, Kailash29792 explained the reasoning to you perfectly. Chopra is not an established singer and neither has any proof that she would be one. Creating a separate discography page at this point is violating the WP:UNDUE as well as WP:CRYSTAL policies of Wikipedia. Suggest you go through them once. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 11:50, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Requesting an actual admin

Are you an admin who is going to read what my complaints are for the edits or are you just going to scold me about my tone? If it's the latter, find me someone who will follow through and read my complaints, thanks DeadSend4 (talk) 10:26, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

I have gone through all your ramblings, which incidentally, is not supported at all except for an archive link. But that does not give you any right to call others foul name and disrespect others opinions. And consensus leans towards keeping Mariah's picture, whether you like it or not. But you would not like to get blocked I'm sure, so I suggest you keep it cute and stop with the personal attacks, else this noticeboard is where it will get reported. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 10:28, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
That wasn't my question DeadSend4 (talk) 10:30, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
You calling them rambling shows you didn't even read anything, find me an actual admin who will read DeadSend4 (talk) 10:31, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
You realize the article was fine for two years with those images and now it's being reverted because of ONE image. You also realize the article is too big and adding an additional image isn't going to help because we've been trying to downsize it for the past few months. Of course you don't, so find me and admin who will DeadSend4 (talk) 10:32, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
No, you learn to treat people with respect, then maybe you will be taken seriously? I have no time for frivolity and yes, they were ramblings of an uncivil man. It holds no candle however the article was for two years. You support your claim that the picture is unncessaruy with valid inputs. You do not attack other editors calling them blind, idiots etc. That makes your case as strong as a prostitute seeking actions for rape. Get it? —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 10:34, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
I really don't give a damn. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 11:14, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Disruption

Sometimes people just never desist, do they? Also, Shane has recently got himself indefinitely blocked, but not for reasons I would've guessed. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 11:03, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

@XXSNUGGUMSXX:, same could be said for me since I reverted it too. :P As for Shane, holy crap, I would have never imagined! I thought Lady Lotus was an admin for crying out loud. :O But checkuser never fails. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 11:08, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Lady Lotus isn't an admin, though she is quite the editor. A month or two ago, she was asking admin Mr. Stradivarius for RFA recommendation, which came close but not there yet. She was somewhat like his guide before his block (mainly for Miley Cyrus-related articles). I would definitely support her in RFA. As for Shane, I'm not sure if you noticed but he also abruptly interjected during Peter's review of Katy Perry's GAN. Peter unsurprisingly got pissed given Shane's disruption at the GAN for Do What U Want. Thankfully, I finally got the article back up to GA :D. I've honestly worked my ass off on that article more than any other on Wikipedia, and plan on getting to FA so it can be "Today's Featured Article" for her 30th birthday this upcoming October 25th. I'm first gonna put up another peer review and maybe take to the GOCE for polishing before FAC. Before I do that, though, I took her to DYK here. Could you perhaps review it? XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 11:24 June 2014 (UTC)
Sure, and I just checked, wow, good job on the article. Shane caused quite a bit of disruption I see. And yes, Nathan was irritated and that's understandable. So when are you starting the PR? —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 11:35, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Thanks bud :). After it goes through DYK, I'll put it up for PR, and if you could assess the DYK that would be great. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 12:49, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
I'm not sure of DYK process and hence would not be the correct person to review it. But surely would coem for the PR. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 12:53, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Just thought I'd ask. See you at PR :). XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 12:54, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Good Article Barnstar
I can see that numerous articles related to Lady Gaga and Artpop topic have been promoted to GA-status and I just want to say: congratulations! I think that WP:GAGA will be dead if you don't contribute to the project. Great job, and keep up your great work! Simon (talk) 14:02, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Wow, thanks Simon. This really motivated me. :D —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 14:06, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Given your Gaga-related work, I'm actually quite surprised you aren't listed among the members of her WikiProject. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 14:30, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
I actually haven't. Just realized. :O I could have sworn that I listed myself. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 15:39, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Same with Madonna WikiProject :P XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 15:49, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
I do forget stuff a lot. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 16:11, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Turn Up the Radio (Madonna song)

The article Turn Up the Radio (Madonna song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Turn Up the Radio (Madonna song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Prism -- Prism (talk) 19:41, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

A quick favour if you will

Hey IndianBio. I noticed that you've got experience in uploading audios, so I wondered if you can help me with a couple of mine:

Thanks in advance. Cheers.--Retrohead (talk) 13:36, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

@Retrohead:, I'm sorry I don't know how to do it from an online website as the software I use supports only mp3s from my hdd. And alas, Megadeath is not something I listen to, and I don't have those songs. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 14:24, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
I thought downloading them from YouTube (the tracks are linked above), but if you're not able right now, no problem, I'll ask someone else. Thanks for the quick feedback though.--Retrohead (talk) 14:39, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Peer review

Some input here would be very nice. Snuggums (talk • contributions) 21:02, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello, sure I will give and congrats on the new sign, well due. :) —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 05:20, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Thank you :) Snuggums (talk • contributions) 06:11, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Who's that girl gay couple...

You said that there's no evidence in the movie that the couple was gay,but if you watched at the end of the movie you'll see they kissing,but the camera don't show... this is not one proof?!--88marcus (talk) 22:58, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

No, it isn't. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 23:00, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of I'm Breathless

The article I'm Breathless you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:I'm Breathless for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of XXSNUGGUMSXX -- XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 00:40, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Congrats again on getting Madge another GA :) Snuggums (talk • contributions) 16:41, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Thanks dear, I really enjoyed your thorough review. Now this week I will on to that Perry peer review. :) —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 16:42, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
You're quite welcome, and I've left you and 11JORN another review here. Snuggums (talk • contributions) 03:29, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bye Bye Baby (Madonna song)

The article Bye Bye Baby (Madonna song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bye Bye Baby (Madonna song) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of XXSNUGGUMSXX -- XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 03:40, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

The Prismatic world tour

The remix for Wide Awake is NOT dudstep. It has been identified as the Jump Smokers Remix and I would appreciate it if you would stop undoing the edits. (Badokami (talk) 04:29, 16 June 2014 (UTC))

@Badokami: you need to provide third party reliable sources for it since Wikipedia policy requires us to have a verification of content we add, until then the edit will get reverted. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 04:32, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
For more, see WP:Verifiability. Snuggums (talk • contributions) 04:35, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bye Bye Baby (Madonna song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bass (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

List of awards and nominations received by Lady Gaga

There are only 189 awards listed on the page, not 361. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gaknowitall (talk • contribs) 21:18, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Congratulations!

The Double GA Award
For bringing two articles (I'm Breathless and Bye Bye Baby) to GA status on the same date! Extremely rare and difficult feat to achieve! Kailash29792 (talk) 12:21, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
@Kailash29792:, wow man, that's one big GA icon. Hahahaha, and my thanks to all of you and @XXSNUGGUMSXX:. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 13:02, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
It was my pleasure reviewing them as well :). Snuggums (talk • contributions) 13:40, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
So what is next? Two Madonna favourites of mine which I'd like to see improved are Human Nature and Secret. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:37, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
@Kailash29792:, there are few Madonna songs I asbolutely adore, and "Secret" is definitely one of them. I guess pretty soon they will be developed, I'm kinda in a Madonna inspiration nowadays, lol. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 03:40, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
Is there a secret you'd like to share (I just had to)? :P Snuggums (talk • contributions) 09:39, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
Yes, I'm Mariah Carey, sshhhh. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 09:53, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
XD Snuggums (talk • contributions) 14:03, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Do What U Want

Materialscientist (talk) 21:58, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Turn Up the Radio (Madonna song)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:38, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Lyrics

this revert WP:SONGS does not say that. WP:SONGS does not say "don't have a lyrics section" and doesn't say "don't cite the a line of lyrics" In ictu oculi (talk) 23:09, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

@In ictu oculi:, it is redundant to have a lyrics section and explanation of the songs's title, when the section just below it does that. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 03:56, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
Sorry but that's different what you said in edit summary "Per WP:SONGS, we do not mention lyrics separately". Is this WP:SONGS or is this your opinion (don't mean to be difficult, sorry, but I'm afraid if it's your opinion then I disagree). In ictu oculi (talk) 03:59, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
@In ictu oculi: WP:SONG#LYRICS is the section you should look into. Do not mention the full lyrics of a song unless they are in public domain. It's not my opinion, and anyways the gist that you wanted to add is unnecessary as stated above. Have a good day. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 04:06, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi, exactly, but that's the problem, I have looked at it and you seem to be citing WP:SONG for your edits for things which WP:SONG doesn't say. Your edit summary said "Per WP:SONGS, we do not mention lyrics separately" but WP:SONGs doesn't say "we do not mention lyrics separately". Can you please copy and paste here the line which you believe says "we do not mention lyrics separately". Thanks.
As to "Do not mention the full lyrics of a song unless they are in public domain." Yes WP:SONG says "Do not include the song's entire lyrics or embed the song's music video in the article unless you are certain they are in the public domain."
What has quoting 1 line of the song got to do with guidance on entire lyrics? In fact what WP:SONG says is "However, how much of a song you can quote is open to interpretation, but you should avoid copyright paranoia." WP:avoid copyright paranoia shows that we can quote part of lyrics. In fact every decent song article should quote at least 1 line of a song. If the song article doesn't mention the lyrics (and usually doesn't mention the notes) what exactly is the song article saying about the song? I would prefer that you would restore my edit to the article because the line which states the meaning of the song is clearly relevant and necessary. In ictu oculi (talk) 04:14, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
As I said, its completely unnecessary to have a separate lyric section, which is anyways unsourced and your point of view. Can you please not go on adding such content if you have? There is a certain way in which song articles are structured and if you want to add lyrics sections, go ahead and get a consensus first. Not write essays in my talk page. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 04:30, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
The reason for coming to your talk page was courtesy - that I wanted to check in private, not in the full glare of Talk page whether your summary "Per WP:SONGS, we do not mention lyrics separately" reflected WP:SONGs. Also it might have been me that was wrong. Now we're clear that there's no reason in WP:SONGS not to have a lyrics section or 1st line sure it should be at the Talk page, cheers. All the best. In ictu oculi (talk) 04:35, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
Yes, you are wrong since the mere thing that you are adding is already present and you are adding WP:OR plus WP:UNDUE and over all there's nothing remotely encyclopedic about it, except for WP:ILIKEIT. Good day to you again. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 04:41, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
We all entitled to opinions. No problem. Incidentally who is the sock, do you mean SuperCamille? In ictu oculi (talk) 04:45, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
I just realized, I am coming across very very rude. I apologize to you profusely. Late-night football matches (World Cup) is taking a toll on me I guess. And yes richoncho indicated that a bit of socking was going on with the nominator. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 04:56, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
That's perfectly fine, but thanks for saying so anyway. :) Thanks also for your comments re lyrics sub section. SuperCamille does look a bit odd, I had a quick look and the Spanish User page creation rings a bell. However I can't see any immediate overlap with the nom. In ictu oculi (talk) 05:10, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Love Don't Live Here Anymore

Dear Sir I corrected the text about the song Love dont live here any more because the story that is there is totally un ture and deceptive the parts that I CORRECTED are ture to my memory I was there my name Leanard Jackson best friend to the writer James Miles Gregory and I was teh cheif Recording and mixing engineer for Norman Whitfield at Whit field Records 1975 to 1994. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.232.11.2 (talk) 07:02, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

You are violating the verifiability clause of Wikipedia by removing sourced material to reliable content and replacing with your own opinion. You did not source any of the content and that is not acceptable in Wikipedia. You can discuss the changes at Talk:Love Don't Live Here Anymore with proper valid sources passing Wikipedia reliable source criteria. Continuing to remove content will result in the IP being reported for vandalism. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 07:43, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Edits made to "Love don't live here any more"

Just FYI, this IP address received a notice about disruptive edits made to "Love don't live here any more." This IP address is for the Westin Atlanta Airport. So anyone who visits Wikipedia from here right now is seeing that message. Just thought I should warn you - the perpetrator has probably left the hotel long since. 205.232.11.2 (talk) 22:46, 21 June 2014 (UTC) Cathy A

Proposal

You might be interested in giving input here. Snuggums (talk • contributions) 03:12, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Rollback

I hope you know that rollback is to be used only for clear cases of vandalism. This is an abuse of rollback since the edit is not vandalism. Continued misuse would lead to revoke of the right. Coming to the edit that the user had made, they were just aligning the year of birth as per what is mentioned in the infobox. You should have rather discussed with the user than abusing rollback. — LeoFrank  Talk 06:34, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

@LeoFrank:, my bad and I apologize for the edit, because there has been slow poisoning vandalism regarding the bio's YOB continuously by IPs and new users, and I immediately jumped into action. You are right, I should have checked with the infobox. PS, I'm aware of how rollback works, so thanks anyways. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 06:38, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Idolator

Hello IndianBio, could you help reach consensus here? Thank you in advance! — prism △ 12:16, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of G.U.Y. (song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article G.U.Y. (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Prism -- Prism (talk) 18:22, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of G.U.Y. (song)

The article G.U.Y. (song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:G.U.Y. (song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Prism -- Prism (talk) 11:02, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

👍 Like Congrats! I wonder, which Artpop track will be next!? :) Keep up the great work. --Another Believer (Talk) 14:57, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
Thank you. :) —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 03:58, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Do It Again (album)

If you have a moment, would you mind leaving your thoughts over at this discussion? Thanks, WikiRedactor (talk) 20:28, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Also, if you have a chance to comment at this discussion about Lana Del Rey's debut record, that would be great too! WikiRedactor (talk) 22:24, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
Done and done. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 04:03, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuck Him He's a DJ (2nd nomination)

As you participated in the first nomination, I thought you might be interested in contributing to this new one. –Chase (talk / contribs) 21:35, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Soliciting comment...

Hi! Would you care to review my FA nomination for the article Of Human Feelings? The article is about a jazz album by Ornette Coleman. If not, feel free to ignore this message. Cheers! Dan56 (talk) 09:51, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:IndianBio/Archive_11&oldid=1139318792"