User talk:Psawyer1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mariah Carey albums discography[edit]

I'd like to know your opinion to this matter! [1]. Thanks! Reidlos (talk) 13:56, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of best-selling music artists[edit]

Please refrain from downgrading artists as you have done with Madonna. Madonna was recently moved into the main table based on the discussion that you can find at talk-page of List of best-selling music artists. If you feel there is something you'd like to point out feel free to discuss at the talk-page. However, any further such removals especially without prior discussions will constitute vandalism and will be treated as such. Regards.--Harout72 (talk) 05:47, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010[edit]

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Kesha worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. (CK)Lakeshadetalk2me 08:12, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010[edit]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Jordan Todosey, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 04:45, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010[edit]

Regarding your edit here: [2], this has been reverted. Billboard magazine's chart year runs from December-November. Therefore, their yearly number-ones may sometimes differ from what is the biggest-selling album per the calendar year (January-December). The article is already sourced properly and there is a separate page highlighting Billboard year-end tallies. Thanks - eo (talk) 19:29, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010[edit]

Kristen Chenoweth was not even nominated for a Tony Award for Promises, Promises. It is hard for editors to WP:Assume good faith for an edit like the one you made to her article today, especially considering your pattern of editing. It seems like mischief. Please do not add information to Wikipedia unless you have a WP:Reliable source for the information you are adding. You should cite the source using one of the accepted formats shown at WP:CITE. Also, please summarize, in the edit summary box, why you are making each edit that you make. Thanks. -- Ssilvers (talk) 04:12, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Test edit[edit]

An edit like this is considered a test edit. If you would like to experiment on Wikipedia, please use the sandbox and not article space. Thank you. Yves (talk) 03:19, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]