User talk:Petepetey

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Jernifenchore! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! —This lousy T-shirt— (talk) 23:49, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo
Hello! Petepetey, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! —This lousy T-shirt— (talk) 23:49, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


I am trying to figure out how I can introduce this photo file:hughes and gwendolyn brooks.jpg into the commons so then it can be used in this article?? I have no idea how to do that. Thanks. here is link to photo that has been approved for public domain but never moved there: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hughes_and_Gwendolyn_Brooks.jpg#file

thank you!

You can always still use the image in Wikipedia articles; it doesn't have to go to Commons for that. There is a huge backlog of files to be moved to the Commons right now, so I wouldn't worry about this one. Hope this helped, --L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 02:56, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for the quick response! I have tried several times to tag the photo and use it anyway. Can you tell me how how i do that? I have tried the gallery and the file upload. ??

I wrote this essay to answer that exact question - hopefully it will help you out, but let me know if you get stuck. Yunshui 雲水 12:42, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Belated thank you! that was super helpful. do you have a link to/ trick up your sleeve for editing references? thanks a million.

Jernifenchore (talk) 01:35, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You might be looking for WP:Referencing for beginners. I hope this helps. — kikichugirl oh hello! 01:50, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Deborah Kampmeier
added links pointing to Hounddog and Split
Film director
added a link pointing to Hounddog

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Petepetey. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Petepetey. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Petepetey. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Exploratory product development for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Exploratory product development is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exploratory product development until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Largoplazo (talk) 22:42, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Exploratory Product Development (November 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 12:08, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Exploratory Product Development concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Exploratory Product Development, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:27, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020[edit]

Information icon Hello. Your recent edit to List of Stanford Law School alumni appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Gab4gab (talk) 18:01, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you. You're right. I created a "Robin Feldman" entry here but can't figure out why it's not showing up. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Robin_Feldman. What have I done wrong? Thank you. Petepetey (talk) 18:28, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Exploratory Product Development has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Exploratory Product Development. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 20:48, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Exploratory Product Development[edit]

Hello, Petepetey. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Exploratory Product Development".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:35, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: JinJa Birkenbeuel (May 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Clearly she's been very active; but the draft doesn't yet say much about her from the viewpoints of people who are independent of her. Perhaps the most promising is In 2023, Birkenbeuel was recognized by AdAge and OUTFRONT for her creative excellence as part of Black History Month. This made me wonder: What did they say about her creative excellence, and how did they recognize her. Clicking on the link, I learned: For the feature, which debuts on Feb. 1, Ad Age has selected four accomplished Black creators who will serve as guest editors throughout the month. These creators will tell the story of the most pivotal project from their own careers, and then give the stage to other talents who are shaping advertising, marketing and beyond. What she says about her own career or about others' careers isn't important. What's important is what reliable sources (which must be independent of her) have said about her career. And all that Ad Age says here is that she's "accomplished".
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Hoary (talk) 22:41, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Hoary -
Thanks for your quick response on this. I understand what you are saying, but I am looking at the 23 people who are listed on wikipedia as brand consultants. 19 are men. Of the 19, I argue that several of them have fewer citations of distinction than I posted here for Birkenbeuel.
See: Andy Stefanovich (Press releases, a simple bio posted on Fast Company are used), Simon Mainwaring (mainly links to his own website), and John Gerzema (listed as primary author in most references).  
Also, it's important to note that only the female branding consultants have questions flagged on their profiles despite the male profiles being arguably as weak or weaker.
Given the paltry number of women leaders featured on wikipedia (especially Black women leaders), the extensive number of references, and that this entry meets or surpasses the threshold of several of the male branding consultants who have bios posted - would you please reconsider?
Kindly,
Petepetey Petepetey (talk) 17:50, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Deborah Kampmeier[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Deborah Kampmeier, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:19, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: JinJa Birkenbeuel (August 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Superboilles was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Most if not all of the references used are orthogonal or unrelated to Ms. Birkenbeuel as a subject as far as one can tell from reading them. Rather than add blogs, notices, a couple of actual entries in regular media would prove more beneficial to ascertain notability. See also previous comment.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Superboilles (talk) 20:06, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Exploratory Product Development[edit]

Hello, Petepetey. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Exploratory Product Development".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:45, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:JinJa Birkenbeuel[edit]

Information icon Hello, Petepetey. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:JinJa Birkenbeuel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:09, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Petepetey&oldid=1208627905"