User talk:See-3 Pee-Oh

Welcome!

Hello, See-3 Pee-Oh! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! —MRD2014 (formerly Qpalzmmzlapq) T C 00:37, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

See-3 Pee-Oh, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi See-3 Pee-Oh! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Administrator's Noticeboard Notice[edit]

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 01:33, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The thread is Mass Creation of UN Resolution Stubs --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 01:35, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I was trying to help Wikipedia, so other editors could add to the new stub pages I created. Unhelpful?See-3 Pee-Oh (talk) 01:35, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Probably, to be honest I'm not sure that they even meet the minimum for stubs which is part of the reason I brought it up at The Administrator's Noticeboars what kind of raised my eye was the amount of pages created in such a short amount of time. --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 01:39, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a minimum for stubs? Do you want me to stop, then? See-3 Pee-Oh (talk) 01:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes there is a minimum for a stub, you probably should stop for now. --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 02:02, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:WikiProject International relations/Assessment#Quality scale --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 02:04, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As an editor who just happened to stumble upon this, I would like to state that I think there is no reason to delete these stub articles. Although it would be much better if basic information about the resolutions could be added, such that found at List of United Nations Security Council Resolutions 2101 to 2200, I don't believe there is any reason to mass delete the stubs when they are going to be created sooner or later anyway. @Cameron11598: It is considered quite rude to immediately bring up an issue with a user on WP:ANI, especially when you admitted that you are not even sure if any policy was broken, and even more so when the user appears to be new and performing their edits in good faith. You should attempt to contact the user directly on their talk page, or use WP:DR, to try to resolve the issue, before going to WP:ANI. WP:ANI should only be a last resort. Thanks. Darylgolden^(talk) Ping when replying 05:00, 21 July 2016 (UTC) Apologies, I didn't realise that you posted it on WP:AN rather than WP:ANI. Darylgolden^(talk) Ping when replying 05:02, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry this seems to have got a bit off-track. We certainly welcome new editors adding new articles. If that didn't happen, there'd be very little here at all, and we could all go home, so thanks for your efforts - they are appreciated.

Is there an easy way to incorporate the addition of basic details which Darylgolden suggests above into your stub creation workflow? It would certainly make the articles much more useful if it can be done. They are useful anyway, but if you need any help improving what you are doing, feel free to ask. If the person you ask is unsure, they can generally point you in the right direction. That's how we work here.

Thanks again for your contributions, and my apologies if this overspill of bureaucracy upset you in any way. It gets impersonal, sometimes, and folks forget that people are new, and not used to it. Please carry on contributing. Begoon ^talk 11:16, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies if you feel as though I threatened, upset, or discouraged you. That wasn't my intention at all by opening an thread at WP:AN I was trying to figure if the articles were indeed in line with policy. It was never my intention to be Bitey --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 16:02, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, See-3 Pee-Oh. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]