User talk:Keith Okamoto/Archives/1/Archives/1

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, Keith Okamoto/Archives/1/Archives, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! GlassCobra 02:48, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

February 2010

STOP adding the WWE employees template to a TV show. That template is for EMPLOYEE pages. Under your bizarre logic, The Simpsons would contain the templates Template:EmmyAward ComedySupportingActress 1976-2000, Template:EmmyAward VoiceOver 1990-2000, Template:Simpsons cast, and Template:Spinal Tap (among others) just because members of the show have those. TJ Spyke 21:18, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Nevermind, I don't really care enough to keep arguing over it. TJ Spyke 21:21, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to the page Talk:America's Best Dance Crew (season 5). Blank pages can confuse readers, and are overall not helpful to the Wikipedia project; furthermore, blanking a page is not the same as deleting it.

If the article you blanked is a duplicate of another article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate revision. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please use the appropriate deletion process. 5 albert square (talk) 01:14, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

WWE: NXT

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Do not removed the sourced information again or you will be reported for WP:3R. Thank you. Wwehurricane1 (talk) 00:12, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Doesn't matter, the information was stated on WWE television which is a reliable source. There is no source to support that ALL of the rookies will go to Raw or Smackdown. It's that simple. Source vs. No Source. Source wins. If Michael Cole misspoke doesn't matter. Until the show airs tonight and they announce otherwise, the information is sourced and, thus, stays in the article. Wwehurricane1 (talk) 00:19, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

WWE NXT

You are vandalising this page by removing a Reliable source. 81.141.102.84 (talk) 21:33, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Your source is not a reliable source.--Yugiohmike2001 (talk) 22:47, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

WP:PW/MOS well if you'd bother to check the Manual of Style you'd see WrestleView is under "Websites proven reliable", Wrestling News World falls under the sites such as LordsofPain and WrestleZone. 81.141.102.84 (talk) 08:38, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

If you'd like we can resolve this issue by asking a more experience editor as to which source is more reliable. 81.141.102.84 (talk) 08:44, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on WWE NXT. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. TJ Spyke 23:04, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Total Drama Island has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Ham tech person 02:16, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

America's Best Dance Crew (Season 5)

I just got your message. I'm still kind of new to Wikipedia.

Problem already fixed. I don't know why someone would post fake results on the episode progress chart this early in the season. The page might need semi-protection (the problem is...it might not technically be vandalism, so there's nothing we can really do about it unless it happens on multiple occasions). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wolf of Ice (talk • contribs) 00:01, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Frank the Entertainer in a Basement Affair

Why do you keep reverting my removal of the stub template for Frank the Entertainer in a Basement Affair? Per the Wikiproject TV Assessment Guide, as well as per WP:Stub, it is obviously not a stub anymore, so the template should be removed. Also, I had asked for discussion, not a generic revert. Wikipedia is a grounds for communications over changes. Please discuss your reasoning for reverting my work. Thanks. Jrh7925 (talk) 04:50, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing at Frank the Entertainer in a Basement Affair. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:09, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

2010 WWE Draft

Well I've only redirected the page, so it hasn't been deleted. All of the edit history (including your edit) is still there right now and will still be there when the article is restored once we get some more info on the draft. Hope this helps. -- Θaks ter 21:54, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

No problemo. -- Θaks ter 21:56, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

March 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. –Turian (talk) 04:13, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. –Turian (talk) 22:22, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

WWE Championship

WWE.com lists the belt both on the Raw and Smackdown pages.

They list it on the Raw page because it's considered Raw property, and on the SD page due to a SD guy holding it.

Batista beat up Bret Hart and in return Vince McMahon gave him a title shot at his time of choosing.

Batista is a SD guy who is on Raw because of his deal with Vince and quite frankly hasn't been on SD since winning the belt. Batista is pretty much a SD guy now in name only.

But to the point at hand, as long as WWE.com lists the WWE Title on the Raw page, it's considered Raw property.

Thank You.

Vjmlhds 18:56, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

WWE.com made it a point to put it on the Raw page to show that the belt itself is considered Raw's property.

Besides, how can it be considered SD "Exclusive" when John Cena (Raw) will be fighting Batista for it at WrestleMania?

Bottom line--the belt is a Raw belt held by a SD wrestler due to a business deal.

Vjmlhds 19:09, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

I know it's on the SD page.

My point is that it's also listed on the Raw page, which means that they still consider the belt to be Raw's property--just so happens an SD guy is holding it.

Thus the WWE Championship is considered to still be Raw's World Championship.

Vjmlhds 19:16, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

It's neither Raw or SD exclusive technically.

WWE considers it Raw's belt, thus they list it on the Raw page, but they have to respect the fact that an SD guy is holding it, thus it's listed on the SD page as well.

But taking into account Batista has spent all his time on Raw since winning the belt, and WWE still lists it as a Raw title, it can't be considered SD "Exclusive".

Vjmlhds 19:24, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

WWE long ago made it a point that the tag team belts belong to both brands and the champions can bounce back and forth.

And you must not be watching Raw, because they made it quite clear that Batista was basically given carte blanche by Vince to have free reign and go and do whatever he wants to do because he beat up Bret Hart.

Like I said WWE is making a point of listing the WWE Title on the Raw page to make clear it's Raw's belt, while also respecting the fact that an SD guy holds it.

Vjmlhds 19:37, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

So you're just going to ignore the fact that WWE.com lists it as a Raw title?

It's Raw's title held by a SD guy due to a business deal. Both brands have claim to the belt as per WWE.com.

But you can't just shut Raw out of the mix.

Vjmlhds 19:44, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Reverted

I am having a hard time assuming good faith when taking in consideration you reverting an edit of mine on the WWE Roster page. I removed some information because the references did not meet the criteria of reliable sources. I do not understand why you reverted my constructive edit and not even explained why.

However, I have a duty as a Wikipedia editor to help you:

• Help:Edit summary will explain what the edit summary section during an edit is there for and why you should always explain the edits you are making.

• WP:VERIFY might help you understand why the source (SESCOOPS) listed in the WWE Roster article is not a reliable source.

• WP:STATUSQUO will explain why reverting constructive edits is only a "last resort" action.

I point this out on your talk page so we can avoid an edit war as neither of us want to suffer a [[WP:3RR}3RR violation]]. You have been on Wikipedia since 2007 and therefore you should already be oriented with the rules around here.

Thank you for your time,

Feedback ^☎ 03:21, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Be More Mindful When Editing

I looked through your contributions and was shocked to see that all you seem to do is revert other people's info. I find this to be a problem, especially since you never use an edit summary. Please be more constructive, diligent, and mindful of others when you edit and revert. Thanks. –Turian (talk) 01:14, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, the info was correct, but the source the user used was in another languange. I was only removing it until someone had the source in english. I know I've been on here since 2007, but I've never been on here fully until now. Sorry for all the trouble I've made.--Yugiohmike2001 (talk) 01:22, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

It seems you read what I said, but you didn't apply it since you were blocked. Please provide an edit summary when reverting otherwise we don't know why you reverted the edit. Also, if there is a problem, take it to the talk page. If you don't, I can only assume that you will be blocked for an even longer period of time. –Turian (talk) 20:02, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Dumbfounded

I am extremely dumbfounded to find you reverted my edit where it was perfectly fine. 81.141.102.111 (talk) 18:15, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Once again, the coding is perfectly acceptable there's no reason for reverting the edit. 81.141.102.111 (talk) 18:29, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

There's no reason for you to be removing an update to the Championship. 81.141.102.111 (talk) 18:58, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a short time to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Toddst1 (talk) 19:08, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Keith Okamoto/Archives/1/Archives (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was just trying to get english info on Alex Riley and The Usos being the new FCW Heavyweight and FCW Tag Team titles.

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Kuru (talk) 19:25, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

My I offer a helpful hint

Hi I Know you are blocked right now but when you return. When you go to revert something that looks to be a good edit before you go to revert it check to see if it has a good source and if it doesn't try to find a source that can be used to back up the new info if none can be found then revert it. You have any question's by all means stop by my talk page and ask I will be happy to try and answer and questions that you have.--Steam Iron 19:53, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Once again

Once again I find you reverting perfectly good edits [1] [2], they were sourced and I don't see why you would feel the need to remove this information. 81.141.102.111 (talk) 23:36, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Someone will eventually get to it, just because there is an inconsistency doesn't mean it's incorrect, Wikipedia even acknowledges its inconsistency in some of the policies and guidelines. 81.141.102.111 (talk) 00:45, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Please Use edit summary

Could you please use edit summary's it makes it really hard to understand as to why you went and did some thing to an article--Steam Iron 05:52, 23 March 2010 (UTC) When you edit a page right above the save page button is the edit summary space to type in a summary as to what you changed on the page ie. removed vandalism or just added some thing to the page that you thing should be there. If you have any more questions fell free to ask me on my talk page i would be happy to answer them.--Steam Iron 06:06, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

FCW

Check the list at WP:PW/MOS. The reliable sources are there as are the sources to avoid. !! Justa Punk !! 09:06, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

ANI

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. –Turian (talk) 02:00, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Edit Summary

Will you please use an edit summary? I don't understand why we have to ask you over and over and over to do it. –Turian (talk) 14:26, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Are you ignoring all of us for the hell of it? Please, use an edit summary or I will take it to ANI. Thanks. –Turian (talk) 00:25, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Episodes

Please do not remove text added in good faith by IP editors. These episode titles have appeared in Japanese magazines.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 20:36, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Ep 29

Both of you stop edit warring. I agree with you however that the wooden board thing need not be mentioned.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 05:50, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced information to pages.

You have no sources that the Money in the Bank match will be at the PPV of the same name, so please stop reverting the edits that add "or if" to the page. If you continue to do this you will be reported to AIV. --ChrisP2K5 (talk) 01:39, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

ShowMiz

I'll leave it because you're right about the Titantron, but gee whiz you'd think they would know how to spell wouldn't you? !! Justa Punk !! 12:13, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

I agree, maybe The Miz asked them to spell it that way.--Yugiohmike2001 (talk) 14:24, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

April 2010

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to The Legacy (professional wrestling), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The information on Million Dollar Championship is not sourced either, and it in fact said "possibly". That's speculation pure and simple. Source it with a reliable source or leave it out. End of story. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 17:58, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on WWE Raw. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. You made 4 reverts without explanation. Minima c (talk) 15:43, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Edit Summary

How many times must we ask you to provide an edit summary when reverting someone's edit? Please take the advice from the multiple editors who have asked you to do so. Thanks. –Turian (talk) 05:32, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Florida Championship Wrestling Edit warring

Hi, I noticed that you and an anonymous contributor are having a disagreement on Florida Championship Wrestling. Both of you are about to break the 3RR (3 Revert Rule) (see Wikipedia:Edit warring, which, seeing you have broken it before, may result in your blocking. Perhaps you and the editor should try to come to a consensus over this? Or, try WP:RFC, request for comment. Thank you for your contributions. --Brandon 5485 23:38, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello, Keith Okamoto. You have new messages at Brandon5485's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Brandon 5485 23:46, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello again. 189.106.76.221 has calmed down, and I think both of you should now work on collaborating on the FCW page. Discuss with him what your intentions were, and try to reach an agreement on how you will solve this problem. He is not a vandal, and he is also trying to improve the page. Please reach an agreement on how the page can be improved while satisfying both of your philosophies. Also, if he is changing the name of the Usos/Uso brothers, ask him if he has a source which calls them that. You never know, that might be their real name. --Brandon 5485 00:25, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Me and him are already talking this over. Thanks for being a unofficial mediator, since you became one anyway.--Yugiohmike2001 (talk) 00:28, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome. Once you guys figure this out, I am probably going to give you both a Half Barnstar. :D --Brandon 5485 00:38, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

If you look at the talk page of FCW, I think we already figured things out.--Yugiohmike2001 (talk) 00:42, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

List of World Wrestling Entertainment employees

Hello Yugiohmike, you are a smart guy, thank you for your work in WWE articles. --Hixteilchen (talk) 18:45, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, and you're welcome! :)--Yugiohmike2001 (talk) 19:04, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Can you please look on WWE.com what the real ring names are before editing the ring names. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hixteilchen (talk • contribs)

Actually, I'd have to agree with you Mike in both cases. Hixteilchen's video source actually features Savannah announcing him as "Montel Vontavious Porter, MVP", so the name is still in use. And according to MVP's inmate records, Burke is his name listed while Assad is only listed as an alias. Hope this helps. -- Θaks ter 20:16, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Savannah is the only person who calls him Montel Vontavious Porter. The commentators call him simply MVP. It is not worth it, if ONLY the ring announcer calls him Montel Vontavious Porter. His ring name is simply MVP. WWE.com is our reliable source and not ring announcers. --Hixteilchen (talk) 20:32, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Half Barnstar
		Thank you for your cooperation and collaboration with 189.106.76.221 on Florida Championship Wrestling. You probably saved yourself a block. I am glad both of you have resolved your dispute, and I reward your resolution with this Left Half of the Half Barnstar. Congratulations ^^! --Brandon 5485 00:57, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter message

It has recently been brought to the attention of WP:PW that the newsletter is being to delivered to several users who have not been actively editing for several months. As a result, their talk pages have become increasingly large, unmanageable and slow to load due to a lack of archiving.
In response, this message is being sent to all editors listed in Category:WikiProject Professional wrestling participants to say that anyone who does not list their name at Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Active before May 16 will be automatically listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Nospam, and will no longer receive the newsletter or any notification of it. If you are added to Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Nospam, please feel free to remove your name if you desire.
If you wish to continue receiving the newsletter as normal, please add your name to Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Active. If you simply wish to receive notification of a new issue, but not have the full newsletter delivered to your talk page, please add your name to the notification only list.
If you have any queries please contact me at my talk page or leave a message at WT:PW. Thank you for your co-operation. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 00:36, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 11:09, 10 May 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Stables/Tag Teams

I don't want to get into a edit war with you so I'll tell you why the information doesn't belong. It's redundant to have wrestlers listed more than once on a list of employees. The article is a list of employees. Storyline partnerships is irrelevant and is available in many other, relevant places. Wwehurricane1 (talk) 00:36, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Except that this isn't a list of championships or of stables and teams. It's a list of employees. The employees are already listed and there is no need for them to be listed again. Wwehurricane1 (talk) 00:42, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

You completely miss the point. This isn't about the importance of anything. The article is a LIST OF EMPLOYEES. Tag Teams and Stables are IRRELEVANT to a LIST OF EMPLOYEES. Having the same person listed more than once on a LIST OF EMPLOYEES is redundant. Wwehurricane1 (talk) 00:49, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Reverts

Don't randomly revert things. This was perfectly good. I've been seeing you revert him a lot. Punk 911 is a trusted editor.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 02:17, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

fine have it your dumb old way. but I am right, Im always right. ive been here for 2 1/2 years, and i havent been wrong yet, well not speciffically here, but on the smashwiki —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.67.189.11 (talk) 16:40, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

MVP

I don't want an edit war on this page because of MVP. I just wanna take the facts. His ring name is simply MVP. Just go with WWE.com, Matt Striker, Todd Grisham AND the ring announcers. On http://www.wwe.com/superstars/smackdown/mvp/bio/ you don't find Montel Vontavious Porter, only MVP! Matt Striker and Todd Grisham always call him MVP. I think it is ok if there is MVP (Montel Vontavious Porter) but NOT Montel Vontavious Porter (MVP)! On Youtube you can see it that I am right http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OviupR2DlvU (Time: 6:37) Plus he had MVP'S VIP Lounge NOT Montel Vontavious Porter's VIP Lounge. Look at the results of the latest SmackDown: http://ww.wwe.com/shows/smackdown/results/ : MVP! When MVP comes to the ring the optical font is MVP, too. So please stop editing it into Montel Vontavious Porter (MVP)! @ Curtis23 and Yugiohmike2001 --Hixteilchen (talk) 02:52, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Recent action

Please do not insult other users like you did in this edit summary [3] and 2nd please start a dessication over MVP's name this is getting out of hand if it continues I will have the page locked from any one being able to edit the page.--Steam Iron 23:40, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Edit War.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Florida Championship Wrestling. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. --Steam Iron 04:46, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

A topic has been started Here about the current edit war taking place at Florida Championship Wrestling please join in on the discussion.--Steam Iron 05:00, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Your username

I don't understand why anyone hasn't brought this up before, but you should read Wikipedia's Username policy regarding using names from a company, group or product (like the one currently in your name: Yugioh. Per this section in the policy, anyone who has a name that is copyrighted or is just a name that identifies with a corporate product are indefinitely blocked. If you do not want to change your username, please go toWP:RFC/N where you can request comments from other editors about it. I don't want to see you blocked or anything like that, but if you don't agree with me and don't go to RFC, I'd have to report you to Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention. Like I said, I don't want to go there, so please, I ask you to go to Wikipedia:Changing username and come up with another witty cool username (that doesn't use copyrighted names of course). I can help you think of one if you like. Feedback ^☎ 16:47, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

I went here Wikipedia:Changing username/Usurpations to change my name. I think Mikeymike2001 would be a great name. Thanks for asking about the name change, cause I was wanting it changed.--Yugiohmike2001 (talk) 17:44, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome man, but that's not the correct place; Usurpations is when the name you want is one that is already taken, but the one who has it has been inactive. Go to Wikipedia:Changing username. That would be the correct place. Feedback ^☎ 17:48, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 13:25, 23 May 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 15:05, 23 May 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Reverts

This was a good edit that you reverted.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 08:24, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Stop reverting all these good edits from this IP.[4]—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 17:16, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Table headers

The following edits broke the pages: [5] & [6]. The "width" thing comes before the episode number column for a reason.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 19:04, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

John Cena

Can you explain exactly why you reverted my edit here? — ξ ^xplicit 22:23, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

June 2010

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to List of World Wrestling Entertainment employees, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Jeff G. ツ 07:07, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

edit summary

please use it, next time you revert me. when I see blank edit summaries, I assume that people have not taken the time to look at my edit and are just being disruptive. カンチョーSennen Goroshi ! (talk) 03:25, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Edit Summary

You might want to use the Edit Summary in future when reverting considering how much you revert, I see on your contributions list your last 25 edits have been Reverting, it'd help you not get caught by the WP:3RR if you're reverting because of vandalism. Afro (DontTazeMeBro) ^{- Afkatk} 08:52, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

WWE NXT

Just wondering why you reverted here and here they seem like perfectly good edits, these edits to my belief are violations of the WP:3RR. Afro (DontTazeMeBro) ^{- Afkatk} 20:30, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

This relates to a different edit This on List of WWE Raw guest hosts, it's a perfectly good, good faith edit made it didn't need to be reverted all it needed was to be rewritten as its a notable occurrence within the guest host concept, maybe you should read up on WP:REVERT before you begin anymore Reversions. Afro (DontTazeMeBro) ^{- Afkatk} 21:33, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Your Edits

I am very concerned about your edits. All you seem to be is revert people, I see virtually NO new content from you, all I see is a constant stream of reverts, most without any edit summary and a desire to get as close to breaking the 3RR as is possible.

I have had my share of problems/blocks on Wikipedia, but my edit history is nothing like yours - from my edit history you can see that while I have been difficult/disruptive at times, I have generally added to Wikipedia in a constructive manner.

I don't expect you to publicly agree with my comments regarding yourself, pride and all that shit gets in the way - however I would like you to read this and take some action, please stop reverting all the time, please stop trying to abuse the 3RR and please start using edit summaries.

If this behaviour does not change, you will find yourself the subject of an ANI report.

カンチョーSennen Goroshi ! (talk) 21:57, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Recreation of link to Sarona Snuka/Sarona Reiher

I see you reverted my removal of a link to Sarona Snuka/Sarona Reiher. The article has been deleted at AfD, and so I am removing backlinks to it. If you wish the article re-created, you need to take it to DRV. If you continue to revert in links to this article, you will be blocked. Jayjg ^(talk) 04:09, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 17:36, 6 June 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 19:20, 6 June 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Re:WWE Roster

Consensus is to go by WWE.com's page and it shows "Lucky Cannon" without no mention of Jason. Feedback ^☎ 06:33, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

an apology

I've been unfair in my actions relating to your edits - for that I apologise. I do think you should use edit summaries, more than you currently do and I don't agree that TV shows episode number should be updated until the show airs in the US, but the vast majority of your edits are good and help improve wikipedia.

カンチョーSennen Goroshi ! (talk) 19:45, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

I agree that you should use the WP:EDITSUMMARY. It's not WP:CIVIL to revert edits with zero explanation. Also, what was the purpose of adding a nearly empty column to the {{Celebreality}} navigation box, not once but twice? An edit summary would help here. Thank you! Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:13, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Betrayer

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Hixteilchen#Florida_Championship_Wrestling —Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.15.90.220 (talk) 13:04, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Guest hosts on WWE Raw

I was just wondering why you keep on re-reverting my revert abnout Maria Menounos and Nancy O'Dell. First of All, I am just doing what user TJSpyke mentioned below in previous edits to the page. Also, Maria Menounos was never advertised as a host on the WWE.COM website. That week, only Nancy O'Dell was the official host. Maria Menounos was just a special guest, so should not be mentioned. Like I said as well, when Jeremy Piven was host, Ken Jeong appeared but he was not an official host. It was only Jeremy Piven. As for the Big Show and Mark Feurstein, Big Show was actually mentioned in the write up on the WWE Upcoming hosts page So he should be memtioned. Meat Loaf appeared in an episode of Raw. Should we add him to the list? No, as he was not hosting the show. Please review the list of hosts on the official WWE page. On those particular weeks, the hosts at the top of each block are O'Dell and Piven. Jeong and Menounos are mentioned in the write up but are not considered hosts. http://www.wwe.com/shows/raw/special/allspecialguesthosts/ So, please do not revert my edit again 65.92.161.245 (talk) 00:37, 19 June 2010 (UTC)samusek2

Hope this helps.

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 19:09, 20 June 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 20:47, 20 June 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, Keith Okamoto/Archives/1/Archives, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! GlassCobra 02:48, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

February 2010

STOP adding the WWE employees template to a TV show. That template is for EMPLOYEE pages. Under your bizarre logic, The Simpsons would contain the templates Template:EmmyAward ComedySupportingActress 1976-2000, Template:EmmyAward VoiceOver 1990-2000, Template:Simpsons cast, and Template:Spinal Tap (among others) just because members of the show have those. TJ Spyke 21:18, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Nevermind, I don't really care enough to keep arguing over it. TJ Spyke 21:21, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to the page Talk:America's Best Dance Crew (season 5). Blank pages can confuse readers, and are overall not helpful to the Wikipedia project; furthermore, blanking a page is not the same as deleting it.

If the article you blanked is a duplicate of another article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate revision. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please use the appropriate deletion process. 5 albert square (talk) 01:14, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

WWE: NXT

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Do not removed the sourced information again or you will be reported for WP:3R. Thank you. Wwehurricane1 (talk) 00:12, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Doesn't matter, the information was stated on WWE television which is a reliable source. There is no source to support that ALL of the rookies will go to Raw or Smackdown. It's that simple. Source vs. No Source. Source wins. If Michael Cole misspoke doesn't matter. Until the show airs tonight and they announce otherwise, the information is sourced and, thus, stays in the article. Wwehurricane1 (talk) 00:19, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

WWE NXT

You are vandalising this page by removing a Reliable source. 81.141.102.84 (talk) 21:33, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Your source is not a reliable source.--Yugiohmike2001 (talk) 22:47, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

WP:PW/MOS well if you'd bother to check the Manual of Style you'd see WrestleView is under "Websites proven reliable", Wrestling News World falls under the sites such as LordsofPain and WrestleZone. 81.141.102.84 (talk) 08:38, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

If you'd like we can resolve this issue by asking a more experience editor as to which source is more reliable. 81.141.102.84 (talk) 08:44, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on WWE NXT. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. TJ Spyke 23:04, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Total Drama Island has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Ham tech person 02:16, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

America's Best Dance Crew (Season 5)

I just got your message. I'm still kind of new to Wikipedia.

Problem already fixed. I don't know why someone would post fake results on the episode progress chart this early in the season. The page might need semi-protection (the problem is...it might not technically be vandalism, so there's nothing we can really do about it unless it happens on multiple occasions). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wolf of Ice (talk • contribs) 00:01, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Frank the Entertainer in a Basement Affair

Why do you keep reverting my removal of the stub template for Frank the Entertainer in a Basement Affair? Per the Wikiproject TV Assessment Guide, as well as per WP:Stub, it is obviously not a stub anymore, so the template should be removed. Also, I had asked for discussion, not a generic revert. Wikipedia is a grounds for communications over changes. Please discuss your reasoning for reverting my work. Thanks. Jrh7925 (talk) 04:50, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing at Frank the Entertainer in a Basement Affair. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:09, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

2010 WWE Draft

Well I've only redirected the page, so it hasn't been deleted. All of the edit history (including your edit) is still there right now and will still be there when the article is restored once we get some more info on the draft. Hope this helps. -- Θaks ter 21:54, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

No problemo. -- Θaks ter 21:56, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

March 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. –Turian (talk) 04:13, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. –Turian (talk) 22:22, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

WWE Championship

WWE.com lists the belt both on the Raw and Smackdown pages.

They list it on the Raw page because it's considered Raw property, and on the SD page due to a SD guy holding it.

Batista beat up Bret Hart and in return Vince McMahon gave him a title shot at his time of choosing.

Batista is a SD guy who is on Raw because of his deal with Vince and quite frankly hasn't been on SD since winning the belt. Batista is pretty much a SD guy now in name only.

But to the point at hand, as long as WWE.com lists the WWE Title on the Raw page, it's considered Raw property.

Thank You.

Vjmlhds 18:56, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

WWE.com made it a point to put it on the Raw page to show that the belt itself is considered Raw's property.

Besides, how can it be considered SD "Exclusive" when John Cena (Raw) will be fighting Batista for it at WrestleMania?

Bottom line--the belt is a Raw belt held by a SD wrestler due to a business deal.

Vjmlhds 19:09, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

I know it's on the SD page.

My point is that it's also listed on the Raw page, which means that they still consider the belt to be Raw's property--just so happens an SD guy is holding it.

Thus the WWE Championship is considered to still be Raw's World Championship.

Vjmlhds 19:16, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

It's neither Raw or SD exclusive technically.

WWE considers it Raw's belt, thus they list it on the Raw page, but they have to respect the fact that an SD guy is holding it, thus it's listed on the SD page as well.

But taking into account Batista has spent all his time on Raw since winning the belt, and WWE still lists it as a Raw title, it can't be considered SD "Exclusive".

Vjmlhds 19:24, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

WWE long ago made it a point that the tag team belts belong to both brands and the champions can bounce back and forth.

And you must not be watching Raw, because they made it quite clear that Batista was basically given carte blanche by Vince to have free reign and go and do whatever he wants to do because he beat up Bret Hart.

Like I said WWE is making a point of listing the WWE Title on the Raw page to make clear it's Raw's belt, while also respecting the fact that an SD guy holds it.

Vjmlhds 19:37, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

So you're just going to ignore the fact that WWE.com lists it as a Raw title?

It's Raw's title held by a SD guy due to a business deal. Both brands have claim to the belt as per WWE.com.

But you can't just shut Raw out of the mix.

Vjmlhds 19:44, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Reverted

I am having a hard time assuming good faith when taking in consideration you reverting an edit of mine on the WWE Roster page. I removed some information because the references did not meet the criteria of reliable sources. I do not understand why you reverted my constructive edit and not even explained why.

However, I have a duty as a Wikipedia editor to help you:

• Help:Edit summary will explain what the edit summary section during an edit is there for and why you should always explain the edits you are making.

• WP:VERIFY might help you understand why the source (SESCOOPS) listed in the WWE Roster article is not a reliable source.

• WP:STATUSQUO will explain why reverting constructive edits is only a "last resort" action.

I point this out on your talk page so we can avoid an edit war as neither of us want to suffer a [[WP:3RR}3RR violation]]. You have been on Wikipedia since 2007 and therefore you should already be oriented with the rules around here.

Thank you for your time,

Feedback ^☎ 03:21, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Be More Mindful When Editing

I looked through your contributions and was shocked to see that all you seem to do is revert other people's info. I find this to be a problem, especially since you never use an edit summary. Please be more constructive, diligent, and mindful of others when you edit and revert. Thanks. –Turian (talk) 01:14, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, the info was correct, but the source the user used was in another languange. I was only removing it until someone had the source in english. I know I've been on here since 2007, but I've never been on here fully until now. Sorry for all the trouble I've made.--Yugiohmike2001 (talk) 01:22, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

It seems you read what I said, but you didn't apply it since you were blocked. Please provide an edit summary when reverting otherwise we don't know why you reverted the edit. Also, if there is a problem, take it to the talk page. If you don't, I can only assume that you will be blocked for an even longer period of time. –Turian (talk) 20:02, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Dumbfounded

I am extremely dumbfounded to find you reverted my edit where it was perfectly fine. 81.141.102.111 (talk) 18:15, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Once again, the coding is perfectly acceptable there's no reason for reverting the edit. 81.141.102.111 (talk) 18:29, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

There's no reason for you to be removing an update to the Championship. 81.141.102.111 (talk) 18:58, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a short time to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Toddst1 (talk) 19:08, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Keith Okamoto/Archives/1/Archives (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was just trying to get english info on Alex Riley and The Usos being the new FCW Heavyweight and FCW Tag Team titles.

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Kuru (talk) 19:25, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

My I offer a helpful hint

Hi I Know you are blocked right now but when you return. When you go to revert something that looks to be a good edit before you go to revert it check to see if it has a good source and if it doesn't try to find a source that can be used to back up the new info if none can be found then revert it. You have any question's by all means stop by my talk page and ask I will be happy to try and answer and questions that you have.--Steam Iron 19:53, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Once again

Once again I find you reverting perfectly good edits [7] [8], they were sourced and I don't see why you would feel the need to remove this information. 81.141.102.111 (talk) 23:36, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Someone will eventually get to it, just because there is an inconsistency doesn't mean it's incorrect, Wikipedia even acknowledges its inconsistency in some of the policies and guidelines. 81.141.102.111 (talk) 00:45, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Please Use edit summary

Could you please use edit summary's it makes it really hard to understand as to why you went and did some thing to an article--Steam Iron 05:52, 23 March 2010 (UTC) When you edit a page right above the save page button is the edit summary space to type in a summary as to what you changed on the page ie. removed vandalism or just added some thing to the page that you thing should be there. If you have any more questions fell free to ask me on my talk page i would be happy to answer them.--Steam Iron 06:06, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

FCW

Check the list at WP:PW/MOS. The reliable sources are there as are the sources to avoid. !! Justa Punk !! 09:06, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

ANI

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. –Turian (talk) 02:00, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Edit Summary

Will you please use an edit summary? I don't understand why we have to ask you over and over and over to do it. –Turian (talk) 14:26, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Are you ignoring all of us for the hell of it? Please, use an edit summary or I will take it to ANI. Thanks. –Turian (talk) 00:25, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Episodes

Please do not remove text added in good faith by IP editors. These episode titles have appeared in Japanese magazines.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 20:36, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Ep 29

Both of you stop edit warring. I agree with you however that the wooden board thing need not be mentioned.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 05:50, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced information to pages.

You have no sources that the Money in the Bank match will be at the PPV of the same name, so please stop reverting the edits that add "or if" to the page. If you continue to do this you will be reported to AIV. --ChrisP2K5 (talk) 01:39, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

ShowMiz

I'll leave it because you're right about the Titantron, but gee whiz you'd think they would know how to spell wouldn't you? !! Justa Punk !! 12:13, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

I agree, maybe The Miz asked them to spell it that way.--Yugiohmike2001 (talk) 14:24, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

April 2010

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to The Legacy (professional wrestling), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The information on Million Dollar Championship is not sourced either, and it in fact said "possibly". That's speculation pure and simple. Source it with a reliable source or leave it out. End of story. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 17:58, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on WWE Raw. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. You made 4 reverts without explanation. Minima c (talk) 15:43, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Edit Summary

How many times must we ask you to provide an edit summary when reverting someone's edit? Please take the advice from the multiple editors who have asked you to do so. Thanks. –Turian (talk) 05:32, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Florida Championship Wrestling Edit warring

Hi, I noticed that you and an anonymous contributor are having a disagreement on Florida Championship Wrestling. Both of you are about to break the 3RR (3 Revert Rule) (see Wikipedia:Edit warring, which, seeing you have broken it before, may result in your blocking. Perhaps you and the editor should try to come to a consensus over this? Or, try WP:RFC, request for comment. Thank you for your contributions. --Brandon 5485 23:38, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello, Keith Okamoto. You have new messages at Brandon5485's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Brandon 5485 23:46, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello again. 189.106.76.221 has calmed down, and I think both of you should now work on collaborating on the FCW page. Discuss with him what your intentions were, and try to reach an agreement on how you will solve this problem. He is not a vandal, and he is also trying to improve the page. Please reach an agreement on how the page can be improved while satisfying both of your philosophies. Also, if he is changing the name of the Usos/Uso brothers, ask him if he has a source which calls them that. You never know, that might be their real name. --Brandon 5485 00:25, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Me and him are already talking this over. Thanks for being a unofficial mediator, since you became one anyway.--Yugiohmike2001 (talk) 00:28, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome. Once you guys figure this out, I am probably going to give you both a Half Barnstar. :D --Brandon 5485 00:38, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

If you look at the talk page of FCW, I think we already figured things out.--Yugiohmike2001 (talk) 00:42, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

List of World Wrestling Entertainment employees

Hello Yugiohmike, you are a smart guy, thank you for your work in WWE articles. --Hixteilchen (talk) 18:45, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, and you're welcome! :)--Yugiohmike2001 (talk) 19:04, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Can you please look on WWE.com what the real ring names are before editing the ring names. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hixteilchen (talk • contribs)

Actually, I'd have to agree with you Mike in both cases. Hixteilchen's video source actually features Savannah announcing him as "Montel Vontavious Porter, MVP", so the name is still in use. And according to MVP's inmate records, Burke is his name listed while Assad is only listed as an alias. Hope this helps. -- Θaks ter 20:16, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Savannah is the only person who calls him Montel Vontavious Porter. The commentators call him simply MVP. It is not worth it, if ONLY the ring announcer calls him Montel Vontavious Porter. His ring name is simply MVP. WWE.com is our reliable source and not ring announcers. --Hixteilchen (talk) 20:32, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Half Barnstar
		Thank you for your cooperation and collaboration with 189.106.76.221 on Florida Championship Wrestling. You probably saved yourself a block. I am glad both of you have resolved your dispute, and I reward your resolution with this Left Half of the Half Barnstar. Congratulations ^^! --Brandon 5485 00:57, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter message

It has recently been brought to the attention of WP:PW that the newsletter is being to delivered to several users who have not been actively editing for several months. As a result, their talk pages have become increasingly large, unmanageable and slow to load due to a lack of archiving.
In response, this message is being sent to all editors listed in Category:WikiProject Professional wrestling participants to say that anyone who does not list their name at Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Active before May 16 will be automatically listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Nospam, and will no longer receive the newsletter or any notification of it. If you are added to Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Nospam, please feel free to remove your name if you desire.
If you wish to continue receiving the newsletter as normal, please add your name to Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Active. If you simply wish to receive notification of a new issue, but not have the full newsletter delivered to your talk page, please add your name to the notification only list.
If you have any queries please contact me at my talk page or leave a message at WT:PW. Thank you for your co-operation. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 00:36, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 11:09, 10 May 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Stables/Tag Teams

I don't want to get into a edit war with you so I'll tell you why the information doesn't belong. It's redundant to have wrestlers listed more than once on a list of employees. The article is a list of employees. Storyline partnerships is irrelevant and is available in many other, relevant places. Wwehurricane1 (talk) 00:36, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Except that this isn't a list of championships or of stables and teams. It's a list of employees. The employees are already listed and there is no need for them to be listed again. Wwehurricane1 (talk) 00:42, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

You completely miss the point. This isn't about the importance of anything. The article is a LIST OF EMPLOYEES. Tag Teams and Stables are IRRELEVANT to a LIST OF EMPLOYEES. Having the same person listed more than once on a LIST OF EMPLOYEES is redundant. Wwehurricane1 (talk) 00:49, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Reverts

Don't randomly revert things. This was perfectly good. I've been seeing you revert him a lot. Punk 911 is a trusted editor.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 02:17, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

fine have it your dumb old way. but I am right, Im always right. ive been here for 2 1/2 years, and i havent been wrong yet, well not speciffically here, but on the smashwiki —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.67.189.11 (talk) 16:40, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

MVP

I don't want an edit war on this page because of MVP. I just wanna take the facts. His ring name is simply MVP. Just go with WWE.com, Matt Striker, Todd Grisham AND the ring announcers. On http://www.wwe.com/superstars/smackdown/mvp/bio/ you don't find Montel Vontavious Porter, only MVP! Matt Striker and Todd Grisham always call him MVP. I think it is ok if there is MVP (Montel Vontavious Porter) but NOT Montel Vontavious Porter (MVP)! On Youtube you can see it that I am right http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OviupR2DlvU (Time: 6:37) Plus he had MVP'S VIP Lounge NOT Montel Vontavious Porter's VIP Lounge. Look at the results of the latest SmackDown: http://ww.wwe.com/shows/smackdown/results/ : MVP! When MVP comes to the ring the optical font is MVP, too. So please stop editing it into Montel Vontavious Porter (MVP)! @ Curtis23 and Yugiohmike2001 --Hixteilchen (talk) 02:52, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Recent action

Please do not insult other users like you did in this edit summary [9] and 2nd please start a dessication over MVP's name this is getting out of hand if it continues I will have the page locked from any one being able to edit the page.--Steam Iron 23:40, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Edit War.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Florida Championship Wrestling. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. --Steam Iron 04:46, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

A topic has been started Here about the current edit war taking place at Florida Championship Wrestling please join in on the discussion.--Steam Iron 05:00, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Your username

I don't understand why anyone hasn't brought this up before, but you should read Wikipedia's Username policy regarding using names from a company, group or product (like the one currently in your name: Yugioh. Per this section in the policy, anyone who has a name that is copyrighted or is just a name that identifies with a corporate product are indefinitely blocked. If you do not want to change your username, please go toWP:RFC/N where you can request comments from other editors about it. I don't want to see you blocked or anything like that, but if you don't agree with me and don't go to RFC, I'd have to report you to Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention. Like I said, I don't want to go there, so please, I ask you to go to Wikipedia:Changing username and come up with another witty cool username (that doesn't use copyrighted names of course). I can help you think of one if you like. Feedback ^☎ 16:47, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

I went here Wikipedia:Changing username/Usurpations to change my name. I think Mikeymike2001 would be a great name. Thanks for asking about the name change, cause I was wanting it changed.--Yugiohmike2001 (talk) 17:44, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome man, but that's not the correct place; Usurpations is when the name you want is one that is already taken, but the one who has it has been inactive. Go to Wikipedia:Changing username. That would be the correct place. Feedback ^☎ 17:48, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 13:25, 23 May 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 15:05, 23 May 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Reverts

This was a good edit that you reverted.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 08:24, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Stop reverting all these good edits from this IP.[10]—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 17:16, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Table headers

The following edits broke the pages: [11] & [12]. The "width" thing comes before the episode number column for a reason.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 19:04, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

John Cena

Can you explain exactly why you reverted my edit here? — ξ ^xplicit 22:23, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

June 2010

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to List of World Wrestling Entertainment employees, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Jeff G. ツ 07:07, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

edit summary

please use it, next time you revert me. when I see blank edit summaries, I assume that people have not taken the time to look at my edit and are just being disruptive. カンチョーSennen Goroshi ! (talk) 03:25, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Edit Summary

You might want to use the Edit Summary in future when reverting considering how much you revert, I see on your contributions list your last 25 edits have been Reverting, it'd help you not get caught by the WP:3RR if you're reverting because of vandalism. Afro (DontTazeMeBro) ^{- Afkatk} 08:52, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

WWE NXT

Just wondering why you reverted here and here they seem like perfectly good edits, these edits to my belief are violations of the WP:3RR. Afro (DontTazeMeBro) ^{- Afkatk} 20:30, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

This relates to a different edit This on List of WWE Raw guest hosts, it's a perfectly good, good faith edit made it didn't need to be reverted all it needed was to be rewritten as its a notable occurrence within the guest host concept, maybe you should read up on WP:REVERT before you begin anymore Reversions. Afro (DontTazeMeBro) ^{- Afkatk} 21:33, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Your Edits

I am very concerned about your edits. All you seem to be is revert people, I see virtually NO new content from you, all I see is a constant stream of reverts, most without any edit summary and a desire to get as close to breaking the 3RR as is possible.

I have had my share of problems/blocks on Wikipedia, but my edit history is nothing like yours - from my edit history you can see that while I have been difficult/disruptive at times, I have generally added to Wikipedia in a constructive manner.

I don't expect you to publicly agree with my comments regarding yourself, pride and all that shit gets in the way - however I would like you to read this and take some action, please stop reverting all the time, please stop trying to abuse the 3RR and please start using edit summaries.

If this behaviour does not change, you will find yourself the subject of an ANI report.

カンチョーSennen Goroshi ! (talk) 21:57, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Recreation of link to Sarona Snuka/Sarona Reiher

I see you reverted my removal of a link to Sarona Snuka/Sarona Reiher. The article has been deleted at AfD, and so I am removing backlinks to it. If you wish the article re-created, you need to take it to DRV. If you continue to revert in links to this article, you will be blocked. Jayjg ^(talk) 04:09, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 17:36, 6 June 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 19:20, 6 June 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Re:WWE Roster

Consensus is to go by WWE.com's page and it shows "Lucky Cannon" without no mention of Jason. Feedback ^☎ 04:21, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

They probably do it to purposely fuck with WP:PW. They know we exist. Feedback ^☎ 06:33, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

an apology

I've been unfair in my actions relating to your edits - for that I apologise. I do think you should use edit summaries, more than you currently do and I don't agree that TV shows episode number should be updated until the show airs in the US, but the vast majority of your edits are good and help improve wikipedia.

カンチョーSennen Goroshi ! (talk) 19:45, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

I agree that you should use the WP:EDITSUMMARY. It's not WP:CIVIL to revert edits with zero explanation. Also, what was the purpose of adding a nearly empty column to the {{Celebreality}} navigation box, not once but twice? An edit summary would help here. Thank you! Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:13, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Betrayer

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Hixteilchen#Florida_Championship_Wrestling —Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.15.90.220 (talk) 13:04, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Guest hosts on WWE Raw

I was just wondering why you keep on re-reverting my revert abnout Maria Menounos and Nancy O'Dell. First of All, I am just doing what user TJSpyke mentioned below in previous edits to the page. Also, Maria Menounos was never advertised as a host on the WWE.COM website. That week, only Nancy O'Dell was the official host. Maria Menounos was just a special guest, so should not be mentioned. Like I said as well, when Jeremy Piven was host, Ken Jeong appeared but he was not an official host. It was only Jeremy Piven. As for the Big Show and Mark Feurstein, Big Show was actually mentioned in the write up on the WWE Upcoming hosts page So he should be memtioned. Meat Loaf appeared in an episode of Raw. Should we add him to the list? No, as he was not hosting the show. Please review the list of hosts on the official WWE page. On those particular weeks, the hosts at the top of each block are O'Dell and Piven. Jeong and Menounos are mentioned in the write up but are not considered hosts. http://www.wwe.com/shows/raw/special/allspecialguesthosts/ So, please do not revert my edit again 65.92.161.245 (talk) 00:37, 19 June 2010 (UTC)samusek2

Hope this helps.

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 19:09, 20 June 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 20:47, 20 June 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 17:53, 4 July 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 18:08, 4 July 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Screwball

Mikey, Screwball is a vandal. he is going against the consensus of WP:PW and the RFC on the talk page. He is disruptive and is facing action. Podgy Stuffn (talk) 04:21, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

What consensus? The opportunity to establish consensus was refused again and again by naysayers like JustaPunk who refused to read any of my references or talk about the material. Mikey, please discuss this on the talk page. There are many trigger-happy deletionists who are senselessly deleting this material, which is not in any way the same, and it is not receiving a fair discussion.--Screwball23 talk 04:24, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Reverts

The same at Florida Championship Wrestling. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.15.21.202 (talk) 05:15, 8 July 2010 (UTC)