User talk:Rj15rj15

Recent edit to Scratch (programming language)[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Dcirovic (talk) 06:09, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Optakeover. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to User talk:Dcirovic— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Optakeover ^(Talk) 06:35, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Dcirovic. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GAB^Hello! 22:56, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Riley poopsie. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 22:58, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Looking at your edits, I've blocked you per WP:NOTHERE. Would you like to start over and help build the encyclopedia? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:53, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rj15rj15 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Anna offered to let me start over. I would like another chance. It seems like my edits were obnoxious, useless and very annoying to the people trying to read the pages. I promise to keep my edits constructive

Decline reason:

I note Anna Frodesiak's question below, but am declining at present on the basis that all of your edits so far are inappropriate, and your request as phrased gives the impression that you do not understand why this is so.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 12:52, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To answer your unblock request question: How about if you explain to us what you did wrong? Here are your contributions. Click the "(diff)"s. This will help us understand if you should be permitted to resume editing. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:37, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Updated my appeal