User talk:PelionClimber

Welcome!

User page[edit]

Enough to stir passions that photo - excellent! Satu Suro 09:39, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey the bottom line on the tasmap art is we dont need tech info - just that it exists and is the govt current equivalent of what all the old state lands and surveys depts that all now call themselves fancy non state oriented corporate identities (i mean what originally was the lands and surveys here in wa is now landgate)- it is more important in my opinion to get a stub up which we can link to so what a non oz and geographically challenged outside reader can click on the link and have it explained what tasmap is - no necessary condition on whether it uses oz adg 94 or whatever - hey maybe ill start it a bit later tonight. Satu Suro 10:50, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Refs[edit]

One of our very respected admins has put ref tags on some of the mountains - dont worry I'll find some real easy - it just a matter of a day or two and ill get em - no big deal - cheers Satu Suro 13:20, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry my chronic chaotic editing will probable see the refs a few days later than i expected - no problems - some tags stay for half a year and no one does anything - ill get something within the week i hope - cheers Satu Suro 23:35, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good to see you back[edit]

Doing a wedding in Lonnie in end of november - hope to drive over Satu Suro 14:40, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neither admin nor chief but nervous nellie watching too many tassie stubs with insufficient WP:RS in the past ... will check soon Satu Suro 13:17, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Missing Permission Templates for Maps[edit]

--Ozhiker (talk) 08:25, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oi![edit]

You in the corner! - there - if your photos are your own they can never be challenged - do not even think that way - I'll be in Tasmania in December - and I'll come and rip your bloody pessimism off you and doubly assure you your piccies are an important part of the Tasmanian wiki project if you are not careful :) - never take another editors point of view on anything as final - talk to more than one to check on anything - and always take it easy - its never worth pulling your head in over permissions etc - you can still provide important contributions to the project and what you have done to date is excellent! Satu Suro 07:47, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if you feel wronged[edit]

I'm sorry if you feel wronged, I am not picking on you nor singling you out - I have questioned the copyright/license of dozens of images previously, many of which were useful images like yours. There were two other Wikipedians involved who both thought the same as I did - User:Stifle who advised to add Template:npd to the maps, and User:Mardetanha who deleted them, but if you feel there's been an injustice, there's several avenues open to you. I hope you're not discouraged from adding to Wikipedia by this.

I'll not nominate your photos - they're obviously wholly your own work.

--Ozhiker (talk) 08:17, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hobart meetup[edit]

Hi Ozhiker, just letting you know that a Hobart meetup is planned for Monday 19th January. If you're around it would be great if you could come along. See Wikipedia:Meetup/Hobart for info. thanks, pfctdayelise (talk) 11:09, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hobart area articles[edit]

Hello, in advance of a possible project in the Hobart area, we're looking to identify and improve a specific range of articles, mainly those associated with locations in the Hobart City Council region. If you'd like to find out more, please join in the discussion at WikiProject Tasmania, or check out the list of articles at QR list. If you'd prefer to not receive these notifications in the future, please let me know.

This message has been sent to members of Category:Wikipedians in Tasmania, Category:Wikipedians in Hobart, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Tasmania participants by Chuq (talk) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:05, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Pelion West from Pelion Plains.jpg[edit]

The file File:Pelion West from Pelion Plains.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Pelion size.jpg[edit]

The file File:Pelion size.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Pelion West top.jpg[edit]

The file File:Pelion West top.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]