User talk:Jonathaniguess

Jonathaniguess, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Jonathaniguess! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

March 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Aureum doxadius. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Battle of Stamford Bridge have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Additionally, if you think I made a mistake, please leave a message on my talk page. Aureum doxadius (talk) 09:33, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Battle for Königshügel moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Battle for Königshügel, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hatchens (talk) 15:37, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Battle of Isted

added a link pointing to Jørgen Sonne

Skirmish of Århus

added a link pointing to Jørgen Sonne

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021[edit]

Please stop adding duplicate images to infoboxes, thank you. FDW777 (talk) 16:26, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please stop adding duplicate images to infoboxes as you did in this edit. FDW777 (talk) 17:20, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm FDW777. I noticed that you recently removed content from Siege of Belgrade (1806) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! FDW777 (talk) 12:36, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Arachova. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Catlemur (talk) 18:51, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Again, stop adding duplicate images like you did here. Either you can start communicating with other editors, or I will escalate this matter for administrator attention. FDW777 (talk) 07:55, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 25[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Siege of Izmail, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mikhail Ivanov.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Battle of Narva (1700), disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Specifically MOS:BOLD. FDW777 (talk) 15:03, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Battle of Deligrad, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. map of 1995 irrelevant for an article about 1806 Aeengath (talk) 13:36, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 6[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Kolding (1849), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bov.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battle for Königshügel[edit]

Hello, Jonathaniguess. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle for Königshügel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Dybbøl[edit]

Thank you for improving the article. I see however that this edit is a direct translation of the text from here, and the text is presumably copyrighted, so that adding its translation is a copyright violation. It can be easily fixed by paraphrasing the text. Could you please do it? Thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:23, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose i can try Jonathaniguess (talk) 16:28, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:33, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edits re Lutzen[edit]

I recognise you spent a lot of time on this and its irritating when work is undone; but then I spent over a week bringing this article from C to B. Your edits have not improved it; in fact, by removing referenced content and introducing large amounts of unsourced material, you have actually downgraded it. So I feel equally frustrated.

I assume from this TP you are relatively new; if you want to make substantial changes to an article, you should first address it on the TP. Otherwise, you'll find yourself fighting endless battles. Up to you of course - some editors enjoy conflict but its really wearing. Robinvp11 (talk) 13:59, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well I’m sorry about that. I suppose you have already reverted my edits by now. If not, then go ahead. I always knew that my edits would not last long. Jonathaniguess (talk) 14:19, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that does beg the question of why make them :). If you add large quantities of material without Sources, they will tend to be reversed. If you actually remove Sourced content, you have to expect it - which isn't really productive for you or others,

Personally, I don't mind people making edits even when I disagree, because it nearly always inspires me to go back and look at it with a more critical eye. But major changes should probably be discussed first.

Also, while I realise the death of Gustavus is a big deal for those interested in Scandinavian history (which you seem to be), it is not the focal point of the Battle of Lutzen. The right place for that is the article on Gustavus, which needs updating BUT you need to include Sources. Robinvp11 (talk) 14:25, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

One other point; the size of the picture in the Infobox is often a function of pagination, particularly on mobile devices (which is how 60% of users access Wikipedia). So its not just a 'Whatever" decision. Robinvp11 (talk) 14:27, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see Jonathaniguess (talk) 14:29, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Battle for Königshügel[edit]

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Battle for Königshügel, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:58, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason.

Specifically WP:MILMOS#INFOBOX. FDW777 (talk) 17:50, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jessicapierce. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Battle of Covadonga have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Jessicapierce (talk) 14:21, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021[edit]

Your edit to Battle of Jemappes has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. (copied from http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/battles_jemappes.html) firefly ( t · c ) 11:26, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 25[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Maxen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prince Henry of Prussia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The use of imagemap was denied by rfc|tech|rfcid=49C0317[edit]

We have found a better and much more simple solution, see Bridge of Sighs. The RFC itseld was done in Talk:Ca' d'Oro#Rfc about navigation for mobile users Ruedi33a (talk) 10:45, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm TylerBurden. An edit that you recently made to Erling Haaland seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Or use the preview feature. TylerBurden (talk) 11:42, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

BAD ACCUSATION.[edit]

Hello. I would like to discuss about the Zlatan page I edited. I CLEARLY ADDED A SOURCE! Why would you lie to me about not adding one? Does it look like I’m a professional editor? How the heck should I even edit that page? Joe Mama 2023 (talk) 04:53, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 30[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Diplo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Silk City.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023[edit]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Zlatan Ibrahimović, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. TylerBurden (talk) 20:06, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 20[edit]

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Christian Eriksen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spartak Moscow.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:49, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You have on several occasions been asked by other editors to provide edit summaries, yet you're still performing edits such as removing content while providing no explanation. TylerBurden (talk) 20:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]