User talk:Rababtoor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello Rababtoor! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Hipal (talk) 01:52, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

WikiGap Pakistan 2020[edit]

Thank you for signing up for the WikiGap Pakistan 2020 Challenge - I see that you have added your username to Dashboard. Please also add your name to the participants list on this page. Thanks, Regards Khilari&historian (talk) 19:01, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sadia Bashir (November 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: zero reliable independent sources.
Theroadislong (talk) 11:37, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Rababtoor! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 11:37, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Sadia Bashir (WikiGap)[edit]

Your article was declined as it lacked reliable sources. Are you interested in adding reliable sources to this article and resubmitting it or would you like to work on another article. Please let me know as I can ask someone else to work on it instead. Thanks, Regards Khilari&historian (talk) 10:55, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please email me at wikigappakistan@gmail.com Khilari&historian (talk) 13:08, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A lengthy welcome[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I've added a welcome message to the top of this page that gives a great deal of information about Wikipedia. I hope you find it useful.

Additionally, I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily in collaboration.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

If you work from reliable, independent sources, you shouldn't go far wrong. WP:RSP and WP:RSN are helpful in determining if a source is reliable.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Hipal (talk) 01:52, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]