User talk:NonProfit YS

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:NonProfit YS/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:NonProfit YS/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 18:20, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NonProfit YS! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 18:20, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020[edit]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Agency for Technical Cooperation and Development. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 14:50, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In response to The Road Is Long: A media source is not be considered as an inappropriate source. Moreover, the edits were providing an accurate, neutral, updating to the page. Because ratings and rankings, in whatever context are evolvng over time, it was not inappropriate to keep the previous info and add an update. Is a contributor to a wikipage trying to "attract visitors to a website or promote a product"? When we had more content to Wikipedia, Wikipedia is becoming more attractive to visitors; Is Wikipedia against that? Thanks for clarifying. NonProfit YS (talk) 15:41, 13 April 2020 (UTC)NonProfit YS (talk) 15:42, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:NonProfit YS/sandbox has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:NonProfit YS/sandbox. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:06, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:NonProfit YS/sandbox has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:NonProfit YS/sandbox. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:20, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:NonProfit YS/sandbox has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:NonProfit YS/sandbox. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:21, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: NGO Advisor (April 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft reads as if it is promoting or publicizing a newsletter or the services of the organization that publishes the newsletter.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NGO Advisor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:NGO Advisor, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:43, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: NGO Advisor (April 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The references are either not WP:RS, contain only fleeting mentions, no mentions at all, or are lightly regurgitated press release. There is no WP:SIGCOV about the organization.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NGO Advisor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:NGO Advisor, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chetsford (talk) 06:08, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at User talk:Theroadislong, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 07:19, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:NGO Advisor[edit]

Hello, NonProfit YS. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "NGO Advisor".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 11:30, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]