This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:IYH Breakdown.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:IYH Breakdown.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Nevermind about this. Breakdown was just split off to its own article, so the FUR had to be changed (which I just did for you). TJSpyke 02:56, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 13:29, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'd say organize it feud by feud, not literally put up wat went on after SS for each feud, just the main feuds and a couple of other small feuds. Cheers =)--TrUcO9311TaLk / SiGn 14:34, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You don't mind me helping Truco with the aftermath for Survivor Series? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 18:45, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. Even though I started on the first 2 (Orton / Jericho and Batista / 'Taker / Edge). Happy 2008. ;) Hey, do you think you can help me expand Unforgiven (2005)? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 23:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank YOU. I would really appreciate it. But, would it take any of your Wikipedia time? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 23:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I thought it was going to "mess up" your time. But, I really need some help. And not to get into detail, I'm injured, so.... -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 23:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I played Hockey yesterday and I forgot to wear both a shoulder and elbow pad and I was slammed to hard to the glass, making my left shoulder the target. Just right now, I'm feeling the pain. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 23:47, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not right now. Probably tomorrow. Instead, there's a pack of ice on my shoulder, its strapped to it. So... how's Judgment Day? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 00:11, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh. Maybe someone will finish it. But hey, its your choice what PPV you want to work on, you know. If you choose one and need help, you know me, just hit me up. :) -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 00:25, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In Your House 1 and Vengeance (2006) have each been listed for peer review. Please review these articles and make suggestions for their improvement. Their respective peer reviews can be found here and here.
The recent focus on improving stub articles has reduced the number of stubs from 777 to 732 since December 15. For more information, check out the stub article subpage.
NOTICE: If you are actively editing and contributing to articles under the scope of WikiProject Professional Wrestling, we suggest you add your name to the list of active members.
You are receiving this because because you are listed as a member of the Professional Wrestling WikiProject. By default, the full newsletter is sent to your talk page. However, you have several delivery options at your disposal. Below are the options:
TheChronic has given you a bottle of Cristal! Cristal costs $350, and hopefully this bottle has made your New Year's Day better. Spread the spirit of the New Year by giving a bottle of Cristal to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Give a bottle of Cristal to someone else by adding {{subst:User:The Hybrid/Finger}} to their talk page with a friendly... wait...
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Kotr93-95.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Kotr93-95.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
The backlog at Good Article Nominations has recently exploded to 236 unreviewed articles! Out of 264 total nominations, 17 are on hold, 10 are under review, and one is seeking a second opinion. Please go to WP:GAN and review an article or three as soon as you have a chance!
The top five categories with the largest backlogs are: Sports and recreation (47 articles), Film and cinema (25 articles), Television and journalism (16 articles), Art and architecture (15 articles), and Politics and government (14 articles).
If every participant of WikiProject Good Articles could review just one article in the next week, the backlog would be almost eliminated!
Reviewer of the Month
Dihydrogen Monoxide is the GAN Reviewer of the Month of December, based on the assessments made by Epbr123 of the number and thoroughness of the reviews made by individual reviewers each week. Dihydrogen Monoxide hails from Brisbane (which, incidentally, is almost a GA, kids ;)) and has been editing Wikipedia since August 2006. He mostly likes to review articles relating to music, Australia, or anything else that takes his fancy! He also has two articles waiting, and notes that there's still a huge backlog,... so get cracking!
Other outstanding reviewers recognized during the month of December include:
This WikiProject, and the Good Article program as a whole, would not be where it is today without each and every one of its members! Thank you to all!
GAReview Template
Lots of you that frequent WP:GAN have undoubtedly seen the articles under review, marked with "Review - I am reviewing this article. ...". The articles have been marked as being under review by an editor using the {{GAReview}} template. The purpose of this template is essentially to prevent two editors from reviewing the same article at the same time, so it's essentially a common courtesy notice to other editors so that they don't pass or fail an article while you're in the midst of collecting and writing comments. However, just because an article is marked, shouldn't preclude another editor from contributing to the review. If you'd like to review it, go ahead; simply collect your comments and write them down on the article's talk page – but don't pass or fail the article – leave that to the other reviewer.
To use this template yourself, simply write "#:{{GAReview}} ~~~~" on the line immediately following the article's nomination at WP:GAN. You can even leave additional comments as well (e.g. "#:{{GAReview}} I will finish my review in the next 24 hours. ~~~~"). Reviewers marking articles with this template should also observe some common etiquette; please don't mark more than 1-3 articles as being under review at a time, and please try and finish your review within 3-5 days of marking the article.
GA Sweeps
After openly requesting the community for more participants into the Sweeps, we have 3 more members on the board. They are (in no particular order) Canadian Paul, VanTucky, and Masem. Canadian Paul will be sweeping "Middle East and the World" articles. VanTucky will be sweeping "Religion, mysticism, and mythology" and "Literature" articles. Masem will be sweeping "Television episodes". We're still looking for more reviewers. Interested individuals should contact OhanaUnited for details.
At this moment, participation in the sweeps project is by invitation only, as we desire experienced reviewers who have a thorough and extensive knowledge of the criteria. This is to ensure that articles that have "fallen through the cracks" would be found and removed, and that additional articles don't fall through the cracks during the sweep.
Currently, there are 16 members working on the project, and we have reviewed 74 articles in December 2007. Of those that are swept, 275 articles are kept as GA, 126 articles are delisted, and 5 promoted to FA.
Did You Know,...
... that the total number of good and featured articles is now over 5000?
... that GA was formed on October 11, 2005 and was formerly called "Half-decent articles"?
... that many discussions were made over the years on whether GA should have a symbol placed on the main article space, yet at the end always removed?
... that there was a proposal to change the GA symbol to a green featured star?
From the Editors
Happy New Year, everyone! I'm just filling in for Dr. Cash as he's busy (or away) in real life. This explains why I wasn't prepared for a full-length article on GA process, and instead I resort to a tiny DYK for GA.
OhanaUnited
Happy New Year as well! I'm still here, and haven't totally disappeared. I had to cut back on editing and reviewing during the month of December as I made the transition from Flagstaff, Arizona to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. But I should be about settled in the Keystone State, so I'll be contributing more to Wikipedia again in the new year. Thanks to OhanaUnited for putting together much of the content for this newsletter! He's been working hard with the Sweeps, and the 'Did You Know' section is also a great idea, so I think that will become a regular feature now! I also figured out how to have a collapsible newsletter, so that will change our delivery options a bit. Cheers!
Just so you know, you aren't really fixing anything when you change the reference names. Those are just used when you are using the same ref more than once, readers don't see it at all. The ref name doesn't actually matter. I suppose you can change a ref name if you want, but there isn't really any need for it most of the time. TJSpyke 23:56, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image:MelinaPerez.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:MelinaPerez.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Icarus(Hi!) 06:14, 4 January 2008 (UTC) --Icarus(Hi!) 06:14, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Don't worry. I've saved it to my hardrive. It will live on, even if it is deleted in Wikipedia. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 01:40, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well I don't actually know much about the images' background. What were you intending it for? Wilhelmina Will (talk) 02:29, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm... Interesting. And it was intended for this woman's infobox in her article, right? Wilhelmina Will (talk) 02:48, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, would it be important to add that HBK defeated Chris Masters' winning streak? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 23:14, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alright. Hey, so Tech didn't apologize to you? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 23:19, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh. I'll take your offer on that. Just hold on, I'm trying to finish the HBK / Masters match. ;) -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 23:24, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No worries. I'm 7 out of 8 to complete the "Event". My help will be on the way. :) -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 23:30, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes sir. I'll start working on some info. in my sandbox and after your done, I'll copy it in the article. Is that cool? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 23:37, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Has been added. I don't know if I can get a whole lot of info. on the Hardy / Helms feud. But, I'll try. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 01:40, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
RE: WrestleMania 21
I don't see why we both can't expand WrestleMania. Would you like to be part of the expansion? ZenlaxTCS 20:02, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Go for it. As you already know, I'm working on the brands main events. ZenlaxTCS 20:25, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'll start that shortly. Meanwhile, how are the feuds coming? ZenlaxTCS 20:02, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Don't worry about it. I know where your coming from, I too have difficulties when editing from an iPhone. As long as you start with the feuds, you don't have to worry about it. ZenlaxTCS 20:30, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Good, after all the feuds are in, I think we can expand the Event. ZenlaxTCS 20:04, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Just add that they both "sneaked" attacked each other; per Michaels dressed up as a cameraman and attacked Angle and Angle attacking Michaels on RAW. Also, I've asked bulletproof to help us in expanding WrestleMania. I hope you don't mind that I've asked bulletproof to join us. Almost forgot, it should be mentioned that Orton then turned heel, while in his feud with the Undertaker. ZenlaxTCS 20:34, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I hope you don't think that I'm rushing you to finish. Just take your time with the rivalry, we have plenty of time to finish the article, don't rush it. This is a team, we stick together. ZenlaxTCS 21:21, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Go right ahead. ZenlaxTCS 21:22, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You got it. ZenlaxTCS 16:50, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Are all the feuds in? If so, then we can probably start working on the Event. ZenlaxTCS 17:09, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I Accept
I accept your offer to be your friend again. Please know your support has been greatly appreciated during this tough time. Tech43 (talk) 03:16, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, kindly!
If man were meant to hunt, he'd have invented wikipedia.
--Pearrari (talk) 03:50, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The focus on improving Stub-class articles is continuing to pay off, as the number of stubs has reduced from 732 to 717 over the past week. To see a list of important stubs that need some work, or to suggest a stub that you think should be improved, check out stub article subpage.
NOTICE: If you are actively editing and contributing to articles under the scope of WikiProject Professional Wrestling, we suggest you add your name to the list of active members.
Due to the length of the queue list, we will begin doing two interviews a week. This week's interviewees are The Chronic (link) and Gavyn Sykes (link).
Next week's interviewees are Speed CG and Nikki311. Submit a question to ask them here.
You are receiving this because because you are listed as a member of the Professional Wrestling WikiProject. By default, the full newsletter is sent to your talk page. However, you have several delivery options at your disposal. Below are the options:
Delivered: 19:57, 9 January 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)
Hey
Hey , LAX ! You wanna know more about me ? Well , here you go : I edited the " Johann Sebastian Bach " article , it mispronounced " Johann " . Well , anyway , I play the trumpet . People claim I'm good , but I was never so sure . I have a busy life . I go CrAzY for Lord of the Rings books . I love to listen to Bach , Tchaikovsky , Rossini , and Italian music . I also play it . I really enjoy playing the trumpet . Well , about the Lord of the Rings , I love elves , ents , Lothlòrien , and the Last Homely House . Who wouldn't love them ? Other than the creatures of Mordor , I don't know of anything that would . —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiki member 2007 (User talk:Wiki member 2007talk • contribs) 01:31, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Now I don't want to take charge or anything but how about renaming it to something like that has something of all are usernames in it?? or something else...??--TrUcO9311TaLk / SiGn 01:54, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
So what's it gonna be? The Kliq or t.L.t United, or just t.L.t?TrUcO9311TaLk / SiGn 02:17, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Let's go with the Kliq. The name TLT United makes us sound like we created another brand of the army / navy. P.S. Thanks for updating Unforgiven. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 20:59, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That would be an o article to work on. But I was proposing we do OTE 98, but SS 02 would be kool. Or mayby something else?? TrUcO9311TaLk / SiGn 22:14, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You mean OTE 98??..lol Buh yea after we done our articles.TrUcO9311TaLk / SiGn 22:23, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alright. It would be a great PPV to work on. But, we should like reserve it or something, before someone takes it. Question: Are we going to have a box for the "Kliq"? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 00:17, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Probably like a notice at PW. Simple, just write the Kliq to the side, and in the box just say, "This user is part of The Kliq". -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 00:23, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think like Black and Blue would fit in. If not, then try asking Truco or just coming up with some color. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 00:30, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alright. I'm pretty sure you can come up with a kick ass box, just like you did for the Clan. :) -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 00:38, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Probably where the Kliq idea was stated. Oh, I know, I'll do that, but I'm writing the fifth match for Unforgiven. But thanks for the heads up. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 00:50, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alright. That's all I came up with. Does Truco know he's suppose to add the box on his page? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 20:36, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm, interesting. Hey, I'm almost done with Unforgiven, tell me what I should do next. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 00:23, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I did it like an hour ago =), buh yea its on my page now. I also added my counter as a wikipedia, can you believe it 2 more months and I will be on Wiki for a year...--TrUcO9311TaLk / SiGn 00:42, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am going to finish OTE probably tonight and then we can start SS laterz...--TrUcO9311TaLk / SiGn 00:46, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm down with working on Survivor Series. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 01:00, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You or I can start it, doesn't matter.--TrUcO9311TaLk / SiGn 01:02, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Cool. I'll be waiting for your call. Have you added SS to the PPV list? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 01:30, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah. It has detail by detail. I would recommend using Online Onslaught, very helpful. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 02:25, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Really? I'm shocked that they don't have a review, since it was the first Elimination Chamber. Wow. But yeah, adding the DVD would work as a great ref. too. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 02:34, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You're WELCOME. You would make a great Administrator and stuff. ;) -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 02:39, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, their really a reliable source. Opinions for Unforgiven '04? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 02:42, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I know, me too. I just can't handle the pressure of users coming to my talk page and telling me that this person is either vandalizing, threatening them, sockpuppets, etc. You know what I mean? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 02:45, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
True about PW. And I just added some images. I think I need one more feud and the article is COMPLETE. Question: Do I have to add a table to all the PPV's about the referees and announcers? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 03:05, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I would add it, but there's some officials that I don't know by name, you know what I mean? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 03:12, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Totally. I guess I'll have to rent some DVD's. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 03:19, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No worries. I'll just rent some from the my local library. ;) -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 03:23, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Neither did I, until my friend just told me. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 03:27, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You know where to find a link to a "sidelock takeover"? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 04:14, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I couldn't find it anywhere. How 'bout an Irish whip? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 04:22, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'd be a lost soul. Just kidding. What feud are you starting with at Survivor Series? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 04:33, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe we can call it iKliq with me now in the group. iMatthew 16:10, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Rollback
It's done. :-) - Philippe | Talk 03:27, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Nestead Scottish borders
Why did you remove the river tweed info box? —Preceding unsigned comment added by S0456769 (talk • contribs) 22:15, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I dont understand what you mean by a template but please jusy put it back. If you wnat to make it a template then put it back that would be better. —Preceding unsigned comment added by S0456769 (talk • contribs) 22:36, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Re: User V
Yeah Im not gonna worry about him. He has two warnings already, I think he has taken it seriously since he hasnt reverted anything yet in the past 15 minutes.--TrUcO9311TaLk / SiGn 23:16, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Guidemap to Templates
I'm interested to better understand templates, user boxes, etc. For example, looking at Template:Nutshell, it seems brief enough, but there are lots of syntactical components I don't understand. To try to understand it better, I tried to reconstruct it in another mediawiki... not working out well. Do you have any sources to better understand these components? They seem to be heavily transcluded and sometimes I'm having trouble separating imbedded components vs. keywords in the syntax. --Pearrari (talk) 03:10, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I know you're busy, but I'd still appreciate your input or direction to some other source for this and the inquiry below. --Pearrari (talk) 00:23, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Bot-start
What bot would you recommend I start with? I'm really not all that interested in vandal-fighting, but I am interested in construction. However if the easiest bot to get started with is a vandal fighter, I'll do that for awhile to get an understanding of it. Thanks! --Pearrari (talk) 03:10, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:32, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A (Slighty) Belated Thanks
I forgot to tell you this, but thanks for the introduction to Wikipedia. Manu-vetalkproSkicontribs 19:08, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Re: Well, the only part that really matters is the adoption at this point. So sure, I will take that if you so desire. Feels a bit odd getting adopted at this age... :) Manu-vetalkproSkicontribs 01:16, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
For catching common spelling mistakes with AWB. Kannie | talk 01:46, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Admin
I think you would make a good admin. I want to be an admin but I feel i will be rejected. I can handle the responsibility though. YOu wanna run?--TrUcO9311TaLk / SiGn 03:00, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well yeah, buh it's not like you "have to" do the many things as an admin.--TrUcO9311TaLk / SiGn 03:26, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Can you upload an image for me?--TrUcO9311TaLk / SiGn 03:27, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah I know what you mean. The image is this one [2] I want to add it to the OTE 99 article. TrUcO9311TaLk / SiGn 03:35, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
THANKS SO MUCH!!!! This image is very important to the article. TrUcO9311TaLk / SiGn 03:56, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Because I get confused with the free use/free rational/and the copyright tags things. So I thought you may have known more about it. So you can upload any image you want as long as you put an appropriate tag?TrUcO9311TaLk / SiGn 04:06, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yea, so you tell me that you are able to upload any image you want if you put an apporpriate tag?TrUcO9311TaLk / SiGn 04:08, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh ok. So Blue is done with Unforgiven, and I am almost done with OTE, just need to add The Rock/HHH feud and finish the aftermath section.--TrUcO9311TaLk / SiGn 04:12, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You 2 can get started with the background and I will catch up later.TrUcO9311TaLk / SiGn 04:23, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
New user
I am a newer user, and I was wondering if you could maybe adopt me? EWC Champion (talk) 05:01, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I oringally created my account on New Year's Day. However, my Uncle Joe died at age 46 of a heart attack. I haven't been able to be on the comp since. I am aiming to edit Vandalism and help with wrestling articles. Also, I read that Big Show might be coming back. I hope that's the case. EWC Champion (talk) 05:22, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I already know not to violate the 3-revert-rule. i read up on that, and it really makes me feel good that I am learning the easy way! EWC Champion (talk) 05:27, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, don't worreh. I am not going to add it. Oh, and you visit wrestleview.com also? EWC Champion (talk) 05:31, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I love that site. I think it has very good headline news. my only complaint is that they seem to add things toward the beginning of the day, and not towards the end when I am very energetic. It pisses off my girlfriend all the time, since she likes to actually SLEEP! EWC Champion (talk) 05:36, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. How do I add links to other websites? i also want to deal with templates. learning those would be great. 06:05, 19 January 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Empire World Champ (talk • contribs)
Hmm..
I was wondering, do you think that, "The Kliq' has room for a fourth member. I could definately learn a thing or two from you guys. :] iMatthew 14:51, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I left a message on both of their pages. (If I join, we can become "iKliq") lol. iMatthew 14:56, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, cool! I remember the userbox from when you and Blue were "The Clan" and after I saw that Truco joined, I thought maybe if the four of us were together, we'd be pretty dominate! *lol* iMatthew 15:04, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely. iMatthew 15:08, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Chronic's been a great teacher. He made my userpage for me, he helped me changed my username, and helped me with my signature, within the first night he adopted me. I haven't been on much this week due to regents practice classes. (I have a math regents on Thursday) iMatthew 15:24, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Definately, at this point, I'm 100% not ready, because I am still learning things. I don't plan on leaving anytime soon, but before I do leave, I would love to become an admin. Why? Would you? iMatthew 15:36, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. One mistake, and they'll be all over you. If you want to give it a shot, I'm sure that Truco, Blue, or myself wouldn't mind nominating you. If it becomes to much responsibility, I'm sure you can resign. Also, I added a reference to SS02. iMatthew 15:48, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You know what. Get ready, because I'm about to nominate you. Do you approve? iMatthew 15:57, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh sorry, I thought you meant that you were ready now. I'm going away mid February. I'll be on wikibreak. How about I nominate you the weekend after I come back. Which will be Saturday March 1st, and Sunday March 2nd.iMatthew 16:08, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No problem whatsoever. I suggested TiLT (if you wanted to use our usernames) Otherwise, I'm ok with leaving it, "The Kliq" iMatthew 16:26, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yup, I agree with you and Truco. "The Kliq" it is. iMatthew 16:30, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
RE: Admin
Hmmm... it appears you have a very good resume; you have 8500 edits, a good fraction of that are mainspace edits. You've a lot of experience in building article, as well as vandal-fighting experience. I believe if you are strong in answering the admin questions are strong, you would have a very good chance of succeeding. TheChronic 17:34, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to run for adminship someday. Right now, I feel like I need to build up my resume further. Cheers, TheChronic 17:39, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from acting like a total dick. It completely annoys me when you do that. If you would like to act like a dick, please... just kidding! Oh, one more thing: could you possibly help with the expansion of the pro wrestling portal? It still needs "selected pictures", "did you know" and "topics". TheChronic 17:53, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Any high-quality pictures would be suitable to be a "selected picture" (there would have to be five of them). They don't have to be featured pictures, but they should be free-use pics. I would suggest looking into the pictures that Mshake3 has. Those may work. TheChronic 18:06, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Chavo/Edge
While they teamed up as a tag team only once (all units had to have a first time teaming) it was established in the article and on TV that Edge, Chavo, and Vickie are all in cahoots with each other now.
Add in Hawkins and Ryder, and you have yourself a stable.
Not trying to be argumentative or a troublemaker, I'm just trying to keep things accurate.
Whatever, man. I just can't deal with this. If he has problems, he shouldn't bring them to Wikipedia, you know what I mean? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 00:43, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alright. Hey, are the images any problem at the Unforgiven article? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 01:04, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, cause Matt said that they were an issue and I wanted someone else's opinions. Are you writing the feud in your sandbox or....? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 01:09, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, okay. Well, right now I'm writing it in my sandbox and when the feud needs to be added, then I'll add it. Is that cool? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 01:14, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I would. Since it kinda goes, with an example, Cena and Edge, then Cena and Triple H, then Cena, Triple H and Edge. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ThinkBlue (talk • contribs) 02:04, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alright. Hey, I've been reading and basically there's not that much hype going into the Chamber match. What should I do? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 02:10, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If they continued the feud YES, but if they didn't then NO. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 02:21, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I see no problem with adding it, so yeah, add it. ;) What is Truco working on? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 02:32, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, just checkin'. Is Matt working with us? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 02:34, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I was just wondering, since he's part of the group. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 02:39, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I knew it. See, I knew I should have let you know. The Kliq member has the back of the other Kliq member. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 02:50, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I would, but you seem to know TJ and Bulletproof very well. Can we just place him in suspicion of a sockpuppet? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 02:58, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I guess. So, do you think he might get block? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 03:35, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm, well, let's just see what happens. What are you working on now? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 03:44, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Cool. I'm fixing the "Background" for Unforgiven, as comments by Truco. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 03:52, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Wait, do you have the Lesnar feud for the Background? Awww, that sucks. I guess you and me will have to expand SummerSlam. Are they on trying to work on Horswoggle's article or what? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 23:31, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Admin
I don't know too much about your non-wrestling related edits, but based on your wrestling related edits I would supports your request for adminship. TJSpyke 01:13, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Dont want to bump in here but LAX you would make a good admin but what other articles other than PW do you edit? Oh and sorry I havent been able to start the SS article, I've been busy with other pages. But I gurantee I will write the entire event section on my own. Also go to my Sandbox, do you see what I am trying to do with the footnotes? can you fix it so it is in the same format as in the thisTrUcO9311TaLk / SiGn 02:50, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. ;) We ALL have lives. Today, we work on SS. Question: Have you read any info. for the Chamber? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 15:38, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, Davnel told me there wasn't any feud, but the feud between GM's Eric Bischoff and Stephanie McMahon. Yeah, just add the Lesnar feud and help me in the Aftermath in my sandbox. *cough* 18-0. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 19:58, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Who knows, today we finish SS and we can work on another PPV. Yeah, I hope they win. Hey, what WrestleMania were you thinking of working in? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 20:07, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I was maybe thinking of working on WrestleMania XII. Opinions? Hey, I can't find any pics. of Orton as the World Heavyweight champion, what should I do? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 20:13, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I guess we can do XX. I don't mind which one we work at. ;) P.S. Somehow you and I are the leaders of the group. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 20:31, 21 January 2008 (UTC)'[reply]
I don't mind which one. I prefer XX, but X-Seven will work too. iMatthew 20:33, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alright. I'm down with that. Are we still doing another Survivor Series? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 20:40, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
ok, no problem! let's just finish SS first. =] iMatthew 20:44, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I'm down with doing SummerSlam. But, are we really going to edit Hornswoggle's article? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 20:48, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, then. :) I guess, we can start working on SummerSlam. Or? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 21:00, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, we all decided that 'Mania was our next project, so I think we stick by it. What do you think? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 21:12, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Go vote on the Kliq's page. iMatthew 21:28, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, RVD and Benoit are probably part of the undercard matches. But it seems someone's starting on the article. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 21:31, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alright. Are we deciding over what's out next project? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 21:38, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
place your votes =] iMatthew 21:49, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Of course, Kliq member. I'll work on the event. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 22:11, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It works. Is there another "Aftermath" to work on? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 23:12, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
As soon as you add the Lesnar feud, and me adding what happened at Armageddon, then I guess we're done. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 23:24, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I believe you. So, do they want to work on WrestleMania or what's the deal? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 23:39, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, it'll take time to get used too. But, we'll get there. Due to the fact we are the leaders and stuff. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 23:45, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
One thing though. Matt said we should do this: work on WrestleMania XX, SummerSlam 02, and Over The Edge 98. What do you think? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 01:45, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Of course. We already agreed that you would have the Background. Hey, can we still work on PPV's, without the Kliq? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 20:24, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Good question; probably me and you AND individually. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 20:29, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
True. So, do you want to expand a PPV together? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 20:36, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, when do you want to start working on SS? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 20:42, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Cool. I'll start researching for the Event. Do you want me to add SS to the PPV list? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 20:50, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alright. Hey, something just caught my eye. Is the Triple Threat elimination match going to a "feud" background? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 00:38, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, its in your hands. ;) But you know what, it seems Truco knows a whole lot about Eddie Guerrero, why not tell him if he can add the feud there. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 00:44, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. I just don't want you to stress out, that's all. So, would you like for me to start in the event? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 00:49, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. I don't mind. ;) Dude, we should like have a schedule on what PPV's we want to work on. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 01:12, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Cool. We should create a table for the PPV's. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 01:24, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, try that. P.S. Some guy by the name of Omstmustisnt, vandalized your page, but not to worry, the Kliq member reverted the guy's edit. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 02:25, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
So, are these guys working on WrestleMania? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 02:42, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, cause the article doesn't have the "under construction" tag and basically no edits have been made by them. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 02:47, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Matt says he's waiting for Davnel and Truco on what they are going to do. They need to "break it down" on what they are going to work on. Like us, SummerSlam, you're working on the feuds and I'm going to work on the event. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 02:55, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to start working on Survivor Series (02) today. What are some things that I should work on? iMatthew 12:44, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Click the link on, "The Kliq"'s userbox, check out the new section I just finished. iMatthew 19:57, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, Blue and I think that Hornswoggle's article could use some help. WIth your's and Truco's approval, that would be our second group project. iMatthew 01:12, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
oh, it's cool. but as Blue said, today we get serious with SS02. iMatthew 12:12, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
So do you like, "The Kliq"'s new page? iMatthew 14:04, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hello LAX (how do you want me to say that? L-A-X or Lax?). I noticed that the welcome that you gave me has a spelling error (experienced not experenced), normally I would just correct it and not tell you about it. However, I don't know much about templates and also don't know the name of the template you used. So, my question is how do you figure out what template someone used if the coding just looks like normal (I see that ~~~~ works so that anybody later just sees the signature substitution)? Really I just want to know the basics of templates. Also, could you teach me some wikimark-up? I already know the quick way to bold, italicize, and a combination of the two. I also understand how to redirect, underline, link, "nowikify" code, strike, and make basic changes to the superficial description of the script (size, strikethrough, position, colour (but only with text, not numbers), face, etc.), but do not know if there are any shortcuts for these. I would really appreciate the help, thanks. Manu-vetalkproSkicontribs 21:02, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
[reply]
cuz its weird seeing a "white guy" (no offense) with a spanish theme (LAX name/mexican colors in username)..lol —Preceding unsigned comment added by Truco9311 (talk • contribs) 23:41, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
SummerSlam (1994) and Royal Rumble (2005) have been listed for Peer review. Please review these articles and make suggestions on how they can be improved before they are nominated for Good Article status. Their respective peer reviews can be found here and here.
NOTICE: If you are actively editing and contributing to articles under the scope of WikiProject Professional Wrestling, we suggest you add your name to the list of active members.
Several wrestling news sites report that former Total Nonstop Action Wrestling stars Ron Killings and Chris Harris have been in talks with WWE. In addition The Big Show is said to be returning as well. Be on the look out for unsourced claims of these signing being added to their respective articles as well as the WWE Roster article.
The focus on improving Stub-class articles is continuing to pay off, as the number of stubs has reduced from 717 to 706 over the past two weeks. The goal for this week is to get it down to 700, so please check out the stub article subpage to see what you can help with.
You are receiving this because because you are listed as a member of the Professional Wrestling WikiProject. By default, the full newsletter is sent to your talk page. However, you have several delivery options at your disposal. Below are the options:
I wouldn't mind, but people will complain that it will be bias and all...--TrUCo9311 20:53, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well in that case, go ahead. Thanks =)--TrUCo9311 20:57, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That's cool, Im just glad its finally being reviewed, its been like 1 1/2 month now.--TrUCo9311 21:02, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yea, thanx I REALLY Appreciate it. (remember review it like u dont know wrestling..lol)TrUCo9311 21:10, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly...--TrUCo9311 21:33, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand what you are trying to ask me?TrUCo9311 21:17, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, well after reviewing the edit history of the article I would say yes/no, but mostly kinda yes because you did add refs, sourced sentences, added templates, and did a few clean up edits. Why, if this is so, you can't give a GA review?TrUCo9311 21:17, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, then Ill keep waiting (for someone to review it)...lol (u think i would make a good admin?)TrUCo9311 21:25, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, oh well I'll wait..lol (how many do u have)?--TrUCo9311 21:31, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, ive been here longer than you i think and you still have more edits than me =D--TrUCo9311 21:37, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have been here for 10 months and 2 weeks, while you have like 6 months. TrUCo9311 21:43, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yea, good job...--TrUCo9311 21:47, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fair Use
Added to the picture, Fair Use NiMiTiZeMsg 22:40, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
New Set Image
I think I deserve to have it used and not deleted because,
Its unlikely for somebody to post/replace a same image on the RAW article
I have a Free fair use for the image NiMiTiZeMsg03:09, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Best of 2007
So why is this episode considered "special", when none of the other yearly specials are listed? Mshake3 (talk) 04:57, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Adminship
The Chronic would like to nominate you to become an administrator. Please visit Wikipedia:Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact The Chronic to accept or decline the nomination. A page will be or has been created for your nomination at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/LAX . If you accept the nomination, you must formally state and sign your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.
Thank you for the barnstar, and good luck on the RFA! TheChronic 00:04, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Just a reminder: you should check your RFA page from time to time to check on your progress, as well as to answer the questions from other users. TheChronic 04:43, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
RE: Adminship
I think you would be a fantastic administrator, that's why I've given my support to your Rfa. ZenlaxTCS 20:03, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I would also too apologize for not working on the article. Recently, I had snowboarding accident, in which I injured my back, and I'm really feeling the pain. The reason I'm telling you this, is maybe we can postpone in completing the article, until my back heals. Is that alright? ZenlaxTCS 20:08, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for understanding. Can I ask a question? How would you feel if I requested an Rfa? (When I'm properly use to Wikipedia). ZenlaxTCS 20:12, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I know. I'll start working on that, when I'm fully recovered from my back injury. But, thanks for pointing that out. ZenlaxTCS 20:19, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've replied on the RFA page. D.M.N. (talk) 21:12, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
So have I...TrUCo9311 21:24, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Me too. iMatthew 23:20, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I'll do my best to remember, but sometimes I just totally forget. iMatthew 23:27, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Thanks for the heads up. iMatthew 23:30, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
So, besides from studying for my next regents (which is tomorrow!), I'm open tonight. What should I do with SS? iMatthew 23:34, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 00:01, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
PPV
After Armageddon, we should work on either a Taboo Tuesday or Vengeance PPV. How 'bout you? P.S. I gave my support to your RFA. ;) -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 00:05, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm down with Taboo Tuesday '05, then we can work on Vengeance 2004. What do you think? And you're welcome, for your RFA. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 16:27, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, glad we agreed on this. So, are the questions hard for your RFA? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 16:36, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I know, that's why I said not to bring him back. Anyways, have the other Kliq members started working on WrestleMania? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 16:54, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That's terrible. But, Davnel is busy with Survivor Series '03. Do you want to help them? Or... -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 17:05, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hey LAX, I haven't been on much for the past few days. I had a regents this morning. I've been at review classes and non-stop studying for it. I'm going to get started on WMXX over the weekend. Maybe I'll work on it a little bit tonight or tomorrow too. iMatthew 22:00, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, just wanted to know. Hey for our next PPV's, why don't we just start working on them in our sanboxes. Example: I write the feud and aftermath for Armageddon and after your done with the SS feuds, you can work on Taboo Tuesday feud / aftermath in your sandbox. You get what I mean? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 18:31, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, cool. So, how's your RFA progress? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 18:37, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not to jinx it or anything, but Congratulations, you might actually become an Admin, again I don't want to jinx it. ;) So, I'm done with the Event, do you want me to start on the Aftermath? Or... -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 18:49, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, I know you have a life also. ;) Alright, I'll start working on that and then we can work on whatever is next. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 18:56, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. I already promised you that. ;) Did you watch the Rumble? P.S. Do I update the PPV list? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 01:17, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Question: What would go first; the HD info. or the the main event / the undercard matches...? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 01:53, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, okay. What do you think of Cena winning the Rumble? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 01:55, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I was shocked. When he came out, I was like, wait isn't he "injured"? I really don't think he should of won it, but at the same time he needs to take the WWE title off Orton; it looks stupid on Orton. But, who knows, anything can happen. Hey, I've been reading and a whole lot of stuff is going to have to be added to the Aftermath section for SummerSlam. What should I include in the section? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 02:09, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, I'll try managing that. But, was The Rock on SmackDown? Because Lesnar was drafted to SD. P.S. Don't worry, its all cool. I would like to apologize for not finishing the Aftermath section, as I've been busy with other articles. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 02:19, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
More reading to my agenda. ;) OMG, what PPV's do we focus on RR or NWO? Due to vandalism. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 02:25, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I won't look at the articles until I watch Raw tonight. ;) Is a certain someone in, though? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 02:57, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Never mind. I thought you would know. So, should the Cena and Orton thing be added to the RR Aftermath? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 03:00, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Damn, Cena shouldn't of won it. That's the main reason for it all. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 03:08, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, but for how long. Not only that, but WrestleMania XXIV, the next target. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 03:13, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah. Well, maybe by that time people will forget the Rumble and remember the results of NWO. But, still. You going to work a late shift tonight? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 03:18, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, but maybe I can "throw" her the party at NWO and afterwards do something else. I really want to go. Only because I hope its going to be good. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 03:43, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No, no. If you see here I learned the first participant. Just say yes or no. Is he in? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 03:51, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, that's it. I will only know 3. Besides, I knew he was going to be part of the Chamber. Its just that if I go, I don't want to take pictures of these guys all bloodied. You know what I mean? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 03:55, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
But, yeah, my vote goes to Hardy to win the Chamber. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 03:58, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I knew you were going to question it. But, yeah. I've read in an article that Shawn doesn't want to be champion, due to the fact that he doesn't participate at house shows and he wants to help the "new talent" advance. So, with that in mind. Hardy is my vote for the win at NWO. And after what he did to Orton on Raw, he's changed my mind. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 04:06, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orton as champion is the stupidest thing that has ever happened to the WWE. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 04:09, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly. Hey, for the Rumble, do we really need to include that Cena broke Lesnar's record by becoming the longest man in a Rumble? (something like that) -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 04:13, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Nice. Which Backlash did you want to work on? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 23:04, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, my bad. Sorry, I'm looking over some stuff for SummerSlam. Sorry. I'm down with that. I think after I'm done adding every match for the Rumble and Survivor Series, I guess we can work on Armaggedon. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 23:14, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I know. What about you? You work non-stop. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 23:19, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, either way, we both work hard. Hey, did you want to work on Vengeance 2004? Or... -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 23:28, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't remember. But, the only reason I bring it up is because Cimmo created the article. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 23:32, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I know. I was so mad when he created the Vengeance 2006 article. And, he also kept adding {{main|Unforgiven (2004)}}, before I created it, to the Unforgiven page. I doubt he'll work on Vengeance or Unforgiven. So, I guess we can take Vengeance. ;) -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 23:50, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I know. He needs a PW intervention. But, maybe Nikki can have a talk with him or something. Anyways, I think we should write one of our PPV's in our sandboxes, create it there and then finish it and paste it into the main article. Do you like that? Or... -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 23:58, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, cool. I guess we can start it with Armageddon. Who's starting what? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 00:02, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Just like the good ol' days. ;) So, when does your RFA expire or end? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 00:08, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm. So, do you have to have a whole lot of support to be an Admin? Or... -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 00:31, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Nice. Question: Do we really need the qualifications match in the Rumble article? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 01:04, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I only found some refs. for some qualifications, the rest is history. But, I'll ask if it needs to stay or be removed. What future 2008 article would you like to work on? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 01:17, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe between the three (or five) of us, we can take WrestleMania 24. iMatthew 01:24, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Or The Great American Bash 08. I might be attending this event, in which case I can take pictures for the article. =] iMatthew 01:25, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Cool. I'd like to work on Vengeance 2008, SummerSlam 2008, Unforgiven 2008, and Survivor Series 2008. We can probably reserve some of these. ;) -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 01:27, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
![[2]](http://homepage.mac.com/knarley/owenhart/timeline/files/owenhartapphoto.jpg){kind=link}