User talk:Ladispeaks

Ways to improve Chris Ekiyor[edit]

Hi, I'm JamesG5. Ladispeaks, thanks for creating Chris Ekiyor!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Page needs categories & sections. To meet WP:BLP it needs references, I linked two on the talk page, they should be incorporated in to the article. Language is WP:NPOV, needs cleanup, as does use like referring to the subject as "Dr. Chris."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. JamesG5 (talk) 09:04, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ladispeaks, please don't take those comments as criticisms, they're some guidelines to help you improve the article. Please note that if you don't add proper sources per WP:BLP someone is likely to mark the page for deletion, I linked some info on the talk page, please use that as an example of what sources to seek & feel free to use those sources in the article. Hope this helps! JamesG5 (talk) 09:06, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again! Saw your comments on my page, I'd gone to bed shortly after. Looks like another editor stepped in and helped you clean up what was needed, page looks great now. One reason for the tags is that it can let more experienced editors know you need help. Let me know if I can assist going forward! JamesG5 (talk) 14:11, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks James. Well appreciated How can I put the lines? The border that separates each section.

If you hit "Edit" on the page you can usually see the code. Sections breaks are represented by == A title done like this ==. (You'll see if you edit this page that I used a nowiki code so you could see that without it actually breaking the page up, at the top of this section it's the same thing with "Ways to improve Chris Ekiyor." JamesG5 (talk) 14:56, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JamesG5 (talk)

Can I use your help in reviewing another of the article I am trying to publish?

Here; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:EBOSA_JOSEPH#Ebosa_Joseph

Speedy deletion nomination of Mike Omotosho[edit]

Hello Ladispeaks,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mike Omotosho for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Vexations (talk) 02:00, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mike Omotosho for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mike Omotosho is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Omotosho (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 2Joules (talk) 07:06, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ebosa Joseph (June 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Etothepi was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ebosa Joseph and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ebosa Joseph, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

•≈20+π^{(talk to me!)} 14:28, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ladispeaks! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! •≈20+π^{(talk to me!)} 14:28, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Spacefinish[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Spacefinish, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 09:36, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Lennox Mall (July 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gene93k was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Of the five references provided, three are affiliated, one is an obvious press release and the remaining one is routine.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Lennox Mall and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Lennox Mall, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

• Gene93k (talk) 22:53, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Bola Adeboye[edit]

Hi, I'm JamesG5. Ladispeaks, thanks for creating Bola Adeboye!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Uncategorized page. Section headers are not standard. Has some grammar errors and questionable word usage. Several claims are not supported by the references provided. All but one reference are the subject's own sites or press releases. Notability is questionable without much deeper sourcing.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

JamesG5 (talk) 20:20, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bola Adeboye for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bola Adeboye is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bola Adeboye until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bbarmadillo (talk) 10:06, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Patricia.com.ng[edit]

The article Patricia.com.ng has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I'm not seeing significant coverage in independent reliable sources; does not appear to meet WP:GNG and WP:WEB.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSS (talk|c|em) 16:54, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Patricia.com.ng[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Patricia.com.ng, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 20:40, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Patricia.com.ng for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Patricia.com.ng is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patricia.com.ng until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GSS (talk|c|em) 06:37, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ladispeaks. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. GAB^gab 16:12, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ladispeaks (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not create any multiple accounts in fact, I encouraged a colleague to sign up as a Wiki Editor instead and she called me yesterday that she got an email that she was called. You can verify the two of us's identity just by typing it on Google. Ladispeaks (talk) 10:20, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are both guilty of meatpuppetry then.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 10:58, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

"I consider that the Nigerian startup community are quite prominent to be mentioned on Wikipedia starting with the e-commerce platforms. I plan to create for others as well who are making waves in the country and taking Africa to the world." 1

Please see our conflict of interest policy and also note that doing promotional work is not allowed. Wikipedia isn't a place to promote start-ups. Also, undisclosed paid editing is not allowed.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 10:58, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think what I would just do is declare that we both share the same IP address because I am sure you would allege a different thing against me now.

And I did not say Wikipedia is a promotional platform and I do not use it as such.

I want to believe you have hidden interests against me actually.160.152.52.30 (talk) 11:01, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I sincerely do not understand how you make unsubstantiated comments amount my activities on Wikipedia. Is this anything racial? Is it because I’m African or what? Ladispeaks (talk) 07:22, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalisation[edit]

For future reference, please be aware that "Social Media" and "Influencer Marketing" are not proper nouns and should not be capitalised. Thanks. - Julietdeltalima (talk) 00:35, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks User:Julietdeltalima

--Ladispeaks (talk) 11:06, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Patricia.com.ng[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Patricia.com.ng, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GSS (talk|c|em) 14:42, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Plaqad[edit]

Hello Ladispeaks,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Plaqad for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Dom from Paris (talk) 01:03, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plaqad (January 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The lead doesn't explain what Plaqad is.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Plaqad and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Plaqad, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:16, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The Lennox Mall[edit]

Hello, Ladispeaks. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:The Lennox Mall.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:31, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ladispeaks (talk) 15:35, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

edited based on the recommendations.

Can you review now? or give suggestions before reviewing on my talk page so i can also work on it to be a better editor on here?--Ladispeaks (talk) 15:35, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Ladispeaks. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in Patricia.com.ng, Plaqad, Draft:Plaqad, and other pages, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. – Athaenara ✉ 16:12, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Plaqad[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Plaqad, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:21, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019[edit]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Freelancer. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. The given sources were not verifying the alleged claim about exploitation (and are barely reliable, low-quality sources to boot). GermanJoe (talk) 16:36, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

– Athaenara ✉ 22:02, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ladispeaks (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Block was very unreasonable and irrational with assumptions Ladispeaks (talk) 16:06, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

One unblock request at a time, please. You had two. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 16:35, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ladispeaks (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

LadiSpeaks Ladispeaks (talk) 14:08, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is blank. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:31, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ladispeaks (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand why I have been blocked and would refrain from doing such. I commit myself to making meaningful contributions to Wikipedia going forward Ladispeaks (talk) 14:08, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This just rephrases the instructions. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:31, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ladispeaks (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand the major reason why I have been blocked is because I have been allegedly advertising on Wikipedia - while this maybe wrong, who would believe me? It's not a law court and it is not a physical space that I can prove myself innocent of this but notwithstanding, I would refrain from doing editing pages that looks like I am advertising anything whatsoever. I commit myself to making meaningful contributions to Wikipedia going forward across all my edit pages. I would appreciate a guide too because being that I would under probation, I would appreciate an admin that can always review first before i Publish to avoid issues like this particular one and many others. Ladispeaks (talk) 08:44, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Apart from the apparent undisclosed paid editing there is Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ladispeaks now.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 14:05, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ladispeaks. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 14:06, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]