User talk:Pr0pulsion 123

Need ur help[edit]

Hi man can u please update the Infobox of Indo-Pakistani War of 1965 and with these images added 2400:ADC1:477:8500:A43D:1527:3F56:20D5 (talk) 17:31, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@2400:ADC1:477:8500:A43D:1527:3F56:20D5 Hello there, i would love to do it but it'll need a joint decision by all of the admins of that page looking at the sheer amount of POV pushing along with the intensity of edit Wars on that article. The only way to notify the admins is Via Talk page. I will look into it but I'm not sure if it'll be acceptable to everyone. And I'm still new to picture arrangement coding so it will take some time. thanks anyway. Pr0pulsion 123 (talk) 17:41, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Global Defence Insight (November 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Global Defence Insight and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing Okay. Pr0pulsion 123 (talk) 15:17, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing hey can i work on this article later and instead make another one for draft? Pr0pulsion 123 (talk) 20:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you can continue to work on this draft; it was only declined, not rejected. And yes, you can create more drafts, either in the draft space or your own user space (eg. in your sandbox). -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:03, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing ok thanks Pr0pulsion 123 (talk) 15:23, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pr0pulsion 123! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:Ghost of Kyiv § entries in see also section[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Ghost of Kyiv § entries in see also section. —usernamekiran (talk) 19:15, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas![edit]

MBlaze Lightning (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

MBlaze Lightning (talk) 09:15, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Admin's Barnstar
	Thank you. AdmiralBOT (talk) 10:33, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Global Defense Insight moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Global Defense Insight, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:45, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969 Noted. Had some personal issues which is why i couldn't get enough time for it. Pr0pulsion 123 (talk) 11:48, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Interceptor ASV[edit]

Hello, nice work on creating the Interceptor ASV article. As you may have noticed, I removed the flag icons from the infobox in the article. Unlike the ship's infoboxes, Template:Infobox weapon shouldn't use flag icons of any kind, per WP:INFOBOXFLAG. This also applies to the aircraft infobox used in aircraft articles. Since you are quite active on articles about Pakistani weapons, if would be very helpful if you could remove these flag icons when you see them, as they have a tendency to get added back from time to time. Thanks! BilCat (talk) 06:46, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@BilCat Will do. Thanks for notifying Pr0pulsion 123 (talk) 07:28, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Pr0pulsion 123. Thank you for your work on Interceptor ASV. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for creating this article. I hope and encourage you to make more articles! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:30, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No. 27 squadron[edit]

Upload this [1] at No. 27 Squadron PAF. 223.123.91.49 (talk) 06:51, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Global Defense Insight[edit]

Hello, Pr0pulsion 123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Global Defense Insight, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/سب سے بڑی گڑبڑ. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 10:13, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pr0pulsion 123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello there. I hope this request finds you well. As you might know, i was blocked indefinitely for having a second account which is User:Xtreme o7. It was my old account which i used to edit on but being new to Wikipedia at that time, i wasn't really professional with it. Resultantly, i decided to make this account as a means to WP:CLEANSTART. I wasn't aware of Wikipedia's policies regarding second accounts due to which i never linked both of my account's user pages and never notified any admins about it (which i deeply regret as the WP:MULTIPLE page was readily available). While i understand why i am blocked and take responsibility for it, i do want to respectfully state that my edits from my main account which coincided with my former one were purely WP:GF and i did not meant to cause edit wars. If you have seen some of my articles which i published from this account, you may have noticed my type of standards. Lastly, it is important that i let you know that i only have these two accounts on Wikipedia and two accounts on Wikimedia commons by the same names (I have linked them this time) and operate no other accounts as i've noticed some innocent users like User:Akaspo are getting in trouble because of my actions (i apologize for that). I humbly request you to take into consideration the above information in your moderation against me. I am ready to cooperate as much as i can in this matter. Thank You.

Decline reason:

It appears that you have continued to evade this block using Mudakazal. I am declining this request. --Blablubbs (talk) 17:58, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Pr0pulsion 123 (talk) 14:22, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Respectfully, Pr0pulsion 123, Akaspo is a WP:SPA that is here exclusively to spread nationalist propaganda. They have been attempting to add (and have, in one case, successfully added) other editors on external social media to coordinate outside of Wikipedia, yourself included, which is a huge no-no. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 15:42, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Incidentally, though, knowing nothing about their editing history admittedly, I don't think Altay74 is a sockpuppet of Pr0pulsion. Altay and Pr0pulsion both posted their social medias for Akaspo to follow, and both of them clearly have accounts pre-dating this with different names. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 16:20, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If i may ask, what will become of User:Altay74? I can assure you he is not my sock as claimed which has gotten him blocked and i really feel guilty for him as he was at the wrong place at the wrong time. Pr0pulsion 123 (talk) 20:13, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, i hope the moderators take required actions against him/her. These types of accounts have caused a great deal of trouble regarding free access to unbiased historical information. Wikipedia is a respectable and important platform for university students like me and help us a lot through our professional lives. Apologies for providing my social media link to this user, i should've gone through his edit history first. If there is anything i can do to help, do let me know. Pr0pulsion 123 (talk) 19:40, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Important[edit]

Hey, is there any way for us to get in contact? Akaspo (talk) 14:31, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]