User talk:Kalunk

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Kalunk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Nathan George Evans. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! 🎼Yexstorm2001🎼 (talk) 00:57, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:TRS-80 Level II BASIC[edit]

Hello, Kalunk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "TRS-80 Level II BASIC".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. SITH (talk) 12:24, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019[edit]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Juglans cinerea does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → check Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Zefr (talk) 21:02, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Climate information on Lancaster, Pennsylvania[edit]

Thank you for your recent additions about climate to Lancaster, Pennsylvania. Can you add citations that verify the information you added? -- DanielKlotz (talk · contribs) 11:27, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Begoon. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Deciduous, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Begoon 00:56, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit last year added some lurid details of the crash, but you didn't provide a source and I can't verify it; it's not in the NTSB report. Frankly, this sounds more like creative writing than an aircrash investigator - please don't add such unverifiable content again to any article. Fences&Windows 00:46, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Kalunk adding unsourced content. Thank you.--Fences&Windows 15:08, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 01:25, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]