User talk:Lindakeb

November 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Yeeno. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Jon Foster, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Yeeno (talk) 04:49, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sara Lewis moved to draftspace[edit]

It appears that you may have a conflict of interest with the subject of Sara Lewis, and as such you should submit this article to be published through the Articles for Creation process. Before editing the article further, please first disclose on your user page and on the article's Talk page whether you have received money to write this or other articles on Wikipedia, or if you have any other kind of conflict of interest concerning the subject. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. Before submitting, you should make sure that the article is fully compliant with Wikipedia’s neutrality and verifiability policies, as well as our notability guidelines. When you’re ready, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. This process is encouraged, but optional. If you choose not to participate in it, you can remove the AfC template and move the article back to mainspace. You should also consider reaching out to the Teahouse for additional feedback and aid from experienced editors. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:28, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Sara Lewis[edit]

Hello, Lindakeb,

Thank you for creating Sara Lewis.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The awards section needs sourcing for each one.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Eagleash}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Eagleash (talk) 22:45, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

COI[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Sara Lewis. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox.

Please do not continue to remove the COI notice without addressing the issue and responding to the earlier messages at this talk page. To do so could be seen as edit warring or disruptive and ultimately lead to the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 02:45, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Still editing[edit]

Hello. Do you have any association with Tufts University? After your account was auto-confirmed, most of your edits seem to relate to it. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 00:34, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. Please do not ignore this request. I note that you have made other edits in the meantime. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 00:32, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! No I do not, thank you for reaching out.

Regards. Lindakeb (talk) 01:31, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is this your image and you still own the copyright for it [1]? Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 23:41, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Yes, I own any/all images that are featured in this page. Regards, Lindakeb (talk) 23:57, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. MrsSnoozyTurtle 00:35, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That seems quite unlikely, as it would require you to be two different people. This image lists one person as the credit in the metadata, while This one lists an entirely different person. I'd also ask, if you have no connection to Tufts or the subjects of these articles, why you happen to have taken what appear to be personal snapshots of Sergei Mirkin and Kelly McLaughlin? BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 19:11, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kelly McLaughlin[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kelly McLaughlin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://as.tufts.edu/biology/mclaughlin-lab/about, https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnsys.2022.768201/full, and https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28818840/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 02:44, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kelly McLaughlin moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Kelly McLaughlin, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:05, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sara Lewis moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Sara Lewis, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:07, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Common Bio-medical Waste Treatment & Disposal Facility[edit]

Hello, Lindakeb. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Common Bio-medical Waste Treatment & Disposal Facility, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:35, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Common Bio-medical Waste Treatment & Disposal Facility[edit]

Hello, Lindakeb. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Common Bio-medical Waste Treatment & Disposal Facility".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:20, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sara Lewis (April 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

All statements need to be sourced. Submitter has denied any COI before, but as the repeated addition of COI tags by other reviewers indicates, the pattern of editing does lean towards this conclusion. Here, detailed biographical information without any source has been added, which is commonly associated with COI editing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sara Lewis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 20:51, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lindakeb! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 20:51, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Lindakeb. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Kelly McLaughlin, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:04, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kelly McLaughlin (April 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Which source gives the content in the first para of the 'Early life and academic career' section? That alone suggests that the author has a connection with the subject, which has not been disclosed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kelly McLaughlin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:05, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kelly McLaughlin[edit]

Hello, Lindakeb. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kelly McLaughlin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kelly McLaughlin[edit]

Hello, Lindakeb. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kelly McLaughlin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 09:55, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]