User talk:Oalexander

June 2016

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Tomáš Rosický, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:37, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Are you saying that you lack the competence to notice that my addition is in line with the existing, documented contest of the article? He was until the winter break with Sparta, played 14 times, scored thrice. Whoo are you???? Oalexander (talk) 23:23, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Willy Baumgärtner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DFB. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

October 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Marius Hiller, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GiantSnowman 08:08, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Marius Hiller, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. GiantSnowman 09:49, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

I have removed unsourced content and links not relevant to the content - all notably introduced by me with my failed edit before that has been highly criticised above. The article should be reverted to before my edits. Oalexander (talk) 11:44, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Oalexander. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Carnival (band), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Roger Nichols and John Hurley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:32, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Carlos Babington, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santiago Bernabéu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

May 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Arne Selmosson, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GiantSnowman 08:12, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 11

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of Southend United F.C. managers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Peter Taylor, David Webb, Steve Thompson, Dave Smith, Peter Morris, Paul Clark, Colin Murphy, Phil Brown and Alan Little

Southend United F.C. (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Peter Taylor, David Webb, Steve Thompson, Dave Smith, Peter Morris, Paul Clark, Colin Murphy, Phil Brown and Alan Little

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

August 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Árpád Fazekas (footballer, born 1930). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. GiantSnowman 08:38, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Oalexander. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Herb Alpert, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pacific Coast Highway and Malibu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maunalua Bay, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Diamond Head and Kahala (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:47, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Adhemar Pimenta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Botafogo FC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:33, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

November 2019

Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. An edit that you recently made to FC Bayern Munich seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The formatting is wrong and is unexplained. Please go to the article's talk page to explain what you're trying to achieve so we can assist you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:36, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

@Walter Görlitz: Please inform in sufficient detail what part of the "formatting" was wrong. I have changed several figures and given reason on the edit line. It is unclear when the first logo, which came into being 1901 according to given- authoritative - source, fell into disuse and was replaced by one I outlined on the tal page under crest. Kindly Refrain from being condescending. Oalexander (talk) 06:46, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

I thought I did, sorry.

Your initial change was based in this explanation:"The green one is from when the club joined Jahn, The next one from 1925 is from independence, the one with the rhombes was introd 1954 s. "25 Jahre FC Bayern", p. 125". I wrote "incorrectly formatted and it's not clear why all of the changes were made if only one needed to be changed". Did you explain why you made the other changes? No. So what's "unjustified and poorly reasoned good faith edit". Date ranges use en-dashes, not hyphens. You changed "1900–1901" to "1901-". ignoring the lack of an en-dash, there was no end date. Was that intentional? Is that logo still in-use? You also changed "1920–1924" to "1919–1924", but that was unexplained (or was that the one that you explained?). It's also clearly against the file name itself which was "1906-1919". You changed "1923–1954" to "1925–1954", again the file name was "1923-1954", and again, why? You changed "1978–1996" to "1954–1996" with a file name indicating it was "1979-1996". SO WTF? Explain your changes in detail or stop editing. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:56, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

@Walter Görlitz::The filenames are from where they were apparently sourced ("DWS-Wappen"). They are largely, but not always, nonsensical. Autoritative is the information I provided. I understand that thew filenames are confusing. Note also my contribs in the section Crest on Talk. The 1901 Logo was in use for a birf time before being replaced with one that lasted unti the joining with MSC in 1906. When exactly totes unknown, veiled behind the mist of history. For you a nice pic When Bayern captain Jakl Streitle and his ManCity counterpart Trautmann meet in Munich 1954. The pennant displays the new logo (note the "Y" - thats how you tell the difference to the successor logo) on a pennant in silver and red. Last use of silver in club history was on a balmy evening in Barcelona. It looked more grey than anyway. I might at some stage create a more narrative based Bayern-Logo section - provided I don't get always those idiotic tackles from behind. Replaces dashes as you like. Cheers, Oalexander (talk) 07:11, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lajos Czeizler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conny Karlsson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:33, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robert Thomson (footballer, born 1905), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Reynolds (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:35, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

April 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Harry Catterick, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:21, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charles Stoneham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York Nationals.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:47, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tewfik Abdullah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York Nationals.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:31, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stan Rickaby, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Southern League.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:06, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Julen Lopetegui, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:21, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jesza Poszony, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jonathan Wilson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:33, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

McPherson

Hi, I'm not 100% on what the title should be, but I would probably name it either James McPherson (football coach) or Jim McPherson (football coach), depending on what you found to be used more often. At first I was unsure if the 'coach' term would be sufficient for Wikipedia admin, certainly 'manager' is more common in titles but that doesn't really describe his role, although he was the 'main man' in most of his jobs apart from Newcastle. But I quickly came across Leonid Slutsky (football coach) so it appears that is OK to use as a term, as long as it's clear that the subject had a prominent role (as McPherson clearly did to anyone who would read the article) rather than just a minor backroom staff member as the name sometimes implies, more so in Britain than elsewhere. Crowsus (talk) 07:21, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

@Crowsus: There we go: James McPherson (football coach). Cheers, Oalexander (talk) 08:16, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

James McPherson (football coach) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, James McPherson (football coach), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:00, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

@ User:onel5969:Thank you for shortening the article. It looks more better so and more readers will like it beacause it is shorter. I will give you barnstar soon for proud display on your page, to respect and honour your contribution about knowledge worldwide. Greetz, Oalexander (talk) 06:23, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

I strongly disagree with this action. But what to do is take the links that are there and copy them as reference points on multiple occasions. Crowsus (talk) 02:20, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

@Crowsus: I personally think this is sick. It is a perfectly good article in an environment where meaningless stubs are the majority (I think, an article that does not contain all important information, should not be published, as it is contrary to reader expectations). But this is in line with what can be expected from a group psychological viewpoint, that an environment that has an uncontrolled ruling class and in general offers no rewards, people seek to get recognition for evermore radical rule interpretations. It is a way of dealing with frustrations experienced here and also their outside WP lives. Then you turn destructive. It also happens in general society, where people largely have to deal with diminishing returns and, according to their disposition, then express outrage on the woke or the populist side whenever they are given half a chance.

Theoretically, if one gets a complaint out, that happens to meet the right person, what has been done here is "disruptive editing", which is a punishable offence. I know this, because at some stage I have done the same like the guy above, and was banned for a day or two. There is more to that story, but it matters not. I have largely given up on doing much on WP:EN because the climate is the way it is. I have written the McPherson article largely for the Bayern clientele of WP:DE (where some colleagues kindly also chipped in), and, as I kind of also speak English, translated it and published it also here. Along the way, I found my co-operation with you very pleasant; knowledgeable people in search for more knowledge in a friendly exchange.

I will not act on this matter any further; for one I have done what was good and necessary. If I want to do academic work, I inscribe at one of the three Universities in my city and get myself a few more letters behind my name, which is useless, but some return other than aggro. Apart from this, I have no problem leading a fulfilling life w/out WP. And more so, if I'd give in to that destructivist, for one I am likely to encourage him to radicalise further. He feels then, that he has successfully lorded over someone. He spent half an hour to cut the article down. In the same time, any intelligent person could have, with the material provided, sorted out basically all issues that the article had in his mind. Apart from this, the article still carries some complaint sticker on top. Responding here would make me feel actually very cheap and dirty. And after all, it is only a "start class" article of "low importance", which is what one gets for quite a few hours, where one follows a many leads to dead ends in order to find some information on a few good leads. I really don't need it. There are so many books to be read, so many movies to be watched, and exciting discussions on YouTube, why would I need aggro?

My very best regards to you, and I am happy to once more express what a pleasure it was to cooperate with you. A nice flower on the wayside. Cheers, Oalexander (talk) 06:14, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Many thanks for that, but I feel my input was very little other than having a look at the evidence you had collected regarding the McPhersons and agreed with it. I'm also kinda demotivated from restoring the information but if i get the time i will go through the removed paragraphs and specifically link them all to the Scots Football and particularly the Speed Raiders articles as they of course have all the information. But it won't be the most interesting task so will probably slip down my 'to do' list. In general there's still a lot about German football that could be improved on enwiki and i hope you will still want to take part. Not really sure why this article has been treated in this way but generally I have found the football admins to engage and discuss first unless it's an obvious pile of scheisse or a mistake. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Crowsus (talk) 13:49, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Sorry!

Hi there. I'm sorry. My revert just now ([1]) was made in error. I'll restore your change. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 10:50, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Rollback

I don't have rollback any more, sorry! GiantSnowman 07:44, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Keith Walker (referee), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abraham Klein.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Clifton Beach, Queensland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clifton.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

March 2023

Your edit to The Cairns Post has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 15:30, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Cairns Post, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kuranda.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Len Quested, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heart of Midlothian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Replaceable non-free use File:Gary Quested (SMH 1971).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Gary Quested (SMH 1971).jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:56, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Terry Venables.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Terry Venables.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

re: Galileo Galilei

Good catch on the German translation! My bad.— Moriwen (talk) 03:14, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Errare humanum est. ;-) Oalexander (talk) 03:23, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

May 2024

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to César Luis Menotti did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Robby.is.on (talk) 10:31, 8 May 2024 (UTC)