User talk:Naniyaal
Welcome[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
|
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
Naniyaal, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]
|
Hi Naniyaal! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:02, 11 July 2017 (UTC) |
Speedy deletion nomination of Hira Hussain[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Hira Hussain requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TushiTalk To Me 08:13, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Hira Hussain for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hira Hussain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hira Hussain until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saqib (talk) 05:47, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
July 2017[edit]
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Hira Hussain. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:41, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Hira Hussain, you may be blocked from editing. Stop removing the AFD notice, and stop falsely claiming on the talk page that the AFD was closed as keep. Meters (talk) 15:49, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Ahmed Ali Akbar for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ahmed Ali Akbar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmed Ali Akbar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saqib (talk) 06:49, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
Final warning[edit]
Any further disruption in any form including putting sock tags on user pages randomly and your editing privileges will be revoked. —SpacemanSpiff 07:35, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
Naniyaal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
The block is no longer necessary because I have understood that for what reason I was blocked and that I will not do it again. It was all because of Saqib nominated my all pages for deletion and that's why I had falsely said him that he is sockpuppet but it was all in angerness and so I apologize for my behavior. Surely, I will not make such blames. Depending on you that you are trusting me or not but I am not the sockpuppet of this user.
Decline reason:
There is technical evidence (based on connectivity etc) that you have been using multiple accounts, so you would need to explain how that could be so. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:31, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Naniyaal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
It can be because of we are using save Internets. Unless, this can't happen.
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.