User talk:NelsonLee20042020/Archive 1
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome!
Hello, NelsonLee20042020, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages that you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia or the Tutorial
- Create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- How to add those all-important references
- Simplified style guide
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. Again, If you need help visit the Teahouse or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! -Sm8900★ 🌎 05:39, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
April 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of major crimes in Singapore, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 08:26, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
NelsonLee20042020, you are invited to the Teahouse!
|
Hi NelsonLee20042020! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:09, 21 April 2020 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for May 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of major crimes in Singapore, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Thai and Sri Lankan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
May 2020
Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of major crimes in Singapore, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. General Ization Talk 01:48, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of major crimes in Singapore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Central Expressway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:16, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Image without license
Unspecified source/license for File:Micheal garing.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Micheal garing.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 15:45, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kho Jabing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Depression (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:38, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
July 2020
Hi NelsonLee20042020! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Andrew Road triple murders that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. TuskDeer (talk) 03:47, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andrew Road triple murders, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mercedes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Capital punishment in Singapore and edit summaries
Thank you for your many contributions to Capital punishment in Singapore. But, I notice that you never include an edit summary. For example, your edit of 12:42, 10 August 2020 could have been summarized as something like
- April 1994 abolition of appeals to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in London for criminal and civil matters
and it would be helpful if the page history included such descriptions instead of literally nothing.
Also, in the past few days, I have edited this article several times, repeatedly enhancing refs along these lines:
- my edit of 4:22, 10 August 2020
{{Cite web|title=The Best I Could S2|url=https://www.mewatch.sg/en/series/the-best-i-could-s2/ep8/312769|access-date=2020-05-20|website=meWATCH}}: "The Best I Could S2". meWATCH. Retrieved 2020-05-20.- →
{{Cite AV media |title=The Best I Could S2 |date=3 November 2014 |publisher=Love vs Hate |via=meWATCH |url=https://www.mewatch.sg/en/series/the-best-i-could-s2/ep8/312769 |access-date=2020-05-20}}: The Best I Could S2. Love vs Hate. 3 November 2014. Retrieved 2020-05-20 – via meWATCH.
But then you went ahead and edited along these lines:
- your edit of 12:43, 10 August 2020
{{Cite web|url=https://www.mewatch.sg/en/series/true-files-s3/ep6/367508|title=True Files S3|website=meWATCH|access-date=2020-04-22}}: "True Files S3". meWATCH. Retrieved 2020-04-22.
I don't think this is correct. The website "meWatch" appears to be, like YouTube, a site where others can post content, and therefore it gets the "via" parameter, not the "website" parameter. The actual publisher appears to be Channel 5. And you omitted the very important "date" parameter, which is given right there as 5 February 2016. Also, when the information is audio-visual, one is supposed to used {{Cite AV media}}, not {{Cite web}}.
Would you kindly edit Capital punishment in Singapore again and change this to something like
{{Cite AV media |title=True Files S3 - EP6: Death on Pulau Ubin |date=5 February 2016 |publisher=Channel 5 |via=meWATCH |url=https://www.mewatch.sg/en/series/true-files-s3/ep6/367508 |access-date=2020-04-22}}: True Files S3 - EP6: Death on Pulau Ubin. Channel 5. 5 February 2016. Retrieved 2020-04-22 – via meWATCH.
or perhaps even better
{{Cite episode |title=Death on Pulau Ubin |url=https://www.mewatch.sg/en/series/true-files-s3/ep6/367508 |series=[[True Files]] |network=[[Channel 5 (Singapore)|Channel 5]] |date=5 February 2016 |season=3 |via=meWATCH |series-no= |number=6 |minutes= |time= |transcript= |transcript-url= |quote= |language=}}: "Death on Pulau Ubin". True Files. Season 3. Episode 6. 5 February 2016. Channel 5 – via meWATCH.
and include an edit summary something like
Improve reference: {{Cite web}} → {{cite AV media}}, provide date and correct title and publisher
or
Improve reference: {{Cite web}} → {{Cite episode}}, provide date and correct title, etc.
What do you think about this? —Anomalocaris (talk) 06:57, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
ok noted, i go try edit NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 09:13, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks! —Anomalocaris (talk) 09:40, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
October 2020
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Larry Hockett (Talk) 06:39, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
thank you i understand NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 06:40, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of serial killers by country, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Britain.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Josephus Tan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Downtown East.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
Oriental Hotel Murder moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Oriental Hotel Murder, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 15:35, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
OK i understand NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 00:57, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Death of Darren Ng Wei Jie for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Death of Darren Ng Wei Jie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death of Darren Ng Wei Jie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 04:45, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Kovan Double Murders for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kovan Double Murders is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kovan Double Murders until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 TT me 12:43, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
The article Murder of Nonoi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Yet another in a series of tragic stories, but no lasting effects, delete as per WP:NOTNEWS.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 TT me 13:55, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Murder of Nonoi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Murder of Nonoi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Nonoi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 TT me 16:06, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
The Anthony Ler case moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, The Anthony Ler case, contains a significant amount of content that are violations of our policies for biographies of living people, and as such cannot be accepted into mainspace at this time. In particular, the use of primary sources, such as trial documents and the perpetrator's confessions, are not allowed. Sourcing requirements for biographical content of living people are very strict, particularly when the claims are about a contentious topic such as criminal activity. Please remove and/or rewrite the content that cannot be cited to secondary sources and resubmit the article through WP:AFC. signed, Rosguill talk 23:37, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
do i need to cite secondary sources like newspapers? NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 23:58, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
October 2020
Hi NelsonLee20042020! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Kho Jabing that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Greyjoy talk 09:31, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Greyjoy, thank you for reminding me. NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 10:40, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Signing posts
Hello, in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death of Darren Ng Wei Jie, you did not sign your post. In case you didn't know, posts can be signed with four tildes, like this but without the slashes: ~/~/~/~/, and you should sign at the end of your post not the first paragraph. Instead of going back and signing, instead type }Unsigned|NelsonLee20042020{ (with the parentheses inverted). Omniscientmoose42 (talk) 19:29, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
oh ok i understand. thank you Omniscientmoose42. because i am a newcomer from wikipedia and only joined a few months prior, so i am kind of unfamiliar with the guidelines. pardon me about it NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 01:19, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
The President's Pleasure (Singapore) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, The President's Pleasure (Singapore), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Cassiopeia(talk) 00:12, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
- Hi NelsonLee20042020, Good day, I moved your page above to draft space since you still have a lot of content to add in. When you have done you can move it to mainspace or ask me to do so and I will review the article for you. Thank you. Cassiopeia(talk) 00:14, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
- ok thank you NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 00:48, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
- thank you cassiopeia
- i will try to find reliable sources thank you for your advice NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 00:49, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
- Hi NelsonLee20042020, Welcome, let me know if anything else I could help. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia(talk) 01:02, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
thank you. you too stay safe NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 01:25, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Links to draft articles
Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to List of major crimes in Singapore (2000–present). Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:04, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
thank you for the reminder arjayay NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 11:48, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
i will take note next time. pardon me about it, since i joined earlier this year NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 11:49, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
sorry about it NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 11:51, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: The President's Pleasure (Singapore) has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Cassiopeia(talk) 00:16, 17 November 2020 (UTC)thank you cassiopeia nevermind i don't mind about the time you took to review the article. i am grateful to you for your help thanks, and happy editing too NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 04:59, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited L (Death Note), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Near and Watari.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Your long-winded essay on Changi Prison is too long, too detailed. I had indicated that it is WP:NOTNEWS. Prisoners die in prison, whether intended or not. Was there foul play? No, and thus doesn't need to be that long winded. Don't slide in a biography into such article as well, it is not relevant to Changi Prison. – robertsky (talk) 09:57, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- Additional comments: If the incident is notable, as well as the original case which the poor guy was sentenced for, then it deserves to be a separate article. Otherwise, just a couple of sentences summarising what happened should do. e.g. filling in words in between these keywords should do: kidnap -> death row -> suicide -> no foul play. – robertsky (talk) 10:13, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
ok NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 10:36, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
December 2020
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sinking of the Titanic, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Aloha27 talk 14:54, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
noted, sir/mdm NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 01:25, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Hi NelsonLee20042020! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Eliyr (talk) 09:19, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Continued incorrect use of "minor" edits
Hello NelsonLee20042020, thank you for your continued work on improving articles here at Wikipedia. I noticed a recent edit of yours was incorrectly tagged as a minor edit. Any edit which adds new information to an article is not minor, minor edits are small edits which do not change the meaning of the article in any way (correcting typos and punctuation for example). I can see that you have been warned about this several times already [1][2][3]. Please try to improve on this. If you have any questions feel free to let me know. Greyjoy talk 09:16, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
sorry. actually some of the errors i didnt mean to commit them. there are times when i made major edits, i pressed on minor edit by error before publishing. i tried to revert but useless, still got published NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 10:56, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
but dont worry i will try to be mindful in the future NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 10:57, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Categorising redirects
Noticed that you have created a bunch of redirects to redirect names of criminals to murder pages. Do not categorise redirects with mainspace categories. These should be be sorted into "maintenance" categories wherever possible. See Wikipedia:Categorizing redirects. – robertsky (talk) 01:34, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
ok thank you for the reminder. but how do such issues get sorted out? NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 03:37, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- By issues, you mean the redirects? There are a lot of "maintenance" categories to remember. Instead, I use a userscript, User:Wugapodes/Capricorn to find and select the appropriate categories. – robertsky (talk) 08:44, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
yeah i mean the redirects NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 09:07, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
January 2021
Hello, I'm Some1. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Murder of Bobbie Jo Stinnett, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Some1 (talk) 05:57, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Dustin Higgs
I don't believe you intended the "Even if he was not sentenced to death ..." wording in this edit, but were instead intending something like, "Even if he had been sentenced to death ...". -- ToE 15:28, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
thanks. oh my god, sorry, i typed wrong thank you for rectifying the error on my behalf. i mean this "Even if he had been sentenced to death...", yes
NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 15:31, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: The Anthony Ler case has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Inexpiable (talk) 10:47, 19 January 2021 (UTC)Disambiguation link notification for January 31
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tay Yong Kwang, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malays.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kovan double murders, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CSI.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
got other titles that have the name CSI other than the tv show? wow, i didnt know NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 06:19, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Direct, reliable sources needed for Days of the Year pages
You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages now require direct reliable sources for additions. For details see the content guideline, the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide or the edit notice on any DOY page. Almost all new additions without a reliable source as a reference are now being reverted on-sight.
Please do not add new additions to these pages without direct sources as the burden to provide them is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages.
Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 19:38, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
thank you for the reminder NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 22:49, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
March 2021
Hello, I'm CommanderWaterford. I noticed that you recently removed content from Kho Jabing without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:23, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
sorry, my bad. i will be mindful of it NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 10:40, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
anyway, someone said the article is too long, so i thought i might want to separate out some details, sorry NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 10:43, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the The Day After Tomorrow plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 23:36, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Your contributed article, List of cases impacted by Kho Jabing
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, List of cases impacted by Kho Jabing. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Kho Jabing. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Kho Jabing. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:25, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Your contributed article, Final efforts to save Kho Jabing's life
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Final efforts to save Kho Jabing's life. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Kho Jabing. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Kho Jabing. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:26, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Splitting Articles Kho Jabing
Hi, please make yourself comfortable with the procedure how to split an article at WP:SPLIT and especially WP:PROSLIT, thank you. CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:58, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
April 2021
Hello, I'm Paper9oll. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to The Penthouse: War in Life have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Please refrain from adding such content. Wikipedia is not a means of promotion. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 12:37, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Ways to improve Yishun triple murders
Hello, NelsonLee20042020,
Thank you for creating Yishun triple murders.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
See Copyvio Dectector report on the similarities between this article here and the copyrighted source.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Robertsky}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
– robertsky (talk) 03:22, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
@Robertsky: thank you for your response. i will rewrite the article, especially the similar partsNelsonLee20042020 (talk) 04:05, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Robertsky i had rewritten the article please read it NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 05:04, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
- Eh.. the match is lower, but at 80.6%. Still requires some more rephrasing. For the red parts that are not quoted directly from the news article and matches in the article here, try rephrasing those. – robertsky (talk) 07:16, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
ok i will see what to do. NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 07:20, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
@Robertsky: i done it. its like 32%. NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 07:58, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Yishun triple murders
Hello NelsonLee20042020. Thank you for creating great articles on the criminal cases of Singapore.
Regarding your edit to Wang Zhijian's fate, you need to provide a source on his execution. Wikipedia policy does not allow speculation, not even if it's a near certainty. It must be confirmed. Thank you. Seloloving (talk) 12:33, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- Understand, Seloloving. Thanks. Its just weird and does not make sense that a man would not be executed even after so many years since he lost his appeal NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 12:35, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- Yes indeed. But until there is official news on the case, we are unable to jump the gun and claim that he has been executed. His fate might eventually be released as ST tends to run factoids on past cases every now and then. All the best. Seloloving (talk) 12:40, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
ok NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 12:44, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
May 2021
Hello, I'm MichaelMaggs. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of murder convictions without a body, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please note that all additions need to include a citation to a reliable source, *even where you know that what you have added is correct*. Thank you. MichaelMaggs (talk) 12:43, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
You reverted to put back your text, but you did not cite any source, contrary to what you just stated on my talk page. Please do not re-add this material unless and until you have read and can follow the citation turorial that I linked to in the paragraph above. Thank you. MichaelMaggs (talk) 13:02, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of murder convictions without a body, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. MichaelMaggs (talk) 13:04, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
- I apologize - I did not realise when I looked at your Singapore edit in wikicode view that you had wikilinked the names in the first two columns. I am so sorry. MichaelMaggs (talk) 13:21, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mimi Wong, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Filipino.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
I moved your page
Hey, I just wanted to tell you that I moved your page, 'Bishan flat murder', to a new name. You can now find it at Murder of Piang Ngaih Don. I figured I'd give you a heads up in case you wanted to edit it. 
Helen (let’s talk) 23:32, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
thank youNelsonLee20042020 (talk) 00:35, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
You are my muse
Hi again! I found your article, Murder of Piang Ngaih Don, to be very inspiring. It gave me impetus to create a whole article on the aubject of maid abuse; as it turns out, it is a widely-documented subject that warrants an article. Thank you for fuelling my creativity. Helen(💬📖) 01:24, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
helen, good to know that you are inspired by me. thank you for what you said. my editing in wikipedia is just an area of interest personally, but still, happy to know that i allow a fellow editor to be inspired for continuing to edit. I feel obliged. NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 01:28, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
and the creativity too NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 01:28, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Murder of Piang Ngaih Don, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Burmese.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:02, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Kallang River body parts murder for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kallang River body parts murder until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Kingoflettuce (talk) 12:37, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Death of Darren Ng Wei Jie for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death of Darren Ng Wei Jie (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Kingoflettuce (talk) 12:44, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Murder of Tay Chow Lyang and Tony Tan Poh Chuan for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Tay Chow Lyang and Tony Tan Poh Chuan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Kingoflettuce (talk) 12:48, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Bunch of Murder AfDs
Hey Nelson, just a heads up that I'm nominating a few of your articles for deletion. Nothing personal, obviously, but some of them have already been deleted before if you were unaware, i.e. Liu Hong Mei & Darren Ng. The state of sourcing hasn't seemed to have changed much in 8 years but consensus on AfD might be different now. Here's hoping! In general you've done some great work, though the detail in most of the murder articles might border on excessive. Kingoflettuce (talk) 12:51, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
- Nelson. I will look into helping you to clean up your articles in the near future. Kingoflettuce is right that many of them do not meet encyclopedic standards. Some of the proposed deletions I agree with, some not. But we will see how it goes and start a cleanup once the AfDs are over. Seloloving (talk) 06:36, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
ok noted. thanks NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 08:47, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Murder of Frankie Tan for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Frankie Tan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Kingoflettuce (talk) 12:55, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of The Anthony Ler case for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Anthony Ler case until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Kingoflettuce (talk) 13:02, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
You might be interested
Hey NelsonLee20042020, I wrote this article I think you'd be interested in expanding. I noticed that you're really into writing about crime (as shown by your fantastic work on the Muawanatul Chasanah page, so perhaps you'd like to have a look at Murder of America Thayer? Helen(💬📖) 19:47, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
yes i will. thanks NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 00:23, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Notification
Hey Nelson, would you like me to upload the photo of Kho Jabing for you? Are you having trouble with the instructions I left you on my talkpage? Seloloving (talk) 14:37, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
yes i do. i am still not sure how, and there is no option of uploading the non free image NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 14:44, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
thank you for asking. not sure if i can master it over time NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 14:44, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
uploading the images i mean --NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 14:52, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
- I have uploaded it for you. :) Seloloving (talk) 16:14, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
thanks for helping. hope that i can slowly learn and get the hang of it NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 22:46, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Anthony Ler.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Anthony Ler.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Anthony Ler.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Anthony Ler.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 18:08, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Photo copyright
Hey Nelson, please be careful of non-free media which you are uploading. This is not an identification of a person. Seloloving (talk) 03:15, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
Sorry seloloving, then what to do? --NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 03:25, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- Nelson, to make it simple, please only upload images where
- a) it's used to provide identification of a deceased person. AND
- b) the photo was not taken by a press agency which may have a commercial interest in selling the photo. (aka news media, ST, CNA, etc) OR
- c) where the photo itself is famous and subjected to longlasting media coverage, such as Tankman.
- Kallang slashing crime scene fails a) as it's not used as an identification of a deceased person, b) because it's taken by a press agency who will have a commercial interest in licensing the photo for reuse and c) because it's itself not a famous photo.
- I understand these rules may be frustrating, and yes, the guide can be a little long. I hope this summary is enough to have given you a better understanding of Wikipedia's use of non-free photos. Seloloving (talk) 09:36, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- Nelson, you cannot upload the photo of Tony Imba or Kim Hyon-hui as these individuals are still alive. Only photos of deceased people can be uploaded under the non-free media criteria. I would heavily suggest reading Wikipedia:Non-free_content#Images before uploading any further photos.
- Please be very careful to ensure that the photos of people you upload are already deceased (imprisoned does not count) and that it was not taken by a press agency.
- If possible, you may clarify with me on my talkpage all the photos you wish to upload, as repeated copyright infringement (even unintended) may lead to an administrator's intervention. Seloloving (talk) 03:56, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- Nelson. Please stop uploading photos at the moment. You cannot upload 1, 2, and 3. You have already uploaded 4 to identify her, and ONLY ONE photo can be used for identification. I need you to read Wikipedia:Non-free_content#Images, and clarify with me any doubts. Please acknowledge this. Regards. Seloloving (talk) 03:14, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
ok sure it feels confusing, like this is this and that is that, not the other this is this and the other that is that NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 03:21, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
- I understand it's confusing, and share your frustration about copyright laws and restrictions in place, but we have no choice. We have to adhere to this, which was why I requested you to ask clarify with me before uploading any photos.
- I would like to request you to stop uploading photos for the moment, while I create a flowchart for you to follow in future. Seloloving (talk) 03:23, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Ok fine. seloloving. but why you did not propose to delete the cross? NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 03:25, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
thank you anyway NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 03:27, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
and sorry about the photo mania because i thought it would not violate since some murder victims have their childhood photos posted other than the top image NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 03:34, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
- Nelson, I have created this flowchart for you. Please adhere to it, and clarify with me any doubts. No worries. Seloloving (talk) 10:29, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
thank you seloloving NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 10:35, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
The file File:Kallang slashing crime scene.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails non-free media rationale 8 of Wikipedia:Non-free_content#Images. The article is not a discussion of the photograph itself and is taken by a press agency. It is also not used to identify a deceased person, violating rationale 10. I have explained further on the non-free media rationale to the uploader and do not recommend any actions for this good faith upload.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Kallang slashing crime scene.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Kallang slashing crime scene.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:18, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
The file File:Tony Anak Imba.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Individual was not executed and is still alive in prison, failing criteria 10 of Wikipedia:Non-free_content#Images
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
Also:
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
The file File:Piang Ngaih Don 2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not used as an identification of the victim. There's already a non-free media photo used at the top of the page Murder of Piang Ngaih Don.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Seloloving (talk) 03:15, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
The file File:Piang Ngaih Don 3.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not used as an identification of the victim. There's already a non-free media photo used at the top of the page Murder of Piang Ngaih Don.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Seloloving (talk) 03:15, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Tony Anak Imba.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Tony Anak Imba.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:11, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
The file File:Passport of Piang Ngaih Don.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not used as an identification of the victim. There's already a non-free media photo used at the top of the page Murder of Piang Ngaih Don.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Kim Hyon-hui.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Kim Hyon-hui.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Passport of Piang Ngaih Don.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Passport of Piang Ngaih Don.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Piang Ngaih Don 2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Piang Ngaih Don 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Piang Ngaih Don 3.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Piang Ngaih Don 3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
The file File:Nagaenthran K. Dharmalingam.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Subject is due to be hanged but not dead yet - fails non-free media rationale.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Seloloving (talk) 23:30, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- Hello Nelson, please refer to the guide on uploading images that I have shown you in the past. The subject is still alive and as events have shown, uploading photos prematurely before their deaths will fail the non-free media rationale. On the other hand, great work on the article so far. Seloloving (talk) 23:49, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
thank you for the advice seloloving NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 02:45, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
The file File:Death warrant of Nagaenthran K Dharmalingam.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Article is not dedicated to the discussion of the letter informing the family of the death sentence, and merely accompanies it. The text on it would also be copyrighted by the Government of Singapore.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Seloloving (talk) 23:32, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Death warrant of Nagaenthran K Dharmalingam.png
Thanks for uploading File:Death warrant of Nagaenthran K Dharmalingam.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:09, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Nagaenthran K. Dharmalingam.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Nagaenthran K. Dharmalingam.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:Kim Seon-ho.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Kim Seon-ho.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason>with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ✗plicit 13:59, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The file File:Ronald Tan Chong Ngee.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
WP:DECORATIVE non-free use in Sim Ah Cheoh#Crime and sentence which fails WP:NFCC#8. Despite the claim made in this file's non-free use rationale, this image is not being used at the top of a biographical article about the individual in question, but rather it is being used in subsection of an article about a different person. There's no sourced critical commentary in the relevant section which specifically discusses this particular photo and the subject of this photo, Ronald Tan Chong, is mentioned by name twice; so, there's no real loss of encyclopedic information to the readers of the article if this file is omitted as explained in WP:NFC#CS. If a stand-alone article about Ronald Tan Chong is written, then this photo would probably OK to use for primary indentification purposes at the top of or in the main infobox of such an article, but it's non-free use in the article about Sim Ah Cheoh doesn't comply with WP:NFCC
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:01, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
- File:Lim Joo Yin.jpg has also been proposed for deletion for the same reasons as given above. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:02, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
The file File:Chong Lon Chong.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
WP:DECORATIVE non-free use in Hock Lee bus riots#Riots which fails WP:NFCC#8. This image is not being used at the top of a biographical article about the individual in question, but rather it is being used in subsection of an article about the event in which the individual in question was killed. There's no sourced critical commentary in the relevant section which specifically discusses this particular photo itself and the content about the student and his death doesn't not require a non-free iamge of him be seen to be understand as explained in WP:NFC#CS. If a stand-alone article about Chong Lon Chong is created, then this photo would probably OK to use for primary indentification purposes (though its value even in such an article would still be questionable because of its poor quality) at the top of or in the main infobox of such an article, but it's non-free use in the article about the bus riots doesn't comply with WP:NFCC. Non-free photos of deceased person aren't simply added to article about event in which they might've been killed just to memorialize them per WP:NOTMEMORIAL; there needs to be some signinificant improvement in the reader's understanding to the degree that not seeing the photo would be detrimental to that understanding. That's not the case at all with respect to this particular photo.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:16, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
The file File:Colt pistol of Wan Kamil.jpeg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
WP:DECORATIVE non-free use in Murders of Koh Ngiap Yong and Jahabar Sathick#Investigations and breakthrough which fails WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#8. The reader doesn't need to see a non-free of the gun used to commit a crime to understand that a gun was used by the perpetrators of the crime per WP:FREER and WP:NFC#CS.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:21, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Colt pistol of Wan Kamil.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Colt pistol of Wan Kamil.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Lim Joo Yin.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Lim Joo Yin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:18, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Ronald Tan Chong Ngee.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ronald Tan Chong Ngee.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 10
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mas Selamat Kastari, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Internal Security Act.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for contributing: Murders of Koh Ngiap Yong and Jahabar Sathick
Thank you for contributing the article Murders of Koh Ngiap Yong and Jahabar Sathick. I have assessed it as being of "C-class" quality at face value and first reading because it covers the crimes, criminal investigations and judicial process with a reasonable balance between the various aspects of what should appear in a crime-related article. (I don't rate higher than C-class upon first assessment.) I think this article sets a standard that authors' of newly created crime articles should aspire to. Thanks for all the hard work putting this article together pretty much by yourself. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 22:09, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
thank you Cameron Dewe NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 00:37, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
On usage of NewspaperSG (at Sim Ah Cheoh)
Heya, noticed that you have used NewspaperSG archives at Sim Ah Cheoh. May I request that you strip out the URLs in references that has no direct links and are linked to keyword searches in the future? Search results may change over time as the archives grow. Cheers! – robertsky (talk) 20:12, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
How do you do it? I am confused...NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 02:24, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Just don't fill in the url field if the URL is of a search URL. You probably have copied the URL in the headings of the articles you can't access from home. Heh. Those URLs are search URLs. The actual URL can only be accessed if you are accessing from NLB. You can look at this Special:Diff/1059981163 as an illustration of what I meant by seach URL. – robertsky (talk) 03:22, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
Also, if you want to use images from NewspaperSG, I suggest going down to NLB and scan/capture/print the image from the microfilm instead of lifting from the digital version due to the watermarking. – robertsky (talk) 03:25, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
thank you NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 03:32, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:Kim Mi-soo at the 24th Busan Film Festival.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please add the appropriate fair use tag and rationale.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 19:47, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note - You did not provide a proper URL for the source and just stated NBC news. I assume you got it from here which credits this as a Shutterstock image. Shutterstock is a commercial image agency. You can't use images from commercial agencies as they fail to meet WP:NFCC#2. -- Whpq (talk) 19:51, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Kim Mi-soo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Kim Mi-soo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Edit summary
After reviewing your contributions, 50 recent edits has no edit summaries. Is it hard to fill out edit summary? –Ctrlwiki (talk) 17:30, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Sorry, it still slipped my mind. NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 01:34, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
I will try to remember next time NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 01:35, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Current Events Barnstar | |
| Absultely brilliant editing over at All of Us Are Dead! Keep up the amazing work!. Slashlefty (talk) 10:46, 3 February 2022 (UTC) |
Slashlefty (talk) 10:46, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
All of Us Are Dead
@NelsonLee20042020:, please do not add more details than is necessary for the episode summaries in All of Us Are Dead. Per [Manual of Style] for television, plot summaries should not exceed 200 words per episode. This is even stated at the top of the section while editing in source mode. Being "summaries", the language used should be concise. Note that I have had to revert your edits several times, save for spelling corrections. I would appreciate it if you took heed of this. Thanks. Yekshemesh (talk) 17:29, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Understand, but from what I saw, there are some details that were not included in, or language corrections within it, which is why I did som sorry if you find it unnecessary. Thanks for the comments though. NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 00:27, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- Okay, but please keep them under 200 words. As at time of writing, most of the summaries still exceed the required word limit. I (and other editors) will continue to trim any words we deem superfluous in keeping with the word count. You might find some useful guidelines at Wikipedia:How to write a plot summary. Cheers. Yekshemesh (talk) 07:23, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- same goes to you, pal. NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 08:07, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Kang Min-chul.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Kang Min-chul.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:49, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Summary
I appreciate your edits to the episode summary of All of Us Are Dead, I try not to remove your contributions, but hopefully, you keep the word count below 200 per episode. Thanks. —Ctrlwiki (talk) 09:26, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
understand, thank you. I also appreciate how you act as an opposing voice and remove some of my edits you deemed were inappropriate. Sometimes opposing voices were needed to know where you erred NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 09:35, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- I am not opposed to your editing, and to your fixing of grammatical errors. I'm just opposed when you add side notes. Hopefully, let's go straight to the point in summarizing each episode. Don't put, those shouldn't be added, to keep below 200 words. —Ctrlwiki (talk) 09:41, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
I understand, thanks for the advice NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 10:18, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Cui Ya Jie.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Cui Ya Jie.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:Lee Yeon (photo).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Lee Yeon (photo).jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason>with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:26, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Restoring copyright violation materials on Twenty-Five Twenty-One
Hi NelsonLee20042020, I noticed that you reverted my removal of copyright violation materials. The entire Episodes section was copied outright from Netflix by Profzed which they also did the same with Business Proposal yesterday with this now-deleted/hidden revision. You may refer to the copyright violation report for Twenty-Five Twenty-One here. Fyi, the tool is not some random tool, it's the official tool used by Template:Copyvio-revdel which I added the template onto the article previously in this revision, you can find the same link in the template in the linked revision, should you wish to compare the URL. The copyrighted revisions is supposed to be hidden away per WP:RD1 by administrators however due to large scale involving exactly 404 revisions (including the revision you just restored unknowingly), it's not feasible to do so as per my enquiry with admin Diannaa on her talk page. Hence, please do not restore it outright, you may however write it in your own words, should you wish to add back the Episodes table/section. Thanks you for your cooperate and understanding. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 13:21, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Now I understand, Paper9oll, thank you for enlightening me on this. I may recant on the details then. --NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 13:54, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
- @NelsonLee20042020 No problem, thanks! — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 14:05, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Abdul Kahar Othman
In what way did the execution of Abdul Kahar Othman have anything to do with his racial background? What's your intention? Singapore has never "targeted" a race for capital punishment. These include a Chinese, Malay, Indian or a white/black foreigner. 125.248.179.49 (talk) 21:48, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Nothing I am just adding in his ethnicity so as to provide his racial identity, which is part of his personal identity and unrelated to his crime after all NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 00:32, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
Besides I have created a quite a number of cases where the death penalty is given to those of other races NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 00:34, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
I am sorry if you are concerned if it may cause some misunderstanding that it can make connection between race and the sentence itself NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 00:37, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
Barnstar for you~!
|
The Most Improved Editor's Barnstar | |
| For showing lots of improvement and willingness to learn. Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 07:36, 26 April 2022 (UTC) |
Thank you NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 13:11, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Nagaenthran K. Dharmalingam
On 28 April 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Nagaenthran K. Dharmalingam, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 23:28, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
How do I make the nomination and which type of article is within the criteria of nomination? NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 00:33, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
May I ask, Stephen, of what to do if I want to nominate? Pardon me since I never done it before NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 00:33, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
On on your edit summary for page move of Execution of Nagaenthran K. Dharmalingam
There are longer article titles than this. And there should not be a problem with search engines picking up on this article. For internal search, the redirections that have been created will point to the right article anyway. – robertsky (talk) 08:40, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- thank you for the enlightenment. and sorry, since i just have the concern that the article title might be too long. theres nothing against the moving after all since the move is reasonable NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 08:42, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Roh Yoon-seo moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Roh Yoon-seo, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). It seems like a case of WP:TOOSOON. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 05:38, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
| This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |