User talk:Pen Bull

Your submission at Articles for creation: AirDee (Record Producer) (March 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EggOfReason was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Tone in lead "career" sections promotional, and more reliable sources would be preferable in these sections as well

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AirDee (Record Producer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:AirDee (Record Producer), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

–eggofreason^{(talk · contribs)} 19:22, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pen Bull! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! –eggofreason^{(talk · contribs)} 19:22, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I have fix the draft. Changed the tone and added suitable references. Pen Bull (talk) 22:36, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AirDee (Record Producer) (March 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, AirDee, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AirDee (Record Producer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:AirDee (Record Producer), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 06:50, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is it an exact duplicate? Pen Bull (talk) 10:44, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of AirDee Production Discography[edit]

Hello Pen Bull,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged AirDee Production Discography for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can edit the page and remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 07:12, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of AirDee for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AirDee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AirDee until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:06, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:AirDee[edit]

Hello, Pen Bull. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "AirDee".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:25, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No one can rule from 1279 to 1313 BC[edit]

without travelling backwards in time.:) Doug Weller talk 17:08, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No lol. You're absolutely right. I made an error. My bad Pen Bull (talk) 18:57, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happens to all of us. Doug Weller talk 09:35, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 17:28, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pen Bull (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked indefinetly for "Likely covert advertising" and a breach of the notability guidelites. I concede it was wrong to move a page without a redirect and I understand the reasons for the block. I want to make clear that I did not fully understand the WP:GNG at the time of the offense. I am willing to rectify these errors in editing and am appealing for an unblock so as to make the correct edits. I also want to make for better, more factual articles when it comes to artists such as those mentiones in the offending article. Pen Bull (talk) 08:59, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You weren't blocked for moving a page without a redirect. You will need to describe your connection to the subject of your edits. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:59, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The connection to the subject is that he is a colleague at an events company. Pen Bull (talk) 10:58, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of AirDee[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on AirDee requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AirDee. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:16, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of AirDee for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AirDee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AirDee (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Xclusivzik (talk) 18:51, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]