User talk:Philosopher/Archive 8

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 15

WikiProject Religion work groups

Just close Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2008 December 10#Category:WikiProject Religion work groups as a keep with the nominators approval. This was a minor concern and there was not a good discussion. I take that as a keep. Thanks. Vegaswikian (talk) 01:21, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

 Done. Thanks. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 01:24, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Deletion review for Eustacius de Yerburgh

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Eustacius de Yerburgh. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedy-deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. OberRanks (talk) 12:59, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Uber Awesome Award Nominee

For your many contributions, and because you are uber awesome, you have been nominated for a january 2009 uber awesome award.Estemshorn (talk) 17:48, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

January '09 Uber Awesome Award Nominee
Congratulations, Philosopher, You've been nominated!!!!! Estemshorn (talk) 17:48, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:RPI logo.jpg)

You've uploaded File:RPI logo.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:08, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Flagged Revs

Hi,

I noticed you voted oppose in the flag revs straw pole and would like to ask if you would mind adding User:Promethean/No to your user or talk page to make your position clear to people who visit your page :) - Thanks to Neurolysis for the template   «l| Ψrometheăn ™|l»  (talk) 06:43, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you but no. Most of the people coming by my userpage probably aren't involved in the Flagged Revs thing and a simple "Say no" flag isn't likely to change any minds. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 09:26, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Bob Vander Plaats

Wikipedia has rules around duplicate categorization. Whether it should be or not, Category:Iowa Republicans is a subcategory of Category:Iowa politicians, and therefore an article is not supposed to be directly filed in both of those categories simultaneously. And the general "state politician" categories are supposed to be as close as possible to being completely empty of individual articles. Ideally, Category:Iowa politicians should contain only subcategories, with no individual articles being filed in it directly. Bearcat (talk) 17:17, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

I think you've identified the problem - Iowa Republicans maybe shouldn't be a subcat of Iowa politicians. Basically, we have two different categorization schemes - by party and by political office. Vander Plaats belongs in Republicans b/c of his party affiliation and he belongs to the general "politician" category b/c there isn't currently a "candidate" or "nominee" sub-cat within the political office scheme. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 17:59, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Looking further at the categorization scheme, I'm removing Iowa Republicans (and other parties) from the Iowa politicians category as this appears to reflect the use of the parent cats - Category:American political people has Category:American people by political party and Category:American politicians as same-level templates. I do note the existence of Category:American politicians by party and its subcats if you think a state-level category would be appropriate that would serve as a sub-cat "combination" of the Republican and politican categories. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 18:07, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

C-class for WP Iowa

{{Project Iowa}} should incorporate a C-class. I'd do it myself, but my template coding skills are a bit rusty, and the template is fully protected. Psychless 22:44, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

It shouldn't take that long to do...I'll get on it. Remind me if I haven't done it in a few days. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 02:50, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 Done. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 15:02, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Mike Stoops
Pat Thomas
Bill Austin
Kay Stephenson
College of San Mateo
Gerry Faust
Paul Hackett (football)
Defensive coordinator
Hank Bullough
Joe Bugel
Rick Venturi
Gary Patterson
John Mackovic
Mike Hohensee
Pepper Rodgers
Lisle Blackbourn
Dan Henning
Greg Robinson
John Robinson (football coach)
Cleanup
List of players from Canada in Major League Baseball
Shaun Alexander
Jim Brown
Merge
Lakeland High School (Lakeland, Florida)
Dolby Stereo
Small print
Add Sources
John Ralston
Joe Montana
Houston Nutt
Wikify
Getty Oil
Bowling Green State University
Paul Winchell
Expand
Emmitt Smith
USC Trojans
Jennifer Allen (football)

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- ForteTuba (talk) 13:19, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Alternative counter

I noticed on User talk:Interiot that you were experiencing the same problems with the edit counter as I was. I've located another edit counter that you may want to try, if you haven't already found it. Best regards --Eustress (talk) 03:48, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Help me, please

My watchlist just suddenly stopped updating. I've reloaded, I've logged in and out, I've closed the browser and opened a new one. It always goes back to the last version before this happened. I know there are newer edits, because I've made them. Do you have a clue what is going on here? Thank you. Belasted (talk) 21:45, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Okay, so I added your talk page to my watchlist and then it was able to update. I guess it's working now, but if you have any more knowledge of why this happened, I would appreciate it. Belasted (talk) 21:49, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

My best guess is that the site was just running slowly - this happens occasionally when they are doing an update to the software, when there are an unusually high number of edits being made, when people edit the most widely-used templates, etc. When that happens the watchlist won't always be current, though there's usually a banner at the top of the watchlist to explain that there will be a delay in edits showing up on the watchlist. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 08:34, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Good faith error at [1]

If you would correct it, that would be grand. Thanks.sinneed (talk) 21:53, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

  • I do wish more people would take the time when they see an IP making the same edit repeatedly to explain WHY they are reverting it. IPs often get a bad rap because they often simply don't have any idea what they are doing wrong and just...keep...trying. Anyway, to be clear, I saw a set of repeated reversions on an article by other editors and explained. I did not do anything repeatedly. Maybe you misread?sinneed (talk) 22:06, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Replied at your talk. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 01:56, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
No problem. :)sinneed (talk) 02:29, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

08 Philosopher (talk | contribs) deleted "National Marine Sanctuaries Program" ‎ (R1: Redirect to a deleted, nonexistent, or invalid target: redirected to itself)

Can you tell me why you deleted this? I restored it, as it is a valid synonym (published use) for the National Marine Sanctuary Program currently a redirect. Viriditas (talk) 10:54, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
When I deleted it, it redirected to itself. Redirecting to an article (as it currently does) is fine. Having a redirect where the target is the same as the source falls under speedy deletion criteria G8 as a redirect to an invalid target. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 16:42, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Could you help me

I see that you are an administrator. Im looking for help. I have been trying to get an explanation regarding my situation. I was told that my usernames from yesterday were not allowed. I was told they were offensive, but no one told me what was so offensive about them. I felt they used some light hearted toilet humor, but not offensive. I went through an appeals process as described, and received no answer to my questions other than that if I continue I will be blocked. There was no answer why I would be blocked, just that if continue with my appeals I will be blocked for trolling. I didn't even know what trolling is until I read about it. Somehow I am being disruptive, but no one wants to tell me how. No one will give me explanations, just threats. This does not seem to be in accordance with the Newbies policy. I just want to understand. I also made a complaint about the username of someone, that I felt violated the username policy, and that was ignored. Once again no explanation. Could you help me?Racingstripes (talk) 17:56, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

I don't know what your previous usernames were or where they were discussed/you were warned, so I can't comment. Your objection to Baseball Bugs' signature was inappropriate because that particular forum is for offending usernames that need to be blocked; your complaint was neither about a username nor a situation warranting a block. If you have a problem with the signature, you should first discuss it with the user himself. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 16:46, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply. I discussed it with another admin-type user. Since my usernames user:diarrheachacha and then user:passedflatus were deemed offensive because one user was somehow offended by my toilet humor. Oh well I'm over it, I have sisters so learned years ago I can't control the sensitivity level of people.Racingstripes (talk) 04:02, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Hershey Page

The Hershey Page has been vandalised. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.62.194.225 (talk) 05:05, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. In the future, feel free to be bold and revert the vandalism yourself. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 18:14, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: Iowa Legislature

For the sake of uniformity across the entirety of United States legislative bodies, a style that originated with the United States Congress, I restored the templates. Nevermore | Talk 04:26, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Where is this pseudo-template used, then? And if it's going to go on each page, perhaps it should be moved into the Template: namespace if only for consistency and so that uniform changes can be discussed? I do like the idea, btw - I just think the formatting could be improved. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 19:58, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Template for the Governors of Iowa Territory

Somw sort of template for the Governors of Iowa Territory is needed.Can the existing template of the Governors of Iowa be used? I just started an article about the 3rd and last Governor of Iowa Territory James Clarke (Iowa). He has settled in Belmont, Wisconsin in Wisconsin Territory before he settled in Burlington, Iowa.Many thanks for your help-RFD (talk) 11:34, 21 March 2009 (UTC) I got the template concerning the Governors of Iowa Territory taken care of.Many thanks-RFD (talk) 22:57, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your involvement - and for getting that taken care of! --Philosopher Let us reason together. 23:14, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

IPBE cleanup

Just checking if Tim4christ17 (talk · contribs) is still stuck under a block or if it can be removed yet? MBisanz talk 08:55, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Tim4christ17 (talk · contribs) doesn't appear to be blocked - I'm posting this from that account as a test. Thanks for checking though. --Philosopher Let us reason together. via alternate account 16:38, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Ah. Perhaps you're wondering about the IP block exemption? I passed on my administrative IP block exemption to my alternate account for if/when I edit Wikipedia from a public computer (and therefore wouldn't be using my main administrative account). --Philosopher Let us reason together. 18:32, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Ahh cool, I understand. It flagged on a list of IPBE accounts that haven't edited in 3 months, thanks for the heads up. MBisanz talk 23:19, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Hey, I have the urge to get Iowa up to GA status. Would you like to help out? CTJF83Talk 19:33, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Normally I'd be up for it, but I'm not going to be free to do any "serious" editing until after finals (beginning/middle of May). Unfortunately I have a major paper due in a week or so and exams start not long after. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 20:54, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Ok, that's fine, school is much more important! CTJF83Talk 16:42, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

What useful template? The only template removed was the {{hangon}}, which since it was no longer up for speedy was not useful, in fact it was pointless. Or to quote the template: "This template should not be removed from a page still marked with a speedy deletion template." Thus no speedy tag (it had moved to AFD, which are two different processes) thus it could be removed. Aboutmovies (talk) 21:54, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Nevermind, I see its the talk page, and I see. That's a software error from a script. I thought it had been fixed. Aboutmovies (talk) 21:56, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Bill Gluba
Bill Dix
Hawaii House of Representatives
Mal Couch
Code of Iowa
Samuel J. Kirkwood
Rougemont Castle
North Dakota Legislative Assembly
Edward Mezvinsky
Hawaii Senate
List of hospitals in Iowa
Montana State Legislature
J. L. Hunter "Red" Rountree
Iowa Stubborn
Clyde L. Herring
LaMetta Wynn
Brian Kennedy (politician)
Lafayette Young
Terry E. Branstad
Cleanup
List of unrecognized accreditation associations of higher learning
Davenport Central High School
Mondegreen
Merge
Vigilante
Kentucky Senate
Dissected Till Plains
Add Sources
Iowa State Daily
Tom Latham
Albert B. Cummins
Wikify
Jim Ross Lightfoot
Messiah College
Humiliation
Expand
Joetown, Iowa
Relational aggression
Coggon, Iowa

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- ForteTuba (talk) 12:13, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

18:24, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

23:00, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

19:08, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Lawyers and law students' signatures needed for Supreme Court amicus brief in favor of publishing the law

Hello, given your userbox I thought you might be interested in helping Carl Malamud's case for the public domain, crucial also for Wikisource: https://boingboing.net/2019/04/25/happy-law-day.html . Best regards, Nemo 21:07, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

22:27, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 April 2019

WikiCup 2019 May newsletter

The second round of the 2019 WikiCup has now finished. Contestants needed to scored 32 points to advance into round 3. Our top four scorers in round 2 all scored over 400 points and were:

  • Scotland Cas Liber (1210), our winner in 2016, with two featured articles and three DYKs. He also made good use of the bonus points available, more than doubling his score by choosing appropriate articles to work on.
  • Wales Kosack (750), last year's runner up, with an FA, a GA, two FLs, and five DYKs.
  • Adam Cuerden (480), a WikiCup veteran, with 16 featured pictures, mostly restorations.
  • Kingdom of Prussia Zwerg Nase (461), a seasoned competitor, with a FA, a GA and an ITN item.

Other notable performances were put in by Chicago Barkeep49 with six GAs, United States Ceranthor, England Lee Vilenski, and Saskatchewan Canada Hky, each with seven GARs, and Denmark MPJ-DK with a seven item GT.

So far contestants have achieved nine featured articles between them and a splendid 80 good articles. Commendably, 227 GARs have been completed during the course of the 2019 WikiCup, so the backlog of articles awaiting GA review has been reduced as a result of contestants' activities. The judges are pleased with the thorough GARs that are being performed, and have hardly had to reject any. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:46, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 special circular

Icon of a white exclamation mark within a black triangle
Administrators must secure their accounts

The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.

View additional information

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:30, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2019).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • XTools Admin Stats, a tool to list admins by administrative actions, has been revamped to support more types of log entries such as AbuseFilter changes. Two additional tools have been integrated into it as well: Steward Stats and Patroller Stats.

Arbitration

  • In response to the continuing compromise of administrator accounts, the Arbitration Committee passed a motion amending the procedures for return of permissions (diff). In such cases, the committee will review all available information to determine whether the administrator followed "appropriate personal security practices" before restoring permissions; administrators found failing to have adequately done so will not be resysopped automatically. All current administrators have been notified of this change.
  • Following a formal ratification process, the arbitration policy has been amended (diff). Specifically, the two-thirds majority required to remove or suspend an arbitrator now excludes (1) the arbitrator facing suspension or removal, and (2) any inactive arbitrator who does not respond within 30 days to attempts to solicit their feedback on the resolution through all known methods of communication.

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

16:27, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

00:48, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

13:04, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

15:33, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 May 2019

15:24, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2019).

Administrator changes

removed AndonicConsumed CrustaceanEnigmamanEuryalusEWS23HereToHelpNv8200paPeripitusStringTheory11Vejvančický

CheckUser changes

removed Ivanvector

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC seeks to clarify whether WP:OUTING should include information on just the English Wikipedia or any Wikimedia project.
  • An RfC on WT:RfA concluded that Requests for adminship and bureaucratship are discussions seeking to build consensus.
  • An RfC proposal to make the templates for discussion (TfD) process more like the requested moves (RM) process, i.e. "as a clearinghouse of template discussions", was closed as successful.

Technical news

  • The CSD feature of Twinkle now allows admins to notify page creators of deletion if the page had not been tagged. The default behavior matches that of tagging notifications, and replaces the ability to open the user talk page upon deletion. You can customize which criteria receive notifications in your Twinkle preferences: look for Notify page creator when deleting under these criteria.
  • Twinkle's d-batch (batch delete) feature now supports deleting subpages (and related redirects and talk pages) of each page. The pages will be listed first but use with caution! The und-batch (batch undelete) option can now also restore talk pages.

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:48, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Teahouse Hosts

Hello. Over at the Teahouse we're having a bit of a 'spring clean' by removing old entries from the list of Hosts that new users see. As you don't appear to have been very active there for quite some time, your 'host profile' has been removed from the list. But please don't let that put you off contributing again in the future - either by signing back up as a Host to assist on a regular basis, or just dropping in whenever you fancy helping out.

Thank you for all your past help and support for new users at the Teahouse. Nick Moyes (talk) 20:50, 9 June 2019 (UTC) "

17:06, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

20:37, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject X Newsletter • Issue 14

Newsletter • June 2019

Updates: I've been focusing largely on the development side of things, so we are a lot closer now to being ready to actually start discussing deploying it and testing it out here.

There's just a few things left that need to be resolved:

  • A bunch of language support issues in particular, plus some other release blockers, such as the fact that currently there's no good way to find any hubs people do create.
  • We also probably need some proper documentation and examples up to even reference if we want a meaningful discussion. We have the extension documentation and some test projects, but we probably need a bit more. Also I need to be able to even find the test projects! How can I possibly write reports about this stuff if I can't find any of it?!

Some other stuff that's happened in the meantime:

  • Midpoint report is out for this round of the project, if you want to read in too much detail about all the problems I've been running into.
  • WikiProject Molecular Biology have successfully set up using the old module system that CollaborationKit is intended to replace (eventually), and it even seems to work, so go them. Based on the issues they ran into, it looks like the members signup thing on that system has some of the same problems as we've been unable to resolve in CK, though, which is... interesting. (Need to change the content model to the right thing for the formwizard config to take. Ugh, content models.)

Until next time,

-— Isarra 21:43, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

17:29, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

The June 2019 Signpost is out!

Administrators' newsletter – July 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2019).

Administrator changes

removed 28bytesAd OrientemAnsh666BeeblebroxBoing! said ZebedeeBU Rob13Dennis BrownDeorDoRDFloquenbeam1Flyguy649Fram2GadfiumGB fanJonathunderKusmaLectonarMoinkMSGJNickOd MishehuRamaSpartazSyrthissTheDJWJBscribe
1Floquenbeam's access was removed, then restored, then removed again.
2Fram's access was removed, then restored, then removed again.

Guideline and policy news

  • In a related matter, the account throttle has been restored to six creations per day as the mitigation activity completed.

Technical news

  • The Wikimedia Foundation's Community health initiative plans to design and build a new user reporting system to make it easier for people experiencing harassment and other forms of abuse to provide accurate information to the appropriate channel for action to be taken. Community feedback is invited.

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:20, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

21:23, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

WikiCup 2019 July newsletter

The third round of the 2019 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round needed to score at least 68 points, which is substantially lower than last year's 227 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:

  • Norfolk Island Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with 500 points derived mainly from a featured article and two GAs on natural history topics
  • South Carolina Adam Cuerden, with 480 points, a tally built on 16 featured pictures, the result of meticulous restoration work
  • Cascadia (independence movement) SounderBruce, a finalist in the last two years, with 306 points from a variety of submissions, mostly related to sport or the State of Washington
  • United States Usernameunique, with 305 points derived from a featured article and two GAs on archaeology and related topics

Contestants managed 4 (5) featured articles, 4 featured lists, 18 featured pictures, 29 good articles, 50 DYK entries, 9 ITN entries, and 39 good article reviews. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them, and it is imperative to claim them in the correct round; one FA claim had to be rejected because it was incorrectly submitted (claimed in Round 3 when it qualified for Round 2), so be warned! When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:12, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

20:12, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

15:29, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

13:07, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

21:42, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 July 2019

Administrators' newsletter – August 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2019).

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Following a research project on masking IP addresses, the Foundation is starting a new project to improve the privacy of IP editors. The result of this project may significantly change administrative and counter-vandalism workflows. The project is in the very early stages of discussions and there is no concrete plan yet. Admins and the broader community are encouraged to leave feedback on the talk page.
  • The new page reviewer right is bundled with the admin tool set. Many admins regularly help out at Special:NewPagesFeed, but they may not be aware of improvements, changes, and new tools for the Curation system. Stay up to date by subscribing here to the NPP newsletter that appears every two months, and/or putting the reviewers' talk page on your watchlist.

    Since the introduction of temporary user rights, it is becoming more usual to accord the New Page Reviewer right on a probationary period of 3 to 6 months in the first instance. This avoids rights removal for inactivity at a later stage and enables a review of their work before according the right on a permanent basis.


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:24, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

13:24, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Bots Newsletter, August 2019

Bots Newsletter, August 2019

Greetings!

Here is the 7th issue of the Bots Newsletter, a lot happened since last year's newsletter! You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding/removing your name from this list.

Highlights for this newsletter include:

ARBCOM
  • Nothing of note happened. Just like we like it.
BAG

BAG members are expected to be active on Wikipedia to have their finger on the pulse of the community. After two years without any bot-related activity (such as posting on bot-related pages, posting on a bot's talk page, or operating a bot), BAG members will be retired from BAG following a one-week notice. Retired members can re-apply for BAG membership as normal if they wish to rejoin the BAG.

We thank former members for their service and wish Madman a happy retirement. We note that Madman and BU Rob13 were not inactive and could resume their BAG positions if they so wished, should their retirements happens to be temporary.

BOTDICT

Two new entries feature in the bots dictionary

BOTPOL
  • Activity requirements: BAG members now have an activity requirement. The requirements are very light, one only needs to be involved in a bot-related area at some point within the last two years. For purpose of meeting these requirements, discussing a bot-related matter anywhere on Wikipedia counts, as does operating a bot (RFC).
  • Copyvio flag: Bot accounts may be additionally marked by a bureaucrat upon BAG request as being in the "copyviobot" user group on Wikipedia. This flag allows using the API to add metadata to edits for use in the New pages feed (discussion). There is currently 1 bot using this functionality.
  • Mass creation: The restriction on mass-creation (semi-automated or automated) was extended from articles, to all content-pages. There are subtleties, but content here broadly means whatever a reader could land on when browsing the mainspace in normal circumstances (e.g. Mainspace, Books, most Categories, Portals, ...). There is also a warning that WP:MEATBOT still applies in other areas (e.g. Redirects, Wikipedia namespace, Help, maintenance categories, ...) not explicitely covered by WP:MASSCREATION.
BOTREQs and BRFAs

As of writing, we have...

  • 20 active BOTREQs, please help if you can!
  • 14 open BRFAs and 1 BRFA in need of BAG attention (see live status).
  • In 2018, 96 bot task were approved. An AWB search shows approximately 29 were withdrawn/expired, and 6 were denied.
  • Since the start of 2019, 97 bot task were approved. Logs show 15 were withdrawn/expired, and 15 were denied.
  • 10 inactive bots have been deflagged (see discussion). 5 other bots have been deflagged per operator requests or similar (see discussion).
New things
Other discussions

These are some of the discussions that happened / are still happening since the last Bots Newsletter. Many are stale, but some are still active.

See also the latest discussions at the bot noticeboard.

Thank you! edited by: Headbomb 17:24, 7 August 2019 (UTC)


(You can subscribe or unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding or removing your name from this list.)

18:19, 12 August 2019 (UTC)