User talk:LilHelpa/Archive 1

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive Number 1 - October 2008 through April 2009

For my archived awards see: User talk:LilHelpa/awards

Welcome!

Hello, LilHelpa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Thanks for copyedit

Thanks for your edits at Bullenhuser Damm. I've changed this section to clear it. Maybe you are able to have a look? Sebastian scha. (talk) 18:30, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank you very much. Sebastian scha. (talk) 18:47, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Good job

I noticed you have been an active contributor to the Wikipedia Typo Team. I just wanted to give you a nod of thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia and our project. Jason Quinn (talk) 17:31, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks Jason. I appreciate it. LilHelpa (talk) 17:37, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Typos in quotes, or citation titles

Hi
I'm assuming you are using some kind of semiautomatic process to fix typos in articles. Can you try to avoid touching quotes, titles in citation templates and probably everything inside reference tags, or at least take extra care in those cases? E.g. you changed "Religon" to "Religion" although the spelling error was in the quoted source.
Thanks & Cheers, Amalthea^Talk 00:08, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Your assumption that I'm using any kind of semiautomatic process is incorrect unless you count cut and paste in the summary line. Am trying to take care in those cases. I believe I reverted the instance you cite when I became aware of it... or at least a similar one. Sorry if not. Will try to be at the top of my game ;) --LilHelpa (talk) 00:25, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Don't worry, I fixed that one. If you run into sourced spelling errors again you might want to consider tagging it with the {{sic}} template so that readers and future editors don't have to wonder. Thanks & Cheers, Amalthea^Talk 00:55, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Good idea. I've done that, but not consistently, and not with that format. Thanks. LilHelpa (talk) 01:03, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

You're doing something that needs to be done more often, thank you. You also caught a misspelling of mine, which I appreciated. Nice to see someone quietly going about fixing stuff. Have a good day and regards,MarmadukePercy (talk) 17:52, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Kind of you to drop by and show you noticed. Thanks. LilHelpa (talk) 17:54, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Great to see you still at work, and thanks for catching my typo. Have a nice weekend.MarmadukePercy (talk) 09:05, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for helping Burn Rate (book)

I read something the other day...that got me thinking. Basically on the idea of fixing things instead of noting that they are wrong (don't get me started on the ballbusters who drop textboxes like turds).TCO (talk) 02:29, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome. Some folks are just too busy to actually do the fixing I think. LilHelpa (talk) 03:21, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors

You may be interested in this wikiproject.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 16:23, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Typo

I think you made a small typo when trying to correct a typo at MD2 (file format). Do you want me to correct it? --DanielPharos (talk) 17:00, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Yep, sure, no problem. :) --DanielPharos (talk) 19:15, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

You rock, dood!

Damn, you're good! Thanks!

--UnicornTapestry (talk) 21:40, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! LilHelpa (talk) 21:54, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Creation of broken image links

Hello, from your edit history I can see that you're doing good work by e.g. correcting spelling mistakes. BUT when you "correct" the spelling of links to file names from an existing to a non-existing one, as you did with this edit to Müller-Thurgau some time ago, you create broken links. Even if you're using a bot, you're not supposed to run on automatic, as I'm sure you know! Regards, Tomas e (talk) 16:29, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Ooops. I usually catch that. No bot being used, just a human and equally prone to mistakes. LilHelpa (talk) 16:34, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

OK, I just checked your recent edit history and saw a lot of spelling error corrections in a row so I assumed it was bot editing. Tomas e (talk) 20:42, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Didn't mean to break your rhythm...

but I saw the correction pattern and started up with this change. I'll slink away as you are faster than I am. I also like to imagine new ways that words can be misspelled. And yes, I end up at Indian articles often, but I figure that helps me to expand my horizons. Best yet is 'metalling' - there are many kinds of English.

The template correction is an example of something I wish I could codify. I once 'fixed' a bunch of mis-categorizations, which were simply people typing in the word 'category' wrong! (e.g. catgory - euuwww) It's my only categorization work yet. :-) If one could find a set of commonly used template names, that might be something to pursue? Shenme (talk) 06:06, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Well, the best found when searching was a result of looking for occurrences of 'abd'. I found "abd nabaged". The key to unraveling that is of course the keyboard-ism that 'managed' the 'b' in 'and'. :-P A simple example is 'bu' vs. 'by'. The fingers either don't move far enough or are entirely misplaced. I now use likely keyboard mis-fingerings when I run out of deletions/transpositions/vowel-changes. Shenme (talk) 23:46, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

intiiative

You just made some spelling corrections, but the change you made was to an incorrect spelling: intiiative. Bubba73 (talk), 16:02, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Bummer! LilHelpa (talk) 16:05, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

I fixed it inBudapest Gambit. Bubba73 (talk), 16:10, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

BAGHA JATIN

Is it possible to verify why and on which ground the date of Bagha Jatin's birth has been modified as 8 December (instead of 7)?--BobClive (talk) 07:04, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Not for Church Folk!

Sometimes the typo's don't need to be "fixed" diff. feydey (talk) 17:21, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Ooops! Yep. My bad. LilHelpa (talk) 19:38, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Too many for me

If you run out of misspellings, go for 'begain'. It looks like at least a hundred? Or 'accross'. Oh, yes, and what they said above, about picture files. There is no fixing some things... :-( Shenme (talk) 04:19, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. Not likely to run out of misspellings, but I'll get to those. LilHelpa (talk) 19:39, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for correction

Thank you for correction made in "Russian Translation (political detective)" article. Muatargim talk Mutargim (talk) 18:49, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

2008 Iditarod

Hi LilHelpa, Thanks for fixing my typo. I can't believe it was wrong all this time. Clerks. (talk) 18:35, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Royal Medal

Thanks for correcting the typo here. The context of the typo (it was in a quote, and in a title of a paper in a quote, no less) means I've reverted it. Keep up the good work, though! I wonder; would you be able to take a looksee at Tetrarch (tank) for me? It is up for Featured at the moment, and copyediting is always needed. Thanks! Ironholds (talk) 12:38, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Not really; it is the title of a book. In that context it is spelt entirely correctly. Errors within the quote itself are a different matter, however; I'll get onto those when I have time. Ironholds (talk) 12:48, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for fixing my typo in Colin Campbell Cooper. I'm usually the one fixing typos left by others (although to a much lesser degree than your impressive efforts). Thanks for helping a fellow WikiGnome out. mandarax • xɐɹɐpuɐɯ 03:01, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

So funny

LilHelpa, your user page is so funny. Thanks for catching the typo in The Road to Samarcand, which I feel is practically written in my blood, or to put it less -- do you have your figurative red pencil sharpened? -- gorilly, written in my sweat. Well, that's hardly more appealing! Anyway, I've worked so hard on that article, and I appreciate your help (please supply multiple exclamation points. I know they are discouraged in good writing, and I've already used one. I tremble to compound the sin.). Thanks again for the humor on your page. So enjoyable. And now...how do you make an adverb out of gore?Hammerdrill (talk) 14:56, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Letitia Dunbar-Harrison

Thanks for fixing the typo - well spotted! Autarch (talk) 11:49, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Wicca music

An article that you have been involved in editing, Wicca music, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wicca music. Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:46, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

New article, same name

hello LilHelpa,

I would like to write a new article about my students organization (www.iaasworld.org) and discovered that the name is already taken by a Nepalese research institute. How can I create a page that clarifies which IAAS one wants to find when typing it in the search box? Or is this something editors do?

on other thing: I am also updating the infos on the German page of this organization, the name has changed recently though. Can I also change the titel of the article somehow? (see http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Association_of_Agricultural_Students; it should be International Association of Students in Agricultural and Related Sciences)

Thanks for your help in this Sebastian Oltmanns (talk) 14:22, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

IAAS

Hi LilHelpa,

thanks for the fast answer! It is true that the article exist already, I would much rather have it under the abbreviation (IAAS) than under the full name as noone will ever want to type it in I guess. The conflict of interest with the Nepalese institute also does not appear in the german version but in the english one in case we would shift the article to IAAS. Therefore, I would like to suggest to create a disambiguation page "IAAS" leading to the two sites "Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science Rampur, Nepal" and "International Association of Students in Agricultural and Related Sciences ". Would this be possible? In case two different topics are not enough, there is also other versions of IAAS such as the "International Association of Academies of Science", "International Association for Astronomical Studies" and others.

in the article called "International Association of Students in Agricultural and Related Sciences" it is also asked to give some references, even indicated for which part. As I am totally new here, would a link to the site of a university be enough here like this one: http://ects.czu.cz/en/?r=227? I mean, where and how do you proof something like this? In our field, everyone knows that Monsanto and Bayer CropScience are two of the leading companies in crop sciences, where where is it written down as proof for an encyclopedia...

thanks, Sebastian Oltmanns (talk) 14:02, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

IAAS

Hey LilHelpa!

I have implemented the changes, think it should be fine like this. Will still have to do a lot on the article "International Association of Students in Agricultural and Related Sciences" but this will follow. One little question to this page: It is asked to give some references, even indicated for which part. As I am totally new here, would a link to the site of a university be enough (as external reference) like this one: http://ects.czu.cz/en/?r=227? I mean, where and how do you proof something like this? And who will be checking if it is fine then / who will put the box away?

Thanks Sebastian Oltmanns (talk) 17:04, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your help so far. I got the point and will work myself a bit more into the topic. cheers, Sebastian Oltmanns (talk) 21:24, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

typo: univeristy -> university

LilHelpa, big thanks for fixing that lil' typo I made on dozens of mantis articles! Good work. Boston (talk) 03:01, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for fixing my typo, too! Belvidere Assembly Plant. Chergles (talk) 15:54, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

My pleasure. LilHelpa (talk) 16:29, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for catching appproach -> approach, too! You've got a good eye! Descriptive Psychology --Anscombe (talk) 20:19, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

All part of the triple to double service provided free of charge. LilHelpa (talk) 20:36, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Request for some help

Hi LilHelpa,

I was glad to see that you corrected a mistake on Bill Crooks. Thank you for that. May I ask you to take a closer look at the article as a whole. I created it a short time ago. But I'm not a native English speaker, as you may find out, when reading it. So please, help me with correcting mistakes in typing, but especially in grammar, if you can find a few minutes for that! Thank you in advance, Dick Bos (talk) 08:03, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanx a lot for correcting it! Dick Bos (talk) 21:17, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Note

Hi, in case you're not already aware of it, I thought I would alert you to the fact that you've been mentioned in a few places: WP:AN#Unauthorized bot? and WP:Bot owners' noticeboard#Unauthorized bot?

Don't worry about the occasional criticism about a mistake or accusation of being a bot. You're doing a great job! MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 03:50, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Antibiotic resistance

Did that do the trick, or is there still a problem? Best regards, -- Ssilvers (talk) 22:24, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

BTW, personally, I don't like the cite templates. They do act as a nice checklist, but they reduce flexibility of how the cite turns out. I know that the FA administrators don't prefer them either, although a lot of the GA reviewers like them. Wikipedia is a crazy place. -- Ssilvers (talk) 22:34, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

FA means WP:Featured Articles and GA means WP:Good Articles. If you want to see what concerns the editors working on the best articles in Wikipedia, check out the review process at WP:Featured Articles and work on a couple of FA reviews. Then you will get a good sense of what we are ultimately working towards. Feel free to ask me any questions, but I think you're doing great. -- Ssilvers (talk) 22:53, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Willie Mount

Thanks for correcting the typo, LilHelpa! :) Hekerui (talk) 12:31, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Last Four months...

Having seen your corrections to Feruary in one of the articles I watch, I decided to work on the last 4 months. I may not have found everything that you would. (You are very intentive looking for mispellings) but I did work on them. Just letting you know in case you are wondering why searches for things like decmber come up with hits which have been fixed...

Still need to get to a few of the Decmber's and all of the Dcember's, but I'm heading home. If you want to do them, fine, otherwise I'll get to them within a day or two. BTW, at this point I'm only looking in the mainspace, though I should probably include templates as well. I don't care how badly people misspell things on their talk pages. :)Naraht (talk) 00:23, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Sheringham

Please stop trying to correct a file name as a spelling mistake, vis File:Sheringham War Memorial 16 Decenber 2007 (1).JPG --palmiped | Talk 19:31, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

Hi there! I noticed that you fixed a typo in the article for Brian Ray. I've been working on that article quite a bit lately. I must have been working too fast to have even noticed it. Your help is greatly appreciated by all of us :-) TheTwoRoads (talk) 22:24, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Sound Level Meters

Thank you for fixing my silly spelling; I have a blind spot on typos. 24malbec09 (talk) 10:44, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

copyedit

Hey, thanks for the various typo fixes i keep seeing in my watchlist :-). If you had time for a more substantial copy-edit, you could maybe take a gander at Homosexuality in SF? I think it is essential FA ready in terms of content, but it's been waiting months for a full copyedit, and no matter how many previews i check, there always things to fix. i requested at the copyeditor list and the guild, but no luck. I think more than 3 have started, but never get through the whole thing.) Thanks either way! YobMod 07:23, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Great! If it seems too long for a thorough CE, then maybe just the last section (film /TV etc). The lead and critical analysis sections were at least partly done already, but i'm not sure if anyone got any further.Yob Mod 11:58, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

You have corrected "publiher" to "publisher" in the Martin Groves and Scott Moran articles. Thank you; much appreciated! Loganberry (Talk) 02:31, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

Haha, thanks for correcting my typo on this page I made. I spent almost an hour making minor changes and looking for typos, and stuff like that, before I was satisfied, and yet! By the way, I read your user page...I'm indian ;) Suede67 (talk) 17:19, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

I havent come across pages with bad grammar or anything like that, but i know what you mean, english isnt our first language you see! hehe... Suede67 (talk) 17:40, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Absolutely! Can't be helped though I feel. They do what they want to do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Suede67 (talk • contribs) 17:48, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Haha! Wiki has standards, maybe they just don't understand symmetry and neatness. Sigh. Anyway, nice talking to you, cya! Suede67 (talk) 17:54, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Lost And Found (Christian Rock Band)

Please, please, note that this is our PREspective is PURPOSELY spelled that way. It is not a typo. It is a pun that Baum and Bridges used with the word perspective and reflect for "thinking about what they will do in the future."

In reference to [1]

Please, do not "fix" PREspective again.

Thank you.

16:52, 19 March 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by KagomeShuko (talk • contribs)

Shadow

Read your page and laughs (after following your work on one of my "initiative page"). May re-visit and ask you to shadow me around if it's okay. Serenity id (talk) 09:30, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Go easy on me. I mostly just like the freedom to do my own thing here. LilHelpa (talk) 11:00, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Royce Campbell

Thanks for that copy edit! Finally, a constructive edit on this article! There has been much debate during the last week over whether this article should even exist or be good material for WP:CSD, or whether Campbell meets WP:Notability criteria, etc. I think those issues have now been resolved, and the editors can move forward to make the article even better--editors like you! Thanks again! Corderite75 (talk) 20:10, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Niger vs Nigeria

Thank you so much on all your hard copyedit work. Per your user page request to be informed when mistakes are made, the demonym for the Republic of Niger is Nigerien, not Nigerian. The later refers to Nigeria, its neighbor to the south. It's a common mistake. I really do want to thank you for all the hard work you do: I've seen your edits on my wachlist many times, and they make Wikipedia a better place. T L Miles (talk) 00:23, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Ümit Kaftancıog˘lu

Hello,

I am researching assassinated persons and came across the name "Ümit Kaftancıog˘lu" in the encyclopedia. I noticed you recently edited his article, and my question is how do I reproduce this name on a standard keyboard? Is that a numeral "1" after the "c" in his last name? Thank you. Michael David (talk) 23:48, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

I did copy & paste; and Googled & Yahooed it to death and in all instances it appears to be the numeral "1". Strange. Thanks for your response. Michael David (talk) 23:56, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

More strangeness: I had originally intended to ask this question of the person who first entered the article (User:Kitia), but this person has been indefinately blocked for "using one or more accounts abusively". Interesting. Thanks again. Michael David (talk) 00:18, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Bedford CF

Thanks I wanted to put more in it but I have not had the time shall I put some info about the engine or bakes or what ever in it? But any way thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.210.127.99 (talk) 09:46, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Joe Tex discography

Many thanks for catching the spelling error. Dreadarthur (talk) 02:18, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Another Tex, but not Joe

to all the helpers on balloon articles...NVO (talk) 18:37, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Tex Settle, fresh from the typing pool, is in need of copyedit. Not only it's your "favorite" Hindu grammar, the whole article is so far a collection of disjointed sketches, but, unless someone steals his Pentagon file, it's what available. Thanks in advance, and then you can check other installments in the Ring of the Balloons: Osoaviakhim-1, USSR-1, Georgy Prokofiev (these are, at least, cohesive in contents). Yours truly, NVO (talk) 19:23, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your copyedits to Tex Settle. I especially appreciate your effort to use correct dashes; few people pay attention to this sort of thing. However, I wonder if you realize that when you added html dash code (— and –), you were just overwriting the actual emdash and endash characters (— and –) with it. No harm done, but I hate to see someone who actually knows how to use dashes spend their time fixing ones that ain't broke :) Perhaps your browser font isn't displaying the varying types of dashes distinctly? Maralia (talk) 04:17, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks much for the heads up on this. I did need to change my preferences to better see this in the edit window. LilHelpa (talk) 11:20, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

No problem; glad you figured it out! Maralia (talk) 18:46, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Why is "it's" wrong?

I see you have a major drive in changing "it's" to "its". But why is "it's" wrong? I thought apostrophes were used in contractions "Do not" to "Don't" and used to show possession like "Fred's". Isn't "it's" something possessed by "it"? -OOPSIE- (talk) 04:33, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for asking! "It's" is almost always wrong on Wikipedia as we try to avoid contractions. But beyond that, the possessive form is "its", not "it's". As always, though, contractions and bad grammar in quotations and titles (where correctly copied into Wikipedia from the originals) must remain. LilHelpa (talk) 11:41, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

I see wrong uses of "It's" in Wikipedia when it should be "Its" and correct it, but sometimes it is correct. I will take a look at avoid contractions, though. --DThomsen8 (talk) 12:20, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for your recent contributions to the article on Tom Laughlin. I have written much of the article myself and have nominated it for good article status and I'd like to thank you for noticing little things in grammar that I did not. Your work is greatly appreciated. BillyJack193 (talk) 11:28, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Style mentor

Hello again and thanks for your message. I would be happy to be a mentor on style questions. That said, I'm not spending a great deal of time here these days and it may take me several days to get back to you about questions. So if that's okay, I'd be happy to help, but just wanted to let you know. You've done nice work on here and I can tell you're someone who just concentrates on the job at hand rather than the politics, which is great. Let me know if I can help. Best regards and enjoy your weekend, MarmadukePercy (talk) 18:25, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Script

Hi. I am in the process of developing a script to automatically correct common misspellings in articles. The initial goal is for users to have a button at the top of the article which will open an edit window and do a search/replace to correct common misspellings. When the script completes, it then shows the changes and allows the editor to decide if the changes were correct. The goal is to have as few falsely corrected entries, so some of the entries on WP:LCM wouldn't be added. If you are interested in trying it out, let me know. My initial prototype only has entries from the "A" page. There are probably some minor bugs in there as well, but it won't commit any changes without approval. The script is at User:Symplectic Map/spell.js and you just have to include it in your monobook.js file, e.g., User:Symplectic Map/monobook.js. If you are using something other than the standard theme, it would have to be included there instead. It should work on Firefox and Google Chrome. I haven't tested Internet Explorer. If you know of another script for doing this sort of thing, please let me know, so I don't unnecessarily waste any time. Thanks! Symplectic Map (talk) 20:54, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your correction of "it's" in the Night's Master article. That's one of my pet peeves too. (e.g. 'to' instead of 'too', or 'there' instead of 'their'. I even saw "thear" once!) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joshkirkwood (talk • contribs) 22:57, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Latin American integration

Thanks LilHelpa! TriniMuñoz (talk) 01:44, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

To whom it may refer:

I noticed youv'e got me twice (maybe I'll find more). Thanks for adding the extra r in referred. I'm usually a decent speller, but there are a few words that betray me.

By the way, I agree with you about many India-related articles - so full of wonderful information. I'm sure they daunt most would-be copyeditors afraid of logorrhea (there's a fun word for you) and so never get reworked. I've tried before, but can only bite off a section at a time.

I'll remember the correct spelling going forward. Thanks, Hamamelis (talk) 13:44, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Moles

Thanks for your help with the article mole (animal). Due to an ongoing edit war, I have recused myself from working on it for some time. I'd seen my stupid "it's" mistake and had been wanting to fix it so bad it was driving me crazy. Feel free to help more with it; I hope to be able to work more on it soon.

BTW, it's a surprisingly interesting case, you might want to check out the Talk page to see what the fuss is all about. I hope that, if my argument is rhetorically effective enough, you might be swayed. I am in need of allies toward a new consensus. As an established editor on that page, your input is solicited. Chrisrus (talk) 16:39, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Bishop Perowne CofE College

The neutrality of the Bishop Perowne CofE College article has been disputed. If you have contributed to this article, please take a moment to see the article's talk:Bishop Perowne CofE College page.--Kudpung (talk) 10:28, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Steel square

Just out of curiosity, you edited the html and the color of the legend changed from a blue highlight to a black highlight? What exactly "did not point to correct def." ???? --Johnalden^talk 01:06, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

More really weird stuff to copyedit

Take a look if you would at Battle of the palaces and Charles Cameron (architect). NVO (talk) 03:00, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Not quite fixed

I think you need to revisit this![2] Ty 15:04, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Ha! good catch. LilHelpa (talk) 16:28, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

HMS Pinafore

Another super edit. All that wikignoming must make you hungry! Happy munching! -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:53, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

LOL! Listen... do you hear the sound of the tiny violin that I am playing? -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:03, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Hee hee. No, listen, they're singing your praises: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnHksDFHTQI -- Ssilvers (talk) 21:21, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Andrew J. Shapiro

good copy/paste catch. It's a copyvio and has been tagged for speedy deletion.--RadioFan (talk) 14:09, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

cool! LilHelpa (talk) 17:08, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Thank You

Hi, Thank you for the corrections in the article on 'BPC Banking Technologies'. Cheers! Oleggazed! (talk) 06:37, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Battle of the palaces

On June 26, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Battle of the palaces, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Wizardman 14:35, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Charles Cameron (architect)

On June 26, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Charles Cameron (architect), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Wizardman 14:35, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Congrats

Nice to see these DYK noms on your page. Regards, MarmadukePercy (talk) 14:57, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Incidentally, I thought I would go on a wikibreak there for awhile, but that did not come to pass, so if you'd still like me to be a consultant/mentor/etc., please let me know. Take care. MarmadukePercy (talk) 20:58, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Possible move of Nazi plunder

I have started a discussion on possibly moving Nazi plunder. As you are currently a reasonably active editor, as well as a past contributor to the article, I hope you can find some time to make comments at renaming Nazi plunder. Un school 17:46, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of StarJets

An article that you have been involved in editing, StarJets, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StarJets. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.

Ishwasafish^{click here!!!}

18:37, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

could i get you opinion

Just wondering if I could get you opinion on something Talk:Manchester mayoral election, 2009 (New Hampshire) is where the discussion is. So there is an disagreement between me and another editor on what the page should be I believe it should be the one posted above and he thinks it should be Manchester, New Hampshire mayoral election, 2009 just wondering if you could contribute thanks Gang14 (talk) 05:14, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, was not tuned in before the discussion reached consensus. Moreover, these discussions are not really my forte. LilHelpa (talk) 15:38, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Chasing Arrows

The article for Chasing arrows has been nominated for deletion. The discussion on if it will be deleted will go on for 7 days at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chasing Arrows.Coffeepusher (talk) 23:05, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Award

		Ukraine Barnstar
		I give you this Ukraine Barnstar for correcting my it's -> its mistakes in Ukrainian related articles the past months! Thank you! — Mariah-Yulia • Talk to me! 14:02, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Rodolfo Valentin

[This] article has been in Wikipedia from several years. Last July 15-2009 somebody from IP # 147.70.118.96 was vandalizing several times the article, into a few minutes interval. In the same moment I reverted to its rigth version, a minute later somebody named "el estremenu", vandalized again. ( probably it was the same from IP # 147.70.118.96)--I requested protection to the article. An hour after the article was protected , another user of name "bjweeks", nominated the article for deletion!! this is unbelievable since this article has been long time there, everybody liked and has also been rated as star-class by wikiproject. I assume that the person that is nominating the article for deletion is probably the same that was vandalizing it before. And also I assume this is a competitor of Rodolfo Valentin just trying to hurt his profile. Please help to keep this good article and remove the deletion request. thank you 71.190.75.176 (talk) 20:37, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

I'll have a look, but I can't remove the deletion request LilHelpa (talk) 23:45, 16 July 2009 (UTC)