User talk:Mdann52/Archive 12

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 Archive 13 Archive 14 Archive 15
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

18:56, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Barnstar

The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
For your efforts in getting the WP:SPER list down to no requests (holy crap!) I award you this barnstar! --ElHef (Meep?) 18:41, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

What browser do you use with EPH? Specifically, this edit appears to have made unintended changes that I can't reproduce. Jackmcbarn (talk) 22:15, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

@Jackmcbarn: this was with IE on Windows 7 - I can not access the network until tomorrow morning (UTC), but I'll get the browser version for you then as well. --Mdann52talk to me! 22:22, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
@Jackmcbarn: Version 10.0.92 (approx.). --Mdann52talk to me! 08:10, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for trying out the rewrite script! I'd love to hear any feedback you have at WT:AFCHRW. :) Theopolisme (talk) 11:01, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

09:20, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

I am Aliso n

Hello,Wikipedia,I am back My name is Miss Alison Weir.I am born in 1951.I am famous author.I am famous.I am not hoax,or liar,and I was not last time.I am true!Please believe me!I would like to edit my article,but has been protected,eh?Please can you unprotect it as soon as can.Thank you,Miss Alison — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.151.208.181 (talk) 09:07, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi there! I am not an administrator, so can not add or remove protection from pages. If you wish for the page to be protected, the correct place to request it is at WP:RFPP, or contact the administrator who added the protection to the page. --Mdann52talk to me! 10:03, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

RFA 3

I hope in about a year I can support Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Mdann52 3 and watch it succeed in a landslide. Whether it does or not is, of course, mostly up to you. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 17:00, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Me too. You still have things to polish and to work on, but in due course, you will be okay. And yes, I'd also recommend to wait a year (I did so for my third RfA and it turned out well). → Call me Hahc21 20:13, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Hopefully so - I will try to broaden my horizons and memorise all of WP:Mos as well :P --Mdann52talk to me! 22:23, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Well done on accepting the nomination in the first place. I expect you'll be able to get plenty more experience over the coming months, and I won't be surprised to see you back with a successful request in 12 months or less. -- Trevj (talk · contribs) 03:53, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
Maybe getting rid of the "READ BEFORE POSTING!!: bugger off and don't post here unless you've read my rules" header might help. It seems to betray an attitude, to some, who prefer a more welcoming talkpage header. I'm sure you mean well, but it's easily misinterpreted as potentially assuming bad faith. Just a thought, and good luck next time... Begoontalk 18:49, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Thank you, it looks much better now, and I pay no heed to edit summaries - nor will future voters. That will help, I'm sure. Let me know if you run again, please, it's likely I'd support now. Begoontalk 18:24, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

08:00, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

07:18, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Removal of the slogan field from Template:Infobox mobile phone

Could you explain why you reintroduced the slogan field at Template talk:Infobox mobile phone? There are people that oppose the slogan field since it is viewed as marketing material. Please, give a clear explanation or we will have to remove that field. --Davidjonesmartin (talk) 10:59, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

@Davidjonesmartin: As it was over a year ago, and in response to a help request, I am not the best person to ask on the matter. I would recommend following the steps at WP:DR if there is a conflict over whether it should be included. --Mdann52talk to me! 19:16, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

08:34, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

07:23, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

07:29, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

CVA

I was wondering if you could be my trainer in the CVA (Counter-Vandalism Academy). I have over 600 edit and you have over 11000 edits, and I need to join CVA so I can be a rollbacker. Could you be my trainer?

Reply on my talk page, please and thank you. Cheers!-- Allied Rangoontalk 00:37, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

BAGBot: Your bot request Mdann52 bot 2

Someone has marked Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Mdann52 bot 2 as needing your input. Please visit that page to reply to the requests. Thanks! AnomieBOT 18:40, 10 May 2014 (UTC) To opt out of these notifications, place {{bots|optout=operatorassistanceneeded}} anywhere on this page.

06:00, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Mdann52. You have new messages at Crab rangoons's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

```mariusz pudzianowski```

I added official web cuz only there are the only truth info,, the info is alredy true but just wanted to add a link more. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.114.94.15 (talk) 19:11, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

07:18, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Notification of a June AfC BackLog Drive

Hello Mdann52:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from June 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 2300 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

The AfC helper script can assist you in tallying your edits automatically. To view a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. Sent on behalf of (tJosve05a (c) by {{U|Technical 13}} (tec) using the MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:45, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Anti-Vandalism Unit

Hi User:Mdann52,

I'm TerryAlex and I'm a newly registered user on Wikipedia, (although) I have also been editing Wikipedia here and there (as an anonymous user) over the years. I am interested in learning about anti-vandalism and I saw you listed yourself as a trainer so just want to know if you can take me in as a student. Thanks.--TerryAlex (talk) 22:28, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Just read at the top of the page that you are busy. No worries. I'll find a different instructor then. Thanks so much.--TerryAlex (talk) 22:56, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
@TerryAlex: I shoudl still be fairly active; I may just drop in and out a bit. If you would like me as an istructor, I am willing to look into taking you :) --Mdann52talk to me! 10:34, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
@Mdann52: Oh, sure, please take me in as a student then :D --TerryAlex (talk) 13:50, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Suzannah Lipscomb

Can you please advise why you removed the subject's parents names and their occupations? The subject gave an interview that gave this information so it is in the public domain already. (Lw1982 (talk) 22:43, 23 May 2014 (UTC))

Will the endless revisions to this page ever cease? She is obviously English and the parents name situation is flimsy at best. plus I see additional reverts of Mdann52's revisionsThewho515 (talk) 03:01, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

@Lw1982: I would prefer not to give out full details on-wiki, per OTRS policy. Additionally, AFAIK, interviews are not really reliable sources. If you wish for more information, please email me, and I will see what else I can tell you.
@Thewho515: although I am not involved too much in the dispute, I am close to referring it to WP:DRN. --Mdann52talk to me! 06:25, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

If the subject was not happy about this information being known, she would not have given this information in an interview. You cannot cherry pick what info is put on this page especially since it is freely available on another website. (Lw1982 (talk) 07:31, 24 May 2014 (UTC))

@Lw1982:... And you should not go against the policy written at WP:OTRS. If you have issues with my actions, I recommend you follow the procedures there, and not just blindly revert my edits. Unless you have the full story, I highly recommend you do not undo actions based on private evidence. Additionally, as you have got the person who you believed contracted me incorrect, I can conclude you are not aware of the full picture. --Mdann52talk to me! 07:39, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

I said the subject was obviously happy for the info to be released into the public domain as she gave an interview to a national newspaper. I did not say the subject contacted you to ask for it to be removed. Although it is interesting that it seems somebody did ask you to remove it. Conflict of interest perhaps? (Lw1982 (talk) 07:55, 24 May 2014 (UTC))

@Lw1982: I have told you all I can. If you are unhappy with my responses to the issue, please follow the procedure at WP:OTRS. Also, please do not edit while logged out; Doing so violates WP:SOCK. As the page has now been protected by Callanecc to prevent violations of the Biographies of Living perrsons policy, please go to the talk page to discuss further changes to the page. --Mdann52talk to me! 10:41, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Mdann Even more edits have taken place on the Lipscomb page. I cant even look at another topic as I get daily even hourly alerts. it is an edit war the Biographies of Living perrsons is clearly violated to the point of sanctions. Callanecc's protection to page was totally ignored. This has taken up everyone's time over what "appears" to be a vendetta by WP:SPA I have become a WP:SPA as these non-stop edits allow me to do nothing else. WP:SOCK has been violated again and again re: blind edit revisions. Will it take WP:DRN Thewho515 (talk) 23:17, 24 May 2014 (UTC)