User talk:Mcruic
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mock chop is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mock chop until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
Zanzibar women's national football team[edit]
Thanks for the corrections. I have better integrated the information into the article so the sources support available statements, added a more reliable source for one piece of information, found another source, etc. --LauraHale (talk) 22:39, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks, but it appears you've reversed some of my necessary grammatical changes in doing so, and created some more in the process. Also, the confusion over the team is still there. "Zanzibar Queens" was not formed as the "Women Fighters". The Women Fighters was the first CLUB TEAM in Zanzibar. From this club team, and other subsequently formed club teams, the first national team (Zanzibar Queens) was selected for the match against Tanzania in 2007. That is to say, Women Fighters is only one club of 5 or 6 that play in Zanzibar. The national team (Zanzibar Queens) is made up of players from ALL of these clubs. Also, one of the most important pieces of information (the result of Zanzibar's ONLY ever match v Tanzania) has been removed. A report of the game in Swahili can be found here: http://mzeewakutibua.blogspot.co.uk/2007/11/ayaa-anaanguka-hata-boli-haijafika.html I've also changed some other edits you've made (i.e. that there were 5 teams in the inaugural league, not 4). Also, an important piece of information about Zanzibar's participation rights has been removed (although I cannot find a source for it in CAF's statutes), CAF does not allow associate members (of which it has 2 - Zanzibar and Réunion) to participate in CAF-organised national team competitions. Clubs from Zanzibar and Réunion, however, are eligible to compete in the CAF club competitions. I also changed the part about Zanzibar not being recognised by FIFA. It is recognised by FIFA, but only as a constituent part of the TFF (i.e., it has no INDEPENDENT recognition, but it DOES have recognition). Mcruic (talk) 22:50, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
- Blogspot is not viewed as the a reliable source on English Wikipedia and the sources support what is said in the article. The blogspot information needs to be found in a reliable source for Wikipedia other than the one sources. The information in the article at the moment is reliably sourced. Where it can be reliably sourced, it can be included. The information cannot be changed to say something different than the source. In making those edits, you were basically saying the sources supported that when they do not. As the article is undergoing a rather extensive review at the moment, adding additional information from unreliable sources and not supported by sources is a bit more problematic. I've spent the better part of the morning trying to find sources for the article at this for the article that relate to the content you're trying to introduce or better expand upon it and I'm not finding it easily. Please be patient and FIRST find sources that support it before introducing material.--01:45, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
- I will try to dig out more reliable sources for the Tanzania 17-0 Zanzibar match. This other blogspot article also mentions most of the 17 scorers from that particular match - http://rsmiruko.blogspot.co.uk/2007/11/haijapata-kutokeamabao-17-0.html. I have a list of the scorers in an e-mail in my files - Asha Rashid (8), Mwanahamisi Omar (2), Ester Chabruma (Lunyamila) (4), Fatuma Abushir (1) na Fatuma Mustapher (2). I realise this is not 'credible', but it's frustrating that arguably the most important part of the article (i.e an actual match played by the subject of the article) cannot be added. The match, by the way, was played as a curtain-raiser to the men's international friendly match between Tanzania Mainland and Zambia, which Tanzania won 1-0 (http://www.lusakatimes.com/2007/11/23/grandstand-a-view-from-dar/), http://allafrica.com/stories/200711220344.html. Unfortunately, the women's match is not deemed important enough to be mentioned in either of those articles.
- "National team players are eligible to play for Tanzania in the Women's World Cup or in football at the Summer Olympics or other CAF sanctioned events.[15]" - In actual fact, National team players are eligible to play for Tanzania in ANY competition (Women's World Cup, Olympic Games, CAF tournaments, friendly tournaments, friendly matches), as Zanzibar is an integral part of Tanzania. The quote above (despite having a credible source) would imply that players cannot represent Tanzania in friendly matches or tournaments.
- "The team plays domestically against men's sides in Zanzibar" - This is not sourced. Is this even true of the national team? Or is this referring to the Women Fighters club? Some clarity is required here. As fasr as I know, Zanzibar's national team competes against women's teams from the Mainland in a domestic competition known as the Mzeru Cup (http://www.tanzaniasports.com/general-sports-news/a-letter-from-nisha-ligon-mzeru-cup-morogoro). The mysterious 17-0 win is mentioned fleetingly in this article ("A while back, the Twiga Stars [NOTE: This is the nickname of Tanzania's women's national team] played Zanzibar in a friendly match, and though no one seems to remember the actual score, general agreement is that it was somewhere between 15 and 18 to nil… and they didn’t even play a full 90 minutes.").
- The whole section entitled 'Team' mostly refers to Women Fighters club. While this is related to the development of a national team, it is not directly relevant to the article subject, and should perhaps be in another article "Women's football in Zanzibar", or even in a subsection of the present article with that name. We don't see mention of, for example, Tyresö FF in the Sweden Women's National Football Team article.
- The problem with even seemingly credible sources is that sometimes they can be wrong, or can be interpreted wrongly, as has happened with this particular article. What is worse? Finding new information that is actually factual (though perhaps is lacking Wikipedia-deemed credible sources) or finding sources and misinterpreting them, and writing ungrammatically, as you and others have done on this article? I'd argue the latter is just as bad, or worse, as it actually introduces non-factual material to the article. So, perhaps it would also be advisable to be patient and make sure sources are interpreted properly and understood before adding material to the article. Mcruic (talk) 02:18, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Zanzibar women's national football team/GA1[edit]
I don't know why you're commenting on Talk:Zanzibar women's national football team/GA1 but you may want to consider either opening a WP:GAR if you do not feel a WP:GAN is earned... or consider commenting on Talk:Zanzibar women's national football team where comments will be seen if your goal is to get additional collaboration. The article has not passed featured article and I'm not particularly fussed with whatever changes you may want to make, unless you take it to WP:GAR and the article needs to be defended to maintain its good article status. --LauraHale (talk) 11:51, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
- My intention was to comment on Talk:Zanzibar women's national football team to highlight the poor state of some of the content, and to offer alternative (and possibly new) content which better serves the purpose of the article. It's possible I mistakenly commented on Talk:Zanzibar women's national football team/GA1, in which case I apologise. I note, however, that the comments now appear on both pages mentioned above. Regardless, the point I was making was that insufficient research was being carried out before content was being added, which I feel is an important point to be addressed. Mcruic (talk) 12:10, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Talkback[edit]
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Mohsen1248 (talk) 09:36, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
WikiProject volleyball - invitation to discussion[edit]
There is a discussion in WikiProject Volleyball about the proposal for Notability Guide for Volleyball Players. Participation of editors outside the project are welcome, please join the discussion. Osplace 17:42, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 12[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 NACRA Rugby Championship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marietta. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Mauritian gerbil listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mauritian gerbil. Since you had some involvement with the Mauritian gerbil redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. PanchoS (talk) 17:39, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Mcruic. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Mcruic. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Mcruic. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Problems with upload of File:Pumpherston FC badge.png[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Pumpherston FC badge.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:30, 4 March 2024 (UTC)