User talk:Juanma281984

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Wagner (Professional Baseball Coach) (July 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by EggOfReason were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Wagner (Professional Baseball Coach) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:John Wagner (Professional Baseball Coach), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

–eggofreason^{(talk · contribs)} 22:36, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Juanma281984! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! –eggofreason(talk · contribs) 22:36, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Draft:John Wagner (Professional Baseball Coach) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:John Wagner (Professional Baseball Coach), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:John Wagner (Professional Baseball Coach)

Hello, Juanma281984. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "John Wagner".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 11:19, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Wagner (Professional Baseball Coach) (July 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clarityfiend was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Wagner (Professional Baseball Coach) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:John Wagner (Professional Baseball Coach), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Clarityfiend (talk) 21:54, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:John Wagner (Professional Baseball Coach)

Hello, Juanma281984. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "John Wagner".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:50, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

February 2022

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Luis Fernando Cifuentes. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. CUPIDICAE💕 21:05, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Luis Fernando Cifuentes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Luis Fernando Cifuentes, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luis Fernando Cifuentes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Notice of discretionary sanctions regarding blockchain and cryptocurrency topics

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose discretionary sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Drm310 🍁 (talk) 13:32, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Luis Fernando Cifuentes Monje

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Luis Fernando Cifuentes Monje requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Richard3120 (talk) 19:27, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Luis Fernando Cifuentes moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Luis Fernando Cifuentes, is not suitable as written to remain published. This is why it was deleted in mainspace. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. An independent edtitor will then review it. Since you have declared your conflict of interest (thank you), you should not be the one to move it. Do you have any questions? Happy to help. Star Mississippi 01:55, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Juanma281984! Your additions to Ying Zhang (Professor) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 23:41, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kishu Inu (cryptocurrency) (April 4)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by DGG were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: advertisement. do not resubmit

DGG ( talk ) 05:39, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Ying Zhang (academic) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ying Zhang (academic) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ying Zhang (academic) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

scope_creep^Talk 13:53, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Question

Do you have a connection to Ying Zhang (academic)? Are you being paid or hope to be paid for your work on this article? Thanks! Jacona (talk) 10:22, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello Jacona (talk). I do not have a connection to Ying Zhang (academic) nor did I receive payment for the creation of the article. Juanma281984 00:38, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Luis Fernando Cifuentes

Hello, Juanma281984. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Luis Fernando Cifuentes, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:04, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Kishu Inu (cryptocurrency)

Hello, Juanma281984. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kishu Inu (cryptocurrency), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:03, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Luis Fernando Cifuentes

Hello, Juanma281984. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Luis Fernando Cifuentes".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:03, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Kishu Inu (cryptocurrency)

Hello, Juanma281984. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kishu Inu".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:40, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Francisco Gomez Paz moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Francisco Gomez Paz, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:29, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello! I would like to know what the proofs are for determining that there is a conflict of interest in the creation of the article. I have not been paid to write the article under any circumstances.

On the other hand, it is mentioned that non-referenced information should be removed. I agree with this point, but what is the content of the article that is not referenced? There are 32 references for a short article and every single paragraph has references, mostly more than two or three references.

So I would like you to clarify from where it is deduced that I have been paid to write the article and on the other hand which sentences are not referenced and should be removed from the article. I look forward to a clear answer please. Thank you! Juanma281984 (talk) 06:11, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Francisco Gomez Paz (June 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Francisco Gomez Paz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 18:39, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

UPE

Hello Juanma281984. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Juanma281984. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Juanma281984|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. US-Verified (talk) 02:42, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello! I want to make it clear that I am not being compensated directly or indirectly for my edits on Wikipedia. Juanma281984 (talk) 04:39, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Ok thanks. I will share the evidence with admins who deal with WP:PAID. US-Verified (talk) 20:03, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Francisco Gomez Paz

Hello, Juanma281984. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Francisco Gomez Paz, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:06, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Francisco Gomez Paz

Hello, Juanma281984. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Francisco Gomez Paz".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:36, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

December 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Toulmin Kitchen & Bath. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. i have opened a discussion for tag removal. please do not remove the tag until then. if there is no discussion, or discussion comes to conensus on removal, it will be removed. RetroCosmos (talk) 08:48, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, as you did at Toulmin Kitchen & Bath. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

• Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
• State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
• Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

Bilby (talk) 09:07, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Hermosillo (construction company) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hermosillo (construction company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hermosillo (construction company) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Aronitz (talk) 12:28, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

UPE Block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Juanma281984 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello administrators! I wanted to confirm that I have read the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements very carefully. I am absolutely committed to following Wikipedia's rules and avoiding any actions that affect them. On the other hand, I wanted to state that I have made a few paid edits, but the contents published under these conditions have not affected the neutral point of view at any time. I encourage you to check my latest articles for any hint of bias or lack of neutrality. I am willing to disclose any compensation I receive in future edits or publications. I apologize for any actions that have affected Wikipedia's rules and I am open to providing any other information that may be required to unblock the account. I look forward to hearing from you. Thank you very much. Best regards! Juanma281984 (talk) 03:30, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Paid editing is a form of conflict of interest; please review that policy and tell us what will be different about your editing going forward. You'll need to disclose your existing paid editing relationships as well. 331dot (talk) 10:08, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Juanma281984 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello administrators! I wanted to confirm that I have carefully read the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements. I am absolutely committed to following Wikipedia's rules and avoiding any actions that would affect them. From now on, I will follow Wikipedia's policies and best practices strictly by acting as follows: * I will disclose my COI when involved with an affected article; * I will not edit affected articles directly; * I will propose changes on talk pages by using the edit COI template or by posting a note at the COI noticeboard; * I will not act as a reviewer of affected articles at AfC and * I will respect other editors by keeping discussions concise. I will then disclose the details of my paid relationships: :1) Employer: Freelancer.com, Client: Jonathan Sheffer. :2) Employer: Freelancer.com, Client: Patrick Hughes :3) Employer: Freelancer.com, Client: Jay Young (Toulmin Kitchen & Bath). I am open to providing any other information that may be required to unblock the account. I look forward to hearing from you. Thank you very much. Best regards!

Accept reason:

Hopefully optimistic per Bilby. @Juanma281984: Please remember to disclose per WP:PAID for each applicable article. Welcome back.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:50, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

• Juanma281984, to assume good faith, those are presumably three still active articles you were paid to create, but you need to list anything you were paid to edit - at least everything that still contains paid edits. And I think you will also need to clarify why you didn't continue to meet the requirements of the ToU and disclose paid jobs, instead choosing to falsely say that you were not paid when asked on multiple occasions, when you had agreed to disclose back in 2022? [1] - Bilby (talk) 06:10, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

• Hello Bilby! In addition to those three articles, I have also made paid edits to Charles DeLisi's article. I have not created it, but made some minor edits. But the template for undisclosed payments has already been placed there. Then I have worked on creating other articles, but they have already been removed.

Regarding your question, I have always wondered why Wikipedia in English establishes the presumption that any article made through a financial contribution is automatically affected in its neutral point of view. I try to reason this rule and it leads me to think that if an editor is hired by a client to create and publish an article on Wikipedia, the most logical thing is that the editor would try to comply with the principles of the platform so that the content remains in force given that he/she has received payment as remuneration. Therefore, in principle, it would not make sense for the editor to publish an article that is not neutral, that has clear indications of overt promotionalism, or that has little or no sources to verify the information provided in the text. I imagine that the editor will try to conform to Wikipedia's rules so that the article is not removed and can remain on the platform.

This is why I believe that an article created through a financial contribution should not necessarily be categorised as possible non-neutral or promotional content. Just as a paid editor can perfectly well write an article that is 100% neutral and correctly verifiable through independent and quality sources, another editor who has not received any compensation can write 100% subjective articles motivated by his or her ideological biases. So I think the issue here is not whether an editor receives compensation for writing an article, but rather that the key issue is to read the text of each article to understand whether the content has any overt bias or promotionality in its lines.

If you read the articles I created about Jonathan Sheffer and Patrick Hughes, both are 100% neutral and have several sources to prove the information contained therein. I think both people have enough notoriety to remain on Wikipedia, as Jonathan is a prominent composer and conductor who has composed the musical pieces for well-known Hollywood films. Patrick, on the other hand, is a producer who has been involved in the production of some well-known Hollywood films and has worked with some prominent personalities from the industry.

So by way of conclusion, I understand perfectly well that Wikipedia considers that a paid editor can influence the sense or the way in which an article is written. But what I don't understand is to consider that this is going to happen in all cases. I don't think one should inexorably link paid content with the violation of the neutral point of view rule. Because again, there must be many cases of editors who, conditioned by their beliefs, ideologies or ways of seeing or analysing things and not necessarily by being paid, write texts with clear signs of subjectivity. While there may be many other cases of paid editors who, having received financial compensation, try to conform to Wikipedia's rules in order to keep their content on the platform and thus fulfil the purpose of the work they have been commissioned to do. Again, what is essential is to read every line of the texts to see if there is neutrality or not, promotional or not, if there is a correct verification of the information through relevant sources or not. The evaluation of an article should not be conditioned or reduced exclusively to whether an editor was paid or not.

As a final thought, Wikipedia in Spanish explicitly allows paid edits and does not maintain this presumption of considering an article made by a paid editor as lacking neutrality. Therefore, while I am willing to strictly maintain the rules of the platform, I would like the administrators to be able to analyze the texts carefully and not label them as lacking neutrality beforehand when it is determined that the article was made by a paid editor. I look forward to hearing from you. Best regards! Juanma281984 (talk) 03:02, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Great Ghu! I'm not reading all that! @Bilby: Omitting the tl;dr wall of text, I'm inclined to unblock. What say ye? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:35, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

I'm not opposed to an unblock, but my problem is that I did read the wall of text. And if I am reading it correctly, the answer as to why Juanma281984 repeatedly falsely told editors that he was not being paid, and stopped disclosing after he agreed to disclose, is that he does not believe that there is anything wrong with his paid editing. Does, not did. Which is counter to the comments in the unblock request. Juanma281984, I want to be convinced that you understand that you must disclose, and that you should have disclosed and been honest in the past. Disclosure is not optional. If you understand that, instead of providing the completely mistaken justification for paid editing that you wrote above, then I'm ok with an unblock. - Bilby (talk) 13:19, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello Bilby! Yes, I fully understand that I must disclose when I receive compensation for writing and publishing an article on the platform. That's why I mentioned it first in the list of best practices and policies to comply with when I developed my rationale for getting the account unlocked.

With the long post I wrote I just tried to understand this presumption that exists between getting paid and an article being declared non-neutral. But it is absolutely clear to me that payment disclosure is not optional but mandatory and from now on I will act accordingly to comply with Wikipedia's rules, recognizing that I should have done so in the past. I look forward to your message. Best regards! Juanma281984 (talk) 14:30, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

@Deepfriedokra:, I'm ok if you want to try an unblock. I hope it will stick. Juanma281984, just noting that you seem to be under the impression that the same rules do not apply on the Spanish Wikipedia. They do. While we have no authority there, you will need to disclose at both locations. Good luck, and I hope that it works out. - Bilby (talk) 11:58, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Will circle back. If anyone gets in ahead of me, that's OK. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:23, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello Bilby and Deepfriedokra! Thank you very much for allowing me to edit content on the platform again. Of course, payments should also be disclosed in the Spanish Wikipedia. I wanted to ask you about the articles about Jonathan Sheffer and Patrick Hughes. It is clear that I can no longer work on those articles because of the existing COI. But I would like to know what will happen with them because I think both people are relevant to be in Wikipedia. I look forward to hearing from you. Thank you very much. Best regards! Juanma281984 (talk) 01:02, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Declaring a COI does not prevent you from working on the articles, especially while in draft, although for live articles it is strongly prefered that you request changes rather than make them yourself. See WP:PAID for the details, along with WP:COI. - Bilby (talk) 06:49, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello Bilby! Perfect, thank you very much for the clarification. So, once the COI has already been declared, could I move the articles from the draft space to the main space to request changes as needed to keep the articles 100% neutral and templates can be removed? I look forward to your message. Best regards! Juanma281984 (talk) 15:53, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello Bilby and Deepfriedokra! I wanted to ask you if, having already declared the COI, I can move the articles from the draft space to the main space in order to request the necessary changes to make the articles 100% neutral and the templates can be removed. I look forward to hearing from you. Thank you very much! Juanma281984 (talk) 19:23, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Patrick Hughes (film producer) (April 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Patrick Hughes (film producer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Toadette^Edit! 10:28, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jonathan Sheffer (April 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jonathan Sheffer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Toadette^Edit! 10:32, 28 April 2024 (UTC)