User talk:Petershipton

Welcome

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10... 100... 200 Fun and interesting pages Userpage guidelines Userbox directory Most visited articles Join a WikiProject Are you a Wikipediholic? The top editors The motto of the day Some really bad ideas... The department of fun! Wikisongs! Some new article ideas Some very odd articles... List of the newest users Barnstars! List of user rewards List of most vandalized pages Very frequently asked questions The earliest surviving edit The reward board (earn awards!) Get interesting articles to edit from SuggestBot Find out exactly how many edits you have! Visit a totally random page! Meet a random user! Hello, Petershipton, and welcome to Wikipedia! I am MBisanz and I would like to thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:   Introduction  5    The five pillars of Wikipedia   How to edit a page   Help   Tips   How to write a great article   Manual of Style   Fun stuff...   Be Bold   Assume Good faith   Keep cool   Have an experienced editor adopt you   Policy on neutral point of view And here are several pages on what to avoid: How to not spam How to avoid copyright infringement What Wikipedia is not Make sure not to get blocked, which should be no problem after reading this I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~), which are produced by clicking on the button; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Also, I think that you might want to join the the adopt-a-user project, where advanced editors can guide you in your first experiences here; so check it out if you want. Again, welcome!  You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.) Fix spelling and grammar Thomas Devaux Delhi Lewis Francis Byington AeroVironment Switchblade Sendamangalam More... • Learn how Fix wikilinks Training Institute Royal Brunei Armed Forces Ghaziabad–Jewar Regional Rapid Transit System Haplogroup E-M2 More... • Learn how Update with new information List of Palestinian rocket attacks on Israel in 2019 Summer Cem La Voix de l'Est (Granby) Rotulo Rail transport in Chad More... • Learn how Expand short articles Kovernino, Koverninsky District, Nizhny Novgorod Oblast Pizhma, Nizhny Novgorod Oblast Alatyr, Nizhny Novgorod Oblast Mukhtolovo Maloye Kozino More... • Learn how Check and add references Railway stations in Angola Stereophonics Definitions of abortion Jason Greene Concita De Gregorio More... • Learn how Fix original research issues Commons-based peer production West Linton China proper Fort Jay Lego Space More... • Learn how Improve lead sections Ferrite bead Autism-friendly Alexander Oswald Brodie Pup Tent Geoffrey Blainey More... • Learn how Add an image Jeejabai Bhosle Marg James Dun's House Jade District John Tonge Centre Jumiles More... • Learn how Translate and clean up Inmarko Julia Wieniawa ASD Forza e Coraggio Gabriela Pizarro Yushaev Zamir More... • Learn how Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women. Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality. Click here to reply to this message. This welcome message was sent by MBisanz at 19:52, July 12, 2009 (UTC)

Susan Boyle

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Susan Boyle. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. J Milburn (talk) 10:41, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Waterloo International railway station

Hi. I've removed your recent addition to this article. The problem with it is that it is unsourced, yet makes some very specific claims and criticisms that cannot be verified. You will of course realise that Wikipedia is not somewhere to raise your own personal analysis and concerns. To be specific;

• "Despite a chronic shortage of platforms at the station" - where was this information obtained?
• "which often results in trains being allocated a platform just minutes before departure," - where was this information obtained?
• "Network Rail has no plans to use the other four former international platforms for domestic use." - where was this information obtained?
• "As a result, the platforms have not been used since November 2007." - How do we know this is a result of the above?
• "Network Rail claims that it would cost too much to bring the unused platforms into service." - where was this information obtained? Using the word 'claim' in this fashion is also something that should be avoided.
• "Instead the company spent around £20 million installing one hundred and seventy automatic barriers on all main line platforms, which came into operation in January 2009 ." - This is a entirely different matter. Who has raised it in conjunction with the topic of platforms?
• "This is the longest line of ticket barriers in the UK." - Where was this fact obtained?

Thanks. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 12:56, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for citing some of this. However you re-added claims that I identified as uncited above. So I have removed again. To be specific;

• "Despite a chronic shortage of platforms at the station" - where was this information obtained? Is it just your opinion?
• "which often results in trains being allocated a platform just minutes before departure," - where was this information obtained? Is it just your opinion?
• "As a result, the platforms have not been used since November 2007." - Where is it shown that one is the result of the other?
• "Network Rail claims that it would cost too much to bring the unused platforms into service." - where was this information obtained? Using the word 'claim' in this fashion is also something that should be avoided.
• "Instead the company spent..." - Where is it indicated that the money spent here was an alternative to the money spent on platforms? Where is a connection established?

Thanks.

--Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 10:02, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

August 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. One or more of the external links you added in this edit to the page Susan Boyle do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. You may wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Zhang He (talk) 15:43, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Susan Boyle. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. AniMate^draw 18:37, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Last warning, though you should probably be blocked for making your fourth reversion. No more reversions, or you could be blocked. Instead of edit warring, why not discuss this and make your case on the talk page of the article. AniMate^draw 01:22, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

This is a courtesy note to inform you that you have been reported at WP:AN3. Whether or not you are blocked this time, I hope that you will take heed of others' views and feelings when you edit. Not only did I find your edit unnecessary, it seems that many others were of that view. What I find particularly objectionable is that you marked these edits as 'minor', and the edit summary was less than descriptive of your change. You know full well your change would be considered controversial, yet you come back every two weeks as if to make a point. I can only advise you to put up or shut up. Attempts to change things by stealth or by force are not the way to go. Ohconfucius (talk) 08:10, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Given AM's warning above, and your lack of reverts since then, I'm giving you a warning rather than blocking. But please read WP:3RR and use the talk pages William M. Connolley (talk) 20:01, 1 September 2009 (UTC)