User talk:Jpseek

Jessica Jung

Hello, I just wanted to let you know that I’ve removed the citation you just added to Jessica Jung’s article regarding her Mix Nine appearance. This was done because per WP:KO/RS, Allkpop is not a reliable source and is not to be used within articles. At the linked page, you will find a list of reliable sources which can be used in articles, and unreliable sources which are not to be used in articles. Thanks, Alexanderlee (talk) 09:03, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip, this is my first time editing Kpop-related articles so I didn't know the unreliable source list exists, will keep that in mind next time. Jpseek (talk) 10:01, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hello Kitty Kruisers (February 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hello Kitty Kruisers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hello Kitty Kruisers, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

_{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 01:50, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Suggested topic area

Hi Jpseek,

Welcome! You are receiving this message because we noticed that you made your first edit related to our project WikiProject Video games. We are a group of editors working on improving articles in the scope of this project, and we need your help to meet the project goals. Please come over to our project page to take a look!

• You will see a list of articles that need most improvement.
• You will find a group of editors who share similar interest with you.
• You will find lots of useful resources related to the topic of Video games.
• Overall, this is a friendly place to discuss any issues related to Video games, ask questions, and collaborate on improving articles on Video games!

Feel free to contact me at my talk page if you have any questions. Hope you will have fun here, and let us know if you need any help! -Thibbs (talk) 17:22, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Think & Feel moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Think & Feel, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). The sources listed, at least through Google Translate, do not seem to indicate any company's involvement beyond the publisher (e.g. Square Enix or Bandai). On top of this I remain unsure if famitsu.com is a reliable source. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 17:28, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

> The sources listed, at least through Google Translate, do not seem to indicate any company's involvement beyond the publisher (e.g. Square Enix or Bandai).

I do not understand what do you mean by this. Also if famitsu.com is not a reliable source for you, I honestly don't know what to say. Famitsu and Dengeki has been the prime source for video games news in Japan for many years, so if you think they are not reliable source I am happy to delete all my articles because I refer to them a lot for the first announcement of the game and/or the publishing date.

I still believe that Think & Feel Inc deserves their own article because they are, after all, not a new studio and has the pedigree for developing the sequel to Final Fantasy XII. I just do my best to find sources for small studios in Japan like them but it seems like they are all too small/do not meet general notability guideline for you. Sorry for any inconvenience caused. Jpseek (talk) 10:47, May 2018 (UTC)

File:Crystar cover lowres.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:07, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Think & Feel

Hello, Jpseek. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Think & Feel".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:01, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)