User talk:Kelseymar

Hellloooooo

Check out the best super bowl commercial everbest commerical ever

Achatani (talk) 21:29, 28 January 2015 (UTC)achatani[reply]

Hi, homework later? Christinam830 (talk) 21:32, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Budweiser has pretty great commercials. They spend millions every year on each one, and somehow they have like five every Superbowl. Can you imagine all the empties in one huge pile that had to be sold/drank to make the net profits to make those commercials?? Jsmerf (talk) 21:36, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New Topic: Music[edit]

You're sort of rocking the ultimate Dad bands - The Beatles and The Eagles... but it's totally cool because they're both amazing. The Beatles are my favorite band, have been my whole life, and anyone who understands that their hype is legitimate (and not overrated) knows what's up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jsmerf (talk • contribs) 21:51, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kelseymar, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Kelseymar! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! I JethroBT (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:10, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Kelseymar, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help.

I work with the Wiki Education Foundation, and help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment. If there's anything I can do to help with your assignment (or, for that matter, any other aspect of Wikipedia) please feel free to drop me a note. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:57, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Demographic targeting[edit]

Hi Kelseymar. Thanks for creating the demographic targeting article. I just had a comment on the source you used. While Inc. (magazine) appears to be a decent source, is it really the best source that you can find? Demographic targeting in advertising produces tens of thousands of hits in Google Scholar[1] - you should look to high-quality scholarly sources, not popular magazine articles, whenever they exist. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:04, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Targeting in Online Advertising[edit]

I folded the page content into a subsection Target market, where it's much better placed for the moment: alternatively, if you are able to write about this topic at greater length, to an extent where it would be awkward as a section of that more general page, you can move that content back there (although retitle it Targeting in online advertising per our capitalization guidelines) and then be sure to summarize the content in Target market. Otherwise no one will be directed to your page—the assignment will be complete but it will only have generated an orphan page. You should check and fix the errors in the citations. Good work, though, this is better content than most of what we see from edu programs. ResMar 23:44, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adding content to multiple articles[edit]

Hi Kelseymar. Taking a look at your article as well as Behavioral targeting, Targeted advertising and Target market, I think there is enough overlap between the three that some of your content could go in each. This is a bit more difficult than adding a single addition at first. It's harder to get up to speed when you start and stop. But quickly I think you'll find that adding small changes bit by bit to different articles is fast and useful. You'll get into the habit of thinking about claims and sources, and making sure each claim is matched to a source to verify it. And you'll find ways in which articles that seem ok could really use some help. Take a look at (not to pick on it) Targeted advertising. We mention two studies, but focus on both too narrowly in terms of scope and time. "controversies" are mentioned in their own section but could be integrated with benefits. There is room to expand that article, though the target market article could also be improved as well. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:36, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm IronGargoyle. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Target market with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:19, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]