User talk:JoyWhick
I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]
Hello, JoyWhick
Thank you for creating Ganesh Chandra Mondal.
User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
link from the constituency page as well
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:43, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]
Hello, JoyWhick
Thank you for creating Jogaranjan Halder.
User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Please update the constituency article as well
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:09, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
Wooden Street moved to draftspace[edit]
An article you recently created, Wooden Street, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheChronium 10:47, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
July 2021[edit]
Hello JoyWhick. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Wooden Street, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:JoyWhick. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=JoyWhick|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. TheChronium 10:50, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
No, I was not paid to create any page on Wikipedia JoyWhick (talk) 14:44, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello MER-C sir,
I am a student and I live in a hostel. A few of my friends are also Wikipedia contributors, We all use the same broadband connection. "WikiCalcutta" is also one of my friend, he learned about the Wikipedia contribution from me. I have already created over 55 news pages and edited over 350 pages.I am continuously contributing here to improve the community as per Wikipedia policy. I kindly request you unblock our user accounts and allow us to contribute more on Wikipedia. JoyWhick (talk) 18:56, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
- Convenience link: WikiCalcutta, who is blocked for suspected UPE. MER-C 19:18, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
- I'm not buying this, and have blocked this account for sockpuppetry. MER-C 12:06, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Navi Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Hatchens (talk) 03:55, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Wooden Street for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wooden Street until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.