User talk:Rebeccaanderson1

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Rebeccaanderson1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 02:18, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nelson Woss may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[//www.imdb.com/media/rm63087872/nm0941837?ref_=nm_ov_ph#

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:18, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You asked about image use at A930913's talk page. Wikipedia requires images to be freely licensed if available. The IMDb image you tried to use does not come with such a free license; using it in the article when we have a freely licensed image of Nelson Woss would be a copyright violation. I don't see why the previous image shouldn't be okay and consequently have reverted the removal. If there is a reason why that image is unsuitable, please discuss it on the article's talk page. Huon (talk) 19:05, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Whether the subject likes the image is not necessarily relevant for Wikipedia - particularly not if the current image is freely licensed and no free equivalent is available. If Mr Woss knows of a freely licensed image of himself that's more to his liking, he could upload it to the Wikimedia Commons via their Upload Wizard (while providing evidence for the licensing) as an alternative, but even then Wikipedia editors may find that the current image is preferable. As an aside, while A930913 operates BracketBot, their talk page is not a general help desk. You should keep this dicusssion either here or at the article's talk page. Huon (talk) 22:51, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rebeccaanderson1, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Rebeccaanderson1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. --Mdann52talk to me! 16:02, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]