User talk:Moreno.ci

This user is a student editor in Northeastern_University/Online_Communities_(Fall_2018) .

5th year Political Science and Communications major originally from California. As part of User:Reagle's online community class, I will be contributing to Wikipedia and reflecting on the experience on a user page here.

Welcome! -Reagle (talk) 20:44, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Moreno.ci, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Moreno.ci! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Moreno.ci, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:41, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notes[edit]

Hi! Here are my notes for the draft:

The Forbes link is self-published - they have staff, but they also allow average people to contribute to the website. They don't provide any sort of verification or editorial oversight for the pieces, so they're not seen as reliable if the author has 'Contributor' next to their name. I would replace this source.

Make sure that all claims are sourced and if they're opinion, attributed to the source. Also keep in mind that as the main focus is the podcast, there should be enough sourcing to establish where the podcast is notable. I'm concerned that at present all of the sourcing for the podcast is primary, as they're released by people involved with the podcast or notifications of events, with the exception of the Forbes source, which won't be able to establish notability because of it being self-published. Something like this article by the AV Club is good and while the Daily Dot isn't the strongest source, they're generally usable ([1]).

I hope this helps! --Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:50, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Bechdel Cast has been accepted[edit]

The Bechdel Cast, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:21, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Bechdel Cast podcast logo.jpg[edit]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Bechdel Cast for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Bechdel Cast is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bechdel Cast until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kleuske (talk) 13:09, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]