User talk:Sir Lunchalot

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello Sir Lunchalot! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Pamzeis (talk) 02:35, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

I reverted this edit as you're not allowed to edit closed AfDs. Feel free to open a Deletion Review if you believe @Liz closed it in error. This does not apply if you simply disagree with the close. Star Mississippi 14:44, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - it seemed to suggest on that page that I should first engage with the deletor (?) which is what I thought I was doing. Sir Lunchalot (talk) 14:52, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It can be confusing, but the way to contact the closer is on their Talk page, which would be User_talk:Liz. Star Mississippi 15:29, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks - I've done that now.
If I can pick your brains, what do I do if she disagrees that it was closed in error - you say the deletion review "does not apply if you simply disagree with the close"? Sir Lunchalot (talk) 16:02, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
if you see a procedural issue, you can open a DRV, but highly respected UK membership organisation, which lobbies the UK Government to foster Employee Share Ownership. is a valid opinion, but isn't indicative of WP:ORG so it's unlike you'd be successful in saying she closed it in error. It may just be that ProShare isn't notable as defined here. Did I miss anything @Liz? Star Mississippi 16:22, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough. Had a quick look at WP:ORG and, as someone who works in that industry, would have thought it met the NGO criteria but, from memory, it likely needed some work. Sir Lunchalot (talk) 16:38, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]