User talk:Nothing444/archive2008/February

Something Upstairs

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Something Upstairs, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 18:00, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:CreativeBarnstar.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:CreativeBarnstar.PNG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:06, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Your RfA

Your RfA was transcluded today onto the main RfA page, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship. I removed it because there was no candidate acceptance statement, making it malformed. It didn't seem like something you were seriously considering. Please let me know if you'd like it restored. Darkspots (talk) 23:32, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

I just got your message on my talk page. I'm willing to transclude the page, however you need to indicate your acceptance formally. Please say "I accept" after the statement "Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:". And sign it with four tildes.

Also, you cannot support yourself, so remove that please. The supports and opposes all have to be from logged-in users, so all the IP statements do not count and will get struck.

Finally, please reconsider this. Your nomination will fail. You do not need to do this to yourself. Get some more experience editing, look at other sucessful and unsucessful RfAs, and come back when you're ready. Darkspots (talk) 18:05, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Do you want me to transclude your RfA to the main page? I blanked the supports and opposes. There's not supposed to be any voting before transclusion, IPs can't vote, and you can't vote for yourself. Let me know, Darkspots (talk) 22:36, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Admin coaching request

You have previously expressed an interest in undergoing the Admin coaching program. We're currently engaged in a program reset to help things move more smoothly in the future. If you are still interested in the program, please go to Wikipedia:Admin coaching/Requests for Coaching and re-list yourself under Current requests, deleting your entry from Older requests. Also, double-check to make sure coaching is right for you at theCoachee checklist; WP:Adoption or WP:Editor review may be more appropriate depending on your situation and aspirations. We should get back to you within a day or so, once a coaching relationship has been identified. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 06:59, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, technically I haven't "referred" you. I've asked if you feel your still interested in admin coaching. I'm looking at your record, and you appear to be a good user. But according to your record, you've only been active on the site this month and have a total of ~600 edits with ~60 in the mainspace. To become an admin one usually needs 5000+ edits and at least 5 months experience, with at least ~2000 edits in the mainspace. While you could be coached by a user, the Admin Coaching program currently has a very large backlog and very few coaches. So we've started asking users who need a great deal of experience to try other avenues such as WP:Adoption or WP:Editor review or WP:Helpdesk to gain experience. Once you have 2000-2500 edits, an admin coach would be able to help you refine some of the fine points of editing and make sure your covering all the right areas. MBisanz ^talk 04:11, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello Nothing444/archive2008/February! Welcome to Wikiproject Christianity! Thank you for joining. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! - Addbot (talk) 17:21, 18 February 2009 (UTC) Getting Started General • Task for You Wikiproject Talk Page • Templates Useful Links Project Category List of Christian Topics Christianity Portal Miscellaneous Featured Articles • Good Articles Did You Know? • Work Groups Anabaptist • Core Topics • Indian Christianity Iglesia ni Cristo • Jesus • Syriac Christianity Projects Article Requests • Destubbing Campaign Assessment • Articles Needing Clean-up Peer Review • Adopted Topics Similar WikiProjects Anglicanism • Bible • Calvinism Roman Catholicism • Lutheranism

- Tinucherian (talk) 10:28, 26 February 2008 (UTC)