User talk:Jydppatel

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Jydppatel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Happy Squirrel (talk) 22:06, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please claim your upload(s): File:Shri Rang Avadhoot Maharaj.jpg[edit]

Hi, Thank you, for uploading this file.

However, as part of ongoing efforts to ensure all media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed it would be appreciated if you were able to confirm some details,

If it's your own work, please include {{own}}, amend the {{information}} added by a third party, and change the license to an appropriate "self" variant. You can also add |claimed=yes to the {{media by uploader}} or {{presumed_self}} tag if it is present to indicate that you've acknowledged the image, and license shown (and updated the {{information}} where appropriate).

If it's not your own work please provide as much sourcing/authorship information as you are able to.

This will assist those reviewing the many many "free" images on commons that have not yet been transferred to Commons.

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:17, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this isn't your own painting please read WP:COPYREQ Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:17, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shri Rang Avadhoot[edit]

Hello Jydppatel,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Shri Rang Avadhoot for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Killer Moff (talk) 11:08, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Killer Moff (talk) 11:51, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recreation of Shri Rang Avadhoot has been deleted again, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. You just copied material directly from the same source again, which as you have already been told is a copyright violation - you will be blocked from editing if you do that again. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:02, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have also protected the article so that you cannot create it again - I will consider removing the protection if you read WP:COPYRIGHT and convince me that you understand Wikipedia's copyright policy and will not offend again. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:06, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:14, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Shri Rang Avadhoot Maharaj.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Shri Rang Avadhoot Maharaj.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:23, 10 August 2016 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Jydppatel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16314 was submitted on Aug 11, 2016 06:34:34. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 06:34, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unblock|reason=I have not enough knowledge for using wikipedia with editing and creation of pages. I will not use copy content in future and always use my own content for wikipedia pages. Jaydeep Patel (talk) 06:45, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You promised that *twice* on my talk page at User talk:Boing! said Zebedee#Page Recreation, but both times went on to copy exactly the same source again. Why should we believe you this time? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:17, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please Believe Me. I will give you a guarantee work by my side in future editing and creation of wikipedia pages. I will sure use my own created content and images for wikipedia. Jaydeep Patel (talk) 09:26, 11 August 2016 (UTC).[reply]

There's no need to put every reply in a new unblock request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:09, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jydppatel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I haven't any other way to request you for unblock me. Now, Tell me, What can I do for this problem? Suggest me for a stat way for good and quality work in wikipedia editing and creations. I hope you will solve my problem as soon as possible with mankind. Jaydeep Patel (talk) 11:16, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

One unblock request at a time, please. Anyway, as noted above, you've previously made that promise before, and then immediately violated it. I can't tell if you are doing so deliberately or not, but competence is required and you aren't showing that. Copyright violations put the entire project at risk, so it would be totally inappropriate to unblock you. Yamla (talk) 11:27, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Orphaned non-free image File:Rang Maharaj Nareshwar.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rang Maharaj Nareshwar.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Begoon ^talk 14:25, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jydppatel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello All, Who block my account. Please help me out of this block. I know you have more knowledge and you are administrator of wikipedia. But everyone had a good day! and it will not with always. In short, This is not good to help someone. I request you please remove my blockJaydeep Patel (talk) 12:17, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You do not have the necessary competence required to edit this Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:30, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jydppatel, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

NgYShung ^huh? 08:18, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Jydppatel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16419 was submitted on Aug 26, 2016 07:48:23. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 07:48, 26 August 2016 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Jydppatel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16514 was submitted on Sep 16, 2016 11:54:54. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 11:54, 16 September 2016 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Jydppatel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #18080 was submitted on Apr 20, 2017 06:14:52. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 06:14, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]