User talk:Mikejhonson555

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attacks in the article Joe Rooke[edit]

Please do not make personal attacks as you did at Joe Rooke. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. De728631 (talk) 16:17, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Victorialine67[edit]

The article Victorialine67 has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 16:19, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Victorialine67[edit]

A tag has been placed on Victorialine67 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 16:22, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008[edit]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 16:23, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not Myspace or Facebook. We're not here to promote your Youtube stuff. Go away. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 16:28, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You can't. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 16:49, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to User:De728631. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. De728631 (talk) 16:50, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

One more reason to not leave your PC unattended when logged in somewhere. De728631 (talk) 16:54, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for catching this. The user has been blocked indefinitely because the user name violates policy. Thanks again! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 17:11, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you making changes on my alternate account user page? Dlohcierekim 19:12, 7 October 2008 (UTC) No prob. Just curious. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 13:20, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to 14322 Shakura has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Brougham96 (talk) 16:49, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Wikipedia talk:Tutorial (Formatting) constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Brougham96 (talk) 16:50, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blatant vandalism[edit]

I'll assume from This post on my Talk] that there is a constructive editor here somewhere that has lost control over his account. Be that as it may-- any further disruption or vandalism by this account may result in an indefinite block from editing without further warning. It should not be assumed from this message that another admin won't go ahead and indef block anyway. Dlohcierekim 17:01, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


PS--Change your password. Now would be a good time. Do not leave your computer out of your control while logged in here. Dlohcierekim 17:03, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

PPS-- I've gone ahead and blocked this account as possibly compromised as the most recent vandalism was less than an hour ago. Dlohcierekim 17:06, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Derrick Marron[edit]

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles you created, as you did with Derrick Marron. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

  1. Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
  2. Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 20:12, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Shave it requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Eeekster (talk) 20:13, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]