User talk:NeverTry4Me/Archive 5

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

←

Archive 3

→

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jyotirmay Chakravarty has been accepted

Jyotirmay Chakravarty, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 13:20, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

C1K98V thank you a lot.

@Deepfriedokra: am I keeping/respecting your faith on me? :)

Please have an assessment of my work here after you unblocked me. I need some inspiration to continue for miles. _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 08:58, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jyotirmay Chakravarty, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages NSG and SPG.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Fixed. _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 06:40, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ellora Vigyan Mancha has been accepted

Ellora Vigyan Mancha, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Doric Loon (talk) 14:23, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Thank you Doric Loon. I was a bit confused if such is eligible for Wikipedia or not. I also thank Deepfriedokra for allowing me to prove my scopes. Regards _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 23:05, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi @NeverTry4Me. In principle an organization like that is eligible, but only if it has attracted public attention, which is ate the core of our definition of notability. I was slightly hesitant about whether the news reports in this case were enough. So it would be great if you can keep your eye out for any further examples of this organization being cited in the national or (ideally) international press. A couple more would protect the article from deletion by an editor who sees things differently. Keep up the good work! Doric Loon (talk) 07:13, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
@Doric Loon Thanks for your reply. I will keep updating the article for sure. Thanking you again. _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 08:06, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Archive location

Ive noticed you removed and then re-added auto-archiving to your page. However, you've messed up a little, and set the archive location to {{SUBST:NeverTry4Me}}. I'm unsure whether or not you really want archiving, but if you do, you should fix the location to User talk:NeverTry4Me, or else the bot will refuse to archive this page further. Thanks. Aidan9382 _(talk) 04:43, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

@Aidan9382 Thanks for your message. I am really facing issues with the Archive, though I followed Archive help pages. Now if possible I want to fix the things or unarchive everything. Regards _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 04:55, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Unarchiving everything might be a bit hard, as theres currently 33 discussions (~67k bytes) already in archives, but it can still be done. I can probably help you out with the archiving, so what is it thats broken for you? Ive noticed that a list of existing archives isnt showing, would you like me to look into that? Aidan9382 _(talk) 04:59, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

@Aidan9382 It would a great help to me if you help me in this issue. I am really stuck. :( _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 05:00, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Alright, ive gone ahead and added the archive header. If you'd like to tamper with it yourself, theres other options available. You can either have that as part of a talk header by using {{Talk header|search=no|archive_age=30|archive_units=days|archive_bot=Lowercase sigmabot III}}, or you can look into the customisation choices yourself over here and get some possible help here. Hope this fixes the issues. Aidan9382 _(talk) 05:08, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

@Aidan9382 Thank you will not be enough for your help. But how do I add the old archives? I am unable to do that. Any suggestion? _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 05:11, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Could you be a bit more clear what you mean by add the old archives? As far as im aware, theres only Archive 1, and thats listed on the header. Sorry if im a bit stupid here but im not sure what you're referencing. Aidan9382 _(talk) 05:12, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

@Aidan9382 The Archive bot messed my Archives. It archived in a random manner like this, this and so on. _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 05:22, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Oh wow, what on earth. I see what you mean. Ill see if i can potentially fix this, as i have no idea whats happened here. Gimme some time, ill look into it. Aidan9382 _(talk) 05:23, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Quick update: Ive figured out whats going on here. Ive gone ahead and organised the archives in chronological order, and im gonna merge them all into 1 or 2 archives. Ill try respect the set archive size of 75k. This shouldnt take me too long. Once ive done merging the archives, ill go ahead and mark all these malformed ones as {{Db-author}}. Aidan9382 _(talk) 05:32, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

@Aidan9382 I have no words to appreciate your efforts to help me. _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 05:38, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Ive finished. Every page in Special:PrefixIndex/User_talk:NeverTry4Me/ other than pages 1-4 have now been marked for deletion, and the new archives all have the minimum amount of posts to go over 75k (which i think is how archive size works, it should be fine either way though). Hope this helped! (Oh and i think everythings fine, but i cant guarantee everything is in perfect order and looking great. Should be good enough though) Aidan9382 _(talk) 05:50, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

@Aidan9382 Thank you mate for the fix. I am very happy. Regards _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 06:14, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Sorry to bug you again, but due to policy, you have to be the one to request {{Db-author}} on the archive pages. Just go through the pages listed here and replace them with the Db-author template to have them deleted now that they've been moved. (Note: Deletion is not required, but cleaning up your userspace is normally a good idea, so ill let you decide if you wish to keep these). Thanks. Aidan9382 _(talk) 06:56, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

@Aidan9382 which code shall I use? _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 06:58, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, what do you mean by code? Aidan9382 _(talk) 06:59, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

@Aidan9382 I mean in which pages as I bit confused. (Sorry for previous confusing message). _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 07:01, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Nah, its fine. Let me get a list of pages for you

All other pages should be kept as they are the merged ones Aidan9382 _(talk) 07:02, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

@Aidan9382, mate you have done a great favor to me. I am delighted. :) _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 07:03, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Viplav Tripathi has been accepted

Viplav Tripathi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hatchens (talk) 11:57, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

@Hatchens thank you. :) _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 01:52, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

@NeverTry4Me but the article is totally dependent on single but an unfortunate event. If you fail to diversify it with more significant information, then it would become very easy to nominate it for an AfD in the near future. - Hatchens (talk) 04:00, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

@Hatchens yes, I understand the issue. I will be on it with more update. Moreover, as the investigation is going on and it is resulting some outcomes, I guess some more content will be eligible to support. Again, in case Indian army officer's death in action, more contents are usually available after some months or a year. I shall keep updating with more relevant inputs. Regards _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 04:09, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tapan Deka has been accepted

Tapan Deka, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 12:28, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Pallab Bhattacharyya

Hi @NeverTry4Me. I'm going to echo what @Bonadea said here. You cannot cherry pick those you wish to be involved, and those you don't. They have every right to act on the article as an AFC reviewer. I also never said it needed to be an admin. I said If someone who reviews it isn't an admin, they can tag it for removal of protection if they believe it's suitable for mainspace. I really think you should leave this particular article for another editor. While @Deepfriedokra has indicated your improvements in other areas, this article is still problematic for you. It might be best to leave it be. Not a formal warning, just a word of advice. Star Mississippi 13:01, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

This part is a warning though. I noticed you immediately re-submitted it without making any of the changes @Bonadea indicated were issues. Do not do that or you'll lose access to re-submit that article. Star Mississippi 13:03, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

@Star Mississippi The duplicate submission was done by mistake. I wanted to click ~~somewhere~~ on the reviewer's name but the click went more than slightly bellow, and by mistake I clicked there. I tender apology for that mistake with good faith. _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 01:51, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

That is an honest advice indeed @Star Mississippi:. The draft is really killing my time. Let me think whether I shall quit or can find something more. I might leave this draft, but let me think over it. Regard _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 03:10, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

You can always come back to it within six months so it doesn't get deleted. Glad it was just a mistake in re-submitting. Star Mississippi 13:25, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rajen Sharma has been accepted

Rajen Sharma, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

HenryTemplo (talk) 06:03, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

@HenryTemplo Thank you for reviewing.

@Star Mississippi:, @Deepfriedokra:, finally it is approved as I removed un-necessary citations, reduced extra claims that needed more citation. Happy now. :) Thank you all. Regards _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 06:10, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Your welcome, however, I am a very new AfC reviewer, so I may lack the boundless experience of some AfC reviewers. Regardless, enjoy your day! HenryTemplo (talk) 06:14, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

@HenryTemplo very new/new/experienced I have no idea. It was solely your own decision. Actually, after getting rejected, I made the article too simple and removed over-citing. I am in a condition where I can create an article through AfC submission only. Such acceptance really makes me happy. Regards _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 06:18, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Why, Thankyou! I will just mention that there were a few (minor) NPOV issues, so you might want to double check the prose. Other than that, good article, and I wish you happy editing! HenryTemplo (talk) 06:23, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

NOV issue is a debacle indeed. Hope other editors will to contribute to the article. Thanking you again _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 06:25, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

I don't believe I've been involved in this article, but I'm glad it was created. Star Mississippi 15:47, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

@Star Mississippi yes you weren't involved. I just informed as the article deleted through wrong AfD consensus, which Djm-leighpark recognized and took the draft through DRV. As Djm-leighpark is blocked, I summarized it as short and with needful citations only. After first decline, I worked again and re-submitted. As the article person died in 1989, there are too few internet resources only. But ~~it has~~ there are old books in the native language (though such native language books are usually not accepted as valid resources). The person is notable indeed as the first ideologue of of major militant outfit and was lynched in too young age.

I am just happy because the conditions put on me about page creation, I am following it. :) Regards _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 18:47, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Pallab Bhattacharyya has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Pallab Bhattacharyya. Thanks! --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:00, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Decline reasons:

Most are press releases. Answer: Without reading the news, it was said. The news is not press releases at all.
the ISBN is for the electronic edition. Answer: Electronic editions are not source?

Above all, no third party source cites the entire article. Sources were well added to support each sentence. Strange. _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 21:20, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Ajmal Foundation has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ajmal Foundation. Thanks! HenryTemplo (talk) 09:57, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

@HenryTemplo The grammar issue is on the statements, not in my editing. Kindly re-check. _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 10:25, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

- Issues fixed. _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 10:28, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

I’ve rechecked, and there’s still a few prose and grammar issues, and it will still need likely need some rewriting to be accepted. However, if it is easier for you, I could try rewriting it, if I am able to (I can’t make any promises I’m afraid!). Have a great day! HenryTemplo (talk) 10:39, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

@HenryTemplo Kindly correct yourself and if you find it to pass WP:NORG, I have left already on the decision of the reviewer. Regards _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 10:43, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

@HenryTemplo: Done with grammar. Regards _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 10:54, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Brilliant, I'll take a look! HenryTemplo (talk) 06:35, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

@HenryTemplo Please consider your own. I'm not trying to convince you. _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 07:30, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2013 Jhankar Saikia Mob Lynching has been accepted

2013 Jhankar Saikia Mob Lynching, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jack Frost (talk) 09:28, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Operation Bajrang has been accepted

Operation Bajrang, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 10:44, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

@Deepfriedokra: Thank you for your trust. After I got unblocked, my 8 Drafts were accepted through AFC. I would be happy if you please keep encouraging. :) Regards _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 23:47, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, NeverTry4Me

Thank you for creating 2013 Jhankar Saikia mob lynching.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:01, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

@SunDawn: My pleasure. :) Thanking for reviewing. _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 03:42, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Inappropriate feedback comments

Your feedback "Non-Indian, Non-Bangladeshi, Non-Pakistani reviewers should be barred to review Drafts related India, Bangladesh & Pakistan related AFC." is offensive and inappropriate, we have no way of knowing what nationality any of us are and it is totally irrelevant. Theroadislong (talk) 09:21, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

@Theroadislong as asked for Feedback, and as per off-Wiki discussion in IRC helpdesk, I have learned about this issue. No offense and I have submitted the feedback with good faith. _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 09:42, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

@Theroadislong I have retracted and corrected the feedback. _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 12:00, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Are you serious, NeverTry4Me? Your new phrasing says "For users like me, senior reviewers should be involved" (why "users like you"? And there are few AfC reviewers more experienced than Theroadislong), and "Kindly do not allow any reviewer who declines simply without checking the draft thoroughly", which is rather an offensive thing to say and clearly not an assumption of good faith, since you imply that the previous reviewers haven't checked the draft thoroughly. A couple of weeks ago you were warned not to make that kind of comment about other editors, after you had posted this.

As for your comment above, there is a limit to how many times you can use the excuse that you didn't know. You have had previous explanations, cautions, and warnings quite recently, after you've said that only certain people should be allowed to review the drafts you create: this is from April (your response), this is from May and so is this.

A final point: please stop trying to bypass the AfC review system by posting requests for your drafts to be reviewed, at the help desk or to individual reviewers, after you have submitted the drafts for review. Why are these drafts invariably so urgent that you cannot wait for the process to take the time it takes? --bonadea contributions talk 12:15, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Draft: Helen Pitt

Hi, you edited the draft of Helen Pitt. I hope you don't mind if I ask, what were the edits? I can't quite find them. Thanks Socialresearch (talk) 21:08, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

@Socialresearch I was trying to help the draft to get accepted. _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 21:12, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Thank you very much! Are there specific edits I can make? Socialresearch (talk) 21:23, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

@Socialresearch The Draft needs a rewrite. Currently the draft is like an announcement kinda. If you don't mind, I can help editing the draft. _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 21:32, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

I would be happy if you would. Socialresearch (talk) 21:34, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

@Socialresearch Let's do then. Cheers. _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 21:37, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Thanks! Socialresearch (talk) 11:46, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Do you think this is okay to resubmit? Socialresearch (talk) 22:15, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2019 Deben Dutta mob lynching has been accepted

2019 Deben Dutta mob lynching, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 07:47, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

@Theroadislong thank you for reviewing the draft and accepting it. My gratitude. Regards- _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 07:50, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

As discussed, I have moved the article to Lynching of Deben Dutta. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 04:12, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

@Cameron Dewe: Thank you for the move. Cheers. _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 04:30, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Madan Kalita has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Madan Kalita. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 11:06, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

MOS issues

Hello, NeverTry4Me. Re this edit, please note that when the information is already cited in the body, it needn't be cited again in lead per MOS:LEADCITE. Also see MOS:DUPLINK: only link the first instance in the infobox, should not be linked everytime. -- Ab207 (talk) 09:18, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Francisco de Borja, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Berkeley.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Operation Rhino (Afghanistan)

Please do not move pages from draft on your own. Certainly, please do not copy/cut-and-paste move anything. Doing things like this is violating your unblock conditions and repetition could lead to reblocking. It is clear that you need this restriction. Thanks. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:27, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

@Deepfriedokra yes I understood yesterday. I won't do again, ever, that I assure with good faith. _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 23:33, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

You keep saying you understand, and then you skirt very close to the lines, repeatedly. I would recommend considering this a final warning for disruptive editing @NeverTry4Me. Star Mississippi 13:38, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

!'m now really in fear to edit anything here in Wiki. Most of the time (after unblocked) I spent my times adding citations in unreffed articles. Now as this is a final warning, I shall take a leave from Wiki. cc @Deepfriedokra @Star Mississippi. _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 09:19, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
You don't have to leave, and I apologize if that's how it came across. I understand from others that you do good work, but your edits are not a priority for reviewers simply because you've done them. You're not entitled to "senior reviewers" as this is not a hierarchy. You don't seem to understand why restrictions exist. Stop skirting the edges of your conditions. Stop begging for early review of your article, which just raises questions on whether you have a conflict of interest with your subjects. Otherwise why the deadline? Make edits, improve articles. But maybe don't create new ones. Star Mississippi 13:41, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
@Star Mississippi I assured already that I won't land into the AFC HelpDesk page as I have already understood the word "help"(I was somewhat in a hurry to get some AfC pages, but I am not connected with those dead people of the subject). As, my restrictions also cover AfC, hence I was working on some draft to increase my AfC page counts. I was working on some real good topic through AfC, most of them will take time to complete and I don't know the completion time, maybe they will take years. You can see my drafts (on work). Regarding COIN, I had landed one COIN unknowingly which I have declared on my user page. And, I guess, COIN and interest on topic are different. _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 22:45, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
I think you've misunderstood the restrictions to some extent. The goal shouldn't be to increase your AfC page counts for the sake of increasing them and/or to end a restriction, but because you think the articles need to exist on Wikipedia. I never intended you to stop editing, but please be careful in areas you're not familiar with because your conduct might lead you to getting blocked. NOt your mistakes, your behavior.

I don't think it's accurate to say you haven't repeated the same mistakes as several of us had to repeat the same advice. There are no senior editors. Ask for help, but allow anyone to help you. Star Mississippi 03:27, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

@Star Mississippi: If you allow, can I resume working? I'm a junior contributor, I might do mistakes. Seniors should guide. I have never repeated the same mistake twice. CC: @Deepfriedokra: _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 00:26, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Madan Kalita has been accepted

Madan Kalita, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 13:35, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alaka Sarma has been accepted

Alaka Sarma, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 18:13, 23 June 2022 (UTC)