User talk:KNivedat

Welcome![edit]

Hello, KNivedat, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Kate McCabe. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Jc86035 (talk • contributions) Use {{ping|Jc86035}} to reply to me 07:24, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

Hi KNivedat! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 07:30, Sunday, March 22, 2015 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Speedy deletion nomination of Calculus One[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Calculus One requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jbh ^Talk 12:24, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been significantly edited to add more info, and sources.

Resolved

KNivedat (talk) 09:41, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Russell Blake (author)[edit]

The article Russell Blake (author) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 17:05, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Book articles[edit]

First off, let me give you a huge and I mean HUGE THANK YOU for helping out with the requested articles. I've been tackling the book requests for a while now and there aren't many others who do this, so I can't tell you how awesome it is that you're helping out. I do see that you're actively enrolled in school, so I hope that you get the time to come back and edit soon.

Anywho, I wanted to give you a few pointers here and there about editing.

One of the biggest recommendations I can give is that it's a good idea to start writing articles in your userspace rather than in the mainspace. By this I mean that you'd start creating articles in your sandbox (which is yours alone and will not automatically empty itself) or in your userspace at places like User:KNivedat/The Disappearing Spoon. The problem about starting articles in the mainspace is that you have to source them right away since they can and frequently will be subject to deletion, as you can see from the other messages in the page. Creating the pages in your userspace will give you more time to flesh them out before you move them to the mainspace, which is extremely handy when you don't have a lot of time to really start working on an article. It's what I tend to do when I'm creating new articles and I've found it extremely helpful since I can move them to the mainspace when I'm done.

The second thing is sourcing. I noticed that at The Disappearing Spoon you used Amazon as a source. This was probably meant as a temporary measure since you likely planned on pulling basic information from the site (something I do on occasion), but the problem is that merchant sites cannot be placed on articles as a source. The reason for this is that putting a merchant link on a page can come across as an endorsement of either the site or the product, which can make people question the page's neutrality. I know that this is intentional, but we've had people question this in the past with various different sites so it's something to be careful about. I do like that you tried to put sources on the page before leaving the article, though- that's a good move. However it's better to leave things like reviews in newspapers and the like since those can be seen as a reliable source and won't make people question the page's notability.

The other thing about creating pages, and why it's important to create them in the userspace first, is that leaving an unfinished page brings up questions of notability. I'd briefly mentioned this above, but I wanted to go into a little more explanation about this. When a new page is created it will show up on a new page log, which is monitored by various different people. If they notice that a page is unfinished or looks to have issues with notability, they will nominate the page for deletion and/or try to improve the page. Not everyone will automatically try to improve the page, especially if the topic is one where it's difficult to find sources. You have to assume that you will be the only person to edit and improve the page, so when you leave a page in the mainspace you need to make sure that the sourcing is strong enough to survive deletion via WP:AfD, WP:SPEEDY, or WP:PROD. Creating an unfinished stub runs the risk of creating a lot of work for others, which can look bad if you're creating a lot of stub articles and don't return to improve all of them. I know that this sounds petty and ideally everyone would be willing to pitch in and finish the article before nominating it for deletion, but this isn't always the case. Luckily you've had a lot of editors step in and help out, so this hasn't been an issue so far but I do need to warn you about this since I've seen several articles go up for deletion despite there being plentiful reliable sources on the Internet. It's frustrating and I wish it wasn't like this, but it's something to be careful about.

Hopefully none of this scares you off and again, I'm really, really glad to see that you've been trying to tackle some of the articles on the various request pages. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:15, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tokyogirl79! Sorry for the late response. I did come onto Wikipedia in the middle a few times - but for some reason this message slipped through my net... Sorry about that! Thanks for the tip on creating articles in namespace - I'll try doing that from now. The only reason I add empty articles and THEN add content is because I'm using the VisualEditor by Wikipedia - editing the source is really, really confusing, and using the Visual Editor makes life easier, overall. However, you cannot START writing an article in VisualEditor, so I generally (used) to create empty articles and THEN edit them... I didn't know that was a wrong thing to do... Now that I think of it, the rule does seem reasonable... I just wish that we could even use Visual editors in talk pages! I mean I had to click on "edit source" to type this message to you... I'm not really sure how to mention someone else in a conversation - I hope I did it right.... A simple "reply" button would make stuff easier... Anyways, I'm not complaining...

Thanks for your kind words!!! (BTW, I won't be writing in books for the next few days - many famous places near me have no Wikipedia pages.. I plan on creating those first, and develop existing ones) KNivedat (talk) 13:34, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yikes, you have my admiration for tackling articles with VisualEditor. I usually end up doing it the old fashioned way because that's what I'm used to. In any case, there are a lot of areas that need articles - I know that this is the case with a lot of places near me as well! Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:17, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello KNivedat, and thanks for using VisualEditor :) I'm interested in finding out what you mean by "you cannot START writing an article in VisualEditor". Last time I checked, you could do that indeed, although it may be not immediate. Can you tell me what's your current way to start an article? Where do you go, what do you click/type, etc.? Thank you :) --Elitre (WMF) (talk) 15:24, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Elitre (WMF)! I generally search for the article in the wiki-search box on the top left to see if an article already exists, and if I find one, I usually create the article from that page itself - there's usually a warning or something - "you may create the page <<hyperlinked text>> but check to see if it exists first". I click on that hyperlinked text(which is red in color) to go to the wikitext editor.... I usually write one line or so, and the click create page, and then really start editing the article with the VisualEditor... KNivedat (talk) 15:34, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey KNivedat, I had kind of imagined that was the case :) So, the bad news is, I need you to make an additional click when you start creating your articles. But hey, the good news is, you can create articles with VE! After you click on that red link, check the tabs at the top of the page, and click on "Create". Then you'll be immediately able to create that article with VE. Try it, and let me know how that goes? Best, --Elitre (WMF) (talk) 16:31, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tip @Elitre)! KNivedat (talk) 14:27, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (The Disappearing Spoon) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating The Disappearing Spoon, KNivedat!

Wikipedia editor Sulfurboy just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

.

To reply, leave a comment on Sulfurboy's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Speedy deletion nomination of GIET[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on GIET requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. KDS4444^Talk 16:39, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

Sorry about this - my bad. I created the article and then filled it... My mistake... I'll be creating new pages first in namespace, and then copy the source to the actual page... Really sorry about this... I've contested the decision, and removed the speedy deletion tag from the page. KNivedat (talk) 13:38, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Bridge County[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bridge County you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cwmhiraeth -- Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:02, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Disrupted: My Misadventure in the Start Up Bubble[edit]

The article Disrupted: My Misadventure in the Start Up Bubble has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

notability, new release

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gnan garra 04:52, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bridge County Rajahmundry - Integrated Township Official Logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bridge County Rajahmundry - Integrated Township Official Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:24, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Silktide British Software Company Logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Silktide British Software Company Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:05, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Udaan (company)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Udaan (company), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:19, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Amod Malviya[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Amod Malviya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:54, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stop Faking It![edit]

The article Stop Faking It! has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable, fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:59, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

BITSoM moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, BITSoM, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 20:03, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CRED Club moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, CRED Club, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Chirota (talk) 21:39, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This article had 11 citations for the three lines of text it had. Every single piece of information in that could be corroborated by two sources each. There are tons of other pages which have similar number of references, which haven't been deleted, eg. Avito.ru KNivedat (talk) 05:02, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I added a bunch of references and added to the article a bit. Is it okay to move this to article space now? KNivedat (talk) 08:15, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, KNivedat. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page CRED, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Chirota (talk) 21:44, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chiro725, I see that you've removed pages for both PharmEasy and CRED. Firstly, I am not employed by any of these companies, nor do I have a monetary relationship with either of them. These companies (very recently) became unicorns and received a lot of coverage in the Indian press. I was surprised to see that Wikipedia didn't really have that many articles on companies and people in the Indian startup space (which is why I also created articles on Udaan, Amod Malviya yesterday). I was thinking of adding more to these articles, and perhaps even adding a couple more pages for other companies, but I'm not sure if I should, after these string of deletions.

If you read the Wikipedia article for CRED (Company) that you moved to draftspace, you will note that the very third line in that talks about how their business model has been criticised along with two citations to news articles that talk exclusively about this (the fact that Economic Times and Hindustan Times, both major newspapers in India "wasted" their time on writing articles on their business model indicates some level of notability atleast). I am not really sure why this has been moved to draftspace - this article meets notability and verifiability requirements (11 citations from 11 different websites) and it is written as neutrally as possible (includes negative coverage of the company). The only valid criticism of this is that it is a stub (definitely agreed), but there are 1000s of stubs in Wikipedia Article space which exist without getting deleted. Would be nice if you could help me with what I should do to prevent people from thinking this is a conflict of interest, because it really is not. Thanks, KNivedat (talk) 04:59, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PharmEasy moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, PharmEasy, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Chirota (talk) 21:45, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Amod Malviya for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amod Malviya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amod Malviya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:21, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of CRED Club[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on CRED Club, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Chirota (talk) 16:57, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sree Vidyanikethan International School, Tirupati for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sree Vidyanikethan International School, Tirupati is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sree Vidyanikethan International School, Tirupati until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 12:35, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BITSOM (BITS School of Management) Logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BITSOM (BITS School of Management) Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Udaan (company) Logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Udaan (company) Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Andrea Massa (electrical engineer) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrea Massa (electrical engineer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrea Massa (electrical engineer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sonofstar (talk) 14:47, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Godavari Institute of Engineering and Technology for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Godavari Institute of Engineering and Technology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Godavari Institute of Engineering and Technology until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sonofstar (talk) 15:24, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Stop Faking It! Finally Understanding Science So You Can Teach It - book series Logo by the NSTA press.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Stop Faking It! Finally Understanding Science So You Can Teach It - book series Logo by the NSTA press.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Conference On Learning Theory[edit]

The article Conference On Learning Theory has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, lacking secondary sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:35, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sree Vidyanikethan International School LOGO.gif[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sree Vidyanikethan International School LOGO.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:28, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Godavari Institute of Engineering and Technology, Rajahmundry - College Logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Godavari Institute of Engineering and Technology, Rajahmundry - College Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:BITSoM[edit]

Hello, KNivedat. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:BITSoM, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of PharmEasy[edit]

The article PharmEasy has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Behind the moors (talk) 15:04, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PharmEasy moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, PharmEasy, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. bonadea contributions talk 15:25, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PharmEasy moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, PharmEasy, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hatchens (talk) 11:21, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

=== Draft talk:PharmEasy ==-

There is some commentary on the draft you created. It has been returned to Draft: space and I hope the commentary on that return to Draft will be useful to you Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 12:27, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

PharmEasy moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, PharmEasy, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CUPIDICAE💕 17:40, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of PharmEasy for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PharmEasy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PharmEasy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alphaonekannan (talk) 05:56, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"James Allan (computer scientist)/" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect James Allan (computer scientist)/ to the article James Allan (computer scientist) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 9 § Redirects ending with extraneous slashes until a consensus is reached. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 02:51, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Luis Ceze[edit]

Hello, KNivedat,

Thank you for creating Luis Ceze.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

He does not qualify, please read WP:NPROF carefully. None of his awards are senior enough.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Ldm1954 (talk) 03:09, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey - Luis Ceze clearly meets notability guidelines because: 1. WP:NPROF criteria 3: "person has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g., Fellow of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers". Within computer science and computer engineering, ACM and IEEE are the major scholarly associations and both are roughly equally "prestigious". If IEEE Fellows meet WP:NPROF, ACM Fellows should too because both are extremely selective. 2. Less than 1% of ACM members become Fellows. WP:NPROF also provides an "average professor test" and receiving a major award like this is something 90%+ of full professors will never achieve in their career. science (and computer engineering), ACM and IEEE are pretty much the only scholarly assoguidelines, and ACM is comparable to IEEE in size, impact and recognizability Additionally, less than 1% of ACM members become Fellows, which is

less than 1% of ACM members become ACM Felmeaning that any ACM Fellow would definitely pass the "average professor test" since most professors will never receive ACM Fellowship in their lifetime. I have been trying to go through the list of all ACM Fellows page on Wikipedia, creating pages for every professor on that list, and all of the ot- the " KNivedat (talk) 05:06, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Luis Ceze moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Luis Ceze. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it does not meet academic notability criteria.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ldm1954 (talk) 03:10, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luis Ceze has been accepted[edit]

Luis Ceze, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Chetsford (talk) 02:53, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2022 Fellows of the Association for Computing Machinery[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:2022 Fellows of the Association for Computing Machinery indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:15, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Liz - all of these categories are no longer empty. I created them, but got swamped with something else, so took a while to start populating them. Also, I opened a Bot request at wikipedia:Bot_requests to automate the process. KNivedat (talk) 19:20, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2021 Fellows of the Association for Computing Machinery[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:2021 Fellows of the Association for Computing Machinery indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:15, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2017 Fellows of the Association for Computing Machinery[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:2017 Fellows of the Association for Computing Machinery indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:15, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]