User talk:Sandilouwiki

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reported to AIV[edit]

Hi Sandilouwiki, this is a notice to let you know that I have reported your removal of speedy deletion templates at Michael Brundage to administrators. An administrator should assess the report in a short while, and they will take any appropriate actions. Please wait for an administrator before taking any further actions yourself. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 04:39, 28 January 2012 (UTC) I don't understand any of this. You people didn't like the article I wrote so I deleted it! What's the big deal? I'm just trying to "learn the ropes" and if you don't like something I write it's no big deal! I just deleted it and "moved on" to other things....like blogging on another site. Sandilouwiki (talk) 05:14, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Brundage[edit]

Hello. I'm writing to let you know that the main problem with your article "Michael Brundage" is that it is written in a way that does not indicate credibly why the subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Please read our biography guidelines before you create any further biographical articles. Thanks! ZZArch talk to me 05:28, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's exactly the problem. I've removed the report on the anti-vandalism page, but if you continue recreating the article without abiding by our core content policies (WP:V, WP:NOR and WP:NPOV), you may be blocked Dreadstar 05:48, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Again, I just don't care! This is not a very friendly place, so I don't care about the "michael brundage" article! That's why I deleted it! Why can't we just delete EVERYTHING concerning that "blunder" of mine and forget the whole thing! My gosh! The way you guys talk, you would think I had committed a felony or something! Sandilouwiki (talk) 05:18, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 05:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  Chzz  ►  23:47, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Someguy1221 (talk) 04:07, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  Chzz  ►  21:21, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ted Parkhurst, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 08:47, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Ted Parkhurst[edit]

Hello Sandilouwiki. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Ted Parkhurst.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ted Parkhurst}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 01:05, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]