User talk:LizardJr8/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

citation for Mysore Vasudevacharya[edit]

I edited the wiki page for him, and very much provided the source. My edit contains a link to an article titled Sangeet Kalanidhi, and that article has the necessary info. I only repeated what is there on wiki anyway, and which i know to be true. Frankly, you wiki editors should not dabble in matters in which you have zero expertise. You should refer the case to some editor who hopefully knows something about Indian Music. Yes, some editing or supervision has its points, but some familiarity with the matter being discussed is advisable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:22F5:C980:7599:E2D8:3533:BE7 (talk) 06:26, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What would satisfy as a citation for Jane Wodening's death?[edit]

Would an online obituary be sufficient? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 8.47.96.17 (talk) 22:14, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Something from a reliable source would be best, if it was in a newspaper for example. LizardJr8 (talk) 22:20, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I'll wait for the obit in the MountainEar and then repost. Julianstaylor (talk) 22:35, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That would be perfect. LizardJr8 (talk) 22:57, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping revert vandalism![edit]

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thanks for helping get rid of those pesky vandals' edits.

Muhammad Ittal 06:20, 1 December 2013 (UTC) THANKS![reply]

J Hiiiguys (talk) 05:07, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you![edit]

You are welcome

Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:12, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas![edit]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message
Thanks, and all the best to you too!! LizardJr8 (talk) 04:37, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas 2603:6010:8D25:D00:110F:BEFE:DDEA:6062 (talk) 03:29, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year LizardJr8![edit]

Happy New Year!
Hello LizardJr8:
Thanks for all of your conihbntributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, Donner60 (talk) 04:28, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks (static)}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

Hello LizardJr8! Thanks for kind words Hope all is well 24.101.54.11 (talk) 05:41, 25 June 2021 (UTC) 24.101.54.11 (talk) 05:41, 25 June 2021 (UTC)yoooooo[reply]

What am I supposed to do here? 70.70.22.133 (talk) 08:32, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here? Nothing unless you have a question about an article. LizardJr8 (talk) 21:02, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Most times some pages on my watchlist are vandalized, you always revert them almost a minute later. That deserves serious recognition! ToxiBoi! (contribs) 21:27, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks!! I'm not here consistently, but I try to do my part. LizardJr8 (talk) 21:29, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For your excellent and speedy anti-vandalism work Woerich (talk) 04:03, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey LizardJr8, whenever you get a chance I’d appreciate it if you returned the favor. Thanks! Woerich (talk) 04:18, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hlo Ganpat ji bhati (talk) 18:28, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thank you for reverting vandalism! Let's keep fighting the good fight! dmartin969 06:01, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One barnstar!!![edit]

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
This is for your valuable efforts on countering Vandalism and protecting Wikipedia from it's threats. I appreciate your effort. You are a defender of Wikipedia. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 06:11, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A goat for you![edit]

Thank you for your contributions. Please enjoy this goat while it lasts.

gobonobo + c 09:25, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Er, thanks? LOL. LizardJr8 (talk) 16:29, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for You[edit]

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For sticking around at Hautlieu School. ThadeusOfNazerethTalk to Me! 00:00, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Notable people[edit]

I've been watching your reverts and you're like a ninja. Well done and thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:14, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll change into my black suit...! Thanks for the kind words. LizardJr8 (talk) 23:18, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This kept us all busy. Cheers! Magnolia677 (talk) 23:34, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I had seen that last night (Friday) and it has been pretty much non-stop. LizardJr8 (talk) 23:37, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thank you for doing all the hard work in wiping out vandalism. This is to let you know that it is much appreciated. Ashleyyoursmile! 17:26, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! The admiration is mutual. LizardJr8 (talk) 17:58, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Just a "thank you" for reinstating my recent edit on the Patchouli page. I'm not a major or systematic editor - I just adjust things as I find them - usually grammar/spelling, but also blatant abuses such as the Patchouli advertising. Gratifying to know that other people appreciate it! Hundovir (talk) 18:16, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Microfoundations[edit]

Hello,

In regards to the information you thought I deleted about the history, it was not deleted it was just moved to restructure the content. I am working on an assignment and you just deleted all of my work, is there any way to get this back? Sorry I did not mention this before but I am new to wikipedia so I am still working it all out. Student2706 (talk) 02:36, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see, thanks -- without an edit summary it wasn't clear. I reversed my edit. Thanks for taking the time to edit Wikipedia! LizardJr8 (talk) 02:41, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Foxiton[edit]

Regarding Foxiton, Its an IT company based in Bangalore offers software services and involved in product development having clients all over India.--Sanovepunchakunnel (talk) 13:55, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unless there are some reliable sources to document its significance, I stand by my !vote that it is not notable. LizardJr8 (talk) 21:57, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
You are the fastest anti-vandal patrol ever! DFW FAA Brianvators (talk) 04:52, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You recently removed my edit[edit]

It's correct you may Google it overall it has the third Largest vote bank combing all the elections Shdjaoalxmx (talk) 03:12, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Readers shouldn't have to google it, you need to add a WP:RS source reference in the article. LizardJr8 (talk) 03:13, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I also had my work undone by you. How can I contact you to discuss the best way to present the facts such as they will be supported? ... have Telegram or WhatsApp or ??? 2001:8003:220D:8C00:3479:71F6:AD3A:2C3F (talk) 23:28, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You can communicate on the article talk page or this talk page, not on external sites. If you do indeed have a source for the information you wish to add, you should put it in the article as a reference. See citing sources. But it needs to be a reliable source, especially for a biography of living persons. I hope this helps. LizardJr8 (talk) 23:42, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the reference information. Wikipedia allows me to cite offline sources (Wikipedia:Offline sources - Wikipedia) which in this case I will do. There is firm evidence, written (in the individuals own credential-assured content), voice recordings (of the individual) and photographic material (photos sent by the individual in question). This material is available for any editor requesting to review.
I also note:
"On Wikipedia, we assume good faith. There is no distinction between using online versus offline sources. Offline sources are just as legitimate as those that are accessible to everyone online. If offline sources, even exclusively offline sources, are used to reference an article, we give the creator (and other contributors) the benefit of the doubt in accepting their accuracy."
"If an editor seeking deletion believes the creator placed fictitious references in the article to make a hoax seem legitimate, the burden of proof is on the one seeking deletion. This will only occur with definitive proof or knowledge that these sources are really fictitious, and not based simply on a hunch. As with the offline sources themselves, online proof that they do not exist is not needed." 123.209.79.8 (talk) 03:35, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Correct, you can use offline sources. But I'm afraid I have no idea which article and edit you are talking about. LizardJr8 (talk) 03:38, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

24.26.141.92[edit]

Next time you see them, don't even revert: it just creates more work in cleanup. Look at their geolocation. They operate from Louisville and from Indiana (they're just on either side of the state line), making these infantile kinds of edits to BLPs and articles of US politicians. Sometimes it's sexist swinery, sometimes it's semi-political bullshit; you can recognize them also by the edits and quick reverts. So report to any admin you see who's on call, ask for semi-protection, and if it's a BLP, ask for revdeletion. Oh, and if you're on call, keep an eye out. When he's bored he goes in spurts. Thanks... Drmies (talk) 22:09, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your mean PacayaPH (talk) 03:39, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's "you're," and there's a way to make it stop. Quit vandalizing. LizardJr8 (talk) 03:43, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks![edit]

Cookies!

MelecieDiancie has given you some cookies! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else some cookies, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

thanks for helping revert vandalism! here's a bunch of cookies to avoid spamming your notifs any further  | melecie | t 03:58, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookies}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Trigram Search[edit]

Hello LizardJr8,

I put the link because I saw this empty stub and I just read part of an article that talk exactly about that. So I put it there so that people have somewhere to look for. I know I put it in bad form but at least it was very relevant, and it was the only real information on the page. So I don't see why remove it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:861:3A04:E320:31EA:A59B:1C06:51F4 (talk) 21:31, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If there is not much in the page, the subject might not be notable enough for a Wikipedia article. Wiki shouldn't be a list of links to information. Check out the WP:LINKFARM policy for more info. LizardJr8 (talk) 21:34, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You could also add some text describing the search in your own words, and then use a link as a reference. That way it is not just a bare link in the article. LizardJr8 (talk) 21:53, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

its all gone[edit]

cats died out in 2005 how did you people find these photos — Preceding unsigned comment added by Higuysitsmebarney123 (talkcontribs) 03:03, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, May You Please Put The Christian Music Edit Back? All I Was Doing Was Naming Famous People In Christian Music And Who Originated It. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.3 The Messsengers (talkcontribs) 01:41, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can put it back if you find reliable sources to back it up. See WP:RS. LizardJr8 (talk) 01:44, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Waiuku[edit]

I got your back. Going to go look for an admin right now. :) 🐍Helen🐍 02:26, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Already reported to AIAV but it's backlogged. LizardJr8 (talk) 02:32, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I just got ahold of Liz. Let’s hope she’s still online (last time I checked, she was). 🐍Helen🐍 02:35, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

Hello Peter123456891011 (talk) 02:29, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you too[edit]

The Teamwork Barnstar
Thanks for tackling the Sneed vandal. Laplorfill (talk) 00:28, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nepenthes[edit]

Hi!

Yes, sorry a bit new to the whole editing thing. So much incorrect information on the Nepenthes, I will be fixing the information and I figured out the citations so rest assured it is correct. Thanks Nrajah587 (talk) 03:43, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merely trying to make Wikipedia more useful.[edit]

While surfing, I happened to stumble upon https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Field_(Provo) and noticed that the "External Link" at the bottom goes to basically an empty page (and you can try it for yourself to see how empty the page is). The "External Link" that would make the Wiki more useful is this URL: https://byucougars.com/page/facilities/w-soccer (which - again - you're welcome to try for yourself).

I confess: 1) I don't donate to Wikipedia, so fixing easily fixable links is a way for me to contribute, and 2) I'm not worried about this particular page. Anyone who is truly interested in South Field will likely surf to byucougars.com eventually, either before or after trying to follow Wikipedia's currently empty External Link.

I see that now, and I have gone ahead and updated the link. But you had also added an extraneous markup (Bold Text) that needed to be removed. Thanks for helping edit Wikipedia! LizardJr8 (talk)


I'm struggling. the logo is incorrect about and I don't know how to fix it.

Recent Oberon editing[edit]

Good day. I erased the content because I was planning to move it to the "In the popular culture" section below, as the section was in referred to Oberon's usage in historical works rather than modern usage and inspiration. Since I'm on mobile, it was easier for me to edit the single sections individually rather than editing the whole page, which would have required me to scroll through all the source text.

I just reinserted such datas in the above-mentioned section before I noticed your message. Can I delate them again from their original place, thus avoiding to have them repeated?

Okay, understood. Of course you can delete the earlier/duplicate text. Maybe next time you can add an edit summary like "moving text within article". LizardJr8 (talk) 22:00, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi LizardJr8 - Thanks for your note and feedback. Our company has come a long way in terms of growth and customer experience. My intention for editing was a two phased approach:

1st - to remove outdated content from 11-20 years ago that is no longer relevant 2nd - to add new content describing our suite of services and products.

Company page[edit]

I made minor punctuation edits but also removed a section that is outdated and irrelevant as the information was 11-20 years old.

My content approach was for two phases: 1) Remove outdated content that is 11-20 years old. 2) Add new content based on updated products and services.

20:37, 17 September 2021 (UTC)20:37, 17 September 2021 (UTC)20:37, 17 September 2021 (UTC)20:37, 17 September 2021 (UTC)20:37, 17 September 2021 (UTC)20:37, 17 September 2021 (UTC)20:37, 17 September 2021 (UTC)jm316

https://www.moneymartfinancialservices.com/index.html

Taishan NPP revert[edit]

I understand that the remark about there being no release of radioactivity is blatantly false. I'm not sure why this change was reverted. 82.43.144.85 (talk) 23:12, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that a reference source was deleted and that usually indicates an issue. But looking at the sentence, it does not line up with the reference. The sentence before the deletion needed that reference, though. I can just put back the reference and leave the remark about no release out. LizardJr8 (talk) 23:19, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Great job editing wikipedia! The Tips of Apmh (talk) 19:55, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Brendan Bracken[edit]

The entry does not add to the article. It does not fit in with it's submissions, nature, themes and tenor. Wikipedia requires entries to adhere to five pillars inclusive of a reliable source. The source cited is a newspaper review of a book; but centrally there is no second supporting source to the originator. In fact it has only surfaced seventy years later in the marketing of a book written by a self - confessed story teller; a case of revisionism to a high degree. The entry should be removed as it is not reflective of the overall article; does not obviously meet group standards, nor ordinary standards or reasonableness. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.61.25.156 (talk) 16:04, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'd suggest you take it to the article talk page for consensus, as suggested before by another editor. Certainly if there are sources discrediting the information, that would help. LizardJr8 (talk) 19:23, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

shady business[edit]

sending you a message regarding the AdvisorShares edits, clearly someone is posting old and personal content, and also posting content from one sided (very slanted) accusations in a lawsuit. not sure why. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.231.39.34 (talk) 20:31, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you![edit]

pls don't block me from editing:) Khoijdugfubeb (talk) 19:41, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits to Porpoise[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm the Derp Vandal. I wanted to let you know that I reverted your recent contributions to Porpoise, as it appeared to constitute Small Dick Energy.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Derp Vandal

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You are a toolbag. LizardJr8 (talk) 05:20, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For reverting vandalism on Lea DeLaria. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 01:23, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! The edits were particularly bad, as were the edit summaries. Completely inappropriate and offensive. LizardJr8 (talk) 01:25, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help[edit]

Hello, I have been reviewing Newfoundland and Labrador articles and have come across several requiring work on their citations. I will do as much as I can but I am seeking other editors to help:

--71.7.243.150 (talk) 02:35, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Working on it, see ones marked "done" above. Converted bare url refs but have not added much in the way of additional sources. LizardJr8 (talk) 21:59, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I've been converting a few bare url refs tonight, but as I am located in Sweden, I'm not really up to finding any new refs. Good luck though, happy to see you guys doing quality improvement work! OJH (talk) 21:08, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm really not that interested in the politicians but might get to some of them eventually. LizardJr8 (talk) 01:48, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Surrounding Health[edit]

Recent reviews driven to copyright obscur health to promote new users for a cure nonstopping brain flow in editing a partrole over a clue of vitamin display. A round the hat surgery cuts away malfunctioning down the core values of the asset. Biliwk7 (talk) 22:12, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

whut? LizardJr8 (talk) 21:17, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another barnstar![edit]

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For repeatedly beating me to the revert! I guess the undo link only works so fast... --67.183.136.85 (talk) 01:43, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Wikipedia:Twinkle or Wikipedia:Huggle are definitely useful tools. LizardJr8 (talk) 01:46, 24 December 2021 (UT->

A Dobos torte for you![edit]

7&6=thirteen () has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.


To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen () 13:54, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

Can you help me to ask a person to stop removing my edits because at the Calgary zoo they have gibbons instead of the pandas! Thanks! 2001:56A:7B14:CC00:DDF2:13F3:4A27:E79D (talk) 17:52, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The text from the other editor(s) already reflects the removal of the pandas so no action is needed. Gibbons are there too. If there is a plan to bring the pandas back to Calgary, it needs a source to support it. LizardJr8 (talk) 19:37, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting my edit of Eugene Trivizas[edit]

why would you remove my edit? the wiki has his first first name in english but not his last name,there is no reason for that. In Greek his last name is Trivizas and it means Threebosoms,therefore his last name should be that in english GeraltOfRivia01 (talk) 21:28, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's disingenuous. LizardJr8 (talk) 23:32, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

Three times now I was going after users for vandalism but during all three, while I'm looking at the possible vandalism, you warn them, please leave some for the rest of us. -Toast (talk) 23:26, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

LOL, I'll stop and have a beer. LizardJr8 (talk) 23:27, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like a plan, I was about to throw my keyboard against the wall because I just saw another one. -Toast (talk) 23:29, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deep breaths. Keyboards don't grow on trees. LizardJr8 (talk) 23:31, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know that keyboards fly very well? They apparently do, however the landing leaves something to be desired, -Toast (talk) 17:35, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

KRJGEKJGHEWKJBFWL4KJG[edit]

JECHVBEBRHEKBKBVILDVV;EUBFIUWUHWLEURHLRWGFEJRVBHSEJBGVNJDWHGHDFBSVJENQDWEUK1HLE2NL1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ew.she.looks.gross (talkcontribs) 01:43, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. LizardJr8 (talk) 01:45, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unlawful intercourse[edit]

Stop vandalizing wikipedia 76.176.147.202 (talk) 07:27, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Eh? Oh, thank you for your concern, troll vandal. LizardJr8 (talk) 07:28, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So I can be there by[edit]

The only thing I can do is say that the offspring is a masterpiece and a joke to do it was your fault I got a joke about the individuals and a masterpiece in my life 🧬 and a joke to do it was a masterpiece in the world and I have to go with the end 🔚🔚 really good and I was your clash RT we r RY right now and I was your 76.176.147.202 (talk) 07:49, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to see you are blocked. LizardJr8 (talk) 20:17, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Editing permission[edit]

Am I blocked from editing K2k queen (talk) 21:15, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not yet, but you are getting close. It appears you might be WP:NOTHERE. LizardJr8 (talk) 21:22, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And it happened. LizardJr8 (talk) 05:50, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

I have no expertise or desire to do so, sorry. LizardJr8 (talk) 05:44, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop removing my edits[edit]

PLZ STOP IM DOING THE RIGHT THING 2607:FA49:1940:5500:A99B:598C:C838:67D3 (talk) 19:29, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are straight up vandalizing. That's not "the right thing." LizardJr8 (talk) 19:31, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your Misogyny[edit]

Why are you so opposed to more inclusive language being used to describe ships? I mean they don’t have to all be female. 50.76.14.241 (talk) 23:45, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I love how vandals act so disingenuous when you are just WP:NOTHERE. It doesn't fool anybody. LizardJr8 (talk) 23:48, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There’s a lot of arrogant Wikipedians. Why not address the subject matter? Exactly why are male tall ships prohibited here? Well they aren’t. Exactly why does one have a problem with them?

Hey look, I have no problem if you change them all to "it" or whatever. But making little jokes about a ship changing gender and then later calling it "he/she/they" just shows you are messing around. Adding "poop" to the edit summary is just lame. Your comedy is tired. LizardJr8 (talk) 23:54, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

One person may be okay with “it,” others may not. Where’s the policy that says all ships be female? Nowhere. Where’s the policy saying changing a gender is not allowed? Nowhere. Seems like some don’t like male and non-binary ships. Not a reason to revert. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.76.14.241 (talk) 23:59, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh. LizardJr8 (talk) 02:09, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, you can refer to MOS:S/HE:

Ships may be referred to using either neuter forms ("it", "its") or feminine forms ("she", "her", "hers"). Either usage is acceptable, but each article should be internally consistent and employ one or the other exclusively. As with all optional styles, articles should not be changed from one style to another unless there is a substantial reason to do so.

LizardJr8 (talk) 20:34, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

U a barnstar u[edit]

Get off wikipedia and let me edit yung beef 31.205.35.79 (talk) 01:12, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No. LizardJr8 (talk) 01:13, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
For your efforts in counter-vandalism. Keep it going! Volten001 20:49, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! LizardJr8 (talk) 20:51, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A bowl of strawberries for you![edit]

I'm glad to see you on Recent Changes Patrol keeping those vandals in check. This is for your efforts! Thanks! LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan) 20:57, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you![edit]

That cat seems quite focused on something... vandalism to revert perhaps? Only for you to revert the vandalism first. Good job!

interstatefive  (talk) - just another roadgeek 21:54, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! It's a cutie. LizardJr8 (talk) 21:57, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The book of thoth[edit]

Obviously you are not familiar with the book of thoth. 66.65.112.202 (talk) 00:29, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Susquehanna[edit]

I saw that you edited Susquehanna. Thank you. By chance, what's the accuracy on the Margin Call info that was edited earlier? 2600:8801:12A0:B400:448E:B0DF:3586:7C18 (talk) 03:56, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fullbeauty Brands edit[edit]

Regarding your note, "Hello, I'm LizardJr8. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Fullbeauty Brands, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. " LizardJr8 (talk) 20:41, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, LizardJr8! Thanks for contacting me. I am completely new to attempting an edit to an article. I know, newbies can be a pain, but if you have any patience and kindness to spare, I could really use it. I could not figure out how to add a reference. Then, I just saw a note that articles need to be neutral in voice. Please give me advice about this:

I read this article on Fullbeauty Brands, and as a customer I can tell you, it so obviously incorrect at so many levels, especially the section about Body Positivity. Just looking at Fullbeauty Brands catalogs, it is obvious there is no body positivity in sight.

How does one describe this, or correct the article while being neutral. I had planned to use the catalog itself as a reference. Do you have any advice? Or is something like this best left alone?

Thank you!

Kplamp (talk) 20:59, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kplamp! Wikipedia needs its information to be sourced to reliable sources, see WP:RS. The best way here would be to find an article which describes the issue, and use that as a source. It shouldn't be based on your own opinion or observations, that is what we call original research WP:OR. Sometimes it takes some time for sources to catch up to what we see or feel about topics, even if others are talking about it... but we need the references to back it up. I hope that helps. LizardJr8 (talk) 21:05, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That helped very much, and I will read the resources you shared. Just goes to show one should research the venue before writing something -- and I know better! Thanks for your patience and kindness! Kplamp (talk) 21:47, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Do good Lizard! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.30.153.197 (talk) 19:01, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you![edit]

nice Noor muhammad hassani 82 (talk) 21:36, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why?[edit]

I Made an update to flick state hospital adding the correct website to the property. Which promotes historical tours of Flick State please reinstate the changes Nocoffeeforyou (talk) 22:12, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see now. It's no problem having it in the website field. Originally the link was added in there twice, and the first one was randomly placed at the article start. Thanks for updating. LizardJr8 (talk) 22:19, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Not providing a reliable source"?[edit]

I think clear vandalism is more like it for the IP user, 46.56.241.229. Moops T 20:49, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I could go either way. I didn't consider "gay" to be a slur so I went with unsourced. LizardJr8 (talk) 20:52, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am messaging you since you have made edits to the above page before. Please check Talk:SeaQuest_Interactive_Aquariums#Removing_Amman_Covino Sincerly. 100.40.189.211 (talk) 18:56, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ingrid Schubert[edit]

Hello, I'm editing an article about Ingrid Schubert, and you kindly delete my add-ons. May I ask the reason for such courtesy? 46.242.8.109 (talk) 00:33, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You need to cite a WP:RS reliable source if you claim that there are "inconsistencies". This statement does not say what they might be, or who raised them. LizardJr8 (talk) 00:35, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lizardjr8.[edit]

Why do you reverted my edit, i was just fixing spelling. I edit pages32 (talk) 03:46, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it was a test. "Licensee" is the correct word: a company that holds the license for a region. LizardJr8 (talk) 23:00, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I am not a native english speaker so I don't know about grammer rules that much. I edit pages32 (talk) 00:25, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RESPECT YOUR EDITING! 70.70.22.133 (talk) 21:50, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, who are you? I edit pages32 (talk) 23:17, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

jj[edit]

WE NEED TO TALK NOW 70.70.22.133 (talk) 21:46, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the vandalism removal[edit]

We need people like you to keep people out of the insane hyperborea nazi pipeline 2601:199:103:7650:1633:8AA6:7404:83AA (talk) 21:37, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

James P. Hoffa Bio Page[edit]

The content in question "old-guard" is an inaccurate description of the Vairma slate. O'Brien and many members of his executive board were in fact members of Hoffa's slate while running for office in the 2021 election. Since both slates had current members of Hoffa's executive board during the election, describing one as "old-guard" or "reform" is inaccurate and deceptive. Whomever added that paragraph on the election was partisan to the O'Brien slate. Additionally, adding O'Brien's action of terminating more than 80 staff members on March 22, 2022 is both factual and topical. 108.48.170.233 (talk) 01:38, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the firing of staff is factual then please cite a source. LizardJr8 (talk) 01:42, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
While it was never reported in the media, there are multiple cases filed against the IBT for alleged and confirmed illegalities surrounding the terminations - one that is open with the NLRB (05-CA-303660) and another that was recently settled with the District of Columbia's Attorney General's Office where the IBT is required to pay out $175,460.83 to terminated employees for violations of D.C. Code 32-1303.
Additionally, this particular line is partisan and the citation does not support the allegation:
"Hoffa failed to cooperate with the O'Brien transition team leading to tension between the outgoing administration and new leadership."
The article that is cited "Punching In: Hoffa’s Teamsters Reign Ends With Hard Feelings" does not include any factual information to support the allegation that Hoffa did not cooperate with the incoming administration. Rather, it offers contradicting views of how the transition unfolded through quotes from representatives from both parties. 108.48.170.233 (talk) 02:16, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
So you can add the NLRB as a source. LizardJr8 (talk) 02:22, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
May I also remove the following?
The use of "old-guard"
The entire line about Hoffa failing to cooperate with the transition
Thanks! 108.48.170.233 (talk) 02:24, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, sure. No problem with that. LizardJr8 (talk) 02:26, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! 108.48.170.233 (talk) 02:27, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Made the edits. Please let me know if they meet your requirements. Thank you! 108.48.170.233 (talk) 02:44, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have any requirements! Just noticed that you had added some info without a source and wanted to get it sorted out. Please keep editing. LizardJr8 (talk) 03:09, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

Hi You did a Rollback here Gunnar Kaiser They try again and again to remove content. Seams to be some fanboys around. Please have an eye on. Thx 62.202.180.235 (talk) 14:15, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did you see this???62.202.180.235 (talk) 23:55, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I do not have enough WP:CIR to figure out what is going on -- it isn't obvious vandalism. Right now it looks like an edit war and should be taken to the talk page at Talk:Gunnar_Kaiser. LizardJr8 (talk) 23:58, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You rolled it back to this version yourself? He is the one who wants to change the old article without a debate. Not me. I just secured the old version. Online since a longe time. Its sourced and its the version you rolled back to yourself? But ok. If you arent interessted in. I am out too. Bye 62.202.180.235 (talk) 00:07, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My rollback was for a deletion of sourced content without any edit summary, with no apparent reason why. All the subsequent changes have an edit summary so I don't have the knowledge as noted above to say whether I agree or disagree. But note that the article talk page remains an option per WP:BRD. I don't see anyone using it! LizardJr8 (talk) 00:12, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think his personal opinion is a summary? :) There is a huge article in a very notable newspaper as ref about this guy "Schattenmacher" and his point is - who is this? :) Come on :). But ok. Atleast its not my problem if the far right whitewash their articles here. By the way. The home Wikipedia of this guy the article is about "Gunnar Kaiser" not eaven list him at all. Deleted 15 Times there. https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spezial:Logbuch&page=Gunnar_Kaiser Have a good time anyway. 62.202.180.235 (talk) 00:21, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Art Innsbruck 2021[edit]

I did not agree with is.Found arhive it 25th anniversary exhibition abd also all artist list who was there . For artist this historical momevtvall for of them is immortant . what is you suggestion maybe there we add category lust of patisipant ? Ukok Ra (talk) 23:21, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is an unsourced list of many non-notable people. A summary (with a reference so people can go look it up) would be better. LizardJr8 (talk) 23:23, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There is a SPI going on with these three editors. Spam links added that show malware. Equine-man (talk) 18:50, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays![edit]

SunilNevlaFan 03:58, 25 December 2022