User talk:Meiwuzhang

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Meiwuzhang, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 07:36, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Wayang Kids moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, The Wayang Kids, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Itcouldbepossible^Talk 13:56, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Girl Giant and the Monkey King[edit]

The article Girl Giant and the Monkey King has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBOOK. Does not appear to have significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Padgriffin ^{Griffin's Nest} 12:54, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Van Hoang[edit]

The article Van Hoang has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:36, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I will try improving the article by having providing the evidence that this is a real person. Meiwuzhang (talk) 12:42, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:56, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Van Hoang for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Van Hoang is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Van Hoang until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:24, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Dragon Warrior moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, The Dragon Warrior, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheWikiholic (talk) 15:35, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Noted, It's just I need to use a computer to add paragraphs. Meiwuzhang (talk) 07:00, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Girl Giant and the Monkey King for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Girl Giant and the Monkey King is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girl Giant and the Monkey King until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Padgriffin ^{Griffin's Nest} 09:59, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Book article sources[edit]

Hi there, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for writing Girl Giant and the Monkey King and starting the Van Hoang article! I'm sorry that one of your first Wikipedia experiences has been having your articles put up for deletion discussion, but I think both of these are likely to be kept, so don't worry too much. You might want to have a look at those two deletion discussions to see the evidence that editors are raising there: the simplest way to show that a book or an author is notable, and therefore qualifies for a wikipedia article, is to show that it has been widely reviewed. (See WP:NBOOK for more info.) Because the general rule of thumb is that a book qualifies for an article if it has received two or more substantial reviews, it's very helpful to make sure that you have at least two reviews used as references in every book article you make, from the very first edit. This should keep people from trying to delete it.

I see that you've used Goodreads as a source for both of these articles. Because Goodreads is user-generated content, it isn't usually considered a "reliable source" (see WP:RS). Likewise, blogs and social media posts are typically not considered reliable sources either. Where you can, you should use sources like the reviews that people are bringing up in those Articles for Deletion discussions - mainstream publications, like (national) newspapers and magazines. You can use some of these now to further improve the two articles you've published, if you like!

Again, welcome, and good luck editing! Feel free to ask if you have any questions. -- asilvering (talk) 05:47, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Advice on drafts[edit]

Hello Meiwuzhang, I noticed that you have started some articles on The Wayang Kids and The Dragon Warrior that are currently in draftspace. I wanted to encourage you to keep working on them as drafts, focusing on linking WP:RELIABLE sources like published reviews. I wasn't able to find any reviews of The Wayang Kids but I found two reviews of The Dragon Warror ([1][2]) which are enough to make it eligible for an article if you wish to write one. For the movie, I notice that the movie itself is in Chinese, so the reviews may also be in Chinese. Non-English sources are allowed for English wikipedia articles, so if you happen to be able to find and read reviews in another language, you can use them for the article. Again, if you have any questions or would like any help, feel free to ask! ~ L 🌸 (talk) 05:52, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I also notice that you may not have gotten a response from other editors when you wrote back because you did not "ping" them! To make sure someone is notified that you are replying to them, you have to use a template like {{re|USERNAME}} to get their attention, like so: @Meiwuzhang:. The "re" template adds the @ sign and the : automatically; you can use {{u|USERNAME}} instead if you don't want that. For the other person to get alerted that you are talking to them, you have to make sure to sign your comment with ~~~~. Happy editing! ~ L 🌸 (talk) 06:04, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Open: A Boy's Wayang Adventure moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Open: A Boy's Wayang Adventure, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CUPIDICAE💕 14:36, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. I was working on this article late at night so I apologize. 😅 Meiwuzhang (talk) 08:17, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Open: A Boy's Wayang Adventure (March 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Praxidicae was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Open: A Boy's Wayang Adventure and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Open: A Boy's Wayang Adventure, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CUPIDICAE💕 13:55, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Meiwuzhang! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CUPIDICAE💕 13:55, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Open: A Boy's Wayang Adventure has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Open: A Boy's Wayang Adventure. Thanks! asilvering (talk) 16:56, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Meiwuzhang, it looks like you've got the problem with the block quotes sorted out? They're working right now for me, at least. The article will still be rejected at AfC, however, because it doesn't show that the book is notable according to the criteria at WP:NBOOK. The type of review we're looking for for this are the kinds of review that were added to Girl Giant and the Monkey King - well-known, reliable sources like Kirkus, not reviews on user-generated websites like Goodreads (these you should not link to at all), or on promotional sites like the publisher's or bookseller's website. -- asilvering (talk) 08:35, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Asilvering Understood. Thanks! 🐵 Meiwuzhang (talk) 08:43, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Asilvering Oh, and quick question, are these soruces listed here acceptable?

literaryheist.com lilbluebottle.com supercoolbooks.com singaporewritersfestival.com Meiwuzhang (talk) 08:49, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Asilvering The blockquote problem is actually not sorted out, but I think I can try to get used to the fact I'm still not seeing blockquotes but I will assume that everyone can see it. Meiwuzhang (talk) 08:56, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The first three: no, they're blogs. The writer's festival one - probably, depending on what you're using it for. -- asilvering (talk) 08:58, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Asilvering thanks. 🐒 Meiwuzhang (talk) 09:09, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Asilvering Hi, my submission got declined for tge third time. I decided to remove the source from goodreads but when I published it, there was no change. I think it is tge same peoblem from earlier again, this time not regarding the blockquote. Meiwuzhang (talk) 12:43, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Meiwuzhang Your edit went through fine. I removed the one remaining Goodreads link for you just now. What device are you using to edit? Maybe your mobile browser isn't refreshing the page correctly...? -- asilvering (talk) 03:37, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The fact is, I actually edit on my phone through the app. Meiwuzhang (talk) 15:37, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sometimes Is would use my tablet. Meiwuzhang (talk) 15:37, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't use mobile to edit so I'm afraid I don't have any further help to offer there, but if you keep having problems with it, if you tell people what app/browser and that you're using a phone/tablet that might help people find a solution. -- asilvering (talk) 16:36, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Open: A Boy's Wayang Adventure (March 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most cited sources are non-independent (affiliated with subject) or unreliable (like GoodReads). Can you find WP:THREE?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Open: A Boy's Wayang Adventure and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Open: A Boy's Wayang Adventure, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 04:10, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Liance I understand but there is this technical problem I have. Every time I make a change and after I published it, the article looks like it is not changed at all. Please look into this matter, thank you Meiwuzhang (talk) 04:22, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Could you check the History tab at the top of the article and see if your revisions are being saved? You could try asking editors at the Teahouse for help with technical edit-related issues if you continue to have them. Best, -Liance^{talk/contribs} 04:26, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Liance I have checked in with the teahouse but no one has replied yet. If you are free now, could you help me please? It woukd be thoughtful. By the way, this error has affected my secondary sources too. :') Meiwuzhang (talk) 05:54, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately I'm not quite sure what causes the technical issue either! As an alternative, you could list all your sources (including those that you say are not showing up) on your draft's Talk Page and leave a note at the top of the article for next reviewer before resubmitting. Hope this helps. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 22:58, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Liance I'll try. Meiwuzhang (talk) 23:02, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Open: A Boy's Wayang Adventure has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Open: A Boy's Wayang Adventure. Thanks! – robertsky (talk) 16:11, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Open: A Boy's Wayang Adventure (March 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Velella was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Only one ref has any degree of independence and that is an interview with the author. This looks like a worthwhile book/ film and it must surely have independent reviews in Singapore and South-east Asia if not elsewhere. Don't worry about the plot etc. it is probably already overlong. What is needed is truly independent and reliable sources talking about the book or film. Refs about the author are not worth much.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Open: A Boy's Wayang Adventure and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Open: A Boy's Wayang Adventure, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Velella ^{Velella Talk} 12:56, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi Meiwuzhang! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Blockquote Error, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Muninnbot The Blockquote problem has already been solved. Thanks for letting me know.😺 Meiwuzhang (talk) 00:25, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Open: A Boy's Wayang Adventure (March 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Ok, this is a bit closer: the New Straits Times review is more like the kind of coverage we're looking for - independent, newspaper reviews. Unfortunately it's for the movie, not this book. The other "review" isn't a review at all - it's actually by the author herself! These are both useful references for writing this article (so do keep them!), but still not the kind of coverage we need to establish the notability of the book or movie itself.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Open: A Boy's Wayang Adventure and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Open: A Boy's Wayang Adventure, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 17:44, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi Meiwuzhang! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Template creator, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template[edit]

Hi, I'm wondering how to create a user template.~ Mya🐵

Concern regarding Draft:The Wayang Kids[edit]

Hello, Meiwuzhang. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Wayang Kids, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:03, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Ten - A Soccer Story cover.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Ten - A Soccer Story cover.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 16:18, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Dragon Warrior[edit]

Hello, Meiwuzhang. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Dragon Warrior, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Dragon Warrior[edit]

Hello, Meiwuzhang. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Dragon Warrior".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:00, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hello, sorry that I was gone for so long. It would probably take some time for me to keep up with my work. It's ok, I don't plan on retrieving it. I will try it again soon. I hope this can be understood. Meiwuzhang (talk) 15:33, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Unfathomable Sand Dunes.png[edit]

Please do not upload images taken from the internet onto Wikimedia Commons without permission from the creator Trade (talk) 13:53, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry its just that Im a bit new (joined last year) and I sometimes get problems when uploading images. Meiwuzhang (talk) 13:29, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]