User talk:Itfc+canes=me

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
My Homepage My Talk Page My Sandbox Homepage My Guestbook (please sign) Contributions
The Wikipedian time was 03:16, Tuesday, 30 April, 2024 (UTC). Update it here!
Please click here to leave me a new message.
Before you type...

Hi! Feel free to contact me here if you have anything to say about my edits, or even if you don't. If you disagree with me, I am interested to hear from you, but please, remember to be civil! After all, there is very little you can do on Wikipedia which deserves SHOUTING, patronizing or just being generally offensive. If you can't be civil, please don't contact me. Cheers!

Also: If you write to me here,I'll hopefully write back to you on your own talk page although on occasions I am unable to so do check back; also please sign your name using four tildes (~) after your comment and please login before you comment, I probably won't reply to numbers on there talk page unless I know that they have users or i know them. If i don't to either then check back every 2 days for a reply.

Finally, if you have a problem with a fellow editor that's posted to my talk page, please don't argue with them here. You both have your own talk pages, do it there!

Also:- Please talk in this using three ='s before and after each subject. and if you want to see my Archive: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Itfc%2Bcanes%3Dme/Archive_1 Thanks Itfc+canes=me Talk Contributions 17:38, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

4 Normal
3.87 RPM according to EnterpriseyBot 20:10, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply] edit
Wikipedia ad for Wikipedia:WikiProject Malaysia
Wikipedia adsfile info – show another – #204

Re: Admin Coachin[edit]

Well, Dylan620 suggested that I could teach you and him simultaneously in the same form as classroom. Would you be open to such a format? –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 02:13, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Of course.. only problem is the time difference. User:Itfc+canes=me Talk Contributions 12:04, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That shouldn't be too difficult to work out. Would you like more of an overall adoption program, or more advanced coaching system? –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 13:45, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"a more advanced Coaching".... please... when can we start (I have an eye appointment at 4:00 UTC - have to leave at 3:30) User:Itfc+canes=me Talk Contributions 13:50, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
As soon as possible. Just create a sub-page in your userspace dedicated to coaching. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 14:16, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Itfc%2Bcanes%3Dme/coaching User:Itfc+canes=me Talk Contributions 14:27, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sunderland A.F.C. season GA review[edit]

Hello there. I must take issue with your recent review of the above page, for a number of reasons. 1) You failed it on the basis that it was not in a neutral point of view, but having read the article, I do not see a problem. Please provide some examples of what needs to be changed. Secondly, you failed it on account of the images. There were no actual images, which is not a failing point for GA; it does say where appropriate, and in this case, there are no free images available. You failed it on these two points, without putting the article on hold, and then failed to explain your reasoning for this instant failure. I ask you to revisit the page and reconsider this review, or explain clearly why this does not meet the GA criteria so the nominator/active editors can improve it. Thank you, PeterSymonds (talk) 17:30, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Peter... I found a few free-images and... it is biased towards sunderland slightly... I apologise for not putting it on hold... I couldn't get the template to work....
No prob. :) Thanks for putting it on hold. Could you possibly revisit the review page and add what specifically needs to be improved? It's very difficult for the primary author of the page to review his own work, if there is bias. Listing the sentences which require work would be a great help to the authors. As for the free images, I'm sure the nominator would be happy to add them to the article if you tell him where they are. :) Thanks again, PeterSymonds (talk) 17:48, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hey ITFC, just got back from holiday, I see you've taken the time to review both of my GACs. I think you've made a slight mistake in that you have listed Sunderland A.F.C. as on hold and Sunderland A.F.C. season 2007-08 as just being reviewed while they should be the other way round if anything. If you'll detail on the season article GAC what I need to do and I'll get right round to it. Cheers. Sunderland06 (talk) 18:35, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Its there... - needs pictures and not to be slightly biased.... and sunderland... can you correct me mistakes. User:Itfc+canes=me Talk Contributions 20:11, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've corrected it, but I think you really need to be more specific and detailed as to where it is biased. Also you couldn't link me to the available pictures could you? Sunderland06 (talk) 20:38, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'll get into it... ok sunderland... this is only my second one... so I'm a noobie! User:Itfc+canes=me Talk Contributions 20:59, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate it, I know GA reviewing is hard, that's why I've never tried it. Thank you. :D Sunderland06 (talk) 21:08, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Lol! User:Itfc+canes=me Talk Contributions 21:26, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, its nearing the week point for the GAC hold, when it reaches that point, can you please fail the article so I can renomminate it. Oh and can you also remove the note on WP:GAC next to Sunderland A.F.C. saying its under review, unless you're going to review it. Thank you. Sunderland06 (talk) 16:36, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. User:Itfc+canes=me Talk Contributions 17:58, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(out) Actually can you keep it held for a bit longer, I've opened this discussion to gain some outlook on whats going on. Thanks. Sunderland06 (talk) 00:10, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Its been a week since I opened that discussion and no one has commented on it, I think you can just go ahead and fail the article now. Thanks. Sunderland06 (talk) 22:13, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Polo[edit]

Cyclonebiskit is making a sandbox for Polo.--Kirk76 1854 Atlantic Hurricane Season 17:18, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just getting practice up for the moment..... User:Itfc+canes=me Talk Contributions 17:19, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikinews[edit]

I saw your great edit to Hurricane Paloma (2008) and I would really like to reuse some of the text you added on Wikipedia sister project Wikinews. Unfortunately Wikinews uses the Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 license (with attribution to Wikinews) so I can not add it to the Wikinews article unless you agree to using these copyright terms for this edit. Would you be OK with using these license terms for the one edit mentioned? Thanks, Anonymous101 (talk) 15:15, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes... of-course... Thanks. User:Itfc+canes=me Talk Contributions 20:14, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas[edit]

Jason Rees (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thanks Jason!!! Merry XMAS back. Itfc+canes=me (talk) 22:40, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Itfc+canes=me - its nice to see you around again.Jason Rees (talk) 22:44, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
well there never is much activity this time off year, esspecially as most people are waiting for the Northen Hemisphere to come alive again with Hurricane Activity. If you are looking for something to do then you could help out with 2008 PTS which needs a lot of work doing to it IMO including the making of several articles. Jason Rees (talk) 20:52, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ok... I am also having a decent go at Invest (meteorology). User:Itfc+canes=me Talk Contributions 20:53, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah i saw that and for some pieces of infomation on that check the JTWC FAQ and the WMO Website Jason Rees (talk) 21:13, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Already done that Jason.. I'm prepping the wording on a word Document.... I'm doing TS Higos as well. User:Itfc+canes=me Talk Contributions 21:14, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Enrolling in more than one project is a good thing[edit]

I'm in both the meteorology and tropical projects right now. Trust me, your help in improving met related topics would be appreciated. There hasn't been much activity in the met project in quite some time. I've actually improved most of the GA articles we have in the met project to GA (there aren't that many met GAs.) I'd appreciate any help you could provide. If outflow is not your thing (though the article does need significant help), go through the articles and see which one is a better fit for your editing. Like the tropical project, some of the more basic topics need the most help...just look around. Excellent examples of this include wind and precipitation (meteorology). Thegreatdr (talk) 17:34, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok... Thegreatdr... i'll have a look. User:Itfc+canes=me Talk Contributions 20:49, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[edit]

The Special Barnstar
Thank you, Itfc, for signing my guestbook with a comment that told me I was doing a good job here on Wikipedia. I'm glad you appreciate my contributions, and it feels good to at least be trying to get back into the swing of things, after a month-long vacation from the mainspace. Ciao, and thanks for signing! :D --Dylan620 Contribs Sign! 23:20, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You really do think I'd make a great admin? Thank you, but I don't think I'd be ready yet. Either way, I'll contact Julian about the matter, and see what he thinks. Julian is my mentor, after all. Thank you for your consideration, though, and I'd be happy to receive your support later on, probably around July or August 2009. FWIW, my admin areas of choice would be blocking, protecting, deleting, WP:AN, WP:ANI, and improving fully protected tropical cyclone articles. Even so, that means I'll be in for quite the learning experience. Cheers, Dylan620 Contribs Sign! 13:29, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
P.S.: You're welcome. :)
Are you sure you didn't mean RfA, as in Requests for Adminship? I'd be pretty frightened if you nominated me as an Article for Deletion. And when I have enough knowledge and exercise, I'll let you know. --Dylan620 Contribs Sign! 13:38, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
P.S.: If you have a guestbook now, add it to User:Jack/ABs.

Dylan620 Contribs Sign! has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!

:-) --Dylan620 Contribs Sign! 13:42, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm pretty sure you'd nominate a user up for community ban at AfD, that's for sure. Or any user in general, but that's what EfD is for. :P --Dylan620 Contribs Sign! 13:45, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome! :D --Dylan620 Contribs Sign! 13:47, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, didn't realize the AfD thing was a joke. --Dylan620 Contribs Sign! 13:58, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi![edit]

Hi there Itfc+canes=me! What is the meaning of your username? Just curious, since you said it sums you up. Chamal talk 13:49, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see :) Interesting name though. Grabs the attention, you know? Chamal talk 14:00, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #23[edit]

The November–December issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 03:18, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments needed[edit]

You are receiving this message because you are listed as an active participant in WikiProject Meteorology, WikiProject Severe weather, and/or WikiProject Non-tropical storms. I have made a proposal to start an official assessment page for these three projects, under the WP:METEO banner. Since this would need significant participation to work properly, I'd like input from as many interested parties as possible (even those who may not watch the project pages), so please visit the discussion here and leave your thoughts/opinions. Thanks! -RunningOnBrains 02:41, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #24[edit]

The January–February issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. Jason Rees (talk) 01:21, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cookie![edit]

download has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!



-download | sign! 02:33, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #25[edit]

The March issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. Jason Rees (talk) 01:46, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Sweeps invitation[edit]

Hello, I hope you are doing well. I am sending you this message since you are a member of the GA WikiProject. I would like to invite you to consider helping with the GA sweeps process. Sweeps helps to ensure that the oldest GAs still meet the criteria, and improve the quality of GAs overall. Unfortunately, last month only two articles were reviewed. This is definitely a low point after our peak at the beginning of the process when 163 articles were reviewed in September 2007. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. All exempt and previously reviewed articles have already been removed from the list. Instead of reviewing by topic, you can consider picking and choosing whichever articles interest you.

We are always looking for new members to assist with the remaining articles, so if you are interested or know of anybody that can assist, please visit the GA sweeps page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. If only 14 editors achieve this feat starting now, we would be done with Sweeps! Of course, having more people reviewing less articles would be better for all involved, so please consider asking others to help out. Feel free to stop by and only review a few articles, something's better than nothing! Take a look at the list, and see what articles interest you. Let's work to complete Sweeps so that efforts can be fully focused on the backlog at GAN. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 08:18, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #26[edit]

The 26th issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. –Juliancolton | Talk 04:47, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #27[edit]

The 27th issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. –Juliancolton | Talk 02:12, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #28[edit]

The 28th issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. –Juliancolton | Talk 03:08, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Severe weather RfC[edit]

Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 19:15, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010 GAN backlog elimination drive[edit]

WikiProject Good Articles will be running a GAN backlog elimination drive for the entire month of April. The goal of this drive is to bring the number of outstanding Good Article nominations down to below 200. This will help editors in restoring confidence to the GAN process as well as actively improving, polishing, and rewarding good content. If you are interested in participating in the drive, please place your name here. Awards will be given out to those who review certain numbers of GANs as well as to those who review the most. Hope we can see you in April.

–MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 17:41, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #29[edit]

The 29th issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. JCbot (talk) 14:19, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Itfc+canes=me/sandbox/2009 atl hurricane season[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. [[User:Itfc+canes=me]] [[User talk:Itfc%2Bcanes%3Dme|<font color="Orange"><sup>'''T'''alk</sup></font>]] <font color="blue">[[User:Itfc+canes=me/Guestbook|Sign me!]]</font> (talk) 09:25, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Update banner on Keynsham Town F.C.[edit]

Hi, Way back in June 2008 you added an update banner to the Keynsham Town F.C. article. A discussion has been started on the talk page asking what this is for. Can you remember what needed updating? was it the squad info - in which case it has been removed. Could you help with a comment on the talk page or would you be happy for the update banner to be removed?— Rod talk 14:05, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011 GAN backlog elimination drive a week away[edit]

WikiProject Good Articles will be running a GAN backlog elimination drive for the entire month of March. The goal of this drive is to bring the number of outstanding Good Article nominations down to below 50. This will help editors in restoring confidence to the GAN process as well as actively improving, polishing, and rewarding good content. If you are interested in participating in the drive, please place your name here. Awards will be given out to those who review certain numbers of GANs as well as to those who review the most. On behalf of my co-coordinator Wizardman, we hope we can see you in March. MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 00:19, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject British TV channels[edit]

This is a message from Wikiproject British TV channels. Please visit the main project page to reconfirm if you are actively taking part in the project and update your details. Many thanks. Auntie Beeb (talk) 00:14, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Good articles (Participant Clean-Up)[edit]

Hello, you are receiving this message because you are currently a participant of WikiProject Good articles. Since the creation of the WikiProject, over 200 user's have joined to help review good article nominations and contribute to other sections of the WikiProject. Over the years, several of these users have stopped reviewing articles and/or have become inactive with the project but are still listed as participates. In order to improve communications with other participants and get newsletters sent out faster (newsletters will begin to be sent out monthly starting in October) all participants that are no longer active with the WikiProject will be removed from the participants list.

If you are still interested in being a participant for this WikiProject, please sign your user name here and please help review some articles so we can reduce the size of the backlog. If you are no longer interested, you do not need to sign your name anywhere and your name will be removed from the participants list after the deadline. Remember that even if you are not interested at this time, you can always re-add your name to the list whenever you want. The deadline to sign your name on the page above will be November 1, 2012. Thank-you. 13:27, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Update for: WikiProject Good articles (Participant Clean-Up)[edit]

Sorry for having to send out a second message but a user has brought to my attention that a point mentioned in the first message should be clarified. If user's don't sign on this page, they will be moved to an "Inactive Participants" list rather then be being removed from the entire WikiProject. Sorry for any confusion.--Dom497 (talk)15:17, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter - October 2012[edit]

Delivered October 3, 2012 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive this newsletter any longer, please remove your name from this list.

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 05:37, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Good Articles - Participant Clean-up (Second Call)[edit]

You are reciving this message because you have not added your name to the list of active WikiProject Good Articles participants. Though you may have recived the first message sent out in September, some users may have had that message archived before coming online to read it and therefore never saw it. If you are deeming yourself inactive with the WikiProject please disregard this message as your name will be moved to an "inactive participant" list at the end of the clean-up. If you are still active with the WikiProject, please be sure to include your name on this list. The current deadline to add your name to the list (if you are still active) is November 1, 2012. A third and final message will be sent out during the last week of the clean-up before the deadline. Thank-you.--EdwardsBot

WikiProject Good Articles - Participant Clean-up (Final Call)[edit]

You are receiving this message because you have not added your name to the list of active WikiProject Good Articles participants. Though you may have recived the past two messages sent out in September and October, some users may have had that message archived before coming online to read it and therefore never saw it. If you are deeming yourself inactive with the WikiProject please disregard this message as your name will be moved to an "inactive participant" list at the end of the clean-up. If you are still active with the WikiProject, please be sure to include your name on this list. The deadline to add your name to the list (if you are still active) is November 1, 2012. This will be the last message sent out before the deadline which is in 2 days. Thank-you.--EdwardsBot

The GAN Newsletter (November 2012)[edit]

The WikiProject Good articles Newsletter
Volume III, No. 2 – November 2012

For past newsletters click here

In This Issue


The WikiProject: Good Articles Newsletter (December 2012)[edit]

The WikiProject Good articles Newsletter
Volume III, No. 3 – December 2012

For past newsletters click here

In This Issue


The WikiProject: Good Articles Newsletter (January 2013)[edit]

The WikiProject Good articles Newsletter
Volume IV, No. 1 – January 2013

For past newsletters click here

In This Issue


This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 14:47, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter - February 2013[edit]

The WikiProject Good articles Newsletter
Volume IV, No. 2 – February 2013

For past newsletters click here

In This Issue


Good Article Nominations Request For Comment[edit]

A 'Request For Comment' for Good Article Nominations is currently being held. We are asking that you please take five to ten minutes to review all seven proposals that will affect Good Article Nominations if approved. Full details of each proposal can be found here. Please comment on each proposal (or as many as you can) here.

At this time, Proposal 1, 3, and 5 have received full (or close to) support.

If you have questions of anything general (not related to one specif proposal), please leave a message under the General discussion thread.

Please note that Proposal 2 has been withdrawn and no further comments are needed. Also, please disregard Proposal 9 as it was never an actual proposal.

WikiProject Good Articles Recruitment Centre[edit]

Hello! Now, some of you might be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers:
  • Recruiters: The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet this criteria. If we don't get at least 5-10 recruiters to start off with, the Recruitment Centre will not open. If interested, make sure you meet the criteria, read the process and add your name to the list of recruiters. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the process section is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available".
  • Co-Director: The current Director for the centre is me (Dom497). Another user that would be willing to help with some of the tasks would be helpful. Tasks include making sure recruiters are doing what they should be (teaching!), making sure all recruitments are archived correctly, updating pages as needed, answering any questions, and distributing the feedback form. If interested, please contact me (Dom497).
  • Nominators, please read this: If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of this page. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article.

If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along.

A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.--Dom497 (talk)

This message was sent out by --EdwardsBot (talk) 01:31, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK RfC[edit]

  • As a listed GA participant, you are invited to contribute to a formal Request for Comment on the question of whether Good Articles should be eligible to appear in the Did You Know? slot in future. Please see the proposal on its subpage here, or on the main DYK talk page. To add the discussion to your watchlist, click this link. Thank you in advance. Gilderien Chat|Contributions03:19, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Naming conventions for tornado outbreaks[edit]

There is currently a discussion ongoing regarding altering the naming conventions for tornado outbreak and tornado outbreak sequence articles. Please feel free to view and comment on the discussion here. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) via User:Ks0awb 22:33, 9 September 2013 (UTC) You are receiving this notice because you are listed as a member of WikiProject Severe Weather. If you would not like to receive future WikiProject Severe Weather notifications, please add your signature at User:Ks0stm/Notify list.[reply]

GAN December 2013 Backlog Drive[edit]

Hello! A GAN Backlog Drive will begin in less than 4 days!

In past Backlog Drives, the goal was to reduce the backlog of Good article nominations. In the upcoming drive, another goal will be added - raising as much money as we can for the Wikimedia Foundation. How will this work? Well, its pretty simple. Any user interested in donating can submit a pledge at the Backlog Drive page (linked above). The pledge should mention the amount of money the user is willing to donate per review. For example, if a user pledges 5 cents per review and 100 nominations are reviewed, the total donation amount is $5.00.

At the time this message was sent out, two users have submitted pledges for a total of 8 cents per review. All pledges, no matter how much money, are greatly appreciated. Also, in no way is this saying you must make a pledge.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact me or leave a message on the Backlog Drive talk page. And remember, there are less than 4 days before the drive starts!--EdwardsBot (talk) 03:22, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GAN December 2013 Backlog Drive[edit]

Hello! Just a friendly reminder that the GAN Backlog Drive has begun and will end on December 31, 2013!

If you know anyone outside of the WikiProject that may be interested, feel free to invite them to the drive!

If you have any questions or want to comment about something regarding the drive, post them here--EdwardsBot (talk) 00:14, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion on changes to the format of the tornado table[edit]

Due to your membership in [[WikiProject Severe weather, I thought that the discussion going on there regarding proposed changes to the tornado table might interest you. If you are interested in participating in discussion, please feel free to join in at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Severe weather#Reference column in the tornado table. All views are welcome, and please do not feel obligated to participate if you are not interested. Inks.LWC (talk) 00:19, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014 GAN Backlog Drive[edit]

It's that time again! Starting on March 1, there will be another GAN Backlog Drive! There will be several changes compared to previous drives:

  • This drive will introduce a new component to it; a point system. In a nutshell, older nominations are worth more points than newer nominations. The top 3 participants who have the points will be awarded the Golden, Silver, or Bronze Wikipedia Puzzle Piece Trophy, respectively.
  • Unlike the December 2013 Backlog Drive, earning an additional barnstar if you reached your goal has been removed.
  • The allowance to have insufficient reviews has been lowered to 2 before being disqualified.
  • An exception to the rule that all reviews must be completed before the deadline has been created.

Also, something that I thought I would share with all of you is that we raised $20.88 (USD) for the WMF in the December 2013 drive. It may not sound like a lot but considering that that was raised just because we reviewed articles, I would say that's pretty good! With that success, pledges can be made for the upcoming drive if you wish.

More info regarding the drive and full descriptions regarding the changes to this drive can be found on the the drive page. If you have any questions, feel free to leave a message on the drive talk page.

I look forward to your participation and hope that because of it, some day the backlog will be gone!

--Dom497

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GAN March 2014 Backlog Drive[edit]

The March 2014 GAN Backlog Drive has begun and will end on April 1, 2014! Sent by Dom497 on behalf of MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:01, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Good articles Future GAN Backlog Drive[edit]

Hello everyone! Hope you've all been having a great summer!

TheQ Editor recently proposed the idea of having another Backlog Drive in either September/October or November/December of this year. For those of you who have participated in the past two drives you know I was the one who organized them, however, come September, this will be my most important year in school so I will not be able to coordinate this drive (if it happens). TheQ Editor has volunteered to be a coordinator for the drive. If any of you would like to co-coordinator, please notify TheQ Editor on his talk page.

If you would be interested in participating in a Backlog Drive sometime before the end of this year, please notify TheQ Editor. Also, make sure to specify what month(s) work best for you.

At the time this message was sent out, the backlog was at 520 nominations. Since May, the backlog has been steadily increasing and we are currently near an all time high. Even though the backlog will not disappear over one drive, this drive can lead to several others which will (hopefully) lead to the day where there is no longer a backlog.

As always, the more participants, the better, and everyone is encouraged to participate!

Sent by Dom497--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:52, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA Cup[edit]

Hello everyone! We hope you have all been having a great summer!

As we all know, the recent GAN Backlog Drives have not had any big impact on the backlog. Because of that, me (Dom497), Figureskatingfan, and TheQ Editor have worked on an idea that could possibly finally put a dent into the massive backlog. Now, I will admit, the idea isn't entirely ours as we have took the general idea of the WikiCup and brought it over to WikiProject Good Articles. But anyways, here's what we have in mind:

For all of you that do not know what the WikiCup is, it is an annual competition between several editors to see who can get the most Good Articles, Featured Article's, Did You Know's, etc. Based of this, we propose to you the GA Cup. This competition will only focus on reviewing Good articles.

For more info on the proposal, click here. As a FYI, the proposal page is not what the final product will look like (if you do go ahead with this idea). It will look very similar to WikiCup's page(s).

The discussion for the proposal will take place here. Please let us know if you are interested, have any concerns, things to consider, etc.

--Dom497, Figureskatingfan, and TheQ Editor

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Good Articles - GA Cup[edit]

WikiProject Good articles is holding a new competition, the GA Cup, from October 1, 2014 - March 28, 2015. The Cup will be based on reviewing Good article nominations; for each review, points will be awarded with bonuses for older nominations, longer articles and comprehensive reviews. All participants will start off in one group and the highest scoring participants will go through to the second round. At the moment six rounds are planned, but this may change based on participant numbers.

Some of you may ask: what is the purpose for a competition of this type? Currently, there is a backlog of about 500 unreviewed Good article nominations, almost an all time high. It is our hope that we can decrease the backlog in a fun way, through friendly competition.

Everyone is welcome to join; new and old editors! Sign-ups will be open until October 15, 2014 so sign-up now!

If you have any questions, take a look at the FAQ page and/or contact one of the four judges.

Cheers from NickGibson3900, Dom497, TheQ Editor and Figureskatingfan.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:04, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To receive future GA Cup newsletter, please add your name to our mailing list.

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

38th edition of The Hurricane Herald[edit]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Newsletter/Archive 38 - here's the link to the latest newsletter! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:51, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

39th edition of The Hurricane Herald![edit]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Newsletter/Archive 39 ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 00:55, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Weather: Map Dot & Template/Infobox Colors[edit]

Dear project member, This message is being sent out to encourage new ideas and feedback on those proposed in regard to the colors debate for WikiProject Weather. For those who are unaware of what's been happening over the last year, I will give a brief summary. We have been discussing proposed changes to the colors of the dots on tropical cyclone maps and templates and infoboxes across the entire weather project in order to solve issues related to the limited contrast between colors for both normal vision as well as the various types of color blindness (MOS:ACCESS). We had partially implemented a proposal earlier this year, however, it was objected to by a number of people and additional issues were presented that made it evident this wasn't the optimal solution. We tried to come up with other solutions to address the issues related to color contrast, however, none of them gained traction and no consensus was generated.

We need your help and I encourage you to propose your own scale and give feedback on those already listed. Keep in mind that we are NOT making a decision on any individual proposal at this time. We are simply allowing people to make proposals and cultivate them given feedback from other project members. Please visit our project page for additional details. The proposal phase will close no later than December 31st at 23:59 UTC. NoahTalk 04:13, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Itfc%2Bcanes%3Dme&oldid=1122997547"