User talk:Keith D/Archive 62
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 55 | ← | Archive 60 | Archive 61 | Archive 62 | Archive 63 | Archive 64 | Archive 65 |
Edits at Alfred Hitchcock
Thanks for your edits on Hitchcock. The article has been somewhat languishing for over 2 months at my GAN nomination for it, and the nomination category as a whole has had no activity for this time period at all. I think the length of the biography for him is slowing down finding a reviewer. Since the article looks fairly good, it occurred to me that nominating it at FAC might get things into motion since they are more amenable to longer articles. The instruction at FAC, however, recommend that editors without a peer review under their belt like me should try doing a joint nomination. If you might have any interest in this article, then with your 5 peer reviewed articles maybe you could team with me for a joint FA nom for Sir Alfred? ManKnowsInfinity (talk) 14:41, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- I mostly do small improvements to articles, rather than major changes, but if you feel that you can cover off any major comments by the reviewers then I am happy to help with the nomination. Though I will be without internet access from tomorrow until 12 November as no BT connection in Hull. Keith D (talk) 19:33, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Sounds good. If its my taking up the larger edits on the article and your taking up the shorter edits then I think it should go well. My own thinking was to start the assessment for this about 2 weeks from now on Nov 14 or Nov 15, whichever sounds better for you. In the meantime, I usually believe in double-checking things and if you have time to double check the photos and images, then I'll give the main body of the article another read through from top to bottom. Let me know if the Nov 14 or Nov 15 dates sound reasonable to start things moving on the assessment. ManKnowsInfinity (talk) 20:24, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- I would go for 15 Nov to give another day to catch-up on watchlist though the new limit on the entries means you miss lots of changes.
- Let's go with the 15th of November. ManKnowsInfinity (talk) 15:00, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- A quick look at the images and File:Number 13.jpg has no author information which may be a problem for the nit-pickers.
- I'll examine this image today further. If the history and description is not good I might try to see what the article looks like after its deleted. This is the image here: [1]. Since the image is before 1947, then it should be public domain in UK with or without the author stated as source. Your call if you would like to retain it. ManKnowsInfinity (talk) 15:00, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- I would suggest converting the rest of the short references to use harv-linkage as one of the references uses that format already. Keith D (talk) 20:55, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- If I recall, all of the references were formatted. Do you mean converting all of them even if formatted? Otherwise, those were nice edits by you on the article over night and on the references you looked at. Later today, I'll try to do a second go-through on the citation again. ManKnowsInfinity (talk) 15:00, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- No I was suggesting converting the plain entries like "Leitch, 2002, p. 115" to the linked versions as per "Truffaut 1984, p. 153" for consistency. Keith D (talk) 23:59, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Found it. That should be all the Leitch references in Harvard now. I noticed over the week-end that someone has added another image to the N by NW section which might mean some image bunching there if you could take a look. Otherwise, its November 15th and if you think the article is ready to green light for the joint nomination process then possibly you could start it tonight. ManKnowsInfinity (talk) 16:31, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- No I was suggesting converting the plain entries like "Leitch, 2002, p. 115" to the linked versions as per "Truffaut 1984, p. 153" for consistency. Keith D (talk) 23:59, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- If I recall, all of the references were formatted. Do you mean converting all of them even if formatted? Otherwise, those were nice edits by you on the article over night and on the references you looked at. Later today, I'll try to do a second go-through on the citation again. ManKnowsInfinity (talk) 15:00, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- I would go for 15 Nov to give another day to catch-up on watchlist though the new limit on the entries means you miss lots of changes.
- Sounds good. If its my taking up the larger edits on the article and your taking up the shorter edits then I think it should go well. My own thinking was to start the assessment for this about 2 weeks from now on Nov 14 or Nov 15, whichever sounds better for you. In the meantime, I usually believe in double-checking things and if you have time to double check the photos and images, then I'll give the main body of the article another read through from top to bottom. Let me know if the Nov 14 or Nov 15 dates sound reasonable to start things moving on the assessment. ManKnowsInfinity (talk) 20:24, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
I have spotted a funny on the Spoto reference, ref 31 & 34, these uses a date range while the entry in the "Further reading" section has a specific date. Would be worth checking out, if you have access, to see if it should be just a specific date and if the page numbers are for 1992 edition. Keith D (talk) 17:16, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- FA nomination seems to be on hold until the current reviewer finishes. I plan to be away from my computer for a long week-end likely until Monday and was wondering if you could keep an eye on the Hitchcock GA review until then. No 'main review' from that reviewer yet but who knows when it will be ready. Cheers. ManKnowsInfinity (talk) 15:17, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- OK, I should be around for the weekend and I will keep an eye out to see if they respond to anything. I expect further comments on the referencing as that was their main problem reported that we have not really covered off. I think we have done the flow and dealt with the tags from their initial comments OK. Keith D (talk) 17:20, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- No update on the review page and I have left an inquiry about the hold there. After checking the instructions for peer review, there is no apparent restriction that a GA must go before an FA nomination, and if its preferable then the article could go straight for FA review. Previously I mentioned choosing a mentor at random from the Adopter list, such as this editor here [2] if you might ask him to see if he is agreeable. Possibly there is a real world obligation that the current GA review editor is dealing with which has put things on a hold for over 10 days. ManKnowsInfinity (talk) 15:51, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Hi, nice to know you are back after break, may be an idea to remind the reviewer on their talk page as they appear to have forgotten the review, yet have been editing today. Keith D (talk) 16:46, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- An experienced FA editor has listed some review comments for Hitchcock on my Talk page which you might be able to help with. Indy looks he might take up the FA mentor for the article if his preparatory edits are addressed. What do you think? ManKnowsInfinity (talk) 15:27, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
- May be we could ask them if they are willing to act as a mentor, though they are not on the list. Would be a good idea to clear-up their comments before nominating or we may get swamped with comments from different editors. Keith D (talk) 18:28, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
- Useful edit by you to list it on FAC Talk for the mentor. It appears unanimous that the editors there would like to see it go to a peer review page. Does one of those editors start that page, or is it up to you, or should we wait another day? I am leaving for the day and will check on things in the morning. ManKnowsInfinity (talk) 20:41, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
- Probably should be one of us rather than someone else. I have not had much success at peer reviews in the past as failed to get many comments. Though it is getting near to Christmas for me, will be without internet connection from Thursday until my return in the New Year. Keith D (talk) 20:49, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for the update regarding your holiday plans. It occurs to me that another option in this case might be to invite Indy as a joint nominator since a successful attempt here would put him over the 5-article requirement for mentor status (he is currently at 4) while effectively providing all the "mentor" benefits of his 4 successful FA nominations. Otherwise, the peer review page might be the only option left prior to your holiday schedule start which you mention as starting this Thursday. Either option sounds fine and it would be nice to start things moving forward prior to your Thursday start of holiday schedule. ManKnowsInfinity (talk) 16:09, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
- I was thinking of starting a peer review, but with the break I was wondering if you could handle this in my absence especially if there is a lot of interest as appears to be generated by the mentor request. I will set-up if you are happy with this. Keith D (talk) 17:21, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
- That should work, and you can do the set-up and start it whenever you are ready. I should be around to check up on it during the holiday week until your return. Holiday wishes in the meantime. ManKnowsInfinity (talk) 17:48, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
- OK I have initiated the peer review, sit back and see what responses we get. Probably best to start a new thread here as getting rather indented. Keith D (talk) 18:49, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
- That should work, and you can do the set-up and start it whenever you are ready. I should be around to check up on it during the holiday week until your return. Holiday wishes in the meantime. ManKnowsInfinity (talk) 17:48, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
- I was thinking of starting a peer review, but with the break I was wondering if you could handle this in my absence especially if there is a lot of interest as appears to be generated by the mentor request. I will set-up if you are happy with this. Keith D (talk) 17:21, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for the update regarding your holiday plans. It occurs to me that another option in this case might be to invite Indy as a joint nominator since a successful attempt here would put him over the 5-article requirement for mentor status (he is currently at 4) while effectively providing all the "mentor" benefits of his 4 successful FA nominations. Otherwise, the peer review page might be the only option left prior to your holiday schedule start which you mention as starting this Thursday. Either option sounds fine and it would be nice to start things moving forward prior to your Thursday start of holiday schedule. ManKnowsInfinity (talk) 16:09, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
- Probably should be one of us rather than someone else. I have not had much success at peer reviews in the past as failed to get many comments. Though it is getting near to Christmas for me, will be without internet connection from Thursday until my return in the New Year. Keith D (talk) 20:49, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
- Useful edit by you to list it on FAC Talk for the mentor. It appears unanimous that the editors there would like to see it go to a peer review page. Does one of those editors start that page, or is it up to you, or should we wait another day? I am leaving for the day and will check on things in the morning. ManKnowsInfinity (talk) 20:41, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
- May be we could ask them if they are willing to act as a mentor, though they are not on the list. Would be a good idea to clear-up their comments before nominating or we may get swamped with comments from different editors. Keith D (talk) 18:28, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
- An experienced FA editor has listed some review comments for Hitchcock on my Talk page which you might be able to help with. Indy looks he might take up the FA mentor for the article if his preparatory edits are addressed. What do you think? ManKnowsInfinity (talk) 15:27, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
- Hi, nice to know you are back after break, may be an idea to remind the reviewer on their talk page as they appear to have forgotten the review, yet have been editing today. Keith D (talk) 16:46, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- No update on the review page and I have left an inquiry about the hold there. After checking the instructions for peer review, there is no apparent restriction that a GA must go before an FA nomination, and if its preferable then the article could go straight for FA review. Previously I mentioned choosing a mentor at random from the Adopter list, such as this editor here [2] if you might ask him to see if he is agreeable. Possibly there is a real world obligation that the current GA review editor is dealing with which has put things on a hold for over 10 days. ManKnowsInfinity (talk) 15:51, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- OK, I should be around for the weekend and I will keep an eye out to see if they respond to anything. I expect further comments on the referencing as that was their main problem reported that we have not really covered off. I think we have done the flow and dealt with the tags from their initial comments OK. Keith D (talk) 17:20, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – November 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2017).
Administrator changes
Longhair • Megalibrarygirl • TonyBallioni • Vanamonde93
Allen3 • Eluchil404 • Arthur Rubin • Bencherlite
Technical news
- The Wikimedia Foundation's Anti-Harassment Tools team is creating an "Interaction Timeline" tool that intends to assist administrators in resolving user conduct disputes. Feedback on the concept may be posted on the talk page.
- A new function is now available to edit filter managers that will make it easier to look for multiple strings containing spoofed text.
Arbitration
- Eligible editors will be invited to submit candidate statements for the 2017 Arbitration Committee Elections starting on November 12 until November 21. Voting will begin on November 27 and last until December 10.
- Following a request for comment, Ritchie333, Yunshui and Ymblanter will serve as the Electoral Commission for the 2017 ArbCom Elections.
Obituaries
- The Wikipedia community has recently learned that Allen3 (William Allen Peckham) passed away on December 30, 2016, the same day as JohnCD. Allen began editing in 2005 and became an administrator that same year.
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- You will no longer see the patrol log on Special:Log unless you specifically select it. [3]
Changes later this week
- The 2017 Community Wishlist Survey begins on 6 November. You can post proposals from 19:00 UTC and until November 19.
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 7 November. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 8 November. It will be on all wikis from 9 November (calendar).
Meetings
You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 8 November at 16:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- URLs that link to sections on Wikimedia wikis with non-Latin scripts have looked like this:
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Википедия#.D0.98.D1.81.D1.82.D0.BE.D1.80.D0.B8.D1.8Finstead ofhttps://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Википедия#История. This will soon be fixed. Old links will still work. [4][5]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
18:45, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
I was puzzled by your comment re FindMyPast, but 1946 is indeed the correct birth year not 1947.
See here
https://www.liveauctioneers.com/item/57073641_mitch-mitchell-hendrix-era-passport
A passport which was auctioned just this moth, also confirms the correct birth year. That, along with the birth record and the employment form makes it quite clear! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.97.205.123 (talk) 18:30, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- I was just trying to point out that the birth was registered in 1946 and not 1947. Keith D (talk) 23:54, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Changes later this week
- The diff you see when you compare two different versions of a page has changed on MediaWiki.org and the test wiki. This is to make it easier to find a text change in a moved paragraph. It will hopefully soon come to more wikis. You can report bugs in Phabricator. [6]
- A new user group on Commons will be able to upload MP3 files. The plan is to have this user group from 17 November. [7]
- Wikis using Flagged Revisions will get the New filters for Edit Review by default on the recent changes pages. It will be possible to opt-out in user preferences. [8]
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 14 November. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 15 November. It will be on all wikis from 16 November (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 15 November at 16:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- Support for uploading and viewing 3D models is coming soon to Wikimedia Commons. The feature will support the .STL file format. You can see an example on the test wiki. [9]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
19:19, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Ackworth
Hi Keith. Just trying to cite an unreferenced section in Ackworth and the Notable people section has really small text (compared to the rest of the article) which carries on through the Ref section and into the External links. It was like that before I got there, I promise! There is a table above and I tried re-formatting that, but it seems nothing I am doing is correcting it. Any ideas? Thanks and regards. The joy of all things (talk) 20:16, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- I have removed the 95% size from the table, I think that fixes the problem. The <div> tag was unclosed. Keith D (talk) 20:24, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- As ever, thanks very much; it was about the one thing I didn't try and I should have seen it! Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 20:35, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Lillian Bilocca edit
Thanks for rescuing my incompetent referencing. I'll try to learn to do better next time! MacAuslan (talk) 18:05, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Thanks again - can you check please new refs. I added a file of old Gledhow Hall photo. Please put the little dots under the letter "c" (for circa) which is in the photo. Thanks from T. 101.189.107.58 (talk) 06:13, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- If you use the Chrome web browser on Android you can see a download icon on the mobile website. You can download a formatted PDF. It will work in other mobile browsers in the future. [10]
- The abuse filter now has a function called
get_matches. You can use it to store matches from regular expressions – one of each capturing group. You can read more in Phabricator.
Problems
- Last week's MediaWiki version didn't come to all Wikipedias because of a database crash. It will be on all wikis on 20 November. [11][12][13]
Changes later this week
- There is no new MediaWiki version this week.
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 21 November at 19:30 (UTC). See how to join.
- You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 22 November at 16:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- Language converter syntax will no longer work inside external links. Wikitext like
http://-{zh-cn:foo.com; zh-hk:bar.com; zh-tw:baz.com}-must be replaced. You will have to write-{zh-cn: http://foo.com ; zh-hk: http://bar.com ; zh-tw:http://baz.com }-instead. This only affects languages with Language Converter enabled. Examples of such languages are Chinese and Serbian. This will happen next week. [14][15]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
19:19, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Please check this page again. - SORRY I would like to have the black and white photo of Gledhow Hall - what do you think? - SOME STRANGE EDITORS OUT THERE!!. also - please check this page - Meghan Markle ok? And also please John Hussey, 1st Baron Hussey of Sleaford. Thanks as always T — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.216.210.155 (talk) 04:41, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Done. May I suggest that you avoid The Daily Mail & Daily Express for references as they are not considered reliable. No views on the image suggest you bring-up on the article talk page. Keith D (talk) 21:10, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Stainforth, South Yorkshire
Hi Keith,
I see you reverted my deletion of the passage about Stainforth Underbargh and Sir Edward Darcy from Stainforth, South Yorkshire's Wiki page.
I removed this from Stainforth, South Yorkshire's page because as a Town Councillor for Stainforth Town Council I believe it is not about my Stainforth, but the other Stainforth in the Yorkshire Dales, North Yorkshire.
The Stainforth Underbargh that the passage refers to, along with Knight Stainforth joined to make the modern day Stainforth, North Yorkshire. Sir Edward Darcy was the third son of Sir Arthur Darcy who owned Stainforth Underbargh during Henry VIII's time. The lands and village passed to Sir Edward in 1579.
This can be seen and is sourced in the Stepping Stones Through History section of Stainforth (North Yorkshire's) website: http://www.stainforth.info/stepping_stones_through_history.htm
the actual page that proves my case is here: http://www.stainforth.info/Stainforth_PDF/06%20Stepping%20Stones%20-%20sale%20of%20manorial%20rights.pdf
I hope you can see that this is a frustrating confusion caused by the two villages sharing a common name and trust that the erroneous passage can be removed from Stainforth, South Yorkshire's page.
Best regards
P Bedford Stainforth Town Council South Yorkshire — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pabford (talk • contribs) 14:50, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know about this. If you had made an edit summary entry with a note about it being the wrong place then I would have looked further, rather than just reverting your edit. Keith D (talk) 18:58, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi Keith - a new edit (number 17) has been done - is this OK? Please check if you can. Thanks T. 203.132.68.1 (talk) 01:58, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- You can now test the new advanced search function beta feature on mediawiki.org. It makes it easier to use some of the special search functions that most editors don't know exist. It will come to German and Arabic Wikipedia this week. It will come to more wikis later. [16]
- You can now upload large files with the Internet Archive upload tool. Previously you could not upload files larger than 100 MB. [17]
- You can now use the Timeless skin on all wikis. You can choose skins in Special:Preferences#Appearance. [18]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 28 November. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 29 November. It will be on all wikis from 30 November (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 28 November at 19:30 (UTC). See how to join.
- You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 29 November at 16:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
20:30, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - November 2017
| The Yorkshire WikiProject Newsletter | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
19:34, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – December 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2017).
Administrator changes
![[1]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Hitchcock#/media/File:Number_13.jpg){kind=link}
Guideline and policy news
- Following a request for comment, a new section has been added to the username policy which disallows usernames containing emoji, emoticons or otherwise "decorative" usernames, and usernames that use any non-language symbols. Administrators should discuss issues related to these types of usernames before blocking.
Technical news
- Wikimedians are now invited to vote on the proposals in the 2017 Community Wishlist Survey on Meta Wiki until 10 December 2017. In particular, there is a section of the survey regarding new tools for administrators and for anti-harassment.
- A new function is available to edit filter managers which can be used to store matches from regular expressions.
Arbitration
- Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is open until Sunday 23:59, 10 December 2017 (UTC). There are 12 candidates running for 8 vacant seats.
Miscellaneous
- Over the last few months, several users have reported backlogs that require administrator attention at WP:ANI, with the most common backlogs showing up on WP:SPI, WP:AIV and WP:RFPP. It is requested that all administrators take some time during this month to help clear backlogs wherever possible. It should be noted that AIV reports are not always valid; however, they still need to be cleared, which may include needing to remind users on what qualifies as vandalism.
- The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative is conducting a survey for English Wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works (i.e. which problems it deals with well and which problems it struggles with). If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be emailed to you via Special:EmailUser.
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Keith D. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- It is now possible to upload MP3 files to Commons. Only users with MP3 file upload rights can upload MP3 files. [19]
- You can now use live updates for recent changes if you use the new filters. This feature updates the filtered recent changes every three seconds when you activate it. [20]
- There is an experimental onion service for Wikimedia projects. [21]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 5 December. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 6 December. It will be on all wikis from 7 December (calendar).
- Very old versions of the Opera Web browser are no longer supported. This means that technical development will not be tested to make sure it works with those Opera versions. Use Opera 15 or above or another browser if you have problems. [22]
- Almost 170 wikis with no high-priority errors in Linter categories will switch to use the Remex parsing library. This is to replace Tidy. A few larger wikis such as German and Italian Wikipedia will also make this switch. It will happen on 5 December. Other wikis will be recommended to switch soon when they have fixed the errors that must be fixed. Tidy will be removed in the middle of 2018. [23][24]
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 5 December at 19:30 (UTC). See how to join.
- You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 6 December at 16:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- The 2017 Community Wishlist Survey will decide what the Community Tech team will work on next year. You can vote for wishes on the survey page until 10 December. You can see what has happened to last year's wishes on the 2016 results page.
- The Community Liaisons team at the Wikimedia Foundation is looking for active tech ambassadors. This is to make sure the Wikimedia communities get all the information they need about new features and can be involved in the technical development. [25]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
17:51, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Keith. On the West Ruislip station article, there is an artefact that looks like this '|-'. It is located in the Services heading between the text and the preceding/following stations box and no matter what, when in edit source, I cannot see where it is to delete it (and it does not seem to appear in visual editing either). Any help, please? Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 21:50, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
- Looks like the problem is {{s-rail|title=Historical}} being on the end of a line rather than a new line by itself. Keith D (talk) 22:22, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
- Amazing, thanks Keith; I would have never have seen that as I was looking for the actual characters themselves rather than an effect of mark-up elsewhere. Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 22:45, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Re 96.31.10.178.
As you may have just noticed, 96.31.10.178 (talk) is spamming editors' talk pages with a warning message I left him—including my signature. Given his other recent edits, like this, I think it's beyond clear that he's here to cause disruption, likely while block evading from an account—see this unblock request and this comment. Would you mind doing the honors? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rebbing (talk • contribs) 01:03, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
- I have blocked indefinitely as being an apparent sock & imitating another use. Keith D (talk) 01:20, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
Edit on Benjamin Law (artist) - ref question
Hi Keith,
Thanks for editing the reference in Benjamin Law (artist) page.
I viewed the hardcopy of the journal for Mackay's article last night. The actual journal itself lists the months as April/May (with a slash). Even though that's as it was published, is the dash used as preference in referencing style? Or is it better to leave the / as that's faithful to the original? Thank you!SunnyBoi (talk) 03:57, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
- Hi, the slash gives a cite date error as it is not one of the styles we use for dates. The way to present this type of date is to join the months with an en-dash. You can see the acceptable styles for dates in MOS:DATES. Keith D (talk) 11:20, 6 December 2017 (
Another Yorkshire page for you to please check if you can. Thanks again T.
also
if you can find the time. Thanks - T.
also
Thank you - T. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.216.210.155 (talk) 22:54, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Should - in the family section - the term queen of England have a link on it? Thanks T. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.182.160.40 (talk) 00:07, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
On this day, 10 years ago...
|
Wishing Keith D a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Lepricavark (talk) 16:08, 11 December 2017 (UTC) |
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- URLs that link to sections on Wikimedia wikis with non-Latin scripts have looked like this:
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Википедия#.D0.98.D1.81.D1.82.D0.BE.D1.80.D0.B8.D1.8Finstead ofhttps://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Википедия#История. This has now been fixed on all wikis. Old links will still work. [26] - A new tag marks edits where a redirect was created or removed. This still works when the editor writes something else in the edit summary. You can see the tags for example in the recent changes feed, article history, user contributions or on your watchlist. [27]
- If you use Chrome on Android, you can now use the print to PDF button to create a PDF of an article. [28]
- Filter by number of edits or filter by time range have been grouped on a same menu on the recent changes page if you use the new filters. The "View new changes since $1" link is now more prominent. [29]
- Some of the web fonts that were provided by the Universal Language Selector extension are being removed. This is to reduce the load time on pages. The web fonts were added many years ago to help users read text in scripts which did not have fonts or had broken fonts. This is not the case any more. You can check the status page for a list of all web fonts and whether they are currently being used and especially for special requirements. [30]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 12 December. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 13 December. It will be on all wikis from 14 December (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 12 December at 19:30 (UTC). See how to join.
- You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 13 December at 16:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- You can discuss new or improved blocking tools with the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-Harassment Tools team. They will work on building better blocking tools. Leave comments on the talk page.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
17:58, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
| This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 55 | ← | Archive 60 | Archive 61 | Archive 62 | Archive 63 | Archive 64 | Archive 65 |