User talk:Rantavia

Speedy deletion nomination of Osage Nation Museum

Hello Rantavia,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Osage Nation Museum for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 20:37, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Recent edit to Osage Nation Museum

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! MorbidEntree - _{(Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥)}(please reply using {{ping}}) 20:51, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

August 2016

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Osage Nation Museum. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   21:18, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Rantavia, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Rantavia! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Samwalton9 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Status and Advice

As reviewing administrator, I did not delete the article on he museum. It was a little too promotional, but it was fixable, and I fixed it. Please add only a brief description of the collections--not the very detailed list you were apparently planning. And word it neutrally, so it doesn't look like a web page. Try to find references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements -- this should be possible if the museum is important.

And, if you have a WP:Conflict of Interest, see our rules about this, and see our Terms of Use, particularly with respect to paid contributions without disclosure for the necessary disclosure. DGG ( talk ) 17:28, 11 August 2016 (UTC)