User talk:Infinty 0

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, Infinty 0, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Ahunt (talk) 02:01, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. BilletsMauves€500 08:55, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean disruptive editing? If you mean Sichuan Tengden, please provide evidence or reference that it is a state-own company or a branch of Chengdu Aircraft Design Institute.
While according to my research, it is a private company [1]. There is a picture of Ownership Structure in it.
Can you stop your threatening and smearing? Infinty 0 (talk) 09:10, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I mean much more than the Sichuan Tengden article; the problem with your edits has turned out to be bigger than that. I'm talking about poorly explained removal of sourced content on Shenyang J-11 (most of the articles on Soviet/Russian/Chinese aircraft have NATO codes, so no reason to remove it on one specific article), addition of unsourced content on CASC Rainbow and CAIG Wing Loong II, and changes to sourced content on Sichuan Tengden. If you want to change content in an article, then change the sources too. By the way, none of this is intended to be "threatening" or "smearing". Please assume good faith in your exchanges with other editors. Thanks in advance. BilletsMauves€500 09:51, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, thank you for your kindly instruction.
Maybe I will re-edit them with sources added and I'm looking forward your instruction with assumed good faith.
Plus I have a question, if you think Soviet/Russian/Chinese aircraft have NATO codes is a tradition or convention and no reason to remove it on one specific article, then why the article about Chinese aircraft like Wing Loong series use manufacturer name instead of the military designation as title particularly? Isn't it a convention too? Or you think it is better to make Wing Loong an exceptional case in the category of Chinese military aircraft? We have to settle this out or it will become a very bad and confusing precedent in the future when new Chinese drone articles added. Infinty 0 (talk) 10:11, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The thing is that we have to use or at least mention the commonly used names for the aircraft we are talking about in the articles. Western sources often use NATO codes to name Soviet/Russian/Chinese military equipment, sometimes without giving the actual designation used by its manufacturer or its users. Hence, mentioning these NATO codes at least once is useful for the reader's orientation, even though these code names are often meaningless for the people who design, manufacture and operate this equipment.
Regarding the Wing Loong article titles, as I said before and per the WP:Article titles policy, for the article titles we have to use the names most commonly found in independent, reliable English-language sources. Now, this criteria still leaves room for personal bias: people prefer to read and use some sources over others, and this influences their perception of which name is used more than the others. Moreover, the use of a name over another can vary over time, especially for subjects that are in the news. This is the case for Chinese-made drones: right now, I would say that the name "Wing Loong" is more widespread than the name "GJ-1", but maybe in five years it will be different.
What differentiates Wing Loong and Wing Loong II from some of the other Chinese drones is that they are quite popular on the export market, and they have been intensively used in combat by some of the export users (notably by the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia). Obviously, export users use the export name, not the one used by the PLA. So a lot of the reporting on these models also uses the export name. This is the reason why I think we should keep the designations "Wing Loong" and "Wing Loong II" for the article's names (but we should also mention the GJ-1 and GJ-2 designations in the main text, especially in the paragraphs dealing with the drones' use with the PLA).
I hope this clears things up, but don't hesitate if you have some further questions. Cheers, BilletsMauves€500 11:10, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Xian Y-7 into List of aircraft produced by China. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:13, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

sorry, I don't know how to add attribution because I don't understand Wiki editing language(I'm using the visual editing). But I will study it, thank you. Infinty 0 (talk) 01:13, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You do it via your edit summary. Like this: Diff of Seres Group. — Diannaa (talk) 00:07, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, now I get it, thank you so much! Infinty 0 (talk) 01:32, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why not contribute in Chinese wikipedia as well?[edit]

Hi there. Thank you for your contribution of Chinese car industry in English Wikipedia. However, since I noticed that you are also from China and your first language is Chinese as well, why not consider to contribute in Chinese Wikipedia as well? There are currently seriously lack of articles and updates about Chinese car models and brands in Chinese Wikipedia and even Ukrainian Wikipedia and Polish Wikipedia have more Chinese car articles than Chinese Wikipedia. So why not consider to contribute Chinese car articles in Chinese Wikipedia as well? It is so tragic to see that even other minor foreign language have more articles about Chinese car stuff than Chinese Wikipedia and Chinese car don't seem to have much attention in their "native language". I am currently uploading more HD Chinese car photos and creating some articles for Chinese Wikipedia in order to change this situation and I hope you could consider to contribute as well. Yours sincerely, User3204 (talk) 15:17, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

你好，谢谢你的关注。你所说的中文维基汽车词典的编辑我之前也考虑过，但因为政治原因在中国大陆地区无法正常使用维基百科，受众人群比起英文会少很多，加上中国有“汽车之家”“懂车帝”等多家专业汽车媒体APP，中国车在中国的信息会比维基百科更全更详细，所以就没有优先编辑中文词条。
不过谢谢你的支持，也许以后我会尽量抽出时间来编辑中文版。 Infinty 0 (talk) 01:52, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Shanghai Maple Automobile Logo and Maple Automobile Logo.jpeg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Shanghai Maple Automobile Logo and Maple Automobile Logo.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The logo of GAC Aion brand.png[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The logo of GAC Aion brand.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Export/Chinese names[edit]

Regarding the Jaecoo 7: if a car uses one name in all English-speaking markets, then that is the correct title for the WP entry. See WP:CARNAMES. While en.wp has a mostly global perspective, English is still the main language and English-speaking markets have primacy.

As for Livan, I replied on my talk page - one article for Maple and one for Livan is plenty and there is no need to list all of the unrelated old Maple products on the Livan page - only include things that overlap both names. Question: what is the IP editor trying to prove? Do they mean to say that Maple is still a separate brand from Livan? Is there any evidence to support their viewpoint or are they just being disruptive? Thank you,  Mr.choppers | ✎  18:15, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
Jaecoo is merely brands that Chery used in selected oversea markets, mostly mid-east countries and Russia (the same as Omoda brand). Jaecoo is far from a global brand and in some English-speaking countries like Australia and NZ, it still uses the Chery brand.
For Livan, and I don't really understand what the IP editor try to express. I'm a native Chinese and as far as I can find on the Chinese language sources, from the capital structure, SMA and Livan can be considered as the same company. The SMA ceased to be an independent brand since 2010 but exists as a subsidiary company that continued to produce Geely vehicles. In 2020, the Maple brand was revived as the Geely launched an joint-venture between SMA and Kandi while Geely further acquired its stake in the joint-venture and invite another new player Lifan (which was also acquired by Geely) to the JV and changed its name to Livan (Maple is not a separate brand anymore). Thus how it is comes to today. SMA never ceased to operate, the name "Shanghai Maple" ,"Maple" and "Livan" are different brand names that SMA used in past decades. This is why I try to prove that it is not necessary to set different articles for them, and the vehicle models that SMA produced should be showed together. They are just the SMA's legacies. Infinty 0 (talk) 22:27, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That mostly makes sense. But Maple/Shanghai Maple are still distinct brands from Livan, just as how Simca became Talbot but remains a separate nameplate with a separate history and its own Wikipedia article; we do not include earlier Simca products at the Talbot page - only those cars which were also sold with Talbot badging. This is why the Livan article should not list anything before the Maple 30X (shouldn't it be "Maple 30x", by the way?). For some very shortlived brand like Dearcc, it might make more sense to move all content to Enovate, but Maple had significant history before being subsumed.
As for the Jaecoo 7 article, please start a discussion on the talk page. Provide a link to Australian market Geely-branded product and I will support restoring your title.  Mr.choppers | ✎  03:18, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I believe it should be Chery you are referring to? Infinty 0 (talk) 06:59, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, of course.  Mr.choppers | ✎  15:26, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023[edit]

Information icon Hi Infinty 0! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Jaecoo 7 several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Jaecoo 7, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 05:19, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Infinty 0,
If someone reverts your edit or page move, you don't revert them back, you start a discussion on the article talk page. Please do that in the future instead of move-warring. Doing that persistently can lead to a loss of editing privileges. Liz Read! Talk! 05:20, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Seres SF5[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Seres SF5, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:51, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 25[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leapmotor C01, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Executive. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 26[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Automotive industry in China, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BWM.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article will be deleted ❌[edit]

The article you created - List of SAIC vehicles will be deleted within 7 days. == Proposed deletion of List of SAIC vehicles ==

Notice

The article List of SAIC vehicles has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Thanks, MrFlyingPies23 (talk) 09:09, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good job👍✅[edit]

Great job fixing the article List of SAIC vehicles. Seeing you have fixed the errors that are needed for a standard Wikipedia page. The encyclopedia article is now closed for deletion. The page issue tags and {{subst:List of SAIC vehicle's|prod}} have been removed. Well done 😎 MrFlyingPies23 (talk) 23:28, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

fuck off Infinty 0 (talk) 23:29, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
huhMrFlyingPies23 (talk) 23:31, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
read Wikipedia:Etiquette & Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Be kind and don't harrass or speak Inappropriate to others. Listen, MrFlyingPies23 (talk) 23:40, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Wuling Motors[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Wuling Motors, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:49, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AITO brand logo.png[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AITO brand logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:04, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 16[edit]

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Automotive industry in China, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ford.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:48, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of GAC vehicles with joint venture for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of GAC vehicles with joint venture is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of GAC vehicles with joint venture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mccapra (talk) 21:38, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 22[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jetour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pick-up.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:02, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Infinty_0&oldid=1220255514"