User talk:JaliscoPine

Welcome![edit]

Hello, JaliscoPine!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 18:02, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Taxobox parameters[edit]

Hi, although the taxobox may appear to work if you omit |taxon=, as here, the title of the article doesn't get italicized, because the code can't check that the taxon name and the page title match. So please include this parameter, as I've now done. I appreciate that taxoboxes can be complicated for new editors. Peter coxhead (talk) 18:28, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Argyroxiphium sandwicense subsp. macrocephalum x Dubautia menziesii has been accepted[edit]

Argyroxiphium sandwicense subsp. macrocephalum x Dubautia menziesii, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 15:54, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting synonym lists[edit]

Hi, have a look at Phyllostegia haliakalae where I have formatted the synonyms correctly.

We use bullet points, not dashes
Species names are italicized
Parentheses have a meaning – they show that a taxon is not in the same genus or at the same rank that the parenthesized author used, so you mustn't introduce them where they aren't present in the source

Using {{Species list}} makes it easier to format synonyms. Peter coxhead (talk) 16:51, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pinus vallartensis has been accepted[edit]

Pinus vallartensis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hughesdarren (talk) 09:02, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cladocolea cupulata has been accepted[edit]

Cladocolea cupulata, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hughesdarren (talk) 06:18, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Pseudohydrosme ebo[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Pseudohydrosme ebo, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:48, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Pseudohydrosme buettneri[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Pseudohydrosme buettneri, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can (bot)&section=new report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:56, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hylaeus perkinsianus moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Hylaeus perkinsianus. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 03:10, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note that this has been improved and accepted now - see Hylaeus perkinsianus. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 14:49, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mud Island (Minnesota) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Mud Island (Minnesota), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Htanaungg (talk) 05:44, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Pseudohydrosme gabunensis[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Pseudohydrosme gabunensis, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can (bot)&section=new report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:26, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Platanus rzedowskii[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Platanus rzedowskii, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can (bot)&section=new report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:32, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Platanus gentryi[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Platanus gentryi, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:28, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Synonyms, taxoboxes[edit]

Hi, we don't have articles on synonyms; create a redirect instead. Also, please note what I wrote above at #Taxobox parameters. Peter coxhead (talk) 06:36, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for telling! I will not make any synonym articles from now on.

- JaliscoPine JaliscoPine (talk) 12:55, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Platanus rzedowskii[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Platanus rzedowskii, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:00, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Western Sumatran rhinoceros has been accepted[edit]

Western Sumatran rhinoceros, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 17:24, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Indonesian Javan rhinoceros has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Indonesian Javan rhinoceros. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:22, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Chobe black rhinoceros has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Chobe black rhinoceros. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:23, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Western white-bearded wildebeest[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Western white-bearded wildebeest, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:11, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cookson's wildebeest (May 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by I dream of horses was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Blue wildebeest instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Already exists.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cookson's wildebeest and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 01:30, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Indonesian Javan rhinoceros (May 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Javan rhinoceros. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Indonesian Javan rhinoceros and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:54, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JaliscoPine! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:54, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chobe black rhinoceros (May 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Black rhinoceros. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There is not enough information in this draft to warrant a separate article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chobe black rhinoceros and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:57, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:North Island little spotted kiwi has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:North Island little spotted kiwi. Thanks! Cabrils (talk) 11:38, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: North Island little spotted kiwi has been accepted[edit]

North Island little spotted kiwi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 19:19, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Volcan de Toluca pocket gopher[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Volcan de Toluca pocket gopher, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:34, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Du Chaillu's rope squirrel[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Du Chaillu's rope squirrel, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:27, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cookson's wildebeest has been accepted[edit]

Cookson's wildebeest, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:14, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Salle's quail[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Salle's quail, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:03, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Cyrtonyx[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Cyrtonyx, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:41, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Montezuma quail[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Montezuma quail, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:55, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pinus georginae has been accepted[edit]

Pinus georginae, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 15:18, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vernacular names for pines[edit]

Thank you for creating articles on the two species of pines recently. I would ask that you provide citations for the asserted vernacular names (Puerto Vallarta pine, Georgina's pine) that you included with them though, as they are not found in any of the literature you cite. If these are not names found in sources they must be removed, as Wikipedia can not create any new information (eg new common names), but can only ever report what is written elsewhere.--Kev min § 14:16, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok! Will do. JaliscoPine (talk) 16:13, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hill fox has been accepted[edit]

Hill fox, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 19:25, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pinus washoensis for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pinus washoensis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pinus washoensis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🌀Cyclone Football71🏈 |sandbox 03:59, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I believe moving it to a variety or a subspecies article would be the right choice. I would be able to edit it to make it as such. JaliscoPine (talk) 18:12, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I also do now realize my mistake, and should have named it as it is accepted online. JaliscoPine (talk) 18:39, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I might have started the AFD too soon, but I agree that it should be moved to either a subspecies article or merged would be a better choice, would be happy to help edit the article more to reflect as such, there is good information here but unfortunately it does not clearly reflect the current view on this species. 🌀Cyclone Football71🏈 |sandbox 20:23, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. That sounds good. JaliscoPine (talk) 22:00, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brown agouti has been accepted[edit]

Brown agouti, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:39, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vancouver Island marten has been accepted[edit]

Vancouver Island marten, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 16:40, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vancouver Island marten moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Vancouver Island marten, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. UtherSRG (talk) 21:27, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Vancouver Island marten has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Vancouver Island marten. Thanks! UtherSRG (talk) 21:30, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Vancouver Island marten has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Vancouver Island marten. Thanks! UtherSRG (talk) 22:06, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Argyroxiphium virescens x sandwicense subsp. macrocephalum (July 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Losipov was:

Declining for now due to only one source, but I think it's notable. More citations will help bolster its notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Argyroxiphium virescens x sandwicense subsp. macrocephalum and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Losipov (talk) 18:18, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Argyroxiphium sandwicense subsp. sandwicense x Dubautia arborea[edit]

Hello, JaliscoPine. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Argyroxiphium sandwicense subsp. sandwicense x Dubautia arborea, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mud Island (Minnesota)[edit]

Hello, JaliscoPine. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mud Island (Minnesota), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Argyroxiphium sandwicense subsp. sandwicense x Dubautia arborea[edit]

Hello, JaliscoPine. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Argyroxiphium sandwicense subsp. sandwicense x Dubautia arborea".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:24, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mud Island (Minnesota)[edit]

Hello, JaliscoPine. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mud Island".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:46, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: United States one hundred-thousand-dollar bill has been accepted[edit]

United States one hundred-thousand-dollar bill, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 10:10, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Chobe black rhinoceros[edit]

Hello, JaliscoPine. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chobe black rhinoceros, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:07, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vancouver Island marten[edit]

Hello, JaliscoPine. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vancouver Island marten, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:05, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vancouver Island marten[edit]

Hello, JaliscoPine. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vancouver Island marten".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 09:01, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]