User talk:Shabana Sheriff

Shabana Sheriff, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Shabana Sheriff! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Bakkiyaraj Kannan for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bakkiyaraj Kannan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bakkiyaraj Kannan (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

GermanKity (talk) 10:44, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Bakkiyaraj Kannan. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Ab207 (talk) 14:30, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Bakkiyaraj Kannan. Ab207 (talk) 05:41, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External links[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I wanted to draw your attention to WP:ELMINOFFICIAL, one of our not very obvious "rules" about Wikipedia:External links. Especially for people and businesses/organizations, we normally only want one "official" link, such as the person's main website. We try to avoid listing multiple links (such as website + Facebook + Twitter + LinkedIn + Instagram). If you like creating collections of official links, then I believe that can be done at Wikidata. Happy editing, WhatamIdoing (talk) 04:53, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sathish Kathiravan, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

-- DaxServer (talk) 14:15, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Gautham offl This user is a sockpuppet, in case you didn't know. CheckUser on Commons has confirmed. I'm waiting for CheckUser here. -- DaxServer (talk) 17:03, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021 - again[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove maintenance templates without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Teddy (film), you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 17:43, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:43, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Sathish Kathiravan per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sathish Kathiravan. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:14, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]