User talk:Jeff G./Archives/2011/July

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Not a personal attack on the bot...

Not meant to be a personal attack on the bot. :) :) but a tongue in cheek chide of the bot. Of course it does not suck, met to be a somewhat funny actually. But the bot does have issues though. Bot should be looking at one those that use a www field in the cite area. Not journals or book or whatever else. DeusImperator (talk) 11:39, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
This edit didn't include the words "idiot editors"? Also, cite templates have no "www" fields and I haven't run the bot in over three weeks due to other concerns.   — Jeff G.  ツ 12:43, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

References

Hey, Sorry about the citing, I just figured that since MLB.com was already referenced on the last change on made to the Wade LeBlanc page I didn't think I had to cite it again. Anyways, is their an easy template to use for citing then?

Thanks for the help.

Detredwings1139 (talk) 19:09, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

"per mlb.com (already a ref)" should do nicely. A more specific URL would be better.   — Jeff G.  ツ 19:11, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for including a ref on a later edit. You may want to stop adding height and weight for MLB players after you read Template talk:Infobox MLB player#Height_and_weight, where the consensus was not to add them to the infobox.   — Jeff G.  ツ 19:32, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Oh, sorry about that. Didn't realize it wasn't supposed to be added.

Detredwings1139 (talk) 19:37, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

vandal

please tell me how changing "partner" to "relationship" can be consindered vadalisum??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.224.188.94 (talk) 19:11, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

"Relationship" is not a valid parameter for Template:Infobox person. Neither is "fucking"[1]. The correct parameter name is "partner" per Template:Infobox person/doc, and since you effectively removed the information about the partner of James Roday from the James Roday article, I interpreted your edit as "unexplained removal of content" AKA vandalism.   — Jeff G.  ツ 19:19, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Help

hello there

the page which I created I need some help UKRockers , many users keep trying to remove it as they state there is no reason for it but I and many others think it does

can you help? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jarvis1983uk (talkcontribs) 19:56, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

The article needs to satisfy WP:CLUB, in addition to providing verifiable references from reliable sources. It did not appear to do that when you wrote to me.   — Jeff G.  ツ 20:45, 31 July 2011 (UTC)