User talk:Mattbuck/Archive8

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Signpost: 01 April 2015

The Signpost: 08 April 2015

The Signpost: 15 April 2015

The Signpost: 22 April 2015

The Signpost: 29 April 2015

GA Notice

GA Notice
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Shirehampton railway station that you recently nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

Vincent60030 (talk) 05:38, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
· · ·

Your GA nomination of Shirehampton railway station

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Shirehampton railway station you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vincent60030 -- Vincent60030 (talk) 05:40, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Shirehampton railway station

The article Shirehampton railway station you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Shirehampton railway station for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vincent60030 -- Vincent60030 (talk) 11:20, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 6 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 May 2015

Your GA nomination of Shirehampton railway station

The article Shirehampton railway station you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Shirehampton railway station for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vincent60030 -- Vincent60030 (talk) 03:21, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Sea Mills railway station services

Template:Sea Mills railway station services has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use {{re|Jc86035}} to reply to me 10:14, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 May 2015

The Signpost: 20 May 2015

Nomination for deletion of Template:Filton railway station services (second)

Template:Filton railway station services (second) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use {{re|Jc86035}} to reply to me 12:40, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Future Rail Insert

Template:Future Rail Insert has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use {{re|Jc86035}} to reply to me 12:46, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 June 2015

First Great Western article name

FYI, based on additional information received that the First Great Western franchise will be rebranded as Great Western Railway, not the abbreviated GWR as previously suggested, I have amended the discussion at Talk:First Great Western to reflect. This may or may not influence your previously given preference on this matter. D47817 (talk) 02:54, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 June 2015

The Signpost: 17 June 2015

The Signpost: 24 June 2015

The Signpost: 01 July 2015

Your GA nomination of Montpelier railway station

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Montpelier railway station you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rcsprinter123 -- Rcsprinter123 (talk) 16:20, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Montpelier railway station

The article Montpelier railway station you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Montpelier railway station for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rcsprinter123 -- Rcsprinter123 (talk) 16:00, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Montpelier railway station

The article Montpelier railway station you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Montpelier railway station for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rcsprinter123 -- Rcsprinter123 (talk) 16:41, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 July 2015

The Signpost: 15 July 2015

The Signpost: 22 July 2015

The Signpost: 29 July 2015

Nomination of Formula One video games for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Formula One video games is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Formula One video games until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tvx1 17:05, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 August 2015

The Signpost: 12 August 2015

The Signpost: 19 August 2015

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Cygnus Loop
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:Ultraviolet image of the Cygnus Loop Nebula crop.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust The Homunculus 19:00, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 August 2015

Banksy pic on Bristol

I saw you reverted my edit on Bristol about the Banksy mural/graffiti. Could you join the debate on Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Bristol/archive1 where User:Nikkimaria is arguing that Freedom of Panorama doesn't apply because it is 2D (a view shared by some others I've consulted).— Rod talk 13:49, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 September 2015

The Signpost: 09 September 2015

The Signpost: 16 September 2015

Bristol P&R

Hi Matt, I'd obviously rather not get in to an edit war but to be completely honest I'm absolutely confused on why you undid the redirect ?,
All of the content here is all at Bristol park and ride so it doesn't make sense to have 2 articles that are pretty much a duplicate of each other?
Anyway thanks, –Davey2010Talk 14:55, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

@Davey2010: I agree it doesn't make sense to have duplicate articles, however my reasoning is that they should not be duplicates. The Bristol P&R article, which covers all the city P&Rs, should be expanded with info on the rest of them. There are articles on the Portway P&R, and I think on the Long Ashton one. The Bath Road one should have its own article too. As for your comment that it's an article about a single service number, it's an article about the facility as well as the service. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:34, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
You're right they shouldn't but if we remove the content on the A4 article that's already on the Bristol P&R article you'll then only have a couple of lines left on the A4 article, Unless individual services are notable than most often that not service numbers are put in to one article, I guess some of it could be merged in to Bristol P&R but as it stands it isn't really notable for a standalone article. –Davey2010Talk 18:52, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
So it's a stub, the world will not end because of that. I'm sure the A4 one can be expanded if people desire. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:02, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Well ofcourse you're more than welcome to revert but I just don't see the point of having 2 identical articles, Anyway Thanks for replying & Happy editing, –Davey2010Talk 22:42, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 September 2015

Disambiguation link notification for September 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Avonmouth (BPRP) railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Women's Army Auxiliary Corps. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

AFD

Hi Matt, Just a heads up I've nominated the A4 Bristol Park & Ride article (here), Seeing as the ping has a mind of its own I thought it was only fair I left a message so I then know you've definitely got a notification!, Anyway thanks, –Davey2010Talk 01:54, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 September 2015

Your GA nomination of Avonmouth railway station

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Avonmouth railway station you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FallingGravity -- FallingGravity (talk) 08:00, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Referencing stuff

Thanks for the ping re Reference formats on the GA review of Avonmouth railway station - I've taken a look at the article and could only see one other (minor error) which had an extra pp after page=. I have removed it. I think the error generated by having a link in work= is new and I have been removing some where I see them (working on the wp Bristol cleanup listing). If you look at item "25 External link in |<param>=" on Help:CS1 errors it seems to be linked to meta data (I'm not sure how). I just removed the link and left the text in work=. Interestingly links to work=BBC and similar don't seem to generate this error. I have a .js tool which highlights CS1 errors in red (but I can't remember which tool it is).— Rod talk 14:31, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Well it's external links that cause the error, internal ones are still fine. It's all a bit annoying, as I was always of the school that references should link everything possible, given they are all read out of context. Thanks for doing the cleanup on a load of the articles I've written. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:47, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 07 October 2015

Talk blanked at QI

A section of Talk:QI containing a comment by you has been blanked by (GUtt01 (talk) 01:22, 15 October 2015 (UTC))[1]. I left it as is with an added notice along the lines of WP:CBLANK. This does not seem to be the way these things are done and definitely needs your permission per WP:TPO. If you think what GUtt01 did is ok we can leave it as is, otherwise feel free to revert the discussion back in. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 02:43, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

I understand Bryn's reasons for returning them, but the fact of the matter is that it pertains to articles that have since been deleted. The apology I put up after that section has run its course, but if you feel there is no point keeping in these sections, let me know.GUtt01 (talk) 10:09, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
I object to any form of talk page blanking. If someone wishes to archive the talk page, that's fine, but the discussion should not simply be blanked. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:46, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Patchway railway station

Hi, I was wondering if Patchway railway station was on your "to do" list of local stations? I've just come across it on the Bristol cleanup list as it is totally unreferenced - as you are much more expert on local stations i wondered if you could add any?— Rod talk 08:06, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

@Rodw: I expect I could work on Patchway in the next few weeks. I've just completed Pill, though next week's a busy week at work so not likely to have so much free time as this week! I was going to do the other Avonmouth stations next, but I'm waiting on a few new sources to arrive, so sure, Patchway it is! -mattbuck (Talk) 10:35, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
@Rodw: that's done now. Apart from a bit of proofreading, it's probably ready for GA. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:22, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks it has certainly got more refs then when I looked at it.— Rod talk 17:08, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 October 2015

Avonmouth railway station has been nominated for Did You Know

Henbury railway station

Hi again, Do you have a copy of Oakley, Mike (2006). Bristol Railway Stations 1840-2005. Redcliffe. ISBN 978-1-904537-54-0. If so could you look up the page number(s) needed for Henbury railway station?— Rod talk 17:33, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

@Rodw: it's in my desk at work, I'll try to remember sometime this week. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:58, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
@Rodw: Henbury is pages 70 and 71. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:36, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 October 2015

Your GA nomination of Avonmouth railway station

The article Avonmouth railway station you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Avonmouth railway station for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FallingGravity -- FallingGravity (talk) 00:42, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 October 2015

Disambiguation link notification for November 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Clifton Bridge railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cumberland Basin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 November 2015

DYK for Avonmouth railway station

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Stapleton Road railway station & other local articles railway articles showing errors

Hi again, I'm looking again at the Bristol cleanup listing and wondered if you could help with some local stations:

  • On Stapleton Road railway station ref 15 a & b, "Train Times from Stapleton Road (SRD)" (PDF). Kadfire Ltd. 31 December 2012 to 10 February 2013". Retrieved 9 October 2013. is showing two errors - date value and dead link. Is that ref vital for the article & is any other source available.
  • On Bristol Temple Meads railway station an update banner has been added to passenger numbers

Any help you could offer would be appreciated.— Rod talk 17:43, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

@Rodw:  Done -mattbuck (Talk) 22:40, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your help.— Rod talk 16:39, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 November 2015

Reference errors on 19 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 November 2015

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 November 2015

MetroWest (Bristol), Proposed transport developments in Bristol, Transport in Bristol, Great Western Main Line etc

Can I ask for help from your specialised knowledge/sources again?

If you were able to help with any of them that would be great.— Rod talk 17:58, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

  • Metrowest - might be able to help, can't remember any obvious examples of it though
  • Proposed transport developments sounds like a random umbrella article which probably has no business existing
  • GWML... may be able to help, I'll take a look.
  • I have no idea about this one - I know it existed because it was on a map, but never found any textual references to it
  • Might be able to help with SWML, but Wessex may be outside my area of expertise. I'll see.
  • I'll take a look.
-mattbuck (Talk) 20:09, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 December 2015

Aborted GA review for Finchley Central tube station

Matt,

Apologies for dropping off the face of the earth during the GA review of Finchley Central tube station. I've had a massive workload on in the real world that has consumed all of my free time. When things quieten down, I will come back to the article, review any outstanding comments and renominate it. Thanks for your input.--DavidCane (talk) 09:07, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Stapleton Road railway station

I have PR'ed the article. Thought I'd let you know here, as it's been a while since it was put up for review. White Arabian Filly (Neigh) 17:29, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

White Arabian Filly, thanks very much, I look forward to reading your comments. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:09, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 December 2015

station articles

Don't take things personally, if someone reverts you it's probably because they simply thought the previous version was better. The way wikipedia works is WP:BRD - make a Bold edit, it gets Reverted, you go to the talk page and Discuss it. Your change to Avonmouth railway station wasn't an improvement to the article as it made the routebox harder to understand. It's exactly this sort of situtation templates like {{rail line one to three}} was designed for. That said, some people do prefer to use the vanilla template, but with the different options on different lines, eg:

Terminus
or
Somewhere

Let me know if you need any help with editing station articles, I've been slowly working on improving Bristol area station articles and am always happy to help others apply the same logic. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:37, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I could do with some help with this:

Preceding station   National Rail National Rail   Following station
Great Western Railway
South Wales Main Line
Saturday only

The problem is when it says Great Western Railway it doesn't appear like it does when it says First Great Western:

Preceding station   National Rail National Rail   Following station
First Great Western
South Wales Main Line
Saturday only

Do you know how to get round this problem? Your help would be much appreciated.-Merlinhst7 (talk) 22:45, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

@Merlinhst7: I'll be honest, I don't know my way around {{s-rail-national}}, I tend to stick to the many {{rail line}} templates as they're fully customisable. The issue will be somewhere in the coding of the template's switch calls on the s-rail template itself, but I'm unsure where exactly. -mattbuck (Talk) 23:02, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 December 2015

MacDermot

Hi, re this edit - what's wrong with MacDermot? --Redrose64 (talk) 21:34, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

@Redrose64: I'm sure it's a lovely book, but it's not one I own and so I can't get a pagenumber from it. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:38, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
I do own it. The gauge conversions are detailed in Appendix I, between pages 596 and 629. The conversions of 1873 (Midland Junction - North Somerset Junction, 36 chains, broad gauge to mixed on 4 August; South Wales Junction - New Passage Pier, 11 miles 37 chains, broad gauge to standard on 7-9 August) are listed on p. 599 and described on p. 66. --Redrose64 (talk) 23:42, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 December 2015

Patchway

Hi, any reason you're trying for FA when the GA review hasn't begun yet? --Redrose64 (talk) 11:15, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Frak, my bad. I've nominated the page for deletion - Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Patchway railway station/archive1 -mattbuck (Talk) 11:19, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
WP:G6 wasn't applicable, but WP:G7 was, so I deleted it as if you had added a {{db-self}}. --Redrose64 (talk) 11:28, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia speedy numbers always confuse me. Commons is so much easier. "It's a copyvio!" Thanks very much. I'll reconsider my article choice, perhaps Avonmouth. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:37, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 January 2016

The Signpost: 13 January 2016

Heart of Wessex Line

Hi again, I don't know if the Heart of Wessex Line falls within your area of interest? If so... it has a banner saying that it needs inline citations and, as you know the sources much better than I do, whether you could add some?— Rod talk 20:37, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Rod. I'm afraid I've been really busy recently so haven't had much chance to do wikiwork. The Heart of Wessex Line I feel may be an invention of sorts, I'll ask at WT:UKRAIL. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:10, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 January 2016

The Signpost: 27 January 2016

The Signpost: 03 February 2016

The Signpost: 10 February 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:28, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 February 2016

The Signpost: 24 February 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:04, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 March 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:01, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Avonmouth (BPRP) railway station

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Avonmouth (BPRP) railway station you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 17:41, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 March 2016

Your GA nomination of Avonmouth (BPRP) railway station

The article Avonmouth (BPRP) railway station you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Avonmouth (BPRP) railway station for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 14:21, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 March 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pill railway station

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pill railway station you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 23:21, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

British Rail and copyright

Do you know if works by British Rail are subject to Crown copyright? That is, should File:The Flying Scotsman (train) centenary poster.jpg be retagged as {{PD-UKGov}}? If not, then it is necessary to remove the image from Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains per WP:NFCC#9. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:44, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

I'm not sure, but you could ask at WT:UKRAIL. On the grounds that the image is currently fair use I have removed it. -mattbuck (Talk) 07:14, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 March 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:25, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Patchway railway station

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Patchway railway station you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 06:20, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Clifton Bridge railway station

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Clifton Bridge railway station you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 06:21, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pill railway station

The article Pill railway station you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pill railway station for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 16:21, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Bathampton railway station

Hi, I know it is a bit outside your normal area of station interest but do you have any sources about Bathampton railway station? It has recently been tagged as unsourced & you know a lot more about these topics than I do.— Rod talk 19:04, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Oakley's Somerset Railway Stations ought to cover it, if I get a chance at work tomorrow I'll have a look. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:29, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Patchway railway station

The article Patchway railway station you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Patchway railway station for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 06:21, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 April 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:12, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Clifton Bridge railway station

The article Clifton Bridge railway station you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Clifton Bridge railway station for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 07:41, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 April 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 April 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:42, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 May 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:09, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 May 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 May 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 June 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:13, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 June 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:58, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 July 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:47, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattbuck/Archive8&oldid=1147319754"