User talk:Neøn
Are you a real person, or a machine? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dikdikvondik (talk • contribs) 06:41, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
24 October 2012[edit]
Hi I noticed that you added "This article needs attention from an expert in Physics", what kind of attention is needed? Is it about the remark that it is too technical? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mutnauq2 (talk • contribs) 20:27, 24 October 2012
The article Fructose and mannose metabolism has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Not sure how necessary this is. It's a bit of an add disambiguation, a page that two links to articles whose titles make up the title of the first page? Is anyone going to search for the combined term?
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. freshacconci talk to me 00:33, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Soyuz 7K-L1 article introduction[edit]
Hi neon. I've moved a lot of the introductory paragraphs into the main body of the Soyuz_7K-L1 article & created 2 new sections to accommodate that change, if you'd like to check it out and see if that banner can now be removed. If not I can try and tighten up the wording for the 3 paragraphs that remain in the intro. ☭Soviet☭ (talk) 17:54, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
Reliable source for Bitcoin edit. Core Admin risk.[edit]
Bitcoin Core Admin Risk reliable source available with consensus for two days already. Kindly read the reliable source.
Reliable source for Bitcoin edit placed two days ago. Please read the reliable source available for two days already.
You just did not read the reliable source that has been there right from the start. Please read it. The edit is almost a verbatim quote from the reliable source. You just made a mistake. We all make mistakes. Homni (talk) 12:24, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
The fact that you can follow in the history that the edit appeared on 11 July in another sector of the article. It was after that suggested by a very creditable editor on this article that it should be moved to Overview. He thus agreed with the edit (consensus). He improved the edit, that he agreed with (consensus), and did not dispute it during the two days that the edit has been in the article - always with the reliable reference - that you completely missed to read. Two other very responsible and daily active editors, Ladislav and Fleetham, who scrutinize every single word on this article daily, day in and day out, never disputed anything about the edit. That is an absolutely clear indication of consensus when the three of them, Wuerzelle, Ladislav Mecir and Fleetham never disputed the edit. Homni (talk) 12:33, 13 July 2014 (UTC)Homni (talk) 12:35, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Thanks Neøn for contacting me on my talk page. I've commented in the article talk page. It's not that the statement is inaccurate (although in fact Bloomberg is not the original source and rather irrelevent to the discussion) it's just that inserting this single statement without any further discussion - at an inappropriate point in the article - damages the quality of the article. I have neither the knowledge nor the time to understand how to resolve an edit conflict such as this (I'm a pretty ocaisional Wikipedian and I've never been involved in one before) so I'm just going to go away and leave this alone. I'm disappointed to see the article being left in a poor quality state, but it appears that there's nothing I can do about it without getting into an edit war. (Or at least, there probably is something I can do but I don't understand Wikipedia processes well enough.) Regards, Roybadami (talk) 13:32, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
User talk:Apus Group[edit]
Hi. I've declined your U2 as the user does exist (and their user page was deleted as spam...). I'm just about to block them for a spam username. Peridon (talk) 13:12, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: User talk:Apus Group[edit]
Hello Neøn. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User talk:Apus Group, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: WP:CSD#U2 does not apply. This is a blocked account, but it is an account. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 10:14, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
Rollback granted[edit]
Hi Neøn. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
- Use common sense.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! — MusikAnimal talk 06:54, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
NASDAQ Edit[edit]
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=NASDAQ&action=history you seem to have reverted my vandalism fix, re-adding the vandalism and then removed it again. --wjdp 14:45, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
Thanks[edit]
Thanks for the fix on the Morbillavirus article. That was quick. 96.41.41.75 (talk) 04:59, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 27[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sydenham's chorea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nodules. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Neøn. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Neøn. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 6[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Embolization, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NBCA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Neøn. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
NBMI / BDTH2[edit]
Hello,
on 15th of July 2014 you added the sentence "However there are indications that the NBMI-mercury-compound moves into adipose tissue." to the article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BDTH2 Change: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=BDTH2&diff=617100421&oldid=606477171
I couldn't find that information in the linked source however: Clarke D, Efficacy of a Novel Chelator for Mercury Chelation and Distribution, Dissertation, Arkansas State University, December 2012
Could you please specify where you found the information?
--2A02:8070:C19D:600:522:3285:C7A9:31EF (talk) 17:55, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- Hello, my apologies for the delay in responding, I'm not sure you'll see this as you aren't on a registered account. I'll post it on your talk page as well. That material was added as a part of the original NBMI page prior to merge by User:Wuerzele here. In the dissertation the only possible material I see that could fit is on 2.16-2.17 (49-50). Neøn (talk) 09:34, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
"Heptadecenoic" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Heptadecenoic. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 19#Heptadecenoic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Mdewman6 (talk) 19:35, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
"Myristol" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Myristol. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 21#Myristol until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Mdewman6 (talk) 19:46, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
"Eicosen" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Eicosen. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 21#Eicosen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Mdewman6 (talk) 19:49, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for July 9[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of VLF-transmitters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Skelton. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]
Hello, Neøn
Thank you for creating Black Fire (2022).
User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 00:51, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 5[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Spin trapping, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PBN.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Mitnick[edit]
We were trying roughly the same edit at the same time, there--I removed your refs, since I put them in in the death section instead :) demize (t · c) 01:12, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, wish edit conflicts were handled more smoothly in software.. --Neøn (talk) 01:13, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Overseas military bases of India for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Overseas military bases of India until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.