User talk:Jovanmilic97/Archive 3

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Battle Stadium D.O.N (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Edge

Other Ocean Interactive (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to CBC

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:27, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

NBA (2005 video game)

Hi Jovanmilic97. When you move pages like "NBA (video game)" for diambiguation purposes, please check to make sure that there aren't any non-free files being used in the article. All non-free files are required to have separate specific non-free use rationales for each use; so, when you change the name of an article, the rationale also needs to be correspondingly changed to avoid problems like this. I caught this and re-added the file to the infobox, but non-free files which aren't being used in any articles can be speedily deleted per WP:F5 after five days. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:38, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Thanks Marchjuly, did not know this! Jovanmilic97 (talk) 07:25, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Great contributions Visualreverb (talk) 11:28, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Diabotical

Hi. It's a long time since I made any articles around here. I've gone ahead and added some references to Draft:Diabotical. Do you mind if I move it back, or is article creation more constrained than it used to be? Evercat (talk) 18:20, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Evercat You can move it back now. Don't have the time to judge whether it passes WP:GNG (before the release even), but refs wise it looks fine. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 18:26, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Jumanji: The Video Game

Can You Please Add Jumanji: The Video Game Because An Person Called: User:Crumpled Fire create Terminator: Resistance on 20 September 2019‎. If You Can Create Jumanji: The Video Game On Wikipedia It Will Be Amazing.

Thanks From JukeboxMan1990 (talk) 11:22, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Regarding the deletion of "Gather 'Round (TV series)" article

I know that it may be too late, but if I would have known that this page for the "Gather 'Round (TV series)" was targeted for deletion, I would have suggested that it be merged with the Paul M. Lally page. Because Mr. Lally was the host of this short lived TV series that was on PBS. Could it still be merged with the Paul M. Lally page even though the page and the information on the TV series has been deleted? Thanks in advance for any answers. Frschoonover (talk) 00:02, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Frschoonover, you can ask for restoration of Gather 'Round (TV series) at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 16:44, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello Jovanmilic97

Few days ago i submitted an article (SEE TV) which was deleted by you however that was an authentic and official article then i had created a draft article of the same article (Draft:SEE_TV) and now this article is ready to be publish on wikipedia. So please checkout this article on draft (Draft:SEE_TV). Muhammadsaaduddin2010 (talk) 01:22, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

The page for "Gather 'Round (TV series)" has been restored. Now, I would like to propose that this particular page be merged with the "Paul M. Lally" page. How does this go about? Is there someone I can talk to? Thanks in advance for any answers. Frschoonover (talk) 11:22, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Who can/do I talk to/with in regards to merging "Gather 'Round (TV series)" with the "Paul M. Lally" page? Thanks in advance for any answers.Frschoonover (talk) 23:54, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Frschoonover, you can just do it yourself per WP:BOLD by copying the text into Paul M. Lally and then redirecting Gather 'Round (TV series) to it. I can do the redirecting for you, you will just need to copy. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 10:11, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Do you mean like copy and paste? I only ask because I'm new to this sort of thing, such as merging. I did read the the WP:BOLD, but couldn't find anything about merging. Thanks in advance for any helpful answers. Frschoonover (talk) 00:11, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Frschoonover, precisely that. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 09:16, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Here's the link to the Gather 'Round Wikipedia page:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gather_%27Round_(TV_series)

The text:

"Gather 'Round was an educational series syndicated on numerous PBS stations from September 1, 1978 until January 1, 1979. The series was a production of CTI/Glad and was shown mainly during weekday in-school telecasts. The programs generally ran for 15 minutes or less. They were hosted/narrated by Paul M Lally and featured the charcoal drawings of Rae Owings. As Lally told stories, Owings would draw pictures with a charcoal pencil, illustrating the story as it was being told. Lally and Owings were also responsible for behind the scenes production work on other shows such as Cover to Cover (produced by WETA-TV), and The Word Shop. "

Last but not least, Paul M. Lally's official Vimeo channel, which has all of his "Gather 'Round" episodes and also, a few "Teletales" episodes:

https://vimeo.com/user368498

Thanks for everything Frschoonover (talk) 00:13, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Excuse me, but I haven't heard from you. I still would like to work with you on this. Thanks. Frschoonover (talk) 23:09, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Deleting Draft

Hi, can you delete Draft:Aybars İbak because that article has been declined for 6 months. Selingunus (talk) 21:29, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Also, this page must be delete from Wikipedia Draft:AYŞEGÜL KAPTANOĞLU Selingunus (talk) 21:32, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

G7

Did you mean to nominate for G7 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dungeon Scroll? I had made an edit which should have disqualified it.... Cc Fastily. --Izno (talk) 18:30, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

I meant to withdraw it thanks to your comment finding sources myself, since it was done in error (I wanted a withdraw not g7 as deletion). Mess! Jovanmilic97 (talk) 18:37, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

I've restored and closed the discussion as withdrawn. Thanks for the heads up. -FASTILY 00:24, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Deletion review for Zonic

Djm-leighpark has asked for a deletion review of Zonic. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Djm-leighpark (talk) 14:49, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Articles for Creation: List of reviewers by subject notice

Hi Jovanmilic97, you are receiving this notice because you are listed as an active Articles for Creation reviewer.

Recently a list of reviewers by area of expertise was created. This notice is being sent out to alert you to the existence of that list, and to encourage you to add your name to it. If you or other reviewers come across articles in the queue where an acceptance/decline hinges on specialist knowledge, this list should serve to facilitate contact with a fellow reviewer.

To end on a positive note, the backlog has dropped below 1,500, so thanks for all of the hard work some of you have been putting into the AfC process!

Sent to all Articles for Creation reviewers as a one-time notice. To opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Regards, Sam-2727 (talk)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Lowrider (video game)

Well sir, have you ever heard of WP:AGF? there is no need to be rude- even in notes. While yes, there are several links- not one of them justify why this game is notable enough to deserve an article- however, instead of nominate it for deletion- I figured I would give the author a chance to put a little more information on it. Not every bad video game needs a WP article, and many bad games that do not need WP articles have 3 or more web-pages that give them negative reviews. I stand by my tag- I think it was the right one, however, I'm not going to get into an edit war with you. Don't be a jerk. If you disagree- try messaging someone and asking them about it, or maybe starting a conversation, or, I don't know- actually improve the page. Nightenbelle (talk) 20:17, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Nightenbelle, I am really sorry that you got offended, since that wasn't my intention (and I had a rough day). However, it's not an issue of WP:AGF because I never thought you did anything out of bad intention! The main criteria is clear in WP:GNG, significant coverage in multiple reliable sources, which the article had even you put the tag. The sources don't need to mention why it's notable. The fact they thought it was notable enough to cover is the real deal here. If you wanted "little more information", then you tag it for refimprove or expanding sections. There are even more reviews also cited by a Metacritic ref. Again, sorry for what I said, but it's not an issue of a WP:AGF failure. Just a simple disagreement, where I believe the game is unquestionably notable per WP:GNG. I also planned to add even more refs, but wasn't able to (so I could turn WP:AGF on you, since you assume bad faith on my behalf). Jovanmilic97 (talk) 22:24, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Your comment was the problem- not the disagreement on notability. I know darn well I am not an expert, I am a gamer, but I will gladly bow to someone with superior knowledge. The problem is what you said. Thank you for apologizing for that. There is no good faith to assume with a rude comment like the one you made- so no, you cannot turn around AGF on me when you took an issue with a tag and decided to make a personal comment about me. For the record- I've been a new page reviewer less than a month- I'm still learning and, of course, I will make mistakes- like the one I made on that page not realizing the notability. Before I marked it that- I did research- I checked to see if there was any coverage at all other than ratings- I couldn't find any. I will know in the future that ratings are enough- thank you for that education. Nightenbelle (talk) 14:58, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Nightenbelle, now that I am reading your background with the Page Curation, I feel even more bad. For the reviews part, I'd say it is similiar to WP:NBOOK or WP:NFILM criteria with reviews, though usually just 2-3 reviews only (if at a poor length at that) would never meet WP:GNG for me, since the video game reviews reliable community is big (just see WP:VG/RS). Regards, and sorry again! It was way out of line of me to say that like in that way, as I could have been much nicer while sending the same point across. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 15:34, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Cell_to_Singularity review

How did this happen... - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 20:38, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Rich_Smith, I heard it is a common error with the tool, because it does not detect any changes that happened during the time while you are writing a decline comment (like your decline). Hence a double decline. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 21:11, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

With ya, no problem at all :) - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 21:12, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Did a merge of both declines and comments over there now! I think I got into a similar situation a year ago or so, still as funny. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 21:14, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Draft:State of Siege: 26/11

I think that you made a good-faith mistake in accepting this draft, which was then pushed back into draft space by User:DMySon. Had the paid status of the paid editor of the draft been disclosed? If not, then it was sneaked through by the paid editor, and illustrates why paid editors must disclose, and why reviewers should be aware of paid editing so that they can be doubly alert to reviewing the tone. I've declined the draft again, this time for blatant tone issues. (I am not saying that the sourcing is satisfactory or that the sourcing is unsatisfactory. My guess is that the sourcing is satisfactory.) Robert McClenon (talk) 00:39, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Robert McClenon, the talk page of that editor disclosed his COI since June 19 [1]. I accepted the draft and cleaned it myself with a reliable source addition to this state [2]. Then it was reverted for sock editing (?!) back to a promo version again which should have been declined of course. DMySon is at fault here in my opinion, because I made sure the article wasn't promotional at the time and that it met WP:GNG and that should trump any COI issues here because I was the last editor there. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 06:21, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

User:DMySon - If the account by User:Jovanmilic97 is correct, and it appears to be, you have been too aggressive in reverting another reviewer, and we as reviewers should be collaborative with each other to keep Wikipedia collaborative. Can we discuss how we as reviewers plan to deal with this draft? I have already told the paid editor to leave the series alone, and they will almost certainly continue pushing to get their article back into mainspace. We, the reviewers, should avoid any move-warring or other disruptive conduct. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:30, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Dear Robert McClenon, I am sorry if my edits on Wikipedia seems aggressive. After your involvement in Draft:State of Siege: 26/11, i didn't touch this page. I assure You that i will not interfere in this matter in future.DMySon 04:42, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Crash Bandicoot Nitro Kart 3D, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page N-Gage (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Help Needed!

Hello Jovan, I wanted to ask if you can review this article: Draft:Dejzi I have added more sources from publishers with very good reputation. Thank you--Arjanhalili (talk) 15:48, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tools Up! has been accepted

Tools Up!, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 10:45, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Dear Jovanmilic97

Hi @Jovanmilic97:. Thanks for declining my article for Beat City. Almost everything I've done for Wikepedia has either been removed or declined, and I appreciate you for adding to my waste of an account. I thought I was trying my best, but apparently not, because BeatBro is a pathetic prick and a waste of an account. By the way, fuck you, AngusWOOF, and any other piece of shit on Wikepedia that ignores my existance and thinks that I've done nothing but cause trouble. Good day sir. - BeatBro

BeatBro, please do not leave. Your existence is not ignored, do not worry. I think you just picked out a poor subject to work on, nothing else. I will try myself to find something regarding Beat City to help. Regards, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 21:05, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

270Soft

Hello,

You moved the 270soft page that I created to draft space. You mention that there aren't enough independent, reliable sources. How many do I need?

Vcczar (talk) 15:11, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

• Like WP:GNG says, multiple secondary sources, so at least two. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 15:33, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, you were right

Sword Girls is a video game first. But a physical card game of it exists too. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:12, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

My draft about Winds of Change

Regarding about my draft of the Winds of Change VN. I've already explained in the edit history, time and time again, that I couldn't find any review source for the PC game because they were rarely talked about because its an indie game and I've said this before that the only way to get more review source is to wait for the Switch release, which is appearently coming out this year according to the creator of the game. So may I ask is to wait for the game to be release on the Switch, unless you have a source the article of of where I can find the game because none of the major sites made a review of the game. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Howlingwolfjoey (talk • contribs) 05:46, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Are these two articles potentially viable?

Jupiter Lander and Killer Bees, there are at least three reviews noted for each game on the article. 2601:249:8B80:4050:CC2:43:4CC:EAB (talk) 22:38, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Not sure why was I notified of this, but I have restored Jupiter Lander as the article already demonstrated the notability, however Killer Bees just had one review actually cited, so you would need to find the links of the other reviews. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 06:25, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi, sorry if I confused you last week by contacting you out of the blue. I had seen you doing other things with games so I figured you would be knowledgeable. I started a more public thread on Killer Bees! and other games at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games#Are these two articles potentially viable? if you have any insight you would be interested in sharing. 2601:249:8B80:4050:EDA7:14E1:E7C0:5A51 (talk) 15:00, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

The Music Quiz copyedit

Copy edit notes for Buzz!: The Music Quiz (this is a bit of a mini-GA review):

• What would you think of including quiz among the game genres? It might also include satire or parody, as it cheesily mocks TV game shows. Keep in mind that genres should have a source and not be original research.
• If there's a source supporting it, can it say that it is based on the format of a TV quiz show? I feel that would be a quick way of explaining the format and the function of the host. Eurogamer (ref 3) says it "plays out just like a real TV game show." Cnet says "The game show motif is present at all levels of this game, with players being treated as if they're contestants on a real program".
• They feature a sizable red button on top and four colored buttons below, sorted in descending order. I'm not sure that I like 'descending order'. Descending by what? Alphabetical names of the colors, their place in the electromagnetic spectrum, etc? How about: They feature a sizable red button on top and four colored buttons below, corresponding to on-screen multiple-choice answers.
• Besides the main game, there are other two modes: Quickfire Quiz and Quizmaster Quiz. Quickfire Quiz bypasses the rounds system The article doesn't previously mention 'the rounds system' so it's difficult to tell what this means. I'd suggest rearranging the layout of the Gameplay section, to explain the basic format and depiction of the game (including the avatars), then the round system of the main game, and then the alternate game modes. I feel that would set better context for the reader's understanding, and would also work better for summary style, giving the broad strokes first then further details.
• Buzz Stop – Conceptually the as Snap but without specific questions. Not sure what this means; did not spot anything in the citation preceding the list.
• The game was announced on 18 May 2005 with a scheduled release date of October 2005 in Europe. After that, it was showcased around the same time at E3 2005 "After that ... around the same time" is a awkward. The E3 event of that year ran 18–20 May. Checking the source (ref 11) it indicates the announcement came on 17 May. Suggest: The game was showcased at E3 2005,(ref SpotE3, Calvert) after being announced at Sony Computer Entertainment Europe's pre-E3 conference on 17 May. It had a scheduled release date of October 2005 in Europe.(ref GamesIndustry)
• According to Amor. Amor wasn't mentioned elsewhere in the article (should maybe check if there's something to be expanded there), so I added his full name and position.
• The lead could be expanded a bit to better summarize the article's content.

I hope this is useful. Please {{ping}} me if you have any questions. – Reidgreg (talk) 21:00, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for all of this! Not only that you took time to analyze the article's content, but you also posted some useful advice notes here (which I will thoroughly follow when I have more time to do so)!! Considering Buzz! was the first article I worked on with an intention towards a GA, it could help me a lot to improve (clarity, writing etc.) Regards, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 07:26, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

You're welcome! I took my time with my first GA as well. Remember, there's no deadline. – Reidgreg (talk) 19:51, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Dmitry Borisovich Volkov

Hello. I ask for your help in correcting the advertising style of the article. I don't understand English very well and it's very difficult for me to understand what exactly needs to be corrected to get rid of this problem. I ask for your help as an experienced editor. Thank you very much! 2A00:1FA1:137:7985:F18B:4A4F:48B8:B821 (talk) 08:31, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Deleted Article: Draft:Igwe Oranu Chidume

A page (Biography of a Living Person) I created in Wikipedia was once deleted after it didn't meet necessary criteria. I've reviewed the article and made substantial changes in it, including addition of verifiable references. What will be the next step forward? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Talktodamian (talk • contribs) 13:32, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Avernum 6

Hello, Jovanmilic97. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Avernum 6".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:53, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Have a Happy Holidays!

CaptainGalaxy is wishing you a Merry Christmas (quite possibly a White Christmas).

Have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year

This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove.

Spread the Christmas spirit by adding {{subst:User:Matty.007/template/Christmas}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message. If everyone who got this put it on two talk pages, we would have... lots of Christmas spirit! Have fun finding links in this message!

— 15:54, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Draft:But That Was Yesterday

Hello, Jovanmilic97. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:But That Was Yesterday.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 09:42, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Jovanmilic97,
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! CaptainGalaxy 00:14, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

---

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

– Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

Tomás Pellicer Frutos

You accepted this article even though the author did not address the copyvio issues in the draft (you can see from the diff that s/he just added more text, rather than revising existing copyvio text). I don't have time to deal with this now, but it needs to be moved back to draft and the author informed what happened. Thanks, Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:22, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

I don't agree that it's a direct copyvio of that link you posted in the first decline. The only thing they both mentioned in a similar way is where was Pellicer born (which I don't find as an issue) and the wording in the article's lead, which I rewrote/cleaned a bit. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 10:25, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK for The Ur-Quan Masters

On 16 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Ur-Quan Masters, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that The Ur-Quan Masters, an open-source remake of the 1992 science-fiction game Star Control II, has been listed several times as one of the best free PC games ever? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Ur-Quan Masters. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Ur-Quan Masters), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

AfD comment

"and relying the notability on sources with questionable reliability like Heavy and Player.One " I don't understand what you originally mean. Darubrub (talk) 23:19, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Re: Last Escort

Hello! I understand your concerns with the stub I created today for Last Escort. I didn't have much time to work on it yet at that point, which is why it is only a bare bones stub. The Japanese wiki has a very long and sourced article about the series, and I intend to add the sources (from there and elsewhere) with more information as I have time. Could this be useful in reinstating the article after I've had the time? https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%83%A9%E3%82%B9%E3%83%88%E3%83%BB%E3%82%A8%E3%82%B9%E3%82%B3%E3%83%BC%E3%83%88 Thank you, Londonbeat41692 (talk) 18:11, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi! Of course it could be reinstated with sources added in, whenever that happens! That's why I moved it to draft, because the subject is potentially notable but the article in current state isn't ready for mainspace. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 18:19, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. It is not quite finished yet, but would you say it is looking better now? I have added several sources. Londonbeat41692 (talk) 06:41, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Absolutely, good job! I may help look for sources later when I have more free time. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 12:04, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, I appreciate it! I will try to add the rest of the info from Japanese wiki. Londonbeat41692 (talk) 13:48, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Do you think the article is okay to reinstate now? I am still looking for other sources/information I can add, but there is a lot on there now. I'm debating about adding the full list of characters from the Japanese article, but I'm not sure how much it adds unless the voice actors are well-known. Please let me know what you think! Londonbeat41692 (talk) 15:28, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	Thank you for reviewing my draft - even though it was rejected, you left a helpful and direct comment. Appreciate it. WikiVillager (talk) 23:02, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for being so kind! It's nice to see someone actually not being mad for a draft getting rejected. I will add that even if the draft was rejected, you might still work on it. Good luck! Jovanmilic97 (talk) 08:17, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Rayman mini Feedback thanks

Hi there. You recently edited, fixed and accepted a draft that I made. I really appreciate the help. I was building drafts to improve some skills, but not many people give good feedback or active help. Because Spanish is my mother language, I am writing here to improve a natural way to talk on English and get some speech skills. I will learn from your changes on the article to get better. Thanks for everything and have a wonderful day.--Javier Alejandro Herrera Carvajal (talk) 12:10, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

You are welcome! Jovanmilic97 (talk) 20:19, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Upit

Pozz, dal mozes odobriti ovaj Draft i provjeriti ako je sve u redu? - Ako ima nekih problema, javi pa popravim. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:V1T0 Captainjackcactus (talk) 20:15, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello Jovanmilic97:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 2700 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.

Volvo – The Game

Hello, just writing to let you know I restored Volvo – The Game with two additional sources. IGN and Wired are major publications, so this ought to be enough to establish notability? Thanks NemesisAT (talk) 18:28, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

NemesisAT From what I can see, IGN source is a reused press release by Volvo, meaning it's a WP:PRIMARY promotion [3] and does not count toward WP:GNG. Wired coverage is passable to use, but the rest seem to be unreliable (Motor Authority and a Wiki). I'll look into it deeper so that maybe I could find something else, but in my opinion it should stay merged somewhere. A possible good target could be Volvo Cars, where it could be covered nicely within Volvo Cars#Marketing section. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 19:20, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the suggestion, I've started a section under Marketing like you suggested. I didn't realise the IGN source was a press release, though I knew already that wikis are a no-go so that should have just been removed. I'll take another look later and maybe propose a merge? My worry is the info being deleted from the already lengthy Volvo Cars article. NemesisAT (talk) 19:36, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Comment on my talk page

Hi there. I saw you removed your comment because you felt I was "ignoring" you. Nothing could be further from the truth. You're a fine editor, and one who's work I respect (regardless of the fact that we don't always agree). I simply did not want to spend a moment or two and fire off a response, but wanted to look further into your question. I agree with your assessment, btw. I was thrown by the state of the article, which while well cited, didn't include many of the items included in the citations in the text of the article itself. That was my bad. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:35, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

I'm really sorry for removing my question! Thank you for doing a reply again, huge kudos for that. Yeah, the Anima article defintely needs a giant work to include all reviews in the reception section, gameplay expansion etc. No need to be sorry, I understand your rationale for doing so, and you are a great editor who handles a really hard part of Wikipedia that is not appreciated enough with New Page reviews. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 07:08, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Is There a God? (Swinburne book, 2010)

Dear Jovanmilic97,

Thanks for reviewing this piece so fast! I see your point about the problem of the two editions and their reviews in the literature, which i had to solve somewhat. You asked for the exact release date of a previous edition, which i mentioned only as "1996". In open public information i can't find the exact month or day of release in 1996, i would have to contact Oxford University Press to retrieve this piece of information: this action would count as my own original research, that is not allowed? (On a side note, it seems you removed a crucial reference to the use of natural theology, as explained by the author Swinburne in a video.)

• Why is the year of release of a superseded edition not enough? Is the exact day and month relevant?

Thank you, Hansmuller (talk) 08:39, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Hansmuller Hello! I didn't ask for an exact release date, but rather to have 1996 initial version be the main point of the draft (as that's when the book released for the first time), with the 2010 one as a side mention. I'd put both dates in the infobox, and slightly rework the text around it. I'll help you with this in a few minutes. And no, no need to contact Oxford Press for that, having a year alone is good enough and a review already verifies that. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 09:03, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Merry Christmas, Jovanmilic97! Or Season's Greetings or Happy Winter Solstice! As the year winds to a close, I would like to take a moment to recognize your hard work and offer heartfelt gratitude for all you do for Wikipedia. May this Holiday Season bring you nothing but joy, health and prosperity. Onel5969 TT me 00:53, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Joshua Dufek for deletion

I am notifying users who participated in the previous deletion discussion that a second deletion discussion is taking place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Dufek (2nd nomination). You are welcome to participate. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 15:47, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

William Buller

Hello. I wonder what you were able to find about William Buller (cricketer) before you decided to redirect? I am not a fan at all of such short articles, but his CricketArchive listing shows he went to Eton - and his Eton listing shows he was a fellow at Exeter College and a barrister at Lincoln's Inn. Before I spend ages digging, did you manage to follow this line at all? Thanks. Blue Square Thing (talk) 14:52, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Blue Square Thing Hello! I saw that (though I needed to go through the archive link, as it requires subscription otherwise). First I searched with Eton, and all I got were mentions of William Buller (bishop) instead. Going with Exeter brings a doctor William Buller Henderson instead, and Lincoln's Inn several people with surname Buller, including Arthur William Buller. A massive problem is that "William Buller" is quite tough to clear out for relevant search results in Archive.org, and adding Marylebone Cricket Club in my searches only offers nothing beyond directories, listings or passing mentions. This is one of the subjects that could be dug into some quite old/not easily obtainable newspapers bits, but the burden was on the article's creator to establish anything beyond what's here right now. Given that I was unable to add anything to it, WP:ATD to a proper list was the only thing I could come up with. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 16:41, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Thanks - that really helps knowing what's been looked at! I suspect that if we were to gain access to Exeter College's archives we'd probably be able to find enough, but that's really not going to happen and I have no problem with using the list - ultimately there are a scad load of stubs like this that probably need the same doing to them in many cases (there are half decent resources for Nottinghamshire and Kent players from this sort of era that I have access to btw should you run into any of them). The article creator was... - well, lets say we didn't agree on the value of stubs like this. Thanks again. Blue Square Thing (talk) 14:09, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Indy

Hello, Jovanmilic97. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Indy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

WP:AFC Helper News

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

• AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
• The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

GodisaGeek on Riftbreaker

Mick Fraser on GodisaGeek is listed as a "top critic" on opencritic.com, not sure why that was removed as unreliable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roscosthename (talk • contribs) 20:47, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Stop redirecting Christine Barger's page

Stop redirecting Christian Barger's page. She has performed in many more projects than just American Pie. Every one of her credits listed are legitimate and verifiable. What is your problem? 172.114.163.57 (talk) 14:59, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

You need to ensure that an article about Barger meets the relevant guidelines (WP:BIO/WP:GNG), and/or indicate which of her credits were significant roles. And please, WP:AGF, there is no problem here. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 16:21, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification

Thank you for the clarification and the links. I sent them to Christine Barger's rep. 172.114.163.57 (talk) 23:46, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Galaxy

Ho jovanmilic97, please review your draft galaxy 4k again. It has a complete resources and references. Lutiness (talk) 08:55, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi! Sorry, but so far it still needs more reliable sources coverage to make it work for WP:GNG. Not yet there. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 09:54, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Instant Jam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of programs broadcast by CBS, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Challenge.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Can you continue your review?

Hello, you made edits to Draft: Zach Herrin. I was hoping you could continue your review and approve the article? Mbmoulton (talk) 14:06, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Indy

Hello, Jovanmilic97. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Indy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:58, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Review my draft again

Hi @Jovanmilic97: I was submitted my draft for review but you rejected, I developed the draft and added new reliable sources, can you review it again?

• Aflantwo (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:MADELA (Video Game) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Please, review my draft again sir. VAStudiosIndia (talk) 11:24, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

'WATCH' is south Indian feature film. Theatrically released on 8th July 2022 VAStudiosIndia (talk) 17:32, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Live Wire

Hello, have you read this draft Draft:Live Wire (band)? There are 3 album published in the world by A&M, and there are 3 references about with all information: why submission is declined? Is not clear the reason.--Gigi Lamera (talk) 10:50, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Yes, I have, and the decline reasoning sums up it all. The main issue is that sources 2-3 aren't significant enough depth wise of the subject (2nd one even has an advertising tag on top of it). I'd suggest you to add more sources that cover the band if possible. There's also a WP:V issue with the Discography section, because every claim in the article needs to be sourced, which is not the case here. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 12:12, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

? I checked, but on source 2 and 3 there is no advertising tag on top (I speak about source 2, Trouser Press, and source 3, Radio Swiss). About discography, you can see this site: https://www.discogs.com/it/artist/375374-Live-Wire-3 I wonder because Live Wire is a very famous band.--Gigi Lamera (talk) 17:52, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

The tag I was talking about was on the bottom text of the source 2 ("See also: Advertising"). In the light of the Discogs, I'd advise you to resubmit the draft (A&M Records label releases will give the band notability per WP:NBAND Criteria 5, will work a bit on referencing), though I'm still not convinced there's multiple significant/non-trivial coverage beyond the 1st source. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 18:32, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

The Times of India

Regarding, Draft:Aaya Vada Sutta Kadhai. The un-reliable part probably has to do with false reporting regarding birthdates/press releases (anything but reviews). The reviews are considered reliable because they are by known film critics. Please see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film/Indian_cinema_task_force/Archive_5#Reliable_Sources_and_our_resources and Wikipedia:WikiProject_Film/Indian_cinema_task_force#Guidelines_on_sources (Times of India is reported). The Times of India is a company like New York Times and citing it as unreliable for film reviews does not make sense because in film reviews, there is no false information whereas in press releases there can be false information. DareshMohan (talk) 01:12, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

actually just see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film/Indian_cinema_task_force#The_Times_of_India_reviews. DareshMohan (talk) 02:29, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Fair enough, I have reverted my decline! Jovanmilic97 (talk) 08:14, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Help.

IN my article, you mentioned that I could merge the article with another, how do I do that? 45BearsFan (talk) 19:32, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi! You can just add/copy the appropriate text from the draft to the main article Fall Guys where needed (I'd list it under a Legacy section, to note how Fall Guys inspired it). Jovanmilic97 (talk) 22:34, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of BlackShot

Hello, Jovanmilic97,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Sideswipe9th and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, BlackShot, for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Sideswipe9th}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Sideswipe9th (talk) 23:09, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

November 2022

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to 2022 MotoGP World Championship has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. See also WP:LIVESCORES ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 13:25, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Fair enough, noted for the next time! Jovanmilic97 (talk) 13:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)