User talk:PeterJensen007

Welcome![edit]

Hello, PeterJensen007, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Duncan Penn, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! SwisterTwister talk 20:18, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Duncan Penn[edit]

The article Duncan Penn has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. SwisterTwister talk 20:18, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion[edit]

Consider using "show preview" (located next to "save page") as this will allow you to change your contributions before submitting. This will also prevent edit conflicts and exhausted servers. SwisterTwister talk 01:10, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Duncan Penn.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Duncan Penn.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Morning Sunshine (talk) 09:31, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Ben Nemtin.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ben Nemtin.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Morning Sunshine (talk) 09:33, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Dave Lingwood.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dave Lingwood.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Morning Sunshine (talk) 09:34, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Jonnie Penn.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jonnie Penn.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Morning Sunshine (talk) 09:35, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. — raeky t 22:25, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jonnie Penn for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jonnie Penn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonnie Penn until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — raeky t 03:04, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Duncan Penn for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Duncan Penn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duncan Penn until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — raeky t 03:04, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dave Lingwood for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dave Lingwood is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Lingwood until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — raeky t 03:05, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ben Nemtin for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ben Nemtin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Nemtin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — raeky t 03:06, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, PeterJensen007. You have new messages at Raeky's talk page.
Message added 11:06, 2 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

— raeky t 11:06, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

COI user warning[edit]

Hello, PeterJensen007. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 15:57, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

Hi Peter. I read your post here. To help convince others that the actor topics you created meet WP:GNG (which will need to be done now that all four are at WP:AFD), you may want to remove content from the articles that is from sources connected to The Buried Life (such as MTV which produces the show). WP:GNG requires that a topic receive enough coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject for there to be a stand-alone article on the topic. The actors Nemtin, Lingwood, and the two Penns appear to have been generating news coverage together as a troupe since at least since 2006,[1] and I found 100+ articles mentioning Ben Nemtin, so at least the Ben Nemtin topic may meet WP:GNG. However, in the Ben Nemtin article, you chose to cite to 1. MTV,[2] which is not independent of the Ben Nemtin topic and 2. WTSP-TV,[3] which may be connected to the Ben Nemtin topic. You falsely implied in the Ben Nemtin article that the WTSP-TV reference supported the article statement, "He placed a bet of $250,000 on red and helped organize the biggest speed dating,",[4] which it does not. The WTSP-TV reference does not even mention Nemtin. The Ben Nemtin article now reads: 'Ben was born. Twenty six years later, he did the following great things.' Does that really sound like a biography to you? -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 16:23, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Four Peaks Media Group (November 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cwmhiraeth was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Four Peaks Media Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:19, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! PeterJensen007, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:19, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Four Peaks Media Group concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Four Peaks Media Group, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Four Peaks Media Group[edit]

Hello, PeterJensen007. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Four Peaks Media Group".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Four Peaks Media Group}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 23:19, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

It isn't entirely clear whether this draft is about Atticus or about his book. Please focus on one topic, or submit two drafts. This draft does not provide enough independent (third-party) references to establish notability either for the author of a not-yet-published book or for a not-yet-published book. See WP:TOOSOON.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:PeterJensen007/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:26, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:PeterJensen007/sandbox[edit]

Hello, PeterJensen007. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TKK! bark with me! 02:00, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]